The Five Biggest Disappointments of 2007: #3 Colt McCoy
This is a tough one, because the kid competed awfully hard this year and evolved as much as he was capable to deal with a sketchy offensive line. But he was fatally prone to turnovers and inconsistent (at best) throwing passes beyond 20 yards. Part of the blame goes straight to Greg Davis, but there was no denying that Colt simply played poorly during large parts of the season.
What did we learn about McCoy in 2007? For starters, you can't build an offense with him as the centerpiece. He's a gutty playmaker who can be a good player for a team, but it was crystal clear that the offense cannot revolve around a McCoy-centric passing game. I was the loudest preseason advocate that it could, but there's no getting around it: that was flat wrong.
Instead, we learned that Texas must have a fear-inspiring running game to be successful. That's not to say that McCoy can't be a strong complement to that running attack, just that it can't be the other way around. In that regard, more aggressive/creative usage of John Chiles is something we should hope for next season. Also on the wish list is the emergence of a legitimate deep threat at receiver - someone who can create and maintain separation down the field. And of course, the 800-pound gorilla in the room: who replaces Jamaal Charles?
That's a lot of big questions for the offense as we head into spring camp.
2007's Five Biggest Disappointments
5. Limas Sweed
4. Jermichael Finley
--PB--
0 recs |
35 comments
Comments
disappointments
I definitely agree there were moments when Colt was not firing on all cylinders, however, I am having trouble placing most of the blame on him directly - this year we had a young, shallow offensive line that allowed very little time (consistently) on pass plays. Colt had to run around to throw SOOO MUCH. That wasn't something he had to do his first year under center. Put into a situation like that, odds/chances of mistakes are increased, bottom line. The kid showed WAY too much moxy and intelligence his first year...but he had TIME to do it. And I don't know the actual number, but I'm guessing, and this might actually be generous, that half of the interceptions charged to him were not passes he made to the other team or a direct result of the throw - many if not most were deflections off our receivers and other bizarre bounces. With a proper O-line next year (hopefully) I'll streak the 40 acres if he throws 18 INT's again.
by bevoshapedwaffles on Jan 22, 2008 1:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If Colt was a disappointment
Its only because his freshman year created such lofty expectations.
As a Junior, he will be beginning his upper classman campaign with the following records:
Colt is 6th in career passing list all time at UT, in place to easily be #2 at the end of the year, and quite possibly #1.
Tied for second fastest to 2,000 yards all time UT.
Fastest to 1,000 yards all time UT.
Colt has the #2 and #4 most completions in a season by a UT quarterback.
Colt needs a mere 10 TDs to be the career TD leader surpassing Applewhite.
Colt has the highest completion percentage for a season of any UT QB.
Colt has the highest completion percentage career of any UT QB.
His sophomore year was a drop off from his freshman one for sure; but with Limas' wrist, the O-line, and Greg's usage of Chiles, Charles and Finley; well, I feel its a bit harsh to proclaim him unable to be the center of the offense.
Personally I will wait to see what he does with his new receiving core, and and O-line thats a year older.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jan 22, 2008 1:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by abtxutfan on Jan 22, 2008 2:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Certainly
Disappointment is relative.
by Peter Bean on Jan 22, 2008 3:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Certainly Agree.
"it was crystal clear that the offense cannot revolve around a McCoy-centric passing game"
Was more the portion I take exception with. If you mean with Greg designing the offense and calling plays, or you mean with our offensive line play, I could agree. Or if you mean he shouldn't be, well thats a possible point of contention as well.
But I dont think that the guy who is by all standards looking to be the most prolific passer in UT history, cannot be the central piece of the offense. Especially with the gut and grit that he has shown us through this rough year.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jan 22, 2008 3:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So what?
I think it's nice that you support Colt, but I would rather be honest about the situation: Gaudy statistics mean absolutely nothing when you can’t lead your team to victory. Colt may be a good guy, and he may bust his ass trying, and he may be gutsy, but he will NEVER lead this team to a Big 12 or National title. He just can’t. His lack of physical ability aside, he doesn’t have the necessary command of the mental aspect of the game. As much as I love to point the finger at Davis, his play calling isn’t what keeps Colt from being successful. Maybe his development of Colt has been lacking, but I think it is more likely that Colt simply doesn’t have what it takes. It goes back to a discussion before the ASU game in which people were debating about the difference between an elite team, and a very good team. With Colt at the helm, we can be good, but Texas will not return to elite status until he is replaced, or at least supplemented VERY heavily with Chiles. Want a good team that wins 9 or 10 games a season, and gets to take a vacation to San Diego or Dallas in December? Then keep supporting Colt. Want to actually have a second Big 12 title, and a shot at a NC? Then support someone else. Do I know that Chiles can do it? No. But I know Colt can’t, so why don’t we give someone else a shot?
There may be something that PB brings up in the top 2 disappointments that I’m not thinking of, but Colt was definitely the biggest disappointment in my book (with a close battle for first between him and the defense/Akina).
by Texas Our Texas on Jan 22, 2008 4:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What is it about Colt...
... That proves to you that he can't win a Big XII or National Title?
by Horn Brain on Jan 22, 2008 5:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
1 modification
I said he can't win without being supplemented heavily by Chiles (or equivalent).
The QB is the most important player on the field. Only in very rare circumstances can a team overcome poor play by their QB in big games against tough opponents. For Texas, those games would be OU, A&M, a Big XII title game, a BCS bowl game, or a National title game, plus some random other such as tOSU. Even Applewhite couldn't pull Texas out of the canyon created by Sims against OU.
The reason that Colt can't lead the team to a champsionship is not because he is "bad," but because the teams we play are so much better. Colt might be a great D-2 QB, but he just doesn't have what it takes to match up with the defense of LSU, or USC, or Georgia, or OU, or even A&M and K-State. He lacks the throwing power, the consistent accuracy, the presence, and the decision making qualities to win the tough games. He is also prone to injury, hence the nickname Cart McCry.
Again, Colt is good. But he is just in above his head and out-matched on the field against other top-quality teams.
To summarize my answer to your question: COlt is not talented enough, not smart enough, not tough enough, and most importantly, not consistent enough to face elite programs.
by Texas Our Texas on Jan 22, 2008 8:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
is chiles all those things?
Because if not, then how does Chiles being predominantly involved or not have any bearing on whether Texas is good enough to win with Colt McCoy? And if Chiles is good enough to make up for Colt's failings, then why not just play Chiles full time?
by billyzane on Jan 22, 2008 8:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe
I don't know if Chiles is all of those things, but I do know that Colt is not. And I do believe that we shoud play Chiles full time, but I live in the real world where Mack Brown coaches the Longhors, and I know there is no way (barring injury) Mack starts someone over Colt. Colt is the starter until he runs out of eligibility.
by Texas Our Texas on Jan 22, 2008 10:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
stupid nickname
You did not use that stupid 'nickname'(!) to show that he is prone to injuries, did you?
PS. Fuck Kellen Heard.
by Cyrus on Jan 22, 2008 9:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
dude
if I didn't know better I would think lawdog is an AGGIE? I wouldnt think a longhorn fan would refer to our quarterback as a nickname given by those damn agro-idiots.
by vivalonghorns on Jan 22, 2008 10:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
stupid
If I didn't know better, I would think you are an aggie for being mentally deficient to the point of thinking that since I reference something an aggie says, that makes me one. And, it's pretty ignorant to believe that only aggies think that Colt is fragile.
I respect Colt, but he just isn't good enough. To say that criticizing a particular player makes me an aggie is just silly.
by Texas Our Texas on Jan 22, 2008 10:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
As a site rule, let's all drop calling fellow fans Aggies. We can disagree without degrading ourselves to that level. Let's leave that for other boards.
by Peter Bean on Jan 22, 2008 11:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
re
agreed, No harm meant, just gettin defensive about my team i guess. Apologies to all.
by vivalonghorns on Jan 23, 2008 6:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Meanwhile, back at the ranch...
I don't think Colt is a Heisman candidate or anything, but I think he is tough/smart/good/whatever enough to take this team to a championship behind a good O-line and beside a gifted tailback. I think you forget, when you say that Colt is by far the biggest disappointment of the season, just how miserable our defense was. We shouldn't have to score 39 points to beat the Aggies, and for God's sake, not those Aggies. That's one example, but there are many more cases of just flat defensive failure throughout a game. Had Colt not played a monster game, there's no way we beat Tech, since Jamaal went out at the half, and Vondrell was reminding us of Selvin Young's senior year. Did Tech punt one time in that game?
My point is, if an upper-classman version of Colt had been on the field against USC in '05, yes, you're right, he probably couldn't have outscored USC like VY did. But given that supporting cast, Colt could have taken us to a win over almost surely any team in the nation this year. He's not going to pilot the best offense ever to play college football, but he can run a championship team as long as you don't require him to score 50 points a game to beat nearly everyone on our schedule. I'm excited for next year's (long) shot at the Big XII title, but very excited for 2009, which looks to be Colt's best chance to prove the haters wrong.
by Horn Brain on Jan 22, 2008 11:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Im sorry
And I don't mean to be antagonistic, but when I read stupid assertions, I get compelled to reply.
19 for 26; for 73.1% completion and 324 yards, 2 Passing TDs, one Rushing TD, 1 Int.
Or what about 11 for 18; for 61.1% completion and 108 yards, 2 TDs, no picks
Would you consider those stats representative of good enough play to beat OU, which we all know is key to getting the Big 12 or the MNC? Or is he just not talented enough? Looks like hes 1-1 so far, and from the stats, I cant really pin the one loss so far on Colt.
Sure I want him to be a little more consistent, and I'm fine with him being a disappointment this year, because he wasn't as consistent as we would have hoped from what we saw last year, but to say he doesn't have the ability to play against Division 1 competition, thats just ridiculous.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jan 23, 2008 8:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We Will See
So, those stats are nice, but what do we have to show for it? Losses to K-State (2 years in a row), A&M (2 years in a row),and OU. Quote stats all you want, and as long as the road to the MNC goes through Baylor and Rice, Colt should be fine. I agree, he shouldn't have to score 50 points a game, but against A&M last year he couldn't score 10. To think that an LSU defense (for example) wouldn't pick him off or force him to fumble about 6 times is being blind to reality.
And, I didn't say he couldn't play against Division 1 schools. Last time I checked, Baylor was a D-1 school. I just said that he can't win titles in D-1.
Believe me, I hope I'm wrong. I would much rather be wrong and have a Big XII or national title, than be right and not have one.
Keep defending and justifying Colt with statistics. I will continue to make my assessments based on results.
by Texas Our Texas on Jan 23, 2008 12:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Colts Losses
Colt is currently 20-6 as a starter. #9 All time at UT, as an underclassman, is that not results?
His losses:
#1 - tOSU 2006 - Played ok (1 TD 1 Pick) Second game EVER in college against top ranked team
#2 - KState 2006 - Phenomenal start (4/4 for 51 yards), left game injured
#3 - aTm 2006 - Played injured, game still came down to pass interference call
#4 - KState 2007 - Bad game by Colt, 4 picks
#5 - OU 2007 - Great game by Colt (see above)
#6 - aTm 2007 - Mediocre game by Colt (1 TD no picks)
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jan 23, 2008 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Would you lump him in the same category as Major?
Are Major's "results" (22-8 record as a starter) in the same neighborhood as Colt's (20-6)?
For the record, I don't think Colt's a world-beater either but he deserves a little more credit than you're giving him. As others have noted, it's a team sport. I'd be willing to bet that VY couldn't have won a title this past season. It just wasn't a complete team. Let's just hope everything comes together a little better over the next two seasons.
by gwh65 on Jan 23, 2008 2:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Blasphemer!
VY would have won the title with tackling dummies for support players! That includes KBD... sorry, had to.
by Horn Brain on Jan 23, 2008 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But once you start
Making excuses/reasons/explanations for his disappointing season, you are already recognizing the fact that it was disappointing.
While there were many factors that went into it, Colt's season was disappointing for different reasons and to varying degrees.
by Useful Idiot on Jan 22, 2008 3:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Colt's Problem...
His first year, he was flat scared. I think that, once he got over the sheer panic of the OSU game, he had a few weeks to build confidence. At the OU game, he was still scared, but it kept him focused, so that he performed his role in the offense, didn't force anything, and just played solid football. And that's what he did for most of 2006. He made a few really special plays (Bomb to Sweed at Nebraska, shortly before being destroyed, for example), but was mostly just a solid quarterback.
The whole offseason, Greg goes on and on about how Colt is this super-kid, and probably thinks he needs to let loose. Colt buys this and thinks that he should make a big play on every snap. The result is Colt thinking too much, either forcing throws into coverage, or trying to make easy throws perfect, which screws up his rhythm. It probably didn't help that he bulked up his arm over the offseason, either. I felt like Colt figured/was told that he was trying to do too much throwing towards the end of the season, and you can see he didn't throw many INTs in his last few games. The problem then shifted to him thinking he was half VY half Earl Campbell. In the aggie game he lost a few fumbles trying to triple-juke LB's or DL's. In the Holiday Bowl, Colt had the fumble into the endzone when he decided to bowl over an LB after a 40 yard run that anyone else would have been content to end with a slide or run out of bounds. Colt will be a very successful QB if he just quits taking so many unnecessary risks, in my assessment.
by Horn Brain on Jan 22, 2008 4:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Your whole assessment
is based on what you think he is thinking and what you think people told him. You could be right, but there is no way to really know.
by Wells on Jan 22, 2008 8:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
I know, that's why I threw in a few "I think"s and "in my assessment". This is just my theory, and it makes sense to me. I didn't mean to propose "The Answer" to Colt's problems.
OK I just checked and I only said "I think" one time... but I intended to say it much more. My bad.
by Horn Brain on Jan 22, 2008 11:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Weird thing about Charles
he could probably be in the Surprising and Disappointing top 5.
First half of his season was a major disappointment. The last half of his season was a major surprise given the major disappointment in the 1st half.
by goingforthecorner on Jan 22, 2008 4:03 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
colt
I don't believe we can lay all the blame on Colt himself, Yeah this season sucked compared to last years for Colt, but he had time to crochet a damn scarf back there last year. I am as proud of Dallas Griffin as anybody but I think the line only got better when he was out. If we can get the line from the holiday bowl to improve on that good performance, and a new deep threat reciever, then I believe Colt will return to form. I did like this year when he ran though, he's a pretty scrappy runner, but maybe he needs to talk to Earl Campbell about fumbling problems. I don't believe anybody had as high expectations for Colt and Limas as I did but unfortunately none of it came to pass. Im keeping my head high for next year though.
by vivalonghorns on Jan 22, 2008 4:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Just a follow up note here
Remember that disappointment is a relative term. Limas Sweed's on that list, though it's not his fault that his season was a disappointment.
Colt's on here, too, and though I point out that part of the problem was with him, it's also true that the disappointment is relative to expectations. Neither he, nor his supporting cast, were consistently good this year.
by Peter Bean on Jan 22, 2008 4:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
He's not Superman
Too many of Colt's interceptions this season we due to either poor decisions or balls getting batted down. Both can be corrected if Colt learns to tuck the ball away unless he's got either a clear shot at a receiver or he's in danger and needs to throw it away and he needs to recognize the passing lanes. A more seasoned o-line can mitigate both of these issues as well.
by BMG on Jan 22, 2008 4:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
We've....
....under-recruited and missed some assessments on the O-Line recruitment for quite awhile now. It really showed this season. Then, as I predicted prior to season's start, some O-Line injuries came into play as our lack of depth affected our ability to platoon on the O-Line.
Colt rarely had the luxury of resting easy in the pocket. Early on, the pressure administered by the staff to "show leadership" caused him to make some poor decisions.
Our lack of experienced depth will continue to be a problem this season. We have some strong players with good initial talent, but they're lacking seasoning and may be too early for them to form a strong unit. 2009 is still my target year.
by HornChamps on Jan 22, 2008 5:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Colt is fine....
Set him behind a quality, experienced line and we will be talking Heisman.
If our linebackers and secondary had not disappointed us until the Holiday Bowl, it could have easily been an 11-1 or 11-2 season.
The 5 biggest disappointments:
1.A
2.K
3.I
4.N
5.A
by MeatchickenHorn on Jan 22, 2008 8:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Colt has yet fully recovered from
his 2006 KSU stinger injury, in addition to all the above mentioned team weaknesses, especially the 2007 OL's inability to maintain and protect a pocket for him to operate in. And all our opposing Ds seem to have adopted the aggy strategy: level Colt early and often, even if it costs you 15 yards. There were many comments during the 2007 season from people in the stands that Colt frequently appeared dazed after some of those hits. You can spend all the time you want bulking up in the weight room but when it really hurts to throw that deep ball, or whatever the particular movement is that sends that shooting pain through your body, you can't blame the kid. IMO, he's been playing hurt since the 2006 KSU game.
by Austin180 on Jan 22, 2008 11:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Lawdog - your posts reflect simple arrogance
With all due respect Lawdog, you sound as if you "truly believe" that you posess some superior knowledge of what McCoy's ceiling as a QB really is. Football is a team sport Lawdog, and I will take this opportunity to remind you that supermen like #10 are very rare indeed. Just because Chiles can run a little certainly does not mean that he should start over a guy that is on track to own every passing record in Texas history. Simply put Lawdog, there is a reason that Chiles has not thrown yet. While we can all questions gameplans, I am quite certain that GD knows just a tad about the passing game.
We all know that last year was a troubling effort Lawdog, but to lay the blame at the feet of a second year QB playing behind a mostly freshman O-line, is absurd at best. The fact is, your opinion of McCoy is obviously tainted by your admitted desire to see Chiles start. I don't mean to offend or mock your opinions Lawdog, but taking all of our offensive issues into account (including coaching to hide and protect an inexperienced O-Line) is sorely missing in your breakdown of the season. McCoy was not the issue this year. Frankly, this year McCoy showed me that he has the physical ability, and the mental moxy to "lead" this team to a NC. Did you see some issue with putting points on the board Lawdog? Need I remind you of our historical defensive weakness?
Last year McCoy was blessed with an outstanding O-line that gave him time to do what he can do, and just like with any other QB, his success depended upon an O-line that routinely performed it's job at a high level, a running back that rarely missed his assignments in blitz pickup (Selvin Young), and receivers that rarely dropped or tipped balls into the hands of the opponent. Even our beloved superman required all these things to get it done. The game of football always starts up front. Cheers to an older and wiser O-line next year!
by jbob on Jan 23, 2008 10:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I know I'm late to this party...
but isn't criticizing Colt McCoy for his "disappointing" 2007 performance eerily similar to criticizing Mack Brown for his "disappointing" 10-win, championship-less seasons? Just putting it out there...
As I've commented before, I'm seeing a Chad Henne-like career for McCoy: always solid, never spectacular. No matter how good he does, he'll still be a disappointment in the eyes of Texas fans, just because of an amazing and unexpected freshman season. But at least Colt's already notched one OU win on his cap.
Here's hoping he proves me wrong...
by jc25 on Jan 23, 2008 11:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

























