Most valuable College Football Teams
by UT2001 on Jun 4, 2007 10:28 PM CDT
Email
PrintI'm lazy (and if I'm violating some blog rule just let me know) so I'll link to the boys at the Michigan Zone site who link to the Forbes magazine site.
http://michiganzone.blogspot.com/
We're number 2 behind the Irish.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
USC
Perennial powerhouse the University of Southern California, which is playing in the Rose Bowl this year, did not make our top 15 because the team’s profits were too low to contribute as much to their schools as did our 15 finalists.
???
Anyone have an explanation for this? Apathetic SoCalers? Money paid to Joe McKnight sapping profits?
They dont sell out games
... although their stadium holds a bunch.
and they dont have the kind of big money (football) donors that Texas/ OU/ A&M/ SEC teams have.
by the other Andrew on Jun 5, 2007 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions
My understanding
was that boosters weren't factored into the calculations, unless Forbes includes these under the "sponsorships" category.
by Old Tex29 on Jun 5, 2007 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
