A Top Ten Recruiting Class And A Dollar Will Still Only Buy You A Pack Of Gum
Signing day has come and passed, and like the good Longhorn fans that we are, we waved our pom poms all day yesterday while sitting dutifully on the edges of our seats as we awaited "official confirmation" that all these 17 year olds would, in fact, attend our favorite university. For his part, Mack Brown's taken all the drama out of national signing day, making an already melodramatic national day of (mostly) needless teeth gnashing even more like watching an episode of MacGyver: no matter what happens - dude, you know it's gonna be fine.
In thinking through the big picture of Texas Longhorn recruiting, I found myself trying to think critically about Mack Brown's strategy of hyper-controlling the process as much as is humanly possible - like he's Adrian Monk at a high school pep rally, petrified of all the filthy germs, the chaos, the natural variance in a universe as orderless as the adolescent one. Not that I really blame him. Mack's had a few signing days like this one - one too many, in fact - to the point where getting the right class has become more about getting the right kinds of kids, as opposed to going after all the best players.
Now, yeah, I'm not kididng myself - there's a lot of overlap. Mack's still going after many of the most highly regarded football players in the state of Texas. But he's undeniably shifted his priorities away from being in the mix for every stud in pads toward simply making sure all his studs are guys who also fit his mold: No kids who want a circus recruiting saga. No kids with grade issues. No kids who might embarrass the coaches and university.
When we're honest about things, we have to admit that, for some of these kids, yesterday was the peak of their athletic lives - right there, at the fax machine, with camera bulbs popping, and the high school spirit team cheering with adoration. As of today, they're officially yesterday's news until they score a touchdown, record a sack, or block a punt. And the reality is that some of these guys will never even see a snap of live collegiate football.
That's why, when you really think about signing day, it pays to temper your expecations with a large dose of reality. Signing kids with talent is important, but turning them into great football players is far more critical to meeting the lofty goals we all set for our favorite teams. Player development, acceptable academic performance, and adequate discipline to avoid the countless pitfalls that await these kids will wind up going a lot further toward determining Texas' won-loss records over the next four years than any accumulation of grading stars ever could.
Recruiting is important, and it can even be fun, but try not to be a determinist about it all. It's simply one step in a long and complicated formula for collegiate football success. Teams don't win and lose games on signing day. Amidst a sea of uncertainty, that's one thing we can be sure of.
--PB--
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
I will do my best
by Kool Hand on Feb 8, 2007 1:20 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Great example
Football is important, as is winning, but in most of these kids cases it is just a four-year leg of their journey through life - most will be far better served by what they accomplish in the classroom than what they do on the field. But for my sanity and selfish pride, I hope they do pretty damned well on the football field too!
by Screw O.U. on Feb 8, 2007 5:47 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Screwou, your last
by ouALWAYSsux on Feb 8, 2007 8:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I heard Weis on my podcast this morning
The "commitment" doesn't mean anything anymore.
IMO, Mack has already put down the ground work and has the system for an early signing period, probably more than any program in the country.
by EYESofBEVO on Feb 8, 2007 9:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ok....not that anyone cares beyond Texas football
1st
Here is the story from the Times (pretty weak) with veiled half-ass accusations, without any proof what so ever. Basically everyone thinks Zook is a big cheaty pants -- and they don't know how he recruits so well.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/07/sports/ncaafootball/07illinois.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&oref=slo gin&adxnnlx=1170873285-T8t0Ha9YHjIM/pUy/E6YjQ&oref=slogin
Money quote:
"But Jim Delany, the commissioner of the Big Ten, made an unsolicited call to a reporter for The New York Times to say that "blogosphere smoke" was the reason for any suspicion surrounding the Illinois class. "Around signing day," he said, "smoke does not equal fire.""
2nd
Now there is this piece from my local main man Teddy Greenstein of the Tribune, "An ill wind blows" http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/college/cs-070207greenstein,1,2215776.column?coll=chi-sportstop -hed
Money quote: "This was a day in which whispered accusations gave way to outright hostility, a day on which two prominent recruits dissed Notre Dame, and Illinois was left defending its recruiting practices after signing a top-15 class."
...."Illinois officials wouldn't acknowledge it, but there's little doubt they suspect Notre Dame is behind the accusations."
by EYESofBEVO on Feb 8, 2007 9:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
what Mack said
Timmons, Edorian, Ramonce and some others have played an instrumental role in how Mack approaches who he offers. The days of Mack going out on a limb and taking a chance are over. We saw him not invite or offer some top 100 players because there were doubts.
by UTeed on Feb 8, 2007 9:51 AM CST reply actions 0 recs



























