Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

#8 Texas Pulls Away in Second Half

Game Recap: #5 Texas overcame a slow start and the hot outside shooting of Texas Southern to defeat the Tigers going away, 98-61. The Horns outscored the Tigers 59-29 in the second half and got a double-double Damion James and solid play on both ends from Justin Mason to improve to 6-0.  

Coach Barnes attributed cold first half shooting and missing energy to two "tough practices" earlier this week. While the Horns were never in danger of losing this one, it was more interesting and a lot closer than I expected.

In the first half, the Texas defense looked like the defense BONers have witnessed at DKR over the last two years. The Horns allowed the Tigers to shoot 45.8% from the floor and 50% from behind the arc over the first twenty minutes. Texas led just 39-32 at half, as they had their own struggles shooting the ball. However, the second half was a different story. Texas shot the ball better (61.5%), dominated scoring in the paint (46-10), and capitalized on countless Texas Southern turnovers in the second half.

The outcome was: Expected. While the Horns were nowhere near as sharp as they were in New Jersey, they still got the won convincingly. This was little more than a mid-week scrimmage for the Longhorns as they now can turn their complete attention to #1 UCLA.  

The Offensive MVP was: Damion James. Even though DJ Augustin was the high scorer (20 points), it was James who helped Texas pull away in the second half. James scored inside and out and finished with 19 points on 8-of-13 shooting, including 1-for-1 from three and 2-for-2 from the foul line. It was more than just scoring though. James added 10 boards, four assists, a block, and a steal in just 28 minutes of action.

The Defensive MVP was: All five starters. Texas Southern did shoot over 40% for the game but they took 27 fewer shots than did the Horns. Why? Because they didn’t even get shots off on many, many possessions. The Longhorns forced 24 Tiger turnovers, 14 of which came of steals. Augustin led the way with four steals, Justin Mason (3), AJ Abrams (2), and James and Connor Atchley with one each. All five starters did a nice job of pressuring the basketball, anticipating ball movement on the perimeter, and jumping passing lanes.

The Freshman Evaluation tonight was: Decent. Wang Chung and Clint Chapman both had some trouble defending the dribble drive, but that it to be expected given they were both matched up with guards thirty feet from the basket. Wangmeme contributed four points and two rebounds in ten minutes, while Chap added two buckets on nice back-to-the-basket moves and grabbed four rebounds in his 13 minutes of action.

Dexter Pittman Watch: 9 minutes, 9 points (4/8), 3 rebounds, 0 fouls. Sexy Dex played briefly in the first half and scored one basket as he basically dunked his defender. But with Texas Southern essentially playing four guards all game, the match-ups were not really conducive for tons of minutes for Dexter. Barnes did give Pittman a chance to close out the final minutes of the game, and he made the most of them. Dexter scored seven points late as his teammates really looked to feed him the ball in the post. The smaller and lighter Texas Southern defenders didn’t have much of a chance.

Three Things I Think: (1) We need Gary Johnson. As long as Gary Johnson remains sidelined, the Horns are going to struggle defending the three point shot. Without Johnson, Texas starts three guards under 6-2 who simply get shot over the top of. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing if our opponents are cold, but it will allow less talent teams to stay close to the Horns unless we are running our own offense at a top-notch efficiency.

(2) DJ Augustin is phenomenal. During the Tennessee game, Augustin was the best player on the floor by far, which included pre-season All American Chris Lofton. I commented in the open thread that DJ would be the best player on the court in nearly every game this season. I’m going to raise that evaluation. Augustin will be the best player on the floor in every game this season. Period. First team All American is attainable.  

(3) UCLA will be a tough matchup. As efficient as the Horns have been, their offense still centers on our three guards, and more specifically, on the penetration ability of Augustin. We still don’t know if Darren Collison will play for the Bruins, but play or not, Ben Howland will game plan to take away that penetration at all costs. If DJ isn’t able to get into the lane and create offense, who will step up? Second, UCLA’s strength is our weakness: the post. How will the Horns defend Kevin Love, Josh Shipp, and Mbah a Moute and keep the extremely physical Bruins off the glass? I liked our matchup with Tennessee; I don’t like this one.

NEXT GAME: Road at UCLA – Sunday 12/2  7:00 p.m. Fox Sports

--AW--

0 recs  |  Comment 26 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Collison

Playing tonight for UCLA; they're up 44-35 on George Washington right now.

I don't like the matchup, either. UCLA is so, so big and physical. God I hate Ben Howland basketball.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Nov 28, 2007 10:41 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Three things you think

Hey Peter, I usually only post when I'm drunk during or after football games, but something has been nagging at me for a week or so.

Your three comments at the end of all these game wrap-ups should be called "Three Things" or maybe "Three Thoughts".  It's sort of implied that you are thinking of or about those things seeing as how you wrote them.

Sorry if that's too "Strunk and White" for you.  Also, it reminds me of Peter King's column on si.com (Three Things I Think I Think).

And while we're at it, can you lend any advice to someone who has fallen into a severe case of writer's block, regarding the law school personal statement?  Or anyone else for that matter...

I was second in line to adopt Sergio Kindle!

by Kool Hand on Nov 29, 2007 3:24 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

thanks

Clearly my close-reading skills are strong enough for the tasks of law school.

by Kool Hand on Nov 30, 2007 2:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good suggestion

And email me about the other stuff.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Nov 29, 2007 10:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

personal statement

don't know if this will help writer's block, but do something creative.  my friend in high school wrote his application to Plan II at UT in crayon - and got in.  i would advise against doing that, but make them notice you.  i spent the first half of mine talking about how, for my entire life, i wanted badly to NOT be a lawyer.  not earth-shattering, but a little different.

most schools have a metric where some calculation of LSAT and GPA get you either rejected, admitted, or in a discretionary zone.  if you're in the discretionary zone, how do they choose you?  I don't know.  but standing out in some way surely can't hurt.

by billyzane on Nov 29, 2007 11:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That sounds like Plan II

What a bunch of jokers. I can only imagine what your friend's senior thesis was...

So take that.

by Kahuna on Nov 29, 2007 12:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

thanks

Yeah, I'm probably not a "presumtive" admit, at least not at the schools I would like to attend.  It seems like if one is on the margin after the LSAT/GPA index, the personal statement, then any number of factors could tip the scales one way or the other.  I'm hoping strength of undergrad institution plays into their criteria.
 

by Kool Hand on Nov 30, 2007 2:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

UGLY ABRAMS!

Everything is going so well, but Abrams' bad shooting night (2-10 from three) bothers me. Not trying to hate on him, but I worry that we might be a team that lives and dies by the three, and I HATE THAT!

We're better than that, especially when Johnson comes back. We don't need to be a team that has to shoot so many threes. It's never worked (as far as winning a NC) and it won't work for this team either. Take it inside and get more higher % shots. I hope we don't jack up threes when UCLA's defense tightens up.

by goingforthecorner on Nov 29, 2007 5:06 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Abrams

I didn't get to attend so, what happened with AJs shots? Were they good shots not going in or forced shots?

This team lives and dies with DJ not 3s.

AJ started 1-8. I feel like his first 3 shots are indicative of how he will shoot the rest of the game. If he misses his first three ro so behind the arc, I would like to see him try and get out in transition for an easy lay-up or penetrate and get a short jumper to get going.

Look at the team stats though. If you take out AJs shooting, the rest of the team shot 7-12 which is pretty decent with the 3 ball. AJ will have nights like this, hopefully few and far between this season, and hopefully against Texas Southerns.

by jimmer on Nov 29, 2007 7:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

AJ

had good looks early but missed at least his first three shots. The release looked the same as it has all season. He wasn't fading away or right or left. The shots just weren't dropping.

His confidence is always there, though, and the Horns were still running sets for him. He knockced down a couple in the second half, but Texas pulled away because of their ability to grab offensive rebounds and finish in the paint over smaller defenders.

Mason, James, and DJ picked up the scoring load in this one. But you're right: Texas will struggle to beat quality opponents if we don't get much offense out of AJ. That is also assuming that Johnson is still on the bench. When he comes back, he'll bring a legitimate inside scoring presence and greatly increase our ability to run an efficient offense even with the three-ball not dropping.

--AW--

by awiggo on Nov 29, 2007 9:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

AW or PB

Do you think Barnes will tinker with the line-up early on?

Who would be your starters for this game?

I'd go DJ, AJ, Damion, CA and Dex.

The problem with bringing in bigger guys like Dex and Wangmene is that they are turnover prone. UCLA will feast on that.

Cats and dogs sleeping together.

by EYESofBEVO on Nov 29, 2007 8:18 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

No

EOB,

I don't think Barnes will tinker with the lineup, nor do I believe he should. Unless Johnson is back, he'll go with the same starting five.

I do think that you'll see Wangmene a lot and Pittman for 10-15 min if the pace is slow. I was also impressed with the two lost post moves Chapman showed on Wednesday. His foot work was solid and his release was high. Chap is a legit 6-9 or 6-10 and will be a difficult match up for a smaller forward. We are probably going to need at least 10 fouls out of these three.

Last, I think you'll see Atchley play more on the preimeter if Love is guarding him. Connor can knock down the open three and is threat on the high screen and pop. He is comfortable popping back to three-poing arc and forcing his defender to guard him 20 feet from the basket. Love is probably too slow to guard James, so this is his most likely matchup. It would great if Connor could pull him away from the paint and allow James and Mason to crash the offensive glass.

--AW--

by awiggo on Nov 29, 2007 9:10 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Starting lineup

I don't get starting 3 guards, even if they are 3 of the best players on the team.  AJ and DJ are tiny and Mason is 6'2".  UT has to point toward beating A&M, KU, and playing well in March.  That is going to require some large bodies for defense and rebounding.  The big guys have to play so they will develop.  

There is virtually no depth at guard if UT starts 3 guards (JD Lewis is the 1st guard off the bench, right?).  Much better to go with 2 guards and let Mason relieve them (so they don't get worn down before march).

BTW, there needs to somebody who can play point guard if Augustin is hurt or in foul trouble.  Who is being developed?  Is it the kid from Turkey who just had knee surgery?  

for UCLA, here are the guys (and their heights) who played at least 10 minutes last night:

Aboya 6'8"
Moute 6'7"
Love 6'10"
Westbrook 6'3"
Ship 6'5"
Collison 6'0"
Real 6'8"
Dragovic 6'8"

by Kafka on Nov 29, 2007 12:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Balbay

The kid from Turkey was a huge loss for us. I agree that we're desperately thin at guard without him. The pro scout I talked to in April about Durant leaving told me Balbay was going to be a huge, huge addition to this team. Freaking sucks that we lost him.

As for playing the bigs - you're right, if there's a game to do it, it's this one. We're gonna have to learn to bang with these big teams.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Nov 29, 2007 1:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Is he out for the season

or could he come back?

For those that have seen several games how does Chapman compare to what we saw with Hill last season? Is more advanced?
Hill looked promising early on against scrubs, but quickly faded as the season went on.

Cats and dogs sleeping together.

by EYESofBEVO on Nov 29, 2007 1:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not sold on Matt Hill

Hill had some moments as a freshman but its hard for me to see him getting minutes this year, even if he was healthy. Matt is not a great athlete, doesn't have good leaping ability, isn't particulary skilled offensively, and has shown rocks for hands.

Chapman has a much bigger upside. He has good feet, solid back to the basket moves, and a good bball IQ.

Let me say it this way, if you want a big body off the bench, you put in Pittman; if you want offense, you put in Chapman; and if you want defense, you put in Wangmene. I just don't see Matt Hill having more upside than any of the other three young posts.

I don't want to be overly negative but the three players mentioned above are sophomore, freshman, freshman and none of there are declaring early for the NBA draft. Not to mention that Connor is a junior. When is Matt going to earn minutes?

--AW--

by awiggo on Nov 29, 2007 7:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Starting lineup

Just b/c we start three guards doesn't mean we have to bring in JD or stay with three guards. Our first move is to bring in Wang and go big or leave the three guards. DJ plays all 40 minutes, so we are really only subbing for 4 players.

As always, the mantra,"when/if gary johnson plays"

by jimmer on Nov 29, 2007 1:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Minutes

for the horns, there are two big tournaments that are the most important: the Big 12 tournament and march Madness.  The regular season is preparation for those tournaments.  I don't think playing Augustin 40 minutes/game (as you propose) is a viable strategy because it wears him down before the most important games of the year (i.e. the season concluding tournaments) are played.  It also increases the probability of him getting injured.  It also precludes developing the backup point guard that the horns need for an insurance policy.

The disadvantage of playing a smart defensive coach (like the UCLA coach) early in the year is that he will show other coaches how to defend UT.  UCLA will surely try to deny Augustin the ball and when he gets the ball, they will probably double him to force him to give up the ball.

The wingman is great at defense but not a lot of help on offense, right?  That means his man will probably be the guy that doubles Augustin whenever possible.  Might be better to go with Chapman to preserve spacing on the floor on offense (since Chapman can shoot outside).  These experiements have to be run.  The more time the horns run with 3 guards, the less time they have to figure out how to play against the big boys (i.e. an example of greedy optimization).

It will be great when Gary Johnson plays but until he does play, an alternative strategy has to be developed and employed during games.

by Kafka on Nov 29, 2007 1:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Minutes

I agree DJ should be rested, but I am merely telling you what I think Barnes will do. See Tenn. game where DJ played all 40. In big games, such as the UCLA game we are discussing, DJ will play the entire game.  The regular season gets you into good position for said tournaments, so experimentation in big games is not always the best idea if you are looking for a win.  DJ has even said that he is in really good shape so he can play 40 minutes.

In the games this season where victory has been assured we have seen Mason getting ample time at point. As noted in this thread, Balbay is out.  I see playing UCLA as an advantage b/c we get to see how we stack up against great competition and adjust accordingly.

Chapman/Wangmene is a fair argument. Great defense vs. possible offensive threat. Wangmene however has a nose for the offensive rebound, and I have a lot of confidence in DJ fending for himself.

I was joking about Gary Johnson because every other bball post has something about 'when/if gary johnson plays'.  I think the alternative strategy is to start three guards and then go big at points throughout the game.

by jimmer on Nov 29, 2007 2:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good points

It sounds like we pretty much agree on Augustin (i.e. rest him when possible but he has to play a bunch in the big games).  

UT plays zone (which has to be secretly killing Barnes) to hide Augustin and Abrams on D and to rest Augustin.  It is going to be real tough to win with a zone late in the season against a good team (the college 3 is a pretty easy shot).

Good to hear Mason is being developed at point guard.

Good point about the UCLA game being a useful measuring stick.  Given that college bball has March Madness and is every inclusive (i.e. 65 teams), there is not much worry about getting into the tournament so it pays to play tough competition and to experiment with your lineup to find out what works and what does not.

Good point about Chapman vs. Wangmene.  I guess the best way to find out is to experiement and see what works best.

Assuming UCLA does their utmost to get the ball out of Augustin's hands, this game should provide a data point about how effective this strategy is.  My guess is that it is effective this early in the season.

Good joke about Johnson (too bad I did not get it (my bad)).

by Kafka on Nov 29, 2007 2:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Kafka,

Barnes doesn't like starting three small guards. It kills him to give up offensive rebounds. And you're probably right, he doesn't like playing zone, although I think he's coming around. But even with all that said, Barnes is rightly putting the five best players on the floor.

Chapman, Wangmene, and Pittman are not ready and all for different reasons. Clint hasn't yet adjusted to big time college basketball. WingMan is so raw offensively and really hasn't been playing basketball for that long. Pittman is still probably not 100% healthy and has trouble changing ends.

And as Jimmer so accurately and cutely pointed out, this all changes with Gary Johnson. I expect James to step out to the wing and Mason to sit. Mason will be able to spell DJ at point, AJ at shooting guard, and James at the wing. Justin still probably plays 30 minutes but isn't a starter.

--AW--

by awiggo on Nov 29, 2007 7:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds like a plan

While I agree that Barnes is putting the 5 best players on the floor, I think, for training purposes,  playing Mason at the point and Chapman, WingMan,and Pittman as much as possible is prudent.  

If there were a definite timetable for Gary Johnson and I had actually seen him play a college game and knew he was likely to play the rest of the season, I would feel differently but, for now, I would like to see that 5th starter selected and get some serious playing time.  

Using Mason as a utility man for 3 positions sounds pretty good (he is an outstanding team player).  In the blow out games (and UT has already had a few), I would rest Augustin as much as possible and let mason play point to get him ready for the night when Augustin is sick.  

The blowout games are excellent opportunities to resolve the team's problem areas.  I don't see the 3 guard lineup working against the big boys (and those are the games that really count). Playing the 3 guard lineup the majority of the minutes in the easy games is a wasted developmental opportunity.

I am sure you are correct about Chapman, Wangmene, and Pittman not being ready yet but that is the reason that they need to be developed.  Play them as much as possible (even if it turns a 40 point victory into a 10 point victory).

Have you heard when Gary Johnson is supposed to be available?

by Kafka on Nov 29, 2007 11:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Collison

He was on the floor to help pummel my Colonials last night.  I imagine he'll be out there Saturday.

Definitely a contrasting styles game.

by DisplacedTexan on Nov 29, 2007 9:26 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Hey PB

How bout replacing that 2007 football schedule with something less depressing: say, the 2007 men's basketball schedule?

My adopted kid is pure genius at the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.

by jc25 on Nov 29, 2007 9:57 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Will work on that

Good suggestion

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Nov 29, 2007 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bevo_small
Aggie Week: Let's hear your favorite Aggie joke.
T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs UC Irvine Gameflow (+/- stats included)
Horns_small
Thanks to our Men & Women in the Armed Forces
Small
The Aggies are doing just enough this year to give us a good upset.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Thought Tre Newton was Suspended?
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Texas-Iowa Game Preview
Small
Colt McCoy Selected as 2009 O'Brien Finalist!
Clock_tower_small
Mystery Recruit?
Small
earl thomas vs trent hunter
Ut_vs_fau_8-30-2008_049_small
Poor, Disillusioned aggies
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
#2 in USA Today Coaches' Poll
Small
Ohio State and Oklahoma Uni's
Small
BCS Formula Question

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports