And The Winner Is... Kellen Heard!
I suppose it's appropriate that we learn about this "saw 'em off" story on the day that we had reserved for the announcement of our winner of the BON Enemies of the Nation Tournament. Our two finalists, after all, are both Aggies.
202 votes were cast in the finals, and the final margin was razor thin: Kellen Heard received 52% of the votes cast, to Eric Pedersen's 48%.
"Congratulations" Kellen Heard! You're the biggest fucktard of the 2006 season!
I thought it would be a close race, because the question was such a difficult one. Which was worse? Kellen Heard's obscene late hit of Colt McCoy? Or the classless, petty column written after the play that glorified Heard's late hit, while demonizing the victim?
I noted that I thought you could make a great case either way, and many of you did.
My vote went for Eric Pedersen. Kellen Heard is a thug of a football player who has no control over himself or his actions. He's an embarrassment to a fanbase who, at the very least, value good sportsmanship.
At least for the most part. Eric Pedersen's column was the most shameful, small-minded, and tasteless piece of garbage I've read all year. It was a sick piece of "journalism" that the student newspaper's editors never should have let see the light of day. As an argument, it was more porous than OJ Simpson's defense case.
I go way out of my way to demean Texas A&M in general, and Texas A&M athletics in particular. I poke fun of Aggies, their traditions, and their general athletic ineptitude. I fully expect the return treatment from Aggies, and am never disappointed. Trash talk and snickering about each other's differing cultures is part of the game. A damn fun part of the game.
I never, ever, though, celebrate injuries or revel in serious misfortunes that befall opponents. Pedersen's commentary epitomized the worst kind of Aggie - the self-loathing, envious little bitch who's constantly, desperately, trying to invalidate the University of Texas. Glorifying a late hit on the opposing team's quarterback is the lowest of the low, and I hate Eric Pedersen for it.
It's most disgusting because it represents the antithesis of all that is actually good about Aggie tradition. For all the mocking and needling we do, their core values of citizenship, comraderie, loyalty, and sportsmanship are highly commendable. This nastiness from Eric Pedersen openly mocks those traditions and gives a horrible name to an otherwise high character fanbase.
I wrote extensively about Robert Gates and Texas A&M's behind-the-times culture, and while their obsession with being the antithesis of the University of Texas seems misplaced and frightfully dated, the values that define the Aggie nation are, at their core, good ones. Eric Pedersen's column, especially in that light, was all the more repulsive.
Eric: fuck you and the sheep you rode in on.
--PB--
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
To be fair
Plenty
And while Pedersen's specific column may not have come about without the Heard hit, anyone who would write that column would have found a way to write something equally offensive and small-minded. The column is less about the play and more about what it says about Pedersen. To me, it says he's the biggest scumbag of 2006.
You're right, though
And the votes speak for themselves.
And I'm happy he "won."
I just wanted to slam Pedersen, too. Done and done.
As far as I'm concerned
Success
Sooner Mom among the worst of the worst.
Cause and effect
But it is weak little shitheads like Pedersen that reward such behavior, not just condoning it but even glorifying it. In doing so, they reinforce the behavior of Heard and others, preventing them from getting the help they need to learn the principles of sportsmanship. I think this makes Pedersen a far, far worse character than Heard. It's a matter of cause and effect. Heard will soon disappear from the scene, but craven little bastards like Petersen will stay and their warped praise will breed more Heards.
Agreed
LOL
by kicker @ Burnt Orange Nation on Jan 22, 2007 2:25 PM CST up reply actions
That was fucking funny
They have our school name in their fight song. There is also an entire industry of anti-Longhorn shirts and memoribilia. They know that we are better then they are in life and won't admit it. They are our rival but the second rival simple as that.
It should have been Pederson because Heard will be forgetten but like the previous guy said guys like Pederson will keep coming back. Heard was just a toy soldier wound up to follow the Aggie propaganda.
Almost hate to bring it up
Regardless, this match-up seemed almost like the chicken and the egg to me. Both are worthy of their participation in the enemy tournament, as did the rest of the inaugural field.
by the usual suspects on Jan 22, 2007 7:57 PM CST up reply actions
Where
Can you tell me how does it go in our fight song?
Why am I not suprised?
Texas fight, Texas fight
And it goodbye to a&m,
Texas fight, Texas fight
And we'll pull over one more win
Texas fight, Texas fight
for it's Texas that we love best!
Give 'em hell give 'em hell
Go horns go
and it's goodbye to all the rest.
Yea orange, yea white,
yea longhorns fight fight fight
Texas fight!
Texas fight, Texas fight
yea Texas fight.
by Hornbud on Jan 23, 2007 10:24 AM CST up reply actions
when do you think
i've always said "make 'em eat shit" except during the OU game when I say "OU sucks." But I went to a different Texas bar than my normal one this year for the K-state game and everyone was screaming "OU sucks." I thought that was stupid and aggie-ish. But that's just me.
I was under the impression
DV: the phrase: "Make 'em eat" shit is a suitable substitute for "go horns go". Although be respectful if you're in the presence of little old ladies. Also, during the ou game, and only during the ou game, substitute the phrase: "OU SUCKS". This is one the blue hairs and students actually agree upon, and it translates nicely through your television speakers.
by Hornbud on Jan 23, 2007 11:10 AM CST up reply actions

by 




























