What Now? Fixing The Longhorn Offense, Part 1
![]() |
We Texas fans find ourselves in quite the difficult situation: we have a problem which is relatively easy to diagnose, but, I'm afraid, tremendously difficult to fix. Let's start from the beginning, though.
Up and until the Vince Young Release Party, when the coaches shelved the offense they'd been running to unshackle the greatest player to ever don a collegiate uniform, Greg Davis, Mack Brown and the Longhorns employed a straightforward under-center attack. The results were mostly good, but often disastrous against opponents with good defenses. Bob Stoops reeled off five straight wins against the 'Horns from 2000-04, in large part because he succeeded in preventing Greg Davis from stretching the field. Dink, dunk. Hunt, peck. A yard here. Two there. Whoops, another loss.
When it became clear midway through 2004 that we were wasting Vince Young's strengths in that system, Davis and Brown made some significant changes. By 2005, they'd created an incredibly simple, but devastatingly effective package of plays to highlight Young. Texas ran virtually every play out of the same formation. The variations were reads for Young to make. Keep the ball, hand it off, or, on the pass plays, freeze six guys who are petrified he might take off at any second.
We won a national championship with Vince Young. And we wouldn't have if Davis and Brown hadn't properly utilized him. Mack Brown and Greg Davis will always get a lot of love from me for that reason alone. They did it. We won it. It was freaking glorious...
But Vince is gone and things have unraveled as quickly as they came together. With Saturday's embarrassing loss to Kansas State, the Vince Young honeymoon officially ends and we've got to start figuring out what to do next.
The McCoy Conjecture
Way back in June of this year, I took a look at Texas' 2006 body of work and concluded that Texas would sink or swim with Colt McCoy's health and effectiveness. The operating theory was based on a look at how McCoy valiantly resurrected the team - beginning with OU - with a flurry of outstanding passing performances. Moreover, when McCoy went down against Kansas State, the wheels of the team came off.
I think I was right that McCoy's strong play last year was the reason for our offensive success and that his injury killed our high hopes for the season. But my prediction for 2007 turned out to be quite wrong: In applying the lessons of last year to speculating how we might be effective in 2007, I wrote:
That's a fine idea in theory, but we've encountered several ugly problems in application so far this year:
- Texas has failed to stretch the field with the vertical passing game.
- McCoy has been neither healthy nor effective.
The first point is a long-standing complaint about Greg Davis among Longhorn fans. When the tough teams come to town, the Texas offensive gameplan retreats to a predictable, conservative, mess of timidity.
The second point, though, is far more complicated. I'm not surprised, then, that the Sunday Morning Quarterback foreshadowed this way back in July:
And indeed we did not.
What's was awkwardly obvious to Texas fans through the Longhorns' four non-conference games in 2007 was painfully, fatally exposed for the rest of the world on Saturday in Austin: teams have made adjustments to the McCoy-based offense, and Texas has failed to make proper counter-adjustments.
Greg Davis abandoned a successful running game in the first quarter Saturday with his decision to start rolling Colt McCoy out of a pocket that was holding strong. The result? Disaster. McCoy started getting hammered by K-State defenders on the perimeter. He suffered a concussion. He threw interceptions. Davis just couldn't get away from it, though. At one point, Davis called 11 straight pass plays, none of them more than 15 yards down the field.
It was an unmitigated disaster, and Texas lost.
In Part 2 we'll discuss where to go from here.
--PB--
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Square peg in a round hole
Or maybe it is how Texas fans view short and goal run plays?
by rachorn06 on Oct 1, 2007 6:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Go Back to the Simms offense
I don't understand why the coaches don't go and find the Chris Simms playbook somewhere. For once, i want that offense back. That offense would be perfect for Colt.
Would that be effect or not?
by longhorn4life on Oct 1, 2007 7:12 PM CDT reply actions
Looks like it, anyway.
Sure, run the Simms offense. Be my guest. Just expect more of the same we saw versus K-State...at least three batted passes and average an interception per game. That's why I loved Simms. You could set your watch by the interceptions he threw.
by DKRismycopilot on Oct 2, 2007 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
Texas Football
I don't know how old all of you are but when I was a kid, Texas football meant two things:
--Man-to-man defense
--Running the damn football out of running formations even when the opponent KNEW it was coming and couldn't help but choke as we rammed it down their damn throats.
Why is it that two years removed from our beloved VY we still haven't found legitimate use for a fullback? Are our WRs SOOOOOOOOOOOO good that we have to bench a run blocker for a mediocre third wideout? I think we know the answers to this question.
I think that Colt is trying to do too much. I think we're putting him in situations where he doesn't have room for error. We need to play action pass more and to do that we have to run. I also think that you need to get this offensive line (talented or not) into a rhythm and there's no better way than to let them run block.
The thing that is most sorrowful about this whole mess with The Colt is that he reminds me of Major Applewhite with a better arm and more mobility. Unfortunately he's doing something Major never did...take steps backward.
Remember that Major beat Nebraska in Lincoln. Major had the killer instinct. He knew how to manage the game and he knew how to WIN the game.
Our coaching staff has fallen in love with players that haven't lived up to expectations on both sides of the ball. If Jamaal Charles keeps fumbling, then the only relevance his great 40 time will have is that he'll be able to chase defenders who've scooped up his fumble running the other way. Put in Ogbonnaya...put in McGee. Let them play.
WHO THE HELL IS OUR FULLBACK? DOES HE HAVE A SCHOLARSHIP!!!?!?!?!?!?
Sorry...but that felt good to get out.
Fullbacks
#1 - Luke Tiemann - No scholarship
#2 - Antwann Cobb - On scholarship
Give the ball to Lokey!!!
colt = unhealthy
i dont think colt has survived from the kstate game of last year. those stingers are sometimes permanent long lasting effects and i think there might be some reason to say that colt will never be the same qb he once was.
after that injury he has never really been the qb we remembered him as, not vs...
aggies
iowa
ark state
tcu
kstate
rice was just the worst D1 team ever.
this mite also explain some reasoning behind the offensive playcalling of GD. against, ark state we at least threw it vertical and the results were 2 ints and potentially 5. hence, GD has scaled back.
it colt is anything less than 2006 OU than the future is chiles.
by sup4mn on Oct 1, 2007 9:46 PM CDT reply actions
O-Line = toast
Who is supposed to keep the OU Front-7 off of Colt? This staff has consistently under-recruited the O-Line and we are paying the price this year. But hey, we sure have plenty of WRs.......
I was hoping you were wrong,
but sadly, that's not the case. Recruiting rankings aren't always everything they're cracked out to be, but in our case, it's remarkably prescient. Here's our list, via Scout:
J'Marcus Webb (5 stars, 2006, out of the program)
Roy Watts (3 stars, 2006, out of the program)
Buck Burnette (3 stars, 2006)
Steve Moore (3 stars, 2006)
Chris Hall (3 stars, 2005)
Charlie Tanner (3 stars, 2005)
Cedric Dockery (3 stars, 2004, although I'd argue he's outplayed this ranking)
Adam Ulatoski (3 stars, 2004)
Greg "Who" Dolan (3 stars, 2004, out of the program)
Kyle "Ditto" Thornton (3 stars, 2003, out of the program)
Dallas Griffin (3 stars, 2003)
Anyone notice a trend? We're stocking the second-most important position on the field with 3 star "average" players. Fact is, our best lineman was recruited as a stud tight end. Obviously, we're expecting good things out of Mack's '07/'08 classes, but the interim has been ugly at best.
O-Line is definitely
a big part of this. A good line in college can hide a lot of flaws and give a QB/RB some room for error.
The good news, like you said, is that we had three 4 star linemen in 2007 (plus 5 star Tray Allen) and three 4 star linemen coming in the '08 class. Hopefully Allen, Huey, and Hix will be ready to have big roles next year.
by JT Longhorn on Oct 2, 2007 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions
The recruit rankings
for O-line value size and weight.
Texas runs a zone blocking scheme and wants O-lineman to move their feet and be more than a tree stump.
The coaching staff values smaller athletic lineman, thus the lower recruit rankings.
IMO, rivals and scout need to somehow factor this in to their rankings.
I don't know what the size/weight of those kids
was coming out of HS, but an excellent zone blocking line only needs to be 6'1, 300 lbs on average.
I'd argue that texas has the reverse problem, that they recruit kids who get too big and sloppy.
Hills isn't your best lineman
If he is, you're in deep shit.
Hills has received a lot of hype, with absolutely no production to support that hype.
Your main problem on OL is a complete lack of depth; any time the backup for one starting tackle is the starting tackle on the opposite side, you have problems.
Starting true freshmen isn't the answer, b/c they aren't physically ready to play, but y'all are having to do that by necessity.
I am kind of shocked about those rankings, though. I would think the players from the '04 and '05 classes would be more elite (back-to-back Rose Bowl wins).
Y'all may be seeing the downside of early recruiting, though.
Colt should not play
I know he wants to and the coaches will probably let him, assumming he's cleared by doctors, but he is going to get seriously injured...as stated above, if KSU can rough him, who is going to protect him against the OU def line and backers?
That said, as disgusting and painful as Saturdays loss was, it was probably the best thing for us, as it is the only thing that can force some changes.
We are gonna need some serious breaks to stay in this one, unless the team gets fired up and plays with emotion for 4 quarters....
I don't feel good about this one.
by MeatchickenHorn on Oct 1, 2007 10:42 PM CDT reply actions
I'll be even more ominous
If Colt goes down, then we have Chiles. Period.
If Sherrod could play, he would be. What little we saw of him vs. Rice, he sure didn't resemble what I saw at the Spring game and at the first practice this year. I hope he is improving fast and is actually OK despite my misgivings.
So, if not Sherrod, then behind Chiles is Kinne, a true freshman.
If we hold Colt out and put in Chiles, at least we have a back-up. No one is really saying anything about this and I don't blame them. Who wants to?
We have the McEachern legacy but we really don't have a third string QB unless it's Quan. And I'd probably take him over someone just learning the drills two months ago.
BTW the link is to the DMN series on the history of the RRS with a short write-up of each game. In 1977, McEachern led the Horns to their first victory after five straight losses. You younger readers can appreciate the feeling of losing five in a row to OU, so you know how much that win meant.
QBs
At this point I'd kind of like to see what Quan can do as a QB.
QBs II
I hope Sherrod is getting much better; while Chiles might be a tad faster, Sherrod has that extra experience that would put us in a much stronger situation.
This goes into that I-hope-we-don't-find-out file.
Remeber the first hit on Colt against OU in 2006?
This time, he might not get back up!
If we can take the field with "emotion" we will be fine. The fact that the coaches didn't hype last weeks game as a "revenge game" is just stupid. In college, the team with the most emotion wins the game 90% of the time. Just look at all the huge upsets this year!
If this team can't get fired up for OU, there's something seriously wrong.
*Trying to find a clip of the hit on McCoy from last year, I came across this gem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLsw7...
Enjoy!
Emotion
I too am a but concerned about the emotional hype level of the longhorns. From what I've seen this week it just seems to be a routine we're getting things done and we're going to try hard mentality. That's great when you've just flunked a test or forgot to put the milk back in the fridge, but not for football.
Mack talked about how OU was mad but wouldn't ever say that we were upset and wanted to prove ourselves. That's the problem. It has to be spoken and put out there to get the team ramped up and get the crowd into it for Saturday. What are we, the goth kid reading poetry?! Geez. Get pissed off and let the team understand that a loss just isn't another loss and we'll all get a trophy at the end and then maybe all of the technical changes and adjustments will actually be able to matter. Until then...

by 





























