Midseason Review: Wide Receivers and Tight Ends
The midseason review continues with a look at Texas' wide receivers.
Statistics
Minimum 5 receptions
Overview
Prior to the season, the working theory on this offense was that it could be a successful, pass-first attack, directed by McCoy. We talked at length about the two elements required for the plan to succeed:
- Offensive line competency
- Limas Sweed stretching the field and commanding double teams
Given the ultimate outcome (Sweed has opted for season-ending surgery), I'll never forget sitting on the stage at BookPeople in Austin, doing an Eyes of Texas 2007 book event with Geoff Ketchum and Chip Brown. Almost simultaneously, right before we were to begin the event, Geoff and Chip's Blackberry's began buzzing. They each looked at their phones and announced to the audience, "Limas Sweed just injured his wrist at practice."
That was back in late August, and though Sweed would soldier through the first six games of the season, there were signs throughout that the injury was more significant than he was letting the rest of us see. It's important to remember just how good a receiver Limas had become by the close of 2006. He was using his body the way a guy his size should, pushing interference rules to the proper limits to better his position, running good routes, and hauling in tough catches. Phil Steele ranked Sweed as the top receiver in the country heading into 2007, and even if you care to quibble with that, a healthy Sweed is easily one of the top ten pass catchers in the country.
His injury was not only a setback for him personally; it drilled a leak in the bigger Texas offensive boat. Without elite play from Sweed, defending the Longhorn aerial attack became significantly less of a challenge. While it would be a mistake to pin all the struggles on this factor alone, Sweed's relative ineffectiveness has been a substantial problem.
Moreover, with Sweed now out for the year, things just went from bad to worse. Though Nate Jones has done a damn fine job working the intermediate routes, and Quan Cosby remains an excellent possession receiver, there's no one on the roster who's ready to fulfill Limas' role. Jordan Shipley is a better playmaker than he looks, but he's a far cry from Sweed. Billy Pittman was a big play threat in 2005, but that's looking more and more like an anomalous VY-driven season.
As for Jermichael Finley, everyone knows what a freak of a weapon he is, but we haven't seen him used as such until this past Saturday when he torched Oklahoma - notably in the first half. With Sweed in street clothes, Texas will undoubtedly try to continue to use Finley more, but there will need to be a credible deep threat to prevent teams from cheating more safety help than normal to containing him.
Adjustments
If Sweed were healthy, this would all be very different. As things stand right now, though, Texas needs to consider some big adjustments.
First and foremost, the Texas coaches now have no excuse not to play Brandon Collins and James Kirkendoll. Their redshirts have already been burned (though neither has registered a reception). Now that Texas is an extreme long shot to win the Big 12, and now that Limas Sweed is out for the season, the coaches must justify the burning of these 'shirts by playing these kids and playing them often. Both earned rave reviews throughout the summer and fall, both have lost their redshirts, and both will be around for three more years. Get them on the field and give them work.
As wonderful as it's been to see Nate having a strong senior season, he's gone after this year. Ditto Billy Pittman. And if you think Texas' 2007 offense looks eminently containable, wait 'til you see the 2008 unit if the coaches don't work on developing someone to play the role of Limas Sweed.
The ugly truth to the matter is that there's not going to be any quick fix to that particular problem, and as discussed above, there's cause for concern that this offense can even be an effective one without that critical deep threat element.
So what's the bottom line? This is another data point for the case to see what we've got in John Chiles. And soon.
--PB--
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
Where's the deep ball?
You know my thoughts on it guys. Input? And please don't use the OL as an excuse.. that's a factor, I'm sure, but they aren't in the QB's face every down.
by chief on Oct 10, 2007 6:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Malcolm Williams?
Do you think that Mack will rip his red shirt off to fill that big tall fast receiver role that we don't have anymore?
If not Williams than I would say the most likely to have an impact is James Kirkendoll, the 4.3 speed will provide us with another playmaker on deep routes and those damned WR screens.
by mvplonghorns on Oct 10, 2007 6:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why burn a shirt this season?
It's a longshot that we could get into a BCS bowl (and that might be an understatement)
by chief on Oct 10, 2007 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
With Limas' absence...
... will teams still show Texas the same dose of Cover 2 that they've seen this year? Part of why the 'Horns offense thrived last year was because teams largely didn't believe that a redshirt freshman quarterback could beat them. So, they stuffed the box to take away Texas' proven ground threats (Selvin and Jamaal). This opened up many of the one on one matchups with Limas that we grew to love because he and Colt were almost always able to connect on deep balls in these situations (witness Limas' TDs against OU, Nebraska, Iowa, etc. last year). Fast forward to this year. Thus far, with Limas in the lineup, we've seen a lot of teams have 2 safeties camped deep to try to take away those deep shots to Limas (and, outside of Rice, have done a relatively good job; however, Limas' injuries probably had something to do with that as well). Now though, with no Limas, will we start to see the same thing that we saw last year? It has to be tantalizing to defensive coordinators to blitz the hell out of the 'Horns mediocre O-Line. I have to think that the WRs will start to get some more man to man looks, because (as you mentioned, PB) Texas doesn't have a go-to big play threat at the moment. PB also mentioned Billy Pittman being the big play guy in 2005, why not the second half of this year too? I really think that there will be more chances for big plays these next 6 games. Whether or not the line can keep Colt conscious or not will be the key to whether or not they connect on enough of them to be effective.
by Sweed4Heisman on Oct 10, 2007 6:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wide outs
After 10 years of Mack ball what do you think the chances are that Mack will play young players, no matter how good they are? Go ask Muckleroy and Norton.
by UTeed on Oct 10, 2007 7:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You know...
Even though we now know why Limas wasn't doing so well this year (the wrist injury explains the performance), he still took up one or two guys in the opponent's secondary every time he was in there, allowing others to be open or in single coverage. That's gone now with his departure.
I think you gotta do something to replace him in your gameplan if you're us and I am for starting the young kids now too. Burn those redshirts and play'em, let'em get their feet wet and develop NOW.
by HornsFan87 on Oct 10, 2007 11:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And its interesting to note...
that Limas is still on the depth chart for Iowa State on the website.
by HornsFan87 on Oct 10, 2007 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A couple of things
I hate taking Nate Jones from his current role, where he has found a real niche to exploit. Colt seems to find him easily as an outlet. I don't think that is a good exchange, particularly if he doesn't draw double coverage out there.
I expect Quan out there a lot, but he also does special teams returns and I hate to see us run his legs off in that role when we might need him late in the game (the Mike Adams situation). Plus he's tough in the slot.
Shipley played the WR in a well-run spread in HS and had a great ability to make deep catches (even more so in retrospect considering McGee was throwing it), so I expect he would be a natural there. Which could open up the slot to Pittman more (if his shoulder is really ready; there's usually a reason when someone ain't hitting the field much).
I still think splitting Jamaal out there several times - and throwing to him regardless of the success - would be useful because that would cause the safeties to take notice and back up. And we could get that any time we want with JC at WR. Useful ploy.
And I don't mind the young guys in there and I like fresh fast legs charged with adrenalin coming off the bench aching to make a big catch. Mackovic used to do that some. You can mix it up and keep the safeties off balance.
I didn't realize Kirkendol could do a 4.3. Is that legit?
I'm all in favor of developing the players now. We really have two or three games for that (depending if NU heals up); then we hit a tough stretch at OSU, TT and A&M when those little threats could loom larger. We're gonna need everything we have to get out of this season with a lot of victories, much less winning out.
by whills on Oct 10, 2007 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs


























