Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Enough Hiding The Problems On Defense

Just a few quick thoughts - and conversation starters - before I head to bed.

First things first - Greg Davis has himself a project this offseason in figuring out how to achieve better balance in the offense and developing a post-Vince running game. But folks that want to chalk the letdowns of the 2006 season to Davis are - with all due respect - bat shit crazy. This team went 10-3 because of the defense. The back seven of this defense left a LOT to be desired, and as easy as it is to scapegoat Davis because the offense wasn't perfect... well... read the next paragraph.

This offense came into the season with a freshman quarterback and a near-impossible task: replace Vince Young. And no, this year's offense doesn't even deserve comparison to last season's. But we came into the 2006 season believing that we had to win all these games with our defense. Hey, guess what? We won ten games in spite of our defense.

Our freshman quarterback set a single season Texas record, and tied an NCAA record, for touchdown passes. The running game - strong at the beginning of the year and a liability at the end - was inconsistent. But this team's high hopes weren't met because the defense was a B- unit - not because Greg Davis failed to deliver us to the promised land.

Does Greg Davis have limitations? Yes. Absolutely. But they paled in comparison to the faults of the defense, who were smoked against Ohio State, missed tackles against Nebraska, fell asleep for a half against Texas Tech, never got off the bus against Kansas State, and couldn't derail a third down play against Texas A&M.

Hate Greg Davis? Fine. Hate him. I'm not here to tell you he's the world's best coordinator. But please, as an intelligent football fan, get real - Texas' struggles this year were on defense. Not offense. The Texas offense was good enough to win the Big 12, prior to Colt's injury. It was the pathetic defense that killed this team.

I will say this, though - and this certainly gets back to Davis. The team really got hurt by poor short yardage and red zone offense. Davis has been remarkably effective developing above average offenses with the personnel that he has, but in his effort to create a Colt-friendly offense this season, he totally lost the ability to develop a short-yardage and red zone offense.  It's something you know, I know, and he knows. And will surely be the focus of this offseason's adjustments.

These are things we need to look at carefully for next season, and Davis must be accountable for. I just insist that we see this season for what it was - one of adequacy on offense (all things considered) and complete failure on defense. We were all wrong that Texas was in contention for a national title this season; but all of you that want to compartmentalize the problems as a Greg Davis inadequacy are simply being dishonest.

Fuck that. Leave that garbage for the messageboards.  If you want to trash Davis, you have room to do so; the man - and his offense - have lots of room to improve. But don't even try to get away with blaming the 2006 season's losses on him. We lost because our defense sucked and our quarterback got hurt.

Period.

I'll leave you with this: I'm a LOT more worried about my secondary and linebackers than I am my offense.

And you should be, too.

--PB--

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks PB,
I really enjoy to read your assessment & thanks for your great BON place to allow the fans to voice/xpress their opinions. Great site! I'm glad that I found this nice place.

After reading your D assessment, my response is we only had Huff/A.Harris/R.Wright gone from last yr. The rest of the MNC D starters had returned & Duane/Gene had been DC for the whole time on this season.

I am still baffling what had contributed to these MNC D bunch to deteriorate in such a worst degree? Is that kind of big impact since Huff/Harris/Wright were gone?  Not to mention given up Baylor to 31 & then, 45 to KS.

Crowder/Mi.Griffin/Robinson/Ross/T.Brown were gone. Hopefully, Bobino/Okam will be the D leaders to lead some talented players like Kindle who can rise up in the occassion to improve our D plays.

You are correct. The more i look, the more i concern the D more than O next season.

Gosh, just hate to see that ou sux team has an overall 11 win this season which had beaten our overall record this yr. No matter what, ou still sux. Hook'em!

by Horns98 on Dec 31, 2006 3:50 AM CST reply actions  

More Thanks to PB
I agree that the D is my main worry for next year. But in particular, I'm most worried not about what we lose on that side, but the only starter we bring back in the secondary: Marcus Griffin. The kid no doubt works hard, but he was just atrocious all of yesterday. The first long touchdown catch yesterday--his fault, getting burned initially, then taking a horrible angle and bumping into Aaron Ross and ruining any chance to take down the receiver. The second long touchdown catch--he takes another terrible angle and whiffs on a tackle. Ross bailed his ass out on the on the pic, because he was burned terribly by the TE! It just kept coming throughout the game. His only good play was spotting and blowing up the trick play on Iowa's last possession.

Here's my hopes for defensive personnel:

The interior line should be solid with Miller, Lokey, and Okam. Ends lose a lot with the departures of Robison and Crowder, but we have capable bodies who can step in: Orakpo, Lewis, E. Jones, et al. (Isn't Lamarr Houston supposed to be a beast, too?) The pass rush may be lacking early on, but I think things should gel eventually. (And best wishes to Mr. H. Melton on his transition, but I think he's just a project at this point.)

Linebackers I'm not terribly worried about. Bobino is serviceable in the middle, Killebrew should actually benefit from not having Chizik whipping him into a berserker, personal foul-producing frenzy every game, and Derry's not too bad as a member of the mix. The key will be Kindle and J. Norton stepping up. If they do, and we can avoid a plague of injuries, then things should be okay.

Moving further back comes my real worry. As stated, Marcus Griffin is not an anchor back there, so my hope is that with the strength and depth at linebacker (at least relative to the secondary!), the coaches will make one by finally moving D. Kelson back to natural, recruited position at safety. The man is a play-making beast--think of the strip of Zwick against OSU in 2004, the should've-been interception in last year's Rose Bowl, and seemingly every big tackle yesterday (at least as perceived on TV; I unfortunately wasn't at the game). I know he's had some nagging injuries the past two years, but he seemed woefully under-utilized by Chizik. So let's have him drop ten pounds, move to safety, and lead the defense from there a la Huff. (He certainly seems like he has the brains for it, given his 4.0 and level of articulation in every interview I've seen or read).

Next to Kelson, well...my hope is that R. Joseph has a monster spring and the coaches start him and use Marcus Griffin in nickel situations. What will probably happen?....Mack and Co. will be loyal to the senior and keep him ahead of Joseph. Bleh. Finally, let's pray that Beasley and Brown also have good camps, stay healthy, and keep the Palmer/Jackson/Foster mess off the field save for nickel and dime necessities. But even if those two do win the starting jobs, they're still going to be pretty green, which leaving us vulnerable to the pass for the start of the season. Oh well.

On offense, I agree that the primary concern will be replacing the center of the line. If that goes poorly, well, Colt won't have any time to save us with his poise and precision.

The outside of the offense will also be fine: WR's will be ungodly solid, and J-Mike looks like he's finally gettting there at TE (I echo others in thinking that  yesterday may be remembered as his breakthrough game).

So then the final piece will be at RB, starting with JC. I don't know if he can be an every-down sort of back, but I hope he'll take aim on becoming one. And I think he should start that process by realizing that he needs to bulk up ten pounds. Seriously, I think that one of the keys for the running game will be whether he finally makes the smart decision that he needs to switch to football full-time. He can add some muscle and still be whip 99% of the defenders he'll face next year in pure speed.

Hopefully GD will accept that we're better off moving to more I-Back formations, letting JC and whomever he platoons with (McGee, Whittaker?) cut directly into the heart of the defense and keeping Colt out of harms way a bit more. Ideally, I think JC could be incredibly dangerous playing a Reggie Bush role (loved that TD catch yesterday; wish we'd line him up in the slot more next year), but we'd need a complementary power back/LenDale White type to make him most effective. Do we have anyone who can really fulfill that role? Could Chris Ogbonnaya, Vondrell McGee, Foshwitt Whittaker provide anything like that? I, for one, think that Kindle will serve us better on defense, but if we lack any other viable options...

Overall, I'm not too bummed about this season. I expected 2-3 losses, only I thought that outside of OSU, we'd drop at Nebraska or Tech, not the insanity at KSU or the heartbreaker at home against A&M. Next year, however, I think could be worse if the defense isn't adjusted properly and GD isn't willing to tweak the offense away from the zone read a little bit. But here's to hoping!

by kiev482 on Dec 31, 2006 4:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Griffin
We also lost Cedric Griffin, don't forget about that.  That was very big.  He was a true lock down corner.

I think what happened is that we returned 3 very good players in Ross, Brown, and Michael Griffin, but two of those players are really known more for their run support than pass coverage, and Brown was never himself due to injuries and distractions.  Huff and Cedric were only 2 players, but they were what made the pass D what it was.

Our secondary could be worse overall next year, but still actually play better in pass defense if our young guys just focus more on that part of the game instead of just headhunting like this year's group did.

by Matt @ Burnt Orange Nation on Dec 31, 2006 5:12 AM CST reply actions  

Matt, u r right...
I have totally forgot C.Griffin.

if he had not that pushed by him on Ohio State TE almost TD, we may not win out that game. He indeed was a significant CB that we had. Funny how, VY had brought him & David Thomas to attend the ESPY last yr.

by Horns98 on Dec 31, 2006 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree on the d backs
Defense probs:
This season (and in the Iowa game) seemed like the dbacks slipped a bunch (A Ross on a third? down Iowa reception). And they seem to stay too far off the receivers. (I am thinking about 80 catching the ball for a big 1st down with nobody within 6 yards of him. And what about the Iowa touchdown that got called back for a penalty. Where was the coverage?)

It seems like we just cannot get the qb down when we bring pressure..

Offense:
It seems like our running game has been inconsistent. Iowa was a good example. Not much from Selvin and our Oline was losing the battle.

Not to take anything away from the Horns! What a big win. Unbelievable, really when you think about Colt's injury. He came in and won the game with his judgement and arm (directing Limas for example to change his route). What an unbelievable year for a freshman qb. I look forward to next year!!

Only other comment is about discipline. I think Texas went loosey/goosey in the Vince era. Just watching Iowa workout/come out on the field. Seems like they had more structure...

Happy New Year to Bon and thanks for PB for all the great input! What a source of college football info.

by crphorn on Dec 31, 2006 7:59 AM CST reply actions  

a combination
The first five paragraph's basically say "but, but, but look at the defense!!!", while doing nothing to defend the offense.  Sure the defense sucked, and our losses were due more to that than other things.  But you can't just blame the entire thing on the defense because you're tired of hearing people say that they want Greg Davis fired.  The crappy rushing offense was a decent portion of the problem this year.  

Of course we can't replace VY, but...

When I heard the quote earlier this week about how the coaches wanted Colt to run more or something like that, I almost shit my pants in a bad way.  Umm... hasn't Colt just had one of the best freshman QB passing years ever, even before the bowl game?  I know GD didn't fully realize until the middle of the season that he had such a good passer, so I wouldn't expect him to change his playbook after the OU game.  But before the bowl game would seem to be an alright time to tweak the playbook a little bit.  If GD needs the QB to run to have a successful rushing offense, then it's probably a good thing we didn't get Brantley.

He obviously doesn't need this, as seen in the Benson/applewhite and simms years.  so i don't really know what the problem with GD is.  he obviously recruits well and has decent enough schemes, but he doesn't seem incredibly willing to adapt to his players.  it took him a year and a half to "let Vince be Vince" or whatever.  so i guess don't fire him, but just hope he becomes a little more flexible?

Anyways, I'm living in Australia this season, and watching games on a crappy laptop screen, which means it's 3am new years day and i'm drunk posting, and so this is an excuse for anything stupid i might have just said, but i take full credit for anything that might be seen as smart.

by funk on Dec 31, 2006 9:27 AM CST reply actions  

PB I agree somewhat
PB, I agree with just about everything you said the defense is and should be a concern for all of the longhorn fans next year.  

The defense did have it's challanges this year and certainly did not live up to my expectations.  However, the offense did not help out in some situations.  To many times (take for example last night, we have the MO going our way get the ball at the Iowa 40 run 3 plays gain two yards and punt) the offense has had an  opporunity to give the defense a break or even take control of the game and GD gets so dang conservative and we lose everything the defense just provided...a short field with an opportunity to score.

I'm really looking forward to see what McCoy can do in the future..I think he is going to be outstanding, but the OC has to put him in a position to be outstanding.  Let's all remember this is the University of Texas we should be able to, and certainly capable of getting one of the best OC's in the country and in my opinion GD is not that guy.      

by utfan1970 on Dec 31, 2006 9:59 AM CST reply actions  

Rumor Mill
Being subjected to SEC and ACC ball all of the time here in Atlanta, the rumor started when GC left that Jon Tenuta, DC at GA Tech was a front runner for our DC job.  I know Mack agreed to wait until after yesterday's game to "interview" new DC candidates.  In saying that, does anyone think Tenuta is:

#1 - a front runner for the job
#2 - worth persuing to shore up the DC job next year?
#3 - anyone else out there on the horizon worth looking at?

Hook 'Em and thank goodness I can get ALMOST all Longhorn games on tv here.  

Horns Up - Colt played a GREAT game after overcoming the shaky start!

TexanInGeorgia

by TexanInGeorgia on Dec 31, 2006 10:32 AM CST reply actions  

Jock's N Jill's
If you want to see all of the Longhorn games, head over to the Brookhaven Jock's N Jill's.  It's not far from Buckhead.  That is where the Exes meet.  Good times.

by murtah on Dec 31, 2006 4:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree
Much as I dislike Greg Davis, and how crazy he's made me since he arrived on Mack's coattails, and how unwilling he is to make needed adjustments, this  team's struggles can't be laid at his feet.

Yes, the secondary sucked.  On a frighteningly consistent basis.  With the exception of the OU game, in which Aaron Ross was a one-man show, our pass defense didn't show up in any of our key games except OSU.  And that's the frustrating part.  Against the Cowboys, the Texas D showed just how much talent they have, and just how good they COULD be.  Where was that team in the Tech, Nebraska, KSU, aTm and Iowa games?

Given that this inconsistent secondary was the responsibility of Duane Akina, I don't see how Mack can elevate him to the DC position.  In fact, I'm not sure how he can justify retaining Akina in any position.

PB, there's one other area that you didn't cover in your recap.  Going into the season, we were all saying that Texas would rely not only on our D to win games, but also on our running game.  We were all giddy with the thought of two 1000-yard rushers and a Heisman run for Jamaal.  As mystifying as the secondary implosion was, I find our lack of productivity in the running game almost as incomprehensible.  And this I think you CAN lay at Davis' feet.  Sure, replacing the fleet-footed VY with a less-mobile Colt has something to do with this loss in productivity.  But the dropoff was SO dramatic that you can't lay it all on that.  The most frustrating thing to me was all the chatter we heard from Davis about how they were "tweaking" the running game during the Alamo Bowl prep.  Those weeks of so-called "tweaking" resulted in 70 net yards on the ground, including 26 and 11 for JC and SY.  And no 1000 yard rusher for the first time in 11 years.

You may be a LOT more worried about our defense than our offense.  Tell you what, I'll leave that to you, because quite frankly there's too much to worry about on this team for just one person.  Leave the worrying about the running game to me.  I think our passing game will set all kinds of team records next year.  But I'll be damned if I will settle for two consecutive years with no 1,000 yard rusher.

The one bright spot:  the 5 yard run by Sergio Kindle.  I hope he spends a LOT of time working with the offense this spring.  As I told you at the beginning of the season, he is my new favorite  Horn.  I think he is the anti-Melton - a man with incredible athletic skills who WILL live up to his abilities, and who WILL become a featured member of the pantheon of Longhorn Legends.  I may be reading too much into that one run, but it was a thing of beauty.  It was exactly what we've all wanted Henry to do for two years - to no avail.

All of the ranting aside, this team still exceeded my expectations for the season.  When I attended the Fall Scrimmage, I texted a friend of mine in NYC and told him this was a 4-loss team.  I expected losses to tOSU, OU, Nebraska and Tech.  So this team won 3 games that it easily could have lost, and lost 2 games that it clearly shouldn't have.  Frustrating, yes, but at the end of the year we beat yet another Big 10 team and notched yet another 10-win season.  More that any other team in the country.  And have been ranked in the polls for more consecutive weeks than any other.  This senior class has won more games than any other class in team history.  So despite my frustrations and disappointments, and despite this lengthy rant, I remain a hopeful - and patient - Horns Fan.

Happy New Year to you all.  And bring on the Burnt Orange 2007!

Starting in January 2007, just another Limey Longhorn

by patienthornsfan on Dec 31, 2006 10:41 AM CST reply actions  

Akina
Maybe I've just missed it, but with all the debate as to whether Akina should be promoted to DC, you are the first I've seen to state the obvious-- that he was reponsible for the secondary with all its problems this year!
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Dec 31, 2006 2:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Most worried about O-Line
D-Coord. has opportunity to be the hero next year (Akina???).  At least the D got it together in the 2nd half but at the end of the day we beat a 6-7 team.  I am not so worried about next year's personnel.  Look at Ohio State year-over-year.  The turnover may turn out to be a good thing.  And, at least Okam sounds like he's coming back.  He was quoted as saying the win/comeback "sets the tone for OUR season next year."

I'm concerned about the O-Line.  Our running game was not up to par this year but we had good pass protection most of the time.  What O-line will we have next year?  They had better not be bad at both run and pass blocking.  

I say O-line concerns me the most b/c we'll have great receivers, we should be good/better at the TE position, I think we'll have roughly 82 running backs and then we have a potential mega-weapon in Chiles.  If the O-line is bad to mediocre, we'll waste a lot of opportunities.  If they are stout all around, we should kill defenses (GD or no GD).

Speaking of RB's, if we have four-to-five RB's (assuming no one redshirts and forgetting Melton), will we be loaded AND complementary?  If Charles is The guy, forget the sweep left, sweep right crap.  One cut + hit hole + run.  I know he's around 190 lbs. and he doesn't seem to me to be a dancing kind of back in the backfield so getting past the line as quickly as possible then making moves in space makes the most sense.  Then (outside of Ogbonnaya) we might have Creer (what's the over/under on UT landing him ... seems better every day), Whittaker and Cody Johnson.  And where will Kindle be?  At 6' 4" I'd much rather have him at LB if he can handle it.  So forgetting Kindle (on offense), we could have a pretty killer RB rotation.  Whittaker should be fun to watch and provide nice contrast at 5' 9".  He'll be hard to find behind the O-Line and he's fast.  I'm not sure about his receiving skills but if he has that too ... wow.  And although Cody Johnson is being projected as a FB, he has some serious HS rushing numbers.  At 5' 10" and 230 lbs., send this guy up the middle 5-10 times a game.  

I'm happy with another 10-win season and Top 25 ranking.  Not estatic, but happy.  Sure beats the days near the end of the Southwest Conference.  I still remember being happy one of those final SWC years when we TIED Syracuse at home b/c that was considered an upset!

Hook 'Em!

by CyHorn770 on Dec 31, 2006 10:57 AM CST reply actions  

This years Saviour.
Colt McCoy deserves much of the credit for the season. The defense had a hard time stopping any body. How many 3rd down conversion did Iowa have last night. How many big plays did a mediocre offense have? Does the Horns defense lack talent?speed?size?strength? Is the secondary that was 98th in giving up yardage that untalented? were there 600 guys better than them? of course not but then why did they play as a unit so poorly?

You can say the same thing on the offense, what does it lack?talent?speed?size?strength?

Jamal Charles is a pretty good running back and one of the fastest men in the country (6th fastest to be exact)most of the time he runs the ball following the pulling lineman who are the slowest men on the field. does that suit his talents? Why did the running game not produce many long runs?  

Last night Iowa was in cover 1, man to man with one safety maybe 12 yards deep many times. All an outside receiver had to do was run a post, it's an easy throw for McCoy, I saw that 4 or 5 times at least. Horns got one score off it, Sweed on the side lines but it was there all night. Didn't the coaches?

When Iowa ran the ball, the deep back in the I was always 2-3 yards deeper than when they passed. It was so obvious that those dumb announcers saw it. Did the coaches? if they did it's didn't show.

Would anyone question that the horns have more talent than A&M, K st or Iowa? It's not a matter of hating or liking anyone the question is can they take all this talent and make it into a team.

This year like last the whole team was bailed out by spectacular play by exceptionally talented quarterbacks both VY and CM should get credit for  scoring more point than the defense gave up.

There is no question Mack Brown is one of the great college recruiters in the game. If you go position by position the Horns match up with any team in college football for talent. If that is the case whose job is it to form that talent into a team that preforms up to it's potential? With that in mind you have measure whether the coaches are up to the challenge of molding that talent into a team. Some teams preform better than you expect based on the talent they have. I think many fans who have watched the Horns feel with their talent level that they underperformed this season.
That has to be an issue that rest with the coaches.
 

xerxes

by Xerxes on Dec 31, 2006 11:31 AM CST reply actions  

Identity...
That is our problem on offense.  We kept trying to run Vince's offense without Vince.  The team is in need of another offensive remaking.  If we want to run Vince's offense, then why are we recruiting drop back passers?  How much do we lose when we change our schemes this dramatically?  I know you have to recruit the best players available, but shouldn't you also be recruiting the best players for your team?  Colt is a drop back passer with a escapability speed, as such, from day one, the scheme should have been adjusted to account for that, and what's more, it should have been recognized by the coaches WAY earlier.  

GD's main problems stem from a lack of imagination, no clue on how to develop a strategy that keeps the D on their heels, and complete lack of a desire to make adjustments due to personel or situations.  Other than that, he's a great coach.  

The defense looked like the forward pass was only introduced this year.  Did we really lose THAT much from the Championship team?  Where were all the 3 and 4 star DB's and athletes we've been recruiting for reloading purposes?  

We have a lot of questions going in to next year, I'm just really proud of our guys for pulling this win off.  It was a tight one, and I was really afraid that they had lost their heart, but somebody found it.  The team is in DESPERATE need of an on field leader....especially on defense.

by Hornbud on Dec 31, 2006 11:40 AM CST reply actions  

Greg Davis
It's a roller coaster with him at OC.  I still believe that he can make the right calls when he needs to, and he usually does.  But he also puts the offense in stiuations they shouldn't be in- it's very much a game of give-and-take.  All in all, however, you can't expect any coach to be perfect, and however much I express my frustrations during close games, I usually calm down when it's all over.  Greg Davis can coach this offense.

I agree with what Matt said about the secondary needing to play better in coverage.  So what if Aaron Ross won the Thorpe?  He also gave up some big pass plays.  But what's also killed the D is the fact that it never really came together and played well as a unit- when the line was playing well, the linebackers weren't and so forth.

I think Akina will stay on, but he certainly failed this adition, so to speak.  We'll get our man at DC, whether it's Tenuta, Van Gorder, or someone else.  Greg Davis will remain at Texas, and he will likely have a better year next year.  I'm perfectly okay with that, even though I get pissed off t him for all his bubble screens and horizontal runs.

This team has all the pieces to win a championship (at least on offense), but the Horns must have both consistency and coherence on offense and defense to make it all work.  There's no doubt in my mind this team will be a contender if the defense is solid- and if not, if Texas won 10 this year, the Horns can win the Big XII next year.

by boomhauer25 on Dec 31, 2006 12:18 PM CST reply actions  

Defense and Offense
Colt McCoy is Chance Mock Redux. That comment is not meant as a slam. McCoy is a very capable quarterback. Hell, aTm wishes Stephen McGee was at least half the quarterback that McCoy is.

McCoy is not going to win many games with that running game. The backs and line were essentially the same as last year's. Where were Young and Charles this season? Where were the 20 plus yard runs?

Can Harris run the option from either the spread or I formations? Last year, Texas was an option team that could pass at will. This year, Texas could not run the ball.

By the middle of the season, Mack Brown said the running game suffered from a lack of Vince Young. Opposing defense did not respect McCoy's ability to run. Um, except McCoy could throw the ball all over the field. Opposing defense played run first at their peril.

Except for the aTm and Ohio State games, no team stopped Texas' passing. McCoy should not have played against aTm period.

Greg Davis and company unveiled the I formation for the Alamo Bowl. Same results for the running game. At least Charles and Young did not fumble.

The defense, or more specifically, the pass defense was terrible this season. It was terrible against Ohio State, Baylor, Nebraska, Texas Tech, Kansas State, and Iowa. At least against Iowa, Texas stopped the halfback pass.

Duane Akina should not get the defensive coordinator's position. The defense gave up two touchdowns on Iowa's first two possessions. Hawkeye quarterback Drew Tate has spent the year battling injuries and was not the same quarterback he was last year. Against Texas, though, he looked like a return to the 2005 version of Tate.

Iowa's receivers are slow and run basic routes. Yet, two touchdowns in the first two possessions.

Akina is not the man for the job. If he needs to leave the Horns, then so be it. But Texas needs a defensive coordinator from the SEC. Texas needs a defensive coordinator who will make the Horns nasty. Bo Pellini?

OU had a nasty defense for their last MNC run. Texas had a nasty defense last year. Where is the nastiness? The linebackers are not very athletic, and do not hit people.

Although the offensive line is gone for next year, Texas could make another run for a MNC. If Harris can run the option, then Davis needs to show he is a legitimate coordinator by benching McCoy. A new defensive coordinator, who instills a sense of nastiness, will help improve Texas' chances.

If there was one positive from the Alamo Bowl, then it was Henry Melton's move to defensive end. Now, that should be nasty.

by milevin on Dec 31, 2006 1:12 PM CST reply actions  

Chance Mock
Are you kidding?  How many records did Mock set?  How many TD passes?  McCoy is not going to win too many games with "that running game."  How about 10 his first season?  Take away his injury and you are probably looking at 12 wins.  Yet you want him benched for a freshman ("lets start over again") QB?

However, I do agree with about Akina.

"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Dec 31, 2006 2:15 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah, but...
while i agree that our defense left ALOT to be desired this year, my biggest concern going into next year is the running game.  without the development of a north-south running game, next year will be alot like this year-we'll go as far as colt can take us.  this season, despite our defense's struggles, the only games that we lost were the ones where colt was either injured or struggling.  every win and loss has a direct correlation to colt's performance.  when he threw 2 or more touchdowns, we were 10-0.  less than 2, 0-3.  we cant continue to put games solely on our qb.  as great as colt was this year, he's not vince...no one is.  the only fault that i would find with greg davis is that he was spoiled by vince.  i think next year we will see a renewed commitment to the I-formation running game.  jamaal was one hell of a back out of the spread...with vince at qb.  i didn't see anything from him this year that made me think that he can be an everydown back.  i think next year we should use him like we used ramonce.
i think that kindle is the answer to at least one of our problems, either short yardage running or improving linebacker play.  personally, i'm hoping they put him at rb.  i agree with patienthornsfan, his 5 yard run was the toughest inside run we had all year.  in fact, i would say that the worst thing that happened in the iowa game was the linebacker injuries, which forced kindle to be used there instead of at rb.
while i think that the defense will determine how good we are next year, i don't see any easy solutions there.  with the personnel available, i don't see how we could be much better next year.
i dont believe in god, but VY makes me want to.

by ctex80 on Dec 31, 2006 1:57 PM CST reply actions  

Kindle has a place ...
but I'm not ready to say it's at RB even though, like everyone else here, I LOVED that hardcore, freight-train, 5-yard run.  He's got speed too.  All the more why I'd like to see Kindle become a stud LB who can anchor that group for the next three years.  I do agree that it doesn't appear Charles can be the every down back and will need help.

Maybe I just need to take off my rose-colored glasses but I feel ok about our RB personnel on paper even though they'll be green.  Ever so slowly this coaching staff has come around to playing more talented freshman and letting the experience come.  So I'm ok with Charles, Foswhitt Whittaker and Cody Johnson in the beginning.  If Creer ever makes a decision and is part of the mix - great.  Johnson's 5-11 frame with 235 or so pounds on it (and proven hard, North/South running in HS) could be that boulder rolling downhill we kept hoping Melton would be.  

Splitting the difference, how about this?  Johnson proves to be a great blocker and hole opener but not carrier.  Kindle proves to have great vision, mobility and ball control at this level making it impossible for Mack not to put him at RB.  Then you have Johnson opening holes for Kindle.  That's the kind of punishment that's good on any down and surely fun for the opposition by the time the 4th quarter comes around!  I don't think McCoy would mind play-action off of that with Sweed and possibly Chiles.    

by CyHorn770 on Dec 31, 2006 4:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Firt time to Blog
I've been reading BON for a while and it a quality site that I've chosen to participate in.  I hope I can add quality to what's already here.  Having said that, here is my nit-pick'n on the season.
  1. It's nice to have 10 wins for six years and be able to nit-pick.  Many fans don't have that luxury.  However, it can also make us become complacent to inadequacies.  I don't have the answers or I would be on the coaching staff so keep in mind that the following or just my own observations and opinions.
  2. Like most I was very hopeful for defending the title this year, then thought it very realistic we would be BCS bound after OSU loss, especially after the OU win.  So a two point win in the Alamo Bowl, with the talent this team had, is disappointing even at 10 wins.
  3. I agree Greg Davis should not be the GOAT entirely, but he is an under-achiever in my view.  I wont go into previous years but with the talent this team had on the O-Line and running back I should've been able to play QB.  I don't know if it's a discipline issue or the talent is not as good as advertised, but when you throw passes in the flat up by 2 and trying to ice a game, it's either bad play calling or you're admitting you have lost the battle at the line.
  4. Colt is the QB of the future.  He has a head for the game and leadership.  He makes smart decisions, is very accurate, and although no VY, is mobile enough to create.  He will only get better with time.  I would liken him more to Applewhite than Mock.  It would take a LOT more than Harris being able to run the option before I would replace him.
  5. As far as defense, that WAS the most disappointing for me.  I'm not even gonna try and figure it out.  Only observation is that we were most weak in secondary and that is Akina's responsibility.
Again, these are just my opinions and not necessarily attacks on anyone else's comments so please have mercy on this rookie blogger.  I look forward to hopefully being a long time participant to BON.

by LonghornWillie on Dec 31, 2006 2:46 PM CST reply actions  

ONE ISSUE
Getting talented players to play at or above their capabilities.

We have failed here, and this is the source of all our frustration. We have the A+ Talent. We must have an OC and DC that can consistently achieve this. (no running game or pass defense with A+ talent?)

GD & DA have failed .

Mack recruits the best, why can we not have the best OC AND DC ?

OLD SCHOOL 70

by MeatchickenHorn on Dec 31, 2006 7:58 PM CST reply actions  

more Greg Davis
I take issue with nothing you've said, but to re-emphasize a statement you made - that our red zone and short yardage offense were bad is key.

I've complained about his predictable and conservative (with a few exceptions, of course) playcalling before, so I won't rehash that.  What I will say is that in watching the Alamo Bowl I lost count of the number of times that we had something like 3rd and 6 and the primary receiver (and generally the one on the opposite side of the field as well) ran 5 yard routes - ususally a five yard hitch or an out.  Pathetic.

Note to GD:  When you need 6, there is absolutely no reason to have the receiver stop at 5.  If you're playing for the upfield block or broken tackle, might as well run the bubble screen.

Hooking 'em since 1990!

by vettejock99 on Jan 1, 2007 8:28 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_57_small
Y'all Can Still Call Me GoBR

Recent FanPosts

Silhouette_bull_crop_small
OU 2012 FB Schedule
Caters-lizard-help-03_181614_small
Next Big Rivalry?
Ff_519532_xl_small
No love for Shakeem Jefferson
Small
Texas Women's Basketball
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Nike helmet redesign
Horns_small
Rivals 100 released
Small
Don't mess with Texas.
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Defense)
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Offense)
Small
Big 12 Expansion is Back!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8