Morning Coffee Gets Colt Crazy
Relentless pursuit of perfection. Colt McCoy hasn't just approached perfection on Saturdays, but during the week of practice as well. Actually, he hasn't just approached perfection, according to Greg Davis he has actually achieved it. Once each during the OU and Missouri game weeks McCoy completed every pass he attempted in practice. Twice more during the Missouri game week McCoy only had one incomplete pass in each practice. No wonder McCoy is completing more than 80% of his passes and only needs to complete 63.12% of his passes for the rest of the season to break Daunte Culpepper's NCAA mark of 73.6%. I can't even think of any apt comparisons for what McCoy is doing right now simply because I've never seen anything like it. What a truly amazing season for the baby-faced country boy from Tuscola.

Return of MyBoy? Tip of the hat to juarez1729 for discovering the little nugget on espn.com that Colt McCoy plans on returning for his senior season. In the words of the man his own self:
I'm going to play here for four years. I've been blessed to be able to play here. Not very many people get to [start] here for four years, so what an opportunity. And if the NFL is there for me, then I hope that I'll get to keep playing, because I love to play this game. Hopefully, it will work out.
While there is no doubt that McCoy means what he says, this isn't the first time that Longhorn fans have heard this story from players before they bolted to the professional level. Everyone from TJ Ford to Vince Young to DJ Augustin to Kevin Durant to Jamaal Charles have uttered the same statements about returning to school, but changed their minds when staring millions of dollars in the face and weighing their chances of injury. McCoy is a different case because I'm not sure that NFL scouts view him on the same level as professional scouts saw the other players, but these things do change after the season. There's a significant chance that McCoy will be returning for a championship run in 2009.
McCoy '08. I just cant talk enough about Colt McCoy. I'm about to run out of superlatives here. I can say that the Heisman pose looks pretty good. In some ways the picture is great though because the Heisman pose in essence a good football move. It's not just the stiff arm that's about to happen to some poor fool. It's the ball positioning, held with all three points of contact. It's the bent knees, ready to explode into the open field. Okay, so maybe I haven't run out of superlatives.
Not all of the Longhorn faithful are buying into McCoy's candidacy, though. PB is understandably lukewarm about it. Many Longhorn fans regard the Heisman with some disdain after Reggie Bush won it over Vince Young and rightfully so, because Vince deserved that trophy. If you look at some of the clowns who won the Heisman, Chris Weinke, Jason White, Danny Wuerffel, Gino Toretta and the like, you realize it doesn't really mean much to be in the company of those football players. Even ESPN called Vince Young one of the ten best football players ever. But not a Heisman winner? No one in their right mind would take any of the aforementioned Hesiman winners over Vince. Well, maybe Merrill Hoge, but that guy's just demented (too many concussions). But no Heisman for Vince. Despite all that, here's why I want Colt to win the Heisman: If McCoy wins the Heisman, I see the Longhorns being undefeated. And being undefeated means a chance at that crystal football everyone wants to hold up at the end of the year. A loss not only seriously hurts McCoy's candidacy, it also makes a national championship berth that much more unlikely, depending on if Penn State or Alabama loses. So here's my take: I want a Heisman for Colt McCoy as the Longhorns stampede their way into the national championship game.
Receiving depth spotted on the football field. After the OU game, it wasn't just the fans who were disappointed that Malcolm Williams couldn't haul in the nearly-perfectly thrown deep ball from Colt McCoy. The young receiver himself was disappointed, asking McCoy for some extra practice on high throws.
Notice anything like that against Missouri? McCoy put the ball up into some traffic, but he gave Williams a chance to go up and make a play on it, just like they had practiced, and Williams brought it in, just like they had practiced. Brandon Collins made his long play on another adjustment practiced with his quarterback, this time a sight adjustment slant on the blitz. The young receiver who didn't catch a pass in the game, but threw a nice block for Colt McCoy? James Kirkendoll. But he was the guy after the game who said he cared more about the team than not catching a pass after Brown apologized for not getting him the ball. As the season goes on and defenses commit more resources to stop Cosby and Shipley, expect the growing rapport between receivers and quarterback to lead to some big plays for the young'uns.
Series straight out the Wild West. Strange, strange things have happened recently between Oklahoma State and Texas in football. It follows the same basic pattern: The Longhorns get down early, then come roaring back. How roaring? Try 48 unanswered in 2003, followed by 49 unanswered in 2004, followed by 48 straight points in 2005, followed by 24 straights points last year in the fourth quarter to win. Think maybe Okie lite has developed a complex about that? History suggests DKR will be the scene of a wild and wacky football game on Saturday, but I expect the Longhorns to get off to a strong start, with the kind of clock-killing, confidence shattering march down the field that characterizes this football team. Perhaps Mack Brown will even consider departing from his strategy of deferring to the second half and take the football first. Trips Right took a look at the OSU/Mizzou drive charts and concluded that they bode well for Longhorn success. Mizzou went on three drives of nine plays or more, while Okie lite relied on the type of big plays that Will Muschamp refuses to allow. See the one explosive play by Missouri against Texas, which I believe came against the second-team defense. Getting off to a fast start and burying Okie lite early has the added benefit of forcing the Big 12's best ground game to take to the air. And you don't want to be one-dimensional against a Muschamp defense.
Comments
no no no no
We can not win the coin toss and receive first. We just can’t do it. Its been the same all year for a reason. Its the same reason that even though my “O WHO?” UT shirt hasnt been washed since we last beat Arizona St, regardless of the fact that it is rank of many alcoholic beverages of the past. Keep the streak alive…
by kriess on
Oct 23, 2008 1:44 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Why, why, why?
I’ve never understood this. Why do teams defer? What possible advantage is there to having the ball to start the second half over getting it to start the first half?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
by Caradoc on
Oct 23, 2008 1:54 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just realized
We discussed this before the OU game. It appears that the answer is that sometimes the opponent (Aggies) will screw up and elect to kick off.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
by Caradoc on
Oct 23, 2008 2:00 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Several reasons
1. If they like to establish themselves on defense rather than offense, they may defer.
2. If they’re winning by halftime, having the ball first allows them to control the start of the second half. If they’re losing, it allows them to jumpstart their comeback.
3. You can do the two scores in a row thing without the other team touching the ball. You score last before halftime, and then you get the ball back.
4. A team can show off it’s arrogance that way: “No, no, it’s okay. You choose. It makes no difference to me.”
5. In flag football, since most teams can’t punt well, turnovers are common, and the first down makers are twenty yards apart, starting on defense first often equals getting the ball back with pretty good field position, if you stop them, in order to score first… wait, I don’t want to get yelled at by Dan Hawkins so I’ll stop.
I don’t see it as a huge strategic move, but some teams just have preferences.
by TheElusiveShadow on
Oct 23, 2008 2:15 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think its mostly #2
You can either have the ball when the game is tied (at the start of the game, zero zero), or you can have the ball when you potentially need it (are behind, want to put away a team), or don’t really need it (are tied).
If you have faith in your D, you should always defer, to give yourself the advantage in the second half, when you dont know what the situation will be.
by BoddickerIsClutch on
Oct 23, 2008 2:26 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
A good example of no. 2
was the 2005 Okie lite game when Vince had his 80-yard run with the juke of one of the Woods (Donovan?) on the first drive of the second half. Think that changed momentum?
I expect Brown to still defer if possible and let the defense go to work. It was beneficial against Missouri, but my original comment was mostly in regards to how important it is to get off to a quick start early.
by GhostofBigRoy on
Oct 23, 2008 2:51 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
#6
When you defer you get to make your opponent go into the wind in the 1st and 4th quarters. Couple that with reason #5, and if you stop the other team and force them to punt into the wind, you could set yourself up w/ field position.
The two scores back to back (reason #3) was my all time favorite move in Tecmo bowl. I cant count how many times that broke the back of the other guy’s team.
by DogTown on
Oct 23, 2008 3:06 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good example of #3 - OSU 2004
We had started our comeback in the 2nd quarter and VY hit Scaife for a score to end the half. OSU’s defense had all half to think about what just happened and that they were going to have to face it again to start the 3rd quarter. We scored again and it completed deflated OSU.
Most amazing thing about that comeback was that, not only did we score 49 unanswered points, we scored 49 points between OSU first downs.
by Horncasting on
Oct 23, 2008 3:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
#2 makes no sense
Getting the ball to start the second half may help you catch up, but taking it at the start helps you get ahead. Which do you prefer?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
by Caradoc on
Oct 26, 2008 11:00 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wind
True, there can be an advantage to having the wind in the fourth quarter, since that’s when teams use time outs and run hurry up offenses and therefore there are more plays. However, one might also say that at the start of the first quarter, you know which way they wind is blowing while the fourth quarter starts two and a half hours later.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
by Caradoc on
Oct 26, 2008 11:05 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
superstition
Thats all. I can honestly care less but its what suits the team. If our D can go out there and get a 3 and out, that’ll set the tone for the whole game…or the first half as in the MIZZ game.
by kriess on
Oct 23, 2008 2:18 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
choices
Deferring allows you to choose ends of the field for the second half – with the wind in the third quarter if you are danger of being blown out, or with the wind in the fourth quarter if you are ahead and want the advantage against the team trying to catch up. The latter, more than anything else besides’ Aaron Ross’ generation of a fumble, helped beat Nebraska in 2006. On the road, avoiding loud ends of a stadium when in scoring position in the fourth quarter can also come into play (I believe this helped in the 2005 Ohio State game, but I’m not sure). IN balmy weather and playing at home, none of these are issues, but Mack has said (I can’t find the quote) that he likes to have the ball last in the first half and first in the second half for reasons given by TheElusiveShadow above
by burnt in ny on
Oct 23, 2008 2:32 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BigRoy, I keep falling asleep, man...
I need my morning coffee in the morning; my productivity is crashing!
by TXinDC on
Oct 23, 2008 4:14 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My bad
I’ll try to do better in the future to keep the morning caffeine buzz going!
by GhostofBigRoy on
Oct 23, 2008 4:23 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs

















