The Times They Are A Changin'
As noted over in the diaries, Nederland linebacker Dravannti Johnson decommitted from Texas A&M and switched to Texas. The 6-2, 220 pounder will play linebacker his senior season, but most believe he's going to be a defensive end at the collegiate level.
There are a lot of interesting threads in the aforementioned diary, one of which I want to comment on. I'm not necessarily sure this applies to anyone here, but there seems to be a misperception among some Texas fans that Mack Brown is "settling" a litle bit (talent-wise) by focusing so strongly on high-character athletes. I actually think that's backwards, and I'll explain why.
Mack Brown has made his name by being out in front of everyone else in the recruiting game - so much so, that he's almost a little bit like Oakland Athletics' general manager Billy Beane of Moneyball fame. Admittedly, that may seem like a stretch, but there's truth in the comparison.
It's not so much that Mack Brown's strength is an ability to capitalize on inefficiencies in the recruiting market (though there's some of that, too), it's that he's consistently ahead of the learning curve in these matters. Getting early commitments from Texas football players didn't start until Mack Brown took advantage of that. His competitors have scrambled to catch up, but they've largely played second fiddle.
Now Mack is making a new adjustment, and it's an interesting one. The decision to completely shut out recruits who the program's evaluators have red flagged as potential problems is not a reflection of some greater moral character of Texas' coaches. This decision has far less to do with idealism than pragmatism. The fact is that the sports media environment has changed dramatically over the last five to ten years. Bad publicity is more destructive in 2007 than it was in 1997. The explosion of 24/7/365 sports coverage - both on the television and internet - have changed the way fans take in their sports.
That change in the media landscape is having an effect on sports leagues across the board. The NBA commissioner issues dress codes for his league's players. The new NFL commissioner's "top priority" is cleaning up the league's criminal image. To that end, players like Pacman Jones are being suspended for a year. Baseball has finally gotten around to dealing with performance-enhancing substances. The timing of all these maneuvers is not coincidental.
Things are undeniably changing. And they have, are, and will continue to change at the NCAA level, too. It's going to become more and more difficult to hide problem players in a program. Baby slaps on the wrist - the norm just a decade ago - are now hyper-scrutinized by journalists and bloggers. The NCAA, like every other sports governing body, is making changes. There are already scholarships on the line, and I'd argue that the momentum is moving toward more sanctioning in the coming years - not less.
Bringing it back to Mack Brown, I think he's right on top of this development and is moving quickly to get out in front of the storm. It's not only inherently nice to have high character guys representing your university, but it's becoming increasingly practical. Mack's not "settling" for high character players; he's avoiding the penalties that can and do accompany problem players.
It's not only smart - it will prove effective.
--PB--
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I couldn't have said it better myself
You are absolutely right on. You ever want to say something, but everytime you do, it just comes out wrong? This is what I was wanting to say.
Where is the mainstream media on this?
Is it only our great guru moderator PB who is having these insights? This is clearly a big big story in NCAA football, and Texas is a state that is clearly crazy about NCAA football and recruiting, so why don't we see articles about the NMRS (New Mack Recruiting Strategy) in the Dallas Morning News, the Houston Chronicle, the Ft Worth Star-Telegram? Notice I don't list the Statesman, although they should pick this story thread up given that they post BON columns on Bevo Beat.
Once again, BON has the scoop.
And like in so many things that Mack does, it's not just the SMART thing to do, it's the RIGHT thing to do.
by patienthornsfan on Apr 24, 2007 12:08 PM CDT reply actions
This helps the recruits in the long run,
bc during the NFL evaluation period the scouts know that UT players aren't as risky, and increases their draft stock. There was a great nfl.com article about the UT pro day, where scouts were educated about Mack's drug testing program.
"Brown said that the team has a drug policy similar to the NFL's - if a player fails to show up for a scheduled drug test, it is treated as if the player gave a failed sample." It's a cool article by Gil Brandt, I recommned it for reading. http://nfl.com/draft/story/10078901
it's a chancy enterprise...
trying to predict NCAA behavior. I guess we'll see what happens w/OU...
If nothing serious is done with OU and/or USC, it's going to be a new era of cheating, particularly with the bigger "bulletproof" schools. And your point here will look rather naive.
However, as of right this moment, there's every reason to believe this will all play out like you predict. And if so, you're right, Mack's out in front of the pack again. Even if the NCAA doesn't actually develop teeth, it's probably a good idea anyway. At some point, the actual talent level is less important than the more nebulous "character" level, in concrete areas like staying qualified, and maybe more so in things like team esprit de corps. Like we all said (and sadly, were not heeded by the likes of Casserly/McNair), Vince Young's greatest talent may lie in what he brings to the team in non-athletic ways. Generally, I think a team of driven players working together will almost always beat a team out only for themselves.
by agent orange on Apr 25, 2007 4:28 PM CDT reply actions
Clarification
I don't necessarily mean that the NCAA is going to start throwing programs the Death Penalty all the sudden. It's damn difficult to sufficiently prove "lack of institutional control" and all that jazz. But I do expect we're going to see clearer rules with clearer penalties for poor graduation rates and what not.
It's worth noting, too, that even when the NCAA doesn't bomb a program with penalties, that's often because school's preemptively self-impose penalties on themselves to try to satiate the regulators.
Great insight, PB
You make a great argument. Mack Brown and his staff are adjusting to the increasingly pervasive nature of information in the 21st century. Like you said, it isn't coincidental that the pro leagues have made sweeping changes, and college football will be forced to follow.
Miami is another good example of how bad publicity on a program induces change at the top. Larry Coker gets replaced by hardass Randy Shannon.
Rather than allow a scandal to envelope Texas football, MB has employed a policy of prevention. His Zero Tolerance recruiting is yet another of his ahead-of-the-curve measures, which other programs will surely emulate.

by 




























