Friday Four Questions: TCU
Apologies for the light posting yesterday and, I'm afraid, today. These last two days mark the end of various law school orientation activities, so I should be on firmer ground heading forward.
Anyhow, we've dug into the TCU game some now, but now's our day to assert our feelings heading into game weekend. We'll do this just like the EDSBS Live Four Questions. I'll offer my own thoughts, but I want your answers to each question in the comments.
1. Are you more concerned about Texas struggling to score on TCU's defense, or Texas' defense allowing too many yards and points to TCU?
This is actually a tough one because the standout units for each team are the Texas offense and TCU defense. Intuitively, I want to say I'm more worried about the Texas defense, but in this case, I think the bigger concern has to be the offense. It's not that I worry about the unit's viability in general; it's that I worry about TCU dictating the pace of this game. The Horned Frogs want a low scoring slugfest. To the extent that this game becomes a burner, they're in trouble.
2. What kinds of offensive changes do you want to see this Saturday?
I think we have to accept the premise that Davis wants to run this offense from the shotgun. That, in and of itself, is not problematic. Rather, what I'm looking for is a willingness to tweak the way we're using Jamaal Charles. TCU wants to shut down our run, and they want to be the aggressor. I'd like to see Texas do more to stretch and spread the back of the TCU defense while working Charles open underneath.
3. Your prediction for the Longhorn player of the game?
Limas Sweed. If there's one area where I think Texas can pick on TCU, it's deep with Limas. It's hard to predict exactly how Patterson intends to scheme us, but I'd be surprised if Limas Sweed didn't find himself in a lot of one-on-one coverage tomorrow. If so? I like him to get the Texas offense going.
4. Your prediction for the game?
TCU keeps things close with solid defense and rushing in the first half, but Texas wears 'em down overall.
Texas 27
TCU 20
--PB--
0 recs |
49 comments
Comments
4 Questions 4 Answers
- I'm more worried that the defense will crumble. The TCU defense can stop the run, and will probably come after McCoy, but there's no reason to believe the Texas receivers can't thrive against TCU's secondary.
- Introduce the Pistol, I'll post about this soon. JC needs a running start.
- Quan Cosby. Texas will win through the air, but Patterson's too smart not to bracket Limas most of the game after seeing that he's healthy. Look for Quan to take advantage.
- Texas 42 - TCU 20
TCU stays in it to start, but a couple Longhorn TDs force them to move away from the run game and the house caves in on them.
by aorist9 on Sep 6, 2007 11:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The pistol???
You mean that new-fangled offense that Nevada runs?
Congrats on ND Law, my wife graduated from undergrad there and she loved it.
by HMFIC04 on Sep 7, 2007 5:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember Hodges Mitchell
Hodges struggled until he started from ~2 yards further back, thus picking up more speed before he hit the line. Good point, JC may need to do the same.
by burntup on Sep 7, 2007 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
All the answers
Actually new at this and I don't really even know if this is where you are supposed to answer but I'll take a shot.
- The defense will be fine. I hope to holy hell that our corners don't give a 15 yard cushion every play this week. Front line will cause fits for the Frogs but always worried about the Linebackers and the DE's containment on misdirection. Offense is where im scared. It supposed to be our strength and we were really bad last weekend. I don't know if Colt is gonna have enough time to let plays develop downfield which may lead to lots of underneath passes(may end up a blessing). I think it all relies on the runnning game. Their front D is good but I think we can get passed them. Play a solid game with solid game plan and we score enough to win. (C'mon Greg)
- Couldn't agree more with the original comments. Would like to see more double moves from Limas like the TD against Ark St. Play action with Finley! Play action at all!
- Hopefully #25...He's great and real close to going crazy we just have to get a rythym going.
- Texas 31 TCU 17
Love the site, just signed up yesterday.
Hook em'
P.S. - I have never seen a worse hands team play then the one on the first onside kick last Saturday. Foster deserved to get punished on the second go round'.
by utjltex on Sep 7, 2007 12:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
quit nagging foster about his cushion...
he's not backing off the WRs, he's backing up in the off chance the opposing team decides to do a 1st and 10 pooch punt
by bleed burnt orange on Sep 7, 2007 1:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly though...
- Concerned about playing the pass, then giving up the run early....only to get burnt by the pass late and often.
- Run North/South.
- Player of the Game - Colt McCoy 237 yds, 4 TDs, 1 INT. Jamaal Rushes for 92, 1 TD.
- Both teams come out timid. Texas strikes first, TCU counters. Texas strikes again and forces a TCU turnover. Goes into half up 17-7.
Final ::Texas 41 - TCU 20
by bleed burnt orange on Sep 7, 2007 2:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Answers
- The defense, hands down. Colt won't have two bad games in a row. So unless the changes alluded to in the article below happen, I think TCU victimizes the Tweedles for two embarassing long TD plays, and scores just enough to win a high-scoring game.
Longhorns' starters officially on notice
By JIMMY BURCH
Star-Telegram Staff WriterAUSTIN -- The videotapes have been graded and the Texas depth chart, at multiple positions, remains clouded as the No. 7 Longhorns prepare for Saturday's meeting against No. 19 TCU.
"There could be potential changes," said coach Mack Brown, who relayed that message in a "point-blank" address to players after last week's 21-13 escape from Arkansas State. "If we do make changes, those will come later in the week."
One area under consideration for personnel shuffling is the secondary, said co-defensive coordinator Duane Akina. Texas allowed 272 passing yards against Arkansas State. Akina said free safety Marcus Griffin is safe. But Akina might tweak the rest of the lineup, which includes strong safety Erick Jackson and cornerbacks Brandon Foster and Ryan Palmer.
- Just get Finley involved. Throw at him at least 10 times. There is no matchup for him on the TCU D.
- McCoy
- Tweedles benched: Texas 31 TCU 24 Tweedles play: Texas 31 TCU 34
by patienthornsfan on Sep 7, 2007 5:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup
the DBs controlling big plays and offensive line playing up to par will win the game.
I finally watched the Arkie st game last night.
Hall, Ulatoskis, Palmer and Foster are not D1 starters. They just aren't. I don't care what they look like in gym shorts. It pains me to say this, because I really like Hall and have been pulling for him, but he got pimp slapped in that game last weekend.
For anyone wanting to know how the game is going pay real close attention to Hall and Ulatoskis. If you see them falling to the ground like last weekend, then prepare yourself for a loss and Colt coming out on a stretcher. If they can at least provide minimal obstruction to the D-line mauling Colt then maybe they eek out some plays.
They are also part of the reason short yardage is not working. Tough to get yards when your blockers are lying on the ground.
Foster and Palmer will cost a minimum of two TDs tomorrow. They play with heart, but miss the ball entirely.
by EYESofBEVO on Sep 7, 2007 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Close enough
- I'm more concerned about Texas' defense because if we play soft, TCU has the offensive patience to stay on the field 35+ minutes. This greatly reduces the margin for error (fewer possessions to screw up) for the wheezy music box that is currently the Texas offense.
- UT must attack the middle of the field either with slants and drags by Quan Cosby, curls and seams by Finley, and draws and crossing routes to JC. I'd like to see Finley get at least 5 catches and hopefully 8.
- If the player of the game is not Colt McCoy, we lose, so I'm picking Colt. The key to the game is his decision-making, which in the past has been excellent, but it wasn't last week. TCU will be stunting and blitzing or faking such to try to get their DE's one on one with the tackles and to try to hold a running back in the backfield to block. It's absolutely essential that Colt make the hot read and get out of bad plays. Regardless of his yards and TD's if he has no interceptions and 2 or fewer sacks, he should be MVP for the game.
- I stand by my prediction from Monday: Texas 20 TCU 17. We get better special teams plays and just enough offense to win, but still can't get TCU off the field.
by burnt in ny on Sep 7, 2007 6:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It seems to me
that its entirely possible for Colt to have a good game and the horns still lose. That usually happens when the running game is ineffective and predictable.
Contrarily, can you imagine JC running for 200yds in a loss?
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 7, 2007 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chicken or the Egg?
JC not gaining 200 yards could be the reaction of being down and going to the passing game more to save clock and not an indication of the effectiveness of the running game.
by Wells on Sep 7, 2007 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess what I meant was
we haven't seen that kind of rushing effort from a Texas back in a long time. I'm pretty confident that if JC has 200 yds, it means we're seeing a different running scheme.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 7, 2007 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Either that or..
we could just play in the Big East. That does wonders for overinflation of stats
by inVINCEable on Sep 7, 2007 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
4Q's and 4A's
1.While I am worried about the potential antics of Dee and Dum, I think the TCU offense can only score in the low 20s on Texas on a good night. Therefore, I am more worried about Texas keeping Colt upright and clearing some lanes for JC.
2.JC between the tackles. I'm tired of this slow developing Shotgun Counter shit. I want to see JC hit the line at 100 mph. Whether that means draws up the middle out of the gun, or getting him some touches out of I or Ace, let him get up to speed instead of letting the defense get a head start.
3.Texas' offensive line. If they keep Colt relatively clean, and give JC a couple of good lanes, things will all fall into place. Yall know the story, JC gets going, and the deep ball to Limas opens up.
4.Texas 31, TCU 13... Excellent defensive effort FROM A NEW LOOK SECONDARY that sees Kelson, Brown, and Brown get a considerable number of snaps. Okam blows up numerous plays in the backfield and forces mistakes out of the young TCU QB. On offense, Colt gets back to his old self and the attack clicks more like we want it to.
Oooohhh baby, I've been lookin forward to this one...
by Sweed4Heisman on Sep 7, 2007 8:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
great Royal quote on TCU
Got this from the Chronicle this morning:
They've probably only vaguely have heard of Royal's famous line after the Horned Frogs' 6-0 victory denied the Longhorns a chance at the 1961 national championship.
"They're like a bunch of cockroaches," Royal said. "It's not what they eat and carry off. It's what they get into and mess up."
Classic Royal. Anyway, I think we will win this thing going away. As usual, our game depends on our secondary and linebackers. If we cant get TCU off the field, it will be a long, bloody night and Colt won't even get a chance to shine. I think we will have our way with their running game, but we will have to elevate on 3rd down. I think it will be a great game that hinges on 2 things for a Longhorn victory. 3rd down defense and 3rd down offense.
Texas 28
TCU 17
by kicker on Sep 7, 2007 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE: Friday Four Questions: TCU
- Neither, to be honest. I would say that there is more room for error on offense then there is on Defense but that's true every game. I think Texas will thoroughly dominate TCU this game on both sides of the ball.
- I'd like to see a few more screen passes if the Defense is getting to Colt often. It sounds like TCU is going to want to bring blitzes often to throw off Colt's superior "skillz". That being the case, throw to JC, OGNYA, and Jermichael Finley. Wow a tight end screen would be sexy if he is at all a decent runner. Even if they only used Jamaal like Tech uses their running backs (That is, letting him get out in the flats past the line and throwing the ball to him) he would be more succesful than your standard fast guy sweep.
- Jamaal Charles. Dude has the potential EVERY game to have a monster game. I know we haven't seen it yet but with Colt Struggling, it's good to see him getting over 100 yards last week. I think that if they are both clicking, defenses will be hurting.
- All the people doubting Colt and Texas (Myself and all the other Texas fans who are nervous included) have their minds put to rest by your standard run of the mill "Stomp your patsy" week while Texas blows out TCU.
Texas: 45
TCU: 10
by inVINCEable on Sep 7, 2007 8:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This game isn't just about schemes and
playing time.
Texas needs to come out sky high with tude and energy. If they return to the pre-Vince malaise this could be a long Saturday night.
This will be a test of attitude.
by EYESofBEVO on Sep 7, 2007 9:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Answers...
- I think you have to be worried more about the defense - we know if the offensive weapons are taken advantage of they should put up points on anyone. Combine that with (hopefully!) some new starters in the secondary and it's an untested defense.
- Less JC starting from a standstill - TCU is too talented to put up with that. A confident and cool Colt - he can fight through Greg Davis's occasional playcalling issues.
- Give me Quan Cosby. He's a security blanket already and with Limas probably being the focus, he might break a couple for TD's.
- Texas 34 TCU 10
I'm getting a 2004 vibe here - recall the 12-0 loss to OU, followed by an 8-point home victory against Mizzou (in which UT was outgained by 60 yards). Word is Texas is down, and they have to go play a cocky Tech team in Lubbock. Expecting a fight, Texas rolls 51-21 as Vince Young imposes his will. Colt imposes his Saturday.
by JT Longhorn on Sep 7, 2007 9:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm scared...somebody hold me
One. Defense, defense, defense: if the linebackers can't get to the appropriate gap, Mr. Bean can gain 117 yards on Saturday. I know the Akina 4-3 doesn't feature the 'backers as it would the D-linemen, but good-gawd-man. Fill a hole. The secondary needs no more mentioning. We know what needs to be done (just like at the end of "Ol' Yeller").
Two. Call me crazy, but how about J. Charles eight yards from the line of scrimmage, C. McCoy UNDER CENTER (hold on, this just might be crazy enough to work) and the O-linemen pulling and blocking on traps and counters? Yes? No? J. Charles working and runninig downhill with starting blocks and the O-linemen decisively getting on a body as opposed to the zone-block-pattycake we saw last week just might be crazy enough to work (cue Gene Wilder from "Young Frankenstein"...IT...COULD...WORK!)
Three. Frank Okam, 4 sacks, 4 TFL, 1 TO. This is where you win the turnover battle. Get the pluses on your side early and often. He's just the spark plug to do it.
Four. Do you guys ever watch "Pinks" on the SPEED channel? It's compelling stuff. Tough to tear yourself away from the telee when you land there flipping incessantly. When a good race is on, and it's neck and neck and there is a ton of pride and capital at stake, sometimes the race is...
TOO CLOSE TO CALL.
Giggity. Shoutout to my boys at the Law School and B-school for hooking a broheim up with a in-demand ticket. Hell, I will road trip for that anytime.
by DKRismycopilot on Sep 7, 2007 9:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think its become gratuitous
for people to call the Longhorn nation negative and fickle.
From my view, there has actually been an attitude of unmerited optimism on BON all week. I think the "cheer up" posts and "we'll be fine posts" have far out-numbered the "sky is falling" posts that they're intended to counter-act.
There are a lot of posts on this specific page predicting a lopsided win. But I just don't see it. The problems with last week's effort go far beyond the typical let-down game. Last week was about more than just motivational issues. There were talent gaps, scheme problems and leadership issues. I can't imagine how those can all be fixed in one week, when nothing, and I mean nothing, was fixed in 8 months.
For the most part, this is an arrogant and stubborn coaching staff. They have a habit of not fixing things until the wheels fall off (read: we lose a game), they instead believe that their schemes are fine, its the players who aren't executing them properly.
So if we see major changes this Saturday night, it will be unprecedented (changes before a loss).
I remember that PB posted right after the game: "lateral running plays? Really? Still?"
I feel the same every time this fanbase is surprised that the coaching staff doesn't make any of the obvious changes that we all can see are necessary. You're surprised? Really? Still?
It is not my intention to bring everybody down, I just think we saw a horrible effort last week, and now the burden of proof is on the players and coaches to clean the taste of last week put of our mouths.
Until then: TCU 34 Texas 24
I'm calling Texas out. This is the pragmatist in me. If I'm wrong, I'll gleefully scream it from my rooftop.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 7, 2007 10:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My problem
with statements like this one:
I feel the same every time this fanbase is surprised that the coaching staff doesn't make any of the obvious changes that we all can see are necessary. You're surprised? Really? Still?
- I think you are over-simplifying the issue by saying "obvious changes we all see". Yes everyone want a more effective running game, but the solutions we all propose are usally contridict each other, indicating that the changes are not that obvious.
- We don't know what the coaches are doing behind the scenes and to think they are not trying to make the offense more effective is a pretty low and in my opinion irrational assessment.
- If it was that easy to fix, then we would all be coaches making millions of dollars.
by Wells on Sep 7, 2007 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say back to you
that you are over-complicating the issue if you think these coaches aren't subject to the same human flaws we all suffer.
Politicians, coaches, leaders, etc. make irrational decisions all the time, born from hubris, arrogance, and stubbornness.
Often, it really is that simple.
To say that we're all missing the greater insight that is somewhere hidden in their decisions seems a bit naive to me.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 7, 2007 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
touché my friend
This may be Mack and GD's Russian winter. I would say that although Mack and GD's conservatism and lack of adjustment on game day can be seen as evidence of their refusal to change, I also think that they have shown flexibility by changing their offense over their tenure to take advantage of the strength of the players that they have.
I still think the the contradictions in everyone solutions to the problems show that correcting the issues is not as easy as pointing them out, and that does not even take into account the unintended consequences of any change that is made.
by Wells on Sep 7, 2007 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To complete the cycle
I don't criticize a coach for an honest effort to adapt to adversity. I put that in the category with athletic failure (ie: missing a shot at the buzzer), which I also wouldn't criticize. My problem is that this staff rarely admits that changes need to be made at all; and this is a failing of which criticism is perfectly valid.
But now we've completed our usual dialog on this topic. I think we both understand [and hopefully respect] each other's position.
My post was more about this particular game, and my predictions for it, rather than a general shot at our coaches, most of whom I think are top-notch. If I had to put money on this game, then this staff's reputation for not implementing changes until after a loss, combined with the dismal performance from a week ago, lead me to say that the smart money just might be on TCU on today.
But again, I hope I'm wrong, and will be ecstatic to admit it tomorrow evening if I am.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 7, 2007 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i kinda feel that they do view the arkansas state
game as a loss
maybe not statistically
but enough to see that there are changes that need to be made
by abcdmetrius on Sep 7, 2007 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
onside kick
I haven't been on here much this week, but has anybody mentioned on here the officials admitting their goof-up on the onside kick penalty in the game last week?
Pardon me if this is a Johnny come lately post
by FreedomDip on Sep 7, 2007 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
I watched the play from the texassports.tv stream, and it was absolutely the wrong call. Just terrible. You hate to win that way.
Although, as others have said, they still would have needed to drive down the field, score a TD, 2-pt conversion, then beat Texas in OT. So all they lost was a chance to have a chance. But still, it's in everybody's best interest that the calls are accurate.
by SelimSivad on Sep 7, 2007 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
WOOHOOO!!!!!!!!!!
Wrong Wrong Wrong!!!!!!!!!!
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 8, 2007 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Answers
- More concerned about the defense. We know Colt isn't as bad as he appeared at times last week, he'll get it together. With JC and the receivers, I think they'll get the offense going. The Defense, OTOH, has some questions that just haven't been answered yet. They need to play the younger guys, and they need to kick ass.
- Get Finley involved in the passing game. Get Ogbonnaya involved in the short-yardage/goal-line plays. Hell, quit stalling and give Lokey the damn ball, he will get in the end zone.
- Quan Cosby. A couple of good special teams plays could provide the spark we need, and he's just the guy to make it happen.
- Texas wins a high-scoring game, 31-27
**MBTF.com now lists Lamarr Houston starting in place of Orakpo, with Eddie Jones as the backup.
by SelimSivad on Sep 7, 2007 10:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
4 answers and 2 cents worth
- Texas defense. We all know the offensive game, especially Texas' current system, is timing and communication based. Hopefully 1 game to work out the kinks with Colt and the passing game at game speed should make the passing game click much better. There were definitely some missed assignments in the running game and my guess is that it will take a bit longer to fix this given the talented yet inexperienced o-line. Still, this is a game everyone knows we absolutely must have. So if dinking and dunking to JC, JF, and Quan moves the ball down the field more effectively than running then so be it. The defense is a bigger issue to me. With the strength we have inside (Okam and Lokey) I expect TCU will use a lot of misdirections and screens to counter the disruptions our guys will create and they will try to get outside with RB and WRs. We will need to contain the outside to really put the hammer on them early.
- Fundamentally, we need to be pass first run second. Spread the field and go no huddle throughout the first half, pepper in runs on delays and counters. Then mix in flanker and RB screens and play action passing to keep the defense guessing. If Colt has completed passes to more than 5 different receivers then I won't have to look at the final score to know who won.
- Player of the game will be Tony Hills. He will have to play his best game to keep McCoy well protected. If the game is tight, Ryan Bailey will be the unsung hero. He's gotta be dead-on.
- Texas 34 - TCU 20
While I expect the offense to look vastly improved in the passing game and the defense to play more aggresively we need to mention special teams. Texas dominated this facet last week, and the special teams contribution will be priceless this week by setting up short fields for the offense and covering punts and kickoffs effectively.
by BMG on Sep 7, 2007 12:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My Thoughts
- I'm really worried about our pass protection. Without time to throw, Colt will be running for his life. And I don't even want to talk about our running game.
- We need to play smashmouth football for the first half. When we are going to run, we should use a double TE, formation with Limas (best blocker) as the only reciever and a Fullback. Let TCU know immediately that we came here to play. If we play a conservative smash-mouth style for one half, the score may be close but we will have taken the emotional will out of the TCU team which will be extremely fatigued as our players are much bigger than theirs. In the second half we can then switch to an all-out, no-huddle attack with four receivers lining up and run TCU off the field.
- Limas Sweed will be the player of the game. I talked to him earlier, and although I could tell he was a little nervous I know him well enough to say that he is going to leave everything on the field for this game.
- UT 7-3 @ the first half. UT 35 TCU 10 final.
by wtfitzhomie on Sep 7, 2007 12:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
wtfitzhomie...
... are you a UT student?
by Sweed4Heisman on Sep 7, 2007 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
where did you see limas?
I'm just a freshman, but I've seen just about everyone except the Big Sweed. I want to know where to look for him so that I can bow when I see him.
by Sweed4Heisman on Sep 7, 2007 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Defensive struggle
I don't know why everyone thinks our offense can put up more than 30 points against TCU. Sure, we have the potential, but that would require the stars to align. Remember they had the #2 defense nationally last year (including #2 run D) and held Tech to 3 (THREE!) points last season, with 9 starters back from that team.
I know we have the weapons to score 30+ but they've given me no reason to think that will happen. I also think there's no way more than 40 points are scored in this game.
If Aaron Brown and Tommy Blake are 100%, it's a close Texas win (<7 points). If Brown and Blake are less than their best: Horns 24, Frogs 14.</p>
by BigTexBD on Sep 7, 2007 12:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention
they haven't given up any points yet this season.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 7, 2007 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brown doubtful
I saw on WWL's bottom line that Blake will start but Brown is doubtful to play. HUGE for Texas, as Brown is the key for TCU's offense (and their defense, too, as they hoped Brown would be effective enough to keep our offense off the field for long periods of time).
by BigTexBD on Sep 7, 2007 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
immobile qb
and nearly complete lack of a running game
by abcdmetrius on Sep 7, 2007 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
answers
- Defense
- I would like to see some passes to JC in space and would like to see Ogbanya carry the ball in short yardage.
- Colt
- Texas 31 TCU 17
by billb on Sep 7, 2007 1:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Which offense shows up for the Horns?
the out come of the game rests with UT Offense vs the TCU defense.
I think the horns will not have improved their ability to pick short yardage when they need to so drives will stall. I don't think they will improve pushing the ball across the goal line so more field goals. The offense will be able to move decently between the 20's and do less well punching across the goal. Say maybe two drives for touch downs and three drives that they have to settle for FG's. The TCU defense will hold them more than half there drives.
Last week a good QB had a good day and put up some decent yards moving between the 20's. This week the Horn's defensive front will put pressure on an inexperienced QB who will have a much harder time getting the ball to his receivers. Luckily this means the secondary will be less important to the out come. Stopping the run maybe more important to stopping drives. In 3rd downs situations the freshman QB might not be very efficient passing and picking up 1st downs so TCU may run more when they have to have yards.
For TCU maybe one TD drive and two drives getting stopped in the red zone and settling for FG's
UT 20 - TCU 13
by Xerxes on Sep 7, 2007 2:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Chip Brown picks TCU
His prediction comes at the end of a pretty interesting column. His take is that the UT players' biggest need right now is leadership. Me, I'm encouraged by the mostly optimistic predictions of my fellow BONers. And I'm relieved that I don't have a bad feeling in my gut. (Yet.)
by NYCHorn on Sep 7, 2007 4:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just another....
flavor of Alphabet Soup in our constant diet of Alphabet Soup and Rice-a-Roni.
Texas: 38
TCU: 17
by HornChamps on Sep 8, 2007 12:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
didn't you pick baylor to beat TCU?
I don't think you're giving TCU enough respect, HC. I know it makes it easier to claim that Texas schedules nothing but patsies if you denigrate TCU's worth, but they're a solid team. I agree that Texas will probably win, but they're solid, especially on defense.
by billyzane on Sep 8, 2007 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I definitely gave....
by HornChamps on Sep 8, 2007 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
27-24, Texas
I honestly have no idea what to expect out of Texas. TCU's offense isn't very good, but who knows what to expect out of UT's defense. and it's the inverse for UT's offense and TCU's defense.
so the only real prediction i'm making is that it'll be close. i have no idea how many points will be scored.
by billyzane on Sep 8, 2007 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup......< wink >
a 21-point victory for our Longhorns. As advertised.
Gosh, it was great to see so many of the highly talented youthful players on the field! If Mack will continue to trust the less-experienced players, then we'll be an improved team.
Then there is OU.........
by HornChamps on Sep 9, 2007 1:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That wasn't TCU....
....having the wood laid to them by Air Force, was it? Who was it that was soooo impressed by their silly preseason ranking?
by HornChamps on Sep 14, 2007 12:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs


























