Pre-Spring Football Notes, Part 1: Dealing With The Discipline Problems
I wasn't expecting any of the big news from the Mack Brown-Will Muschamp press conference that some kept teasing, but that doesn't mean there isn't interesting information to discuss. Chip Brown summarized the big points in a nice tidy article for us, which we'll go through in a series of posts. (By the way, the DMN's college blog has come a long way to become a daily stopping point.)
Brown said he has instituted a curfew for his team.
I... well how 'bout that? Starting last June with the first arrest of Robert Joseph and ending with the disastrous loss to Texas A&M, we spent a disturbing amount of time at this site grousing about all the things Mack Brown wasn't doing right. From off-field arrests to non-meritocratic playing time, frustration with Texas football was as marked as it's been during the Mack Brown era.
As related to the discipline problems, we discussed at length the need for Brown to take some truly substantive steps towards rectifying the issues. And now he has. According to the Austin American-Statesman, Rucker's position was created in large measure to address the concerns about player discipline:
"It's very important. They have needs just like your own children do," said Rucker, who has coached for 28 years, including the past three with the Longhorns. "To have an extra set of eyes and someone to be there for them 24/7 is something that's very important to us."
Rucker, who successfully battled prostate cancer this season, also will deal with high school coaches, summer camps and recruits' unofficial visits. One of his main duties will be maintaining the team's new curfew.
At the beginning of last season, Brown stated a curfew wouldn't be a viable option to keep his team in check. He changed his mind after the November loss to Texas A&M and enforced a midnight curfew leading up to the Holiday Bowl victory over Arizona State.
Brown liked the results and decided to continue the curfew throughout the year.
I remember the disappointment many of us shared when Mack was dismissive of curfew (and many other bona fide) suggestions, instead opting to retreat defensively into a protective shell, blame the media for singling out bad apples, and insisting that the house was in good order. But that only exasperated fans' frustration as Mack missed the point: very few were saying that the overall health of the program was problematic, but almost of all of us felt that the problem was indicative of a general slipping of standards. The team lacked leadership. Discipline issues seemed more systemic than Brown was willing to admit. The "Not Our Standard" focus which had helped Texas in the recent past suddenly seemed conspicuously absent.
I remember talking to Chip Brown about this and he reminded me that Mack Brown isn't quite as stubborn as some of his fiercest critics seem to believe, but that he does hate feeling like others are dictating what he has to do. He likes to do things on his timetable, and on his own accord. While you could argue that doesn't always serve him well, some of the changes we've seen since the loss to Texas A&M suggest Mack Brown isn't so much incapable of change as he is deliberate in making it.
And that, experience will teach you, can be as often a good trait as it is a weakness. What matters presently is that Mack's addressed this in a meaningful way. It's worth applauding.
Next: Early departures for the NFL and the impact on freshman playing time.
--PB--
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
It's Interesting...
...but no one's mentioned how these discipline problems affect recruiting. Speaking as a father I'd be pretty concerned about letting my kid go to UT. I mean, let's face it: If you're the parent of a kid that's talented enough to be offered a full-ride to play football for a program the caliber of Texas then your kid can play ANYWHERE in the country. Now, if you're a concerned parent you will definitely take a look at which school offers a safe environment that will look after your kid the way you would if you lived on campus.
I dunno... It's just my two-cents. I think Rucker's position is much more about future recruiting (as the job title may imply) and less about losing talent and keeping it on a short leash once it's on campus.
by Bombilla on Jan 14, 2008 1:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think you're right
But of course the two are related. If the current crop of kids are in the newspapers for bad behavior, it affects your ability to get some of the kids in the next crop.
by Peter Bean on Jan 14, 2008 1:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
RB coach rumors
Don't expect us to hire anyone until after signing day. The instant that we hire someone, Ken Rucker has to remove himself from the recruiting process. There's no sense in a new person stepping in this close to the end, especially when Rucker already has relationships with the few recruits (D Scott) that we are still heavily recruiting. Orangeblood had a ton of stuff swirling about Major, but there's little to no substance behind it for the time being.
by BMG on Jan 14, 2008 3:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Back to Muschamp's defensive strategy
If, according to him, a blitzing D is like chocolate cake, I think we could describe our Akina defense as the Duncan Hines Chocolate Cake Defense. Plain, ordinary, slightly fufilling, but only if spruced up a bit with some icing or additives.
What flavor is our offense? Vanilla is too easy, and inaccuate as there's nothing wrong with a good honest scoop of vanilla ice cream.
No, our offense is Orange Sherbet. It's not really offensive (no pun intended), but it's cloying. It sits in that reach-in freezer waay in the corner of Baskin-Robbins, and no one under the age of 50 who lives in a major metro area ever eats the stuff.
by txzen on Jan 14, 2008 4:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Curfew?
It strikes me that imposing a curfew is move made to mollify the alumni more than to accomplish anything of substance. Do burglars respect curfews? Can burglaries take place before midnight? Will the bed checks look for guns under their pillows?
No. The way to end the crime wave is to bring fewer future criminals into the program. And once the kids are here, make sure they know what is expected of them and the consequences of screwing up. For ones with problems, get them counselors/mentors to put them back on track.
by Caradoc on Jan 14, 2008 5:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
it's the broken windows theory of enforcement
if you police all the little things, then the big things rarely become a problem.
by billyzane on Jan 14, 2008 5:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
broken windows theory is bunk
Follow up studies have shown that overpolicing does not produce good results, compared to programs stressing alternative sentencing and community involvement. Mostly, the 'broken windows' approach makes politicians look better as it appears they have 'gotten tough'. But to reduce crime, you have to get people to change. And if their behavior is dependent on the threat of punishment, they become dependent on being told what to do rather than acting on their own. This is my point exactly.
by Caradoc on Jan 14, 2008 9:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Caradoc's right
Having the ability to understand trends and use resources as efficiently as possible is the most effective crime prevention strategy. Policing the little things necessarily diverts resources from the important things. Getting quality kids (which I think Mack does pretty well) and getting the kids to understand the nature of the spotlight in big time college athletics is what's important.
For what it's worth, The Boy at Rock M Nation's dad has one hell of a corrections policy blog. He's an Okie, but he was a good boss in Wisconsin.
by Bob LaBlog on Jan 14, 2008 10:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i wasn't really supporting the idea
merely stating that it was a viable theory of enforcement in case you hadn't heard of it.
Regardless, everything's "bunk" to someone. One study says one thing, another says something else. I don't put too much stock in one thing being "right" and the other "wrong."
by billyzane on Jan 14, 2008 10:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Admittedly...
You do have to get people to change, you're right about that, however that is learned behavior or re-learned behavior, whatever you want to call it. In the meantime until the learning takes effect, the punishment idea is effective and has its place in the scheme of teaching young kids to do well. Maturity and learning will produce the change while under the tutlege of imposed motivatons due to the threat of punishment.
by HornsFan87 on Jan 15, 2008 10:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
























