Does Last Year Matter?
The first look at how national champs fared in their title defense year immediately triggered two more questions I wanted to answer. First, where did the national champion for a given year finish in the previous year?s Final AP Poll? And second, where was a national title team ranked in the title winning year?s Preseason AP Poll?
We?ll tackle the first of those two questions today.
The table below lists the year, the national champion for that year, and the team?s final poll position in the previous year. (NR indicates the team did not finish ranked in the AP Top 20 the previous year.)
National Champions1| Year | National Champ | Previous Year |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | Georgia | NR |
| 1981 | Clemson | NR |
| 1982 | Penn State | 3 |
| 1983 | Miami | NR |
| 1984 | BYU | 7 |
| 1985 | Oklahoma | 6 |
| 1986 | Penn State | 3 |
| 1987 | Miami | 2 |
| 1988 | Notre Dame | 17 |
| 1989 | Miami | 2 |
| 1990 | Colorado | 4 |
| 1991 | Miami | 3 |
| 1992 | Alabama | 5 |
| 1993 | Florida St. | 2 |
| 1994 | Nebraska | 3 |
| 1995 | Nebraska | 1 |
| 1996 | Florida | 2 |
| 1997 | Michigan | 20 |
| 1998 | Tennessee | 7 |
| 1999 | Florida St. | 3 |
| 2000 | Oklahoma | NR |
| 2001 | Miami | 2 |
| 2002 | Ohio St. | NR |
| 2003 | USC | 4 |
| 2004 | USC | 1 |
| 2005 | Texas | 5 |
1AP Final Poll Only
Also interesting. A few more quick thoughts:
*Between 1986-96, the national champion for the a given year could be found in the top five of the previous year, except for 1988 with Notre Dame (the exception to many rules).
*If we assign a rank of #21 to Georgia 1980, Clemson 1981, and Miami 1983, as well as a #26 to Oklahoma 2000 and Ohio State 2002 (the AP Final Poll increased from the Top 20 to the Top 25 in between the two groups), we can calculate an average ranking of a national champion the year before. Using those numbers, we get a previous year?s ranking of 8.26. I thought this number might be a little bit lower, actually.
*Teams do sometimes come out of nowhere. It?s happened twice in the BCS era, and came close in 2004 as well (Auburn). However, 73% of national champions since 1980 finished the previous year ranked 7th or better.
*It gets very interesting if you drop the NR teams as outliers. Not counting any NR teams, the average finish the year before nearly drops in half, to 4.8. Barring the occasional perfect storm from a team out of nowhere, you can find next year's champion at or near the top of the final AP Poll for a given year.
*This set of data tells us very little, though it?s fun to look at. What I ?am- interested to see, and what we?ll explore next, is how high each team ranked in the AP Preseason Poll. That, I suspect, will be telling.
--PB--
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Doesn't
It seems like looking at the previous year's record and the following year's record will have a connection.
That being said, its all very interesting. Especially now, since preseason polls help put teams on track to get in the BCS. I would imagine that in the BCS era there is a very strong relationship between high preseason rankings and MNCs. Even more so than in the pre BCS era.
by EYESofBEVO on Jul 6, 2006 3:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
For now
First, a not insignificant majority of the time, the national champion finished the previous year ranked very highly - 73% of the time it's been #7 or better. That's intuitive, so no big surprise.
Still, outside of those 73% of champs that came from the Top 7 of the previous year, the remainder won their title after a not at all stellar year before. It's even happened twice in the BCS era. Just interesting to note, as conventional wisdom says that BCS champs have to start the season ranked highly.
I'm most interested in comparing pre-season rankings of national champs. That, I think, will tell us a lot.
by Peter Bean on Jul 6, 2006 3:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
1990
by Jeff on Jul 7, 2006 9:48 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What a weird year
by Peter Bean on Jul 7, 2006 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In any case
by Peter Bean on Jul 7, 2006 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Bad
by Jeff on Jul 7, 2006 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
1979 Georgia
Included in that was a record of 5-1 in the SEC. And 1-3 vs. the ACC and lost to South Carolina who was an independent at the time.
The team was one of the most irratic in UGA history. They were young at many positions and basically lacking a great running back.
With a year of experience, a HUGE senior class and a game breaking back, it was an entirely different result in '80.
In other words, I think if you're going to come out of nowhere, it helps to have a MASSIVE senior class of returning starters AND you have to somehow fill or fix the thing that was broken in the past. (Oh...some enormous dose of luck would be nice too)
Ohio State's 2002 title is very similar to UGA's '80. They had a large senior class, and a magical FR back arrived on the scene to change the look of the offense. And they were ridiculously lucky)
In Oklahoma's case, they were learning a new system in Year 1 and that held them back in '99. You could argue their "missing piece" was experience/knowledge of the Stoops system.
Plus, in 2000 OU returned almost everyone while making it through an entire season with virtually no meaningful injuries. An incredibly rare combo.
So...to come out of no where, you need:
Tons of Seniors
+
Filling a Missing Piece
+
Silly Amounts of Luck
pwd
by Paulwesterdawg on Jul 7, 2006 1:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs



























