Texas Longhorns Depth Chart Analysis: Offense vs Arkansas State
First day of classes is over, I've had time to cook dinner and relax, and we can get into the depth chart breakdowns with a little more fervor.
PREFACE
We've got to get a few caveats out of the way here. For one thing, as a general rule: Coaches Know Best. There's plenty of room for analysis, questioning, and even second-guessing the decisions that the coaching staff makes - on and off the field. That's one of the things we do here.
However, it's critical we note that our overall confidence in this coaching staff and their decisions is extraordinarily high. We grade Mack Brown and his staff out very, very highly in virtually everything they do. It needs to be said that we're supporters of this regime and mindful that they're making decisions with infinitely more data than we are.
With that said, this is a freaking Texas sports site. We're all here because we care about Texas football, and damnit, we wanna win. We're gonna analyze it to death. Like the coaches, sometimes we'll be wrong.
Onward to the depth chart.
QB
1. Colt McCoy 2. John Chiles
No surprises here. Harris' knee injury precludes his appearance on the depth chart versus Arkansas State, which means the only big question here is how much and in what manner the coaches intend to use #2 John Chiles. We've gone over that many, many times now, so at this point, it's just Wait And See.
RB
1. Jamaal Charles 2. Chris Ogbonnaya --OR-- Vondrell McGee
No surprises here, either. It'll be interesting to see both how the coaches employ the backup, as well as how each performs early on. I still like Ogbonnaya's chances to be a reliable, Priest Holmes-like weapon in short-yardage and goal-to-go situations. As for McGee, the kid's got a ton of talent, wiggling and banging through space with remarkable ability.
FLANKER (Z)
1. Nate Jones 2. James Kirkendoll --OR-- Brandon Collins
One of the big surprises (Seriously, how the hell does the Statesman run this blog entry right after the two-deep is released?) from today's depth chart was that the coaches elected to start a fullback instead of three wideouts. That changes the formation from our original projections. If you're not familiar with the I-formation, the "flanker" receiver is the wideout who stands a yard or two back from the line, at the quarterback's flank.

This is a departure from the three wideout shotgun spread look Texas was employing last season with McCoy. Presumably, the pileup of injuries among the receivers led the coaches to this adjustment and, though it's not what Texas fans should want to see, we have to note that this is the depth chart for Arkansas State alone. It's too early - way too early - to start defaming the season's offensive gameplan.
What we do know is that Texas is going to be running a very conservative offense in the opener. We're gonna run the ball straight ahead, and we're gonna run a very basic passing package off the power running game. Health permitting, we can hope that things will open up from there, but at least for week one, things are going to be straight ahead.
Anyway, Sweed is listed below as Quan's backup, but I think the reshuffling really means he's unlikely to play unless Texas finds itself in an improbable scrap with Arkie State. There's not much to worry about for the season opener, but Texas really needs Limas healthy. Injuries killed 2006. Let's hope they don't kill 2007, as well. We're off to a dubious start.
TIGHT END
1. Jermichael Finley 2. Peter Ullman --OR-- Blaine Irby
Greg Davis' offense over the last few years has consistently worked three deep at the tight end position, so it's not surprising to see Irby listed here. I think in a perfect world, they might try to protect Irby, but as it is, he's gonna be on the field.
RT
1. Adam Ulatosky 2. Kyle Hix
And so it begins. Hix is one of three true freshmen to make the two deep on the offensive line, and though Ulatoski is ready for his role as a full-time starter in the Big 12, the Webb/Watts transfers really rear their heads on this depth chart. Kyle Hix - all 6-7, 320 pounds of him - would normally be a surprise to see here.
RG
1. Chris Hall --OR-- Cedrick Dockery 2. Michael Huey
Mack Brown said in his press conference that Dockery is incredibly close to being all the way back, but that they don't think he's quite ready to play 60-70 snaps just yet. Given that, the chairs were reshuffled, at least for week one, to allow Dockery to ease his way back into things. Additionally, the coaches can test out Charlie Tanner at left guard and see just how close he is to being a consistent contributor. No harm in finding out against Arkansas State.
C
1. Dallas Griffin --OR-- Chris Hall 2. Buck Burnette
Dockery and Burnette are both on the cusps of full recoveries from injury, which is why you see this rather creative either>and/or...if-Then depth chart. Not much to say here other than: get. healthy. now. Allofyou.
LG
1. Charlie Tanner 2. Britt Mitchell
It's put-up-or-shut-up time for Charlie Tanner, as the myriad injuries allow him a season opening start. Britt Mitchell, a 6-5, 300 pound redshirt freshman from Kilgore, will back him up. Once everyone gets healthy, this is going to be one fierce competition for playing time on the Texas offensive line. Lot of big, talented bodies.
LT
1. Tony Hills 2. Tray Allen
Tony Hills is your man for '07. Allen is your man for 2008 and beyond. Allen needs to be on the two deep, he needs to play meaningful minutes this year, and he's eventually going to slide in and be one of Texas best tackles during the Mack Brown era once Hills graduates. The depth at tackle isn't exactly ideal for 2007, but my are these young linemen impressive.
SPLIT END (X)
1. Quan Cosby --OR-- Limas Sweed
I guess this is some sort of nod that Limas is close to being at full strength (at least let's hope so), but I think it's really more an indication that the staff doesn't intend to use him much, if at all. And why bother? Arkansas State won't win the game regardless, and there's no sense in giving Gary Patterson a look at what Texas really wants to do.
In fact, I'll note that if this depth chart is a game of misdirection for TCU, then it's a smart one. If there's one thing Patterson and his Horned Frogs can do, it's frustrate an offensive gameplan. It very well might be that Texas intends to open the 2007 offense up in week two - not week one. I wouldn't complain about that strategy one bit.
FB
1. Luke Tiemann 2. Antwan Cobb
I really find it hard to believe Texas is going to switch to an I-Formation with Colt McCoy all year. Maybe in week one, or against other opponents we can pound to death, but not as an operating philosophy. We just don't have any reasont to believe that's the case. At least not yet. Let's see if Texas can catch a break or two with the injuries.
Up next: the defense.
--PB--
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
QB
Doesn't sound like they intend to use Chiles much in this game, by the sounds of this (Mack's quote from the press conference):
"What we would do is plan on playing Colt [McCoy] as the quarterback and John [Chiles] would be in a back-up role. Unless some things changes between now and Saturday, we would not play him the third series in the game like we have in some other situations. We would just let Colt be the starting quarterback and John is the back-up quarterback. He would come in as needed."
by crocodile235 on Aug 27, 2007 11:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You're right
Looks like Colt will play entire first half and part of second; Chiles will mop up. Again, the lack of depth here necessitates this.
The Harris injury has complicated things.
Damn - injuries everywhere have complicated everything.
GET HEALTHY LONGHORNS
by Peter Bean on Aug 27, 2007 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
doesn't sound like they have committed to burning
doesn't sound like they have committed to burning Chiles' shirt.
as for this....
In fact, I'll note that if this depth chart is a game of misdirection for TCU, then it's a smart one. If there's one thing Patterson and his Horned Frogs can do, it's frustrate an offensive gameplan. It very well might be that Texas intends to open the 2007 offense up in week two - not week one. I wouldn't complain about that strategy one bit.
this just isn't what's going on - every year, we open up with an insipid gameplan and that's what we play with until we lose.
by cortexas on Aug 28, 2007 12:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
how are they NOT going to burn chiles' redshirt?
harris can't play against arkie st. who knows beyond that? you think they're really going to keep mccoy in for the ENTIRE game?
sorry, the harris injury necessitated burning chiles' redshirt. there's just no way around it.
by billyzane on Aug 28, 2007 3:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how we won't burn chiles' redshirt --
depending on Harris' prognosis, i don't think it would be absurd to play one of the walk-ons in the second half of Arkansas State, hope McCoy can play through TCU and see how Harris is doing in vs. UCF.
I thought it was strange that MB didn't say anything about Chiles playing this week - only being "ready" to play if needed.
we have 3 other mop up QBs until Harris is back



by cortexas on Aug 28, 2007 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
okay
those last 2 are clearly 12 and 13, respectively.
regardless, while of course it's possible that we could play a 13 year old at QB in the second half of Arkie St and still win the game and Colt could play all the way through TCU, that's terrible coaching.
What if Colt gets hurt during TCU or against UCF? Then you have no one who's ever taken a snap in a college game other than a 13-year old walk-on. And what if Harris' injury takes a lot longer to heal than we think it will? That's a possibility. Then you still have to burn the redshirt but also just wasted 3 weeks not playing Chiles when you could have been.
If you're right, then I'll definitely give you props for reading Mack Brown. And I'll simultaneously call it the stupidest decision Mack's ever made.
by billyzane on Aug 28, 2007 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
especially strange
That comment was especially strange given that on Aug 22, Mack said Chiles would "play this year" and that the fans "would be pleased" with what they saw. If he's going to play, now's the time to get the jitters out. Based on the timing of Sherrod Harris' injury, he won't be game ready until KState, if then (2-4 weeks for a sprained knee is always optimistic for a guy who makes his living with his wheels instead of his arm). I don't know how we can live with walk-ons all the way through September.
But maybe I'm wrong and Sherrod Harris is due back earlier than anticipated, in which case the difference in Mack quotes between Aug 22 and Aug 27 might make sense.
by burnt in ny on Aug 28, 2007 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man
Think how good our offense would have been in 2005 if they had lost and then gotten rid of that insipid gameplan.
by Wells on Aug 28, 2007 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're right
i'm not usually one to disparage our offense.
i've been reading too much barking carnival.
by cortexas on Aug 28, 2007 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Z flanker
we should get him the same colored jersey. He's kind of obvious in red.
by the other Andrew on Aug 28, 2007 12:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey Cortexas
Thanks for giving me a thoroughly unproductive morning at work. That Barking Carnival site is absolutely hilarious.
by jc25 on Aug 28, 2007 1:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
mind of Mack
I think MB is still torn between how he wants to play. Reading between the lines of his press conferences, I think he is REALLY happy with Ogbonnaya and McGee and figures that run blocking against Arkie State is easier and less risky to Colt than pass blocking. Don't forget, the strength of Arkie State is their secondary (but I'm not sure what Mack is smoking when he says they have four NFL prospects back there).
Mostly I think he wants to see if UT CAN BE a smashmouth team. I mean, if you can't pound it for 300+ yards even against the weak sisters (and in some years, like 2002, this was the case) then you know you have to go to the spread and just get on with it.
by burnt in ny on Aug 28, 2007 7:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs


























