Graduation rate question
54b, I'm curious about your feelings on this subject, but I'd like anyone else's opinions as well.
I meant to pose this question a while back, when it was mentioned in Texas Monthly, but forgot. Their latest issue was the Bum Steer Awards, in which they mentioned UT because we had the lowest graduation rate in the Big 12. I remember when this study first came out, and I remember reading some message board stuff on it, but I don't remember it being mentioned here.
My question for 54b or anyone else with inside knowledge is, basically, if this is total bullshit. Does UT emphasize graduation? Is there some reason that UT doesn't graduate as many players as other schools in the Big 12? Was this study old and outdated, and Mack Brown does a better job than the Macs of old? Does anyone out there even give a shit about whether or not the players graduate? Did Texas deserve to be a Bum Steer?
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
0 recs |
22
comments
Comments
I Don't Care
Let me ask you something. Do you really think Ramonce Taylor could quallify for UT if he didn't play football? How about Ricky Williams? I loved Ricky but Texas' pr management was one of the most underrated achievements. How did they keep that guy from going crazy? They hid him so well. Come on be realistic. The guys that mostly do graduate are the ones that relize early the NFL is not a viabale option.
Some of you may call me heartless or whatever but its the product on the field that counts.
This is kind off topic but i went to the Missouri vs. UT game a couple of years ago and my friend who lives in another country came with me. He looked around the fans and asked where are the minorities? I said look on the field. Just a thought there.
Since we are actually talking about the education. I thought i'd bring it up. Pleas don't burn me at the stake. There is no hidden agenda here. I am just going to leave it at that.
by txlonghorn on Jan 25, 2007 11:11 PM CST 0 recs
my take
I actually agree with much of what you're saying. About Ramonce, yeah, he probably wouldn't have made it into UT if he didn't play football. I remember when I was applying to UT, they didn't have a minimum GPA or SAT score, they just said that they took everything into consideration. So I gave them my GPA, SATs, I wrote two essays, I told them about my extra-curricular activities, my community service, clubs, etc. So yeah, I can see the argument that being one of the best football players in the country is the same as having lots of great extra-curriculars on your application.
I also think that the goal of college is to prepare you for the "real world," and you don't have to graduate to be ready for it. Look at Michael Dell. So I completely understand someone like Vince going pro before graduating.
But my question still remains: does UT focus more or less on graduating than other schools? My guess is that they focus on it more for the players who are less likely to go to the NFL. That's why they have career day. It's a great way to get those guys who are good players but still not in that top 2% or whatever that go to the NFL.
by hornbone on
Jan 25, 2007 11:21 PM CST
up
0 recs
Ricky Williams
by Bob LaBlog on
Jan 25, 2007 11:46 PM CST
up
0 recs
Ironic, isn't it?
by hornbone on
Jan 25, 2007 11:48 PM CST
up
0 recs
Running backs take
by kicker on
Jan 26, 2007 9:10 AM CST
up
0 recs
Everybody takes it
by Bob LaBlog on
Jan 26, 2007 10:36 AM CST
up
0 recs
Agree
Being a college football player is a full time job now. You have practice everyday and pretty much something to do in the offseason everyday. If you are getting pounded every day would you focus on school? Most of the majors that you see guys taking are "eligibility majors" or my favorites "General Studies" "Communications" or i think with Ramonce "Undecided".
I can't help but think a couple years ago when UNC with Felton, McCants, and that fat center who sucks in the NBA. Who is it? Oh, Shawn May. The NCAA during tourney time alwasy shows the "student-athlete" and during a break in the game CBS showed Raymond Felton and his bio. Guess what his major was "African Studies" wow what a challenging major. Raymond thats going to get you far in life. There is a whole lot more i can go into that but we will leave at that it. Just embarrsing African Studies wow. You guys know what i mean.
To most coaches it is a joke and they don't care. They just tell them. Keep your ass eligiible (including you PJ). I don't know about Mack.
I honestly want to believe and believe that he stresses school and graduating. But he has to win games. And thats priority numero uno. I love VY but he doesn't sound like the sharpest tool in the shed. There have been plenty of guys that weren't exactly bright. Chris Simms, VY, Aaron Harris, Cedric Griffin to name a few. There have been though some really smart guys on the team. Who can forget Michael Huff. One of the guys that i thought was a complete dumb ass was Ced Benson.
I looked over some of his interviews and the similiarities betweeen him and Ricky go beyond the football field. I don't think Ced is crazy like Ricky but both are extremely articulate and intelligent guys. Yeah he smokes weed but lets be realistic alot of people do. I bet Mack lights it up "once in a blue moon."
I was at the Rose Bowl when they beat Michigan and had really good seats. When Mangum hit that field goal everybody started mobbing each other on the field and running out celebrating. Everybody except Ced he just kneeled on the ground and observed everything. He took it all in.
He even talked about that during an interview with "The Mag" about how he thinks and is thoughtful and not a dumbass. Don't remember it real well but how he says he is his own man and people don't tell him what to think and do.
He said "man there were guys there that never stepped foot on the field and they were mobbing each other and celebrating and i found that interesting" its something like that. He was asking and wondering how important it was and how special. Ced is one of my all time favorite Horns just a great player and good guy.You can tell both Ricky and Ced aren't airheads they know what they are doing.
Some people on "Da Bears" question his commitment to football and i think yeah Ced doesn't think its the most important thing the world. There is nothing wrong with that. It actually makes you a better person. I'm calling it Ced Benson Super Bowl MVP with 180 yards rushing 2TD's including a 50 yarder to win it in OT.
To sum it up there are airheads and idiots on the team that don't graduate and really smart guys that do graduate as well. The coaches try to make the guys that aren't going to be pros to graduate.
by txlonghorn on Jan 25, 2007 11:53 PM CST 0 recs
The best part of this post
by hornbone on
Jan 26, 2007 12:01 AM CST
up
0 recs
Greg Davis?
Er, or maybe not as much? I can't decide.
by Margaritaking on
Jan 26, 2007 9:10 AM CST
up
0 recs
another Ricky/Ced similarity that we often forget
I got nothing bad to say about either. Ricky was my UT hero and dominated the nation on team with poor coaching and so-so talent for what we are used to. Ced was very good, but not at Ricky/Earl level even though he had great numbers (he also had awesome lines to run behind most of the time).
by longhornJ on
Jan 28, 2007 5:05 PM CST
up
0 recs
Onus is still on the individual
When I was a walk-on at UT, I took 12-15 hours a semester and between practice, film sessions, weights and other meetings, averaged about 40 hours of football a week. I kind of felt like school was school and football was my job. And in that sense, I don't really consider the student-athlete much different than any other student who works to put themselves through school.
But to answer your question, yes, the football coaches and support staff certainly stressed the importance of graduating. We had mandatory study halls and access to tutors and a computer lab. We even had advisors help us choose our classes and make sure we were staying on track in regards to our degree plan. So, if anything, I think the student-athlete actually has less of an excuse than the typical student for not graduating.
So why does UT have a lower than average graduation rate that warrants a Bum Steer Award?
I don't really want to make any excuses because I think it's deplorable that our graduation rate for football players is as low as it is, especially when you consider how crucial the college diploma has become to gaining access to meaningful and lucrative job opportunities.
But you also have to look how they measure that rate. Don't quote me on this, but I believe every football player who enters the University on scholarship is counted. So if that student transfers, drops out for personal reasons, or even leaves early for the NFL, no matter the reason (legit or not) he counts against the graduation rate. So there are a myriad of reasons for why UT ended up with such a low rate. Regardless, our rate should be higher, a lot higher. There are too many resources available for it not to be.
That being said, I'm also a big advocate for taking personal responsibility. Most of the people reading this blog are college graduates. If they had dropped out, would they be blaming a 3rd party for it? I doubt it. Everyone makes choices and we live with them. People who want to point the finger at the football program because of a low graduation rate (like Texas Monthly) aren't any more concerned about the student-athletes than you are, they're just pushing their own political agenda.
And what if we held the University overall to the same measuring stick we're imposing on the football program? There are tons of incoming Freshman that never make it all four (or five) years and actually graduate? I bet the attrition rate percentage for the student body as a whole is comparable to that of the football program. Yet, is anybody blaming the administration for the Freshman attrition rate? Maybe some people are, but not the ones selling ad space in magazines.
Hopefully Mack can get it turned around as I'm a firm believer in the importance of getting a diploma, even if your major is Bubble Blowing. It will have a direct effect on your pursuit of happiness for the rest of your life. But now I'm preaching to the choir.
by 54b on Jan 26, 2007 10:28 AM CST 0 recs
The thing that gets me...
http://cbs.sportsline.com/collegefootball/story/9106181
I would really like to believe that graduating players is at least something the football staff works at, but it's hard to believe that with these numbers.
The thing that gets me is that Texas NEVER loses players early to the draft, so we can't even use that as an excuse. So why do so few of them graduate??? Mack has lost, what - 3 players early as a coach? Right? So wtf?
by Broccoli on Jan 26, 2007 10:29 AM CST 0 recs
Keep in Mind
From the article posted above...
"The statistics released ... in the GSR were compiled from classes that entered during the years 1995-98," men's athletic director DeLoss Dodds said in a statement. "These rates do not reflect the work of our current student-athletes and coaching staffs. In fact, student-athletes on our campus today were attending middle school at that time. "Low graduation rates are not acceptable. ... We have made dramatic changes in this area and we project our current APR -- a snapshot of what is happening today -- will more accurately reflect true academic progress."
by Humdrum on Jan 26, 2007 10:37 AM CST 0 recs
true
by hornbone on
Jan 26, 2007 11:21 AM CST
up
0 recs
While we're on the subject
by jlhotze on Jan 26, 2007 11:58 AM CST 0 recs
That is really apples to oranges
by Wells on
Jan 26, 2007 1:11 PM CST
up
0 recs
my perspective
Also what 54b said about everything counting against you is true, players that transfer count against you whether they graduate or not. If the do not graduate in 6 years they count against you. Also as I understand it those numbers are actually go back six years ago and come from a couple of years ago, meaning many of the students would have been mackovics recruits.
Finally, what they do not mention is the graduation rate at UT was lower, last I looked at it than it was for athletes, 54% to 52% or something like that. So it seems like if they are doing better than the average student, when what they have to work with can be decidedly below average achievers in highschool, that's pretty darn good. Besides there are lies, damn lies and statisitics.
by billb on Jan 26, 2007 5:52 PM CST 0 recs
54b on point as always...
also, if a kid makes a decision to transfer (choice is 100% his) why in the world do you penalize the school for that? seems to me that scholarship should be 'revoked' or whatever other word you want to use for not counting against the rest of the bunch. Likewise, if a guy goes pro and finished up at U. Phoenix online or something then why would you not count that retroactively?
when I was at UT in the 80's the average time it was taking non-athlete students to graduate was over 5 years...so six years for an athlete that is basically pulling a full time job worth of hours as a football player strictly to entertain the rest of us couchbound coaches is just plain unfair.
I know some schools do an awesome job at graduating kids and being good programs too, but there must be a 'devil in the details' if UT doing everything that we know they do for these kids is still looked upon as Bum Steer worthy.
btw, for the most part, Texas Monthly is a completely biased all-too-typical Dallas based rag. Except for writer John Spong, who went to UT the same time I did. he's hillarious...
by longhornJ on Jan 28, 2007 5:19 PM CST 0 recs
Don't understand
Where is all this antagonism coming from?
by PB @ BON on
Jan 28, 2007 5:55 PM CST
up
0 recs
It's a liberal magazine
For me personally, Texas Monthly is a lifeline to the Promised Land. Having been a "marginal Texan" all my life (not born there, lived more time out of the state than in), it's great to have a well-written link to the happenings, culture and politics.
However, that's the view of someone living in Yankee-land (defined as: North and East of Dallas), not paying any taxes. I can see how someone in the midst of Texas with a different viewpoint might find TM's slant off-putting. It's like how reading the Washington Times makes me want to stick my finger down my throat..
by Kahuna on
Jan 29, 2007 8:47 AM CST
up
0 recs















