"We're not playing together"
I couldn't help but notice the following Charles quote from yesterday's press conference:
"I don’t know why we’re not dominating, but we’re winning games still. We’re not playing together, but when we connect and when we play together you’ll see us. We’re not dominating right now, but we keep getting better and better every week."
(on MB-TF)
I ignored the optimism bit and focused on the fact that even Charles recognizes that they aren't playing together. This seems to be the key problem. We have great talent at all (at least most) positions, yet the team isn't gelling.
I'd be interested to hear people's opinions on why this is happening.
Personality problems? We've got quite a range of kids here, from felons to future lawyers. . .
No leaders? No one seems to have stepped up yet.
Overconfidence? Underconfidence?
Dissatisfaction with the coaching schemes?
Also, can this be fixed?
Can a team be born from a group of individuals? You can't teach camaraderie. You can't force people to be in synch.
And what about PASSION? I watched OTHER teams play with it this weekend.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
Lack of leadership
I think it's been mentioned many times in the media and on this blog. There isn't that VY or Michael Huff to lead vocally or by example. Mack isn't a Stoops type of coach (hate to say it) who can be the sole leader himself. He has to depend on players to do it. It harkens back to the days of Chris Simms where the team was "cliquey" and Mack couldn't fix it. Some of those teams were uber-talented. Major Applewhite did his best to change it because he was the fiery leader who everyone looked to.
Plus this team lacks confidence after how last year ended and this one has started. That kills a team without great leadership. Everyone is looking to someone else for the solution. Sometimes it doesn't ever click - I hope some players can step up and help flip that switch. After all that has happened, it will take a strong team to fight through it and be successful.
by JT Longhorn on Sep 18, 2007 2:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
leadership
by UTHorns on Sep 19, 2007 9:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
camaraderie
You can't teach camaraderie.
Oh, yes you can. That's the first thing they start teaching you in the Army. If your battle buddy is ate up, you're all ate up. And they punish the team for one persons mistake.
Eventually, everybody helps each other out because they realize if the unit doesn't succeed, neither does the individual. If JC is saying that they're just not "playing together", the problem (theoretically) is simple.
The players dont trust or care enough about the man to the left and the man to the right of them. That's why our military units are so successful. We care for the guys we go in to fight with, and we learn how to do things right so that, individually, we can be a strong link in the chain. We learn how to work together, and live by the motto "Leave No Man Behind".
I think it would be a good idea for Mack to take a practice off, and send the team to a team building course. One of the fastest ways to improve a team's chemistry is force them into a situation where the only way they can succeed is by working together.
by bleed burnt orange on Sep 19, 2007 11:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
huh
good point! that would work, especially if the guys were actually on-board and wanted to work--believed in the process, etc. but it certainly couldn't hurt, either way!
by crocodile235 on Sep 19, 2007 12:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Leadership
I agree with the others - lack of leadership is the key problem. Which player is leading this team? IMHO it should be the QB. Somebody needs to step up, lead this team and climb in these guys asses to let them know they are underachieving and that it is completely unacceptable.
This team reminds me of teams pre-Vince...tons of talent, zero heart.
by Screw O.U. on Sep 19, 2007 7:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















