Postgame React: Texas 28 Oklahoma State 24
Before we even get into the details, consider that you could easily argue:
| Match Up | Winner |
| OSU D-Line vs Texas O-Line | Oklahoma State |
| Texas D-Line vs OSU O-Line | Oklahoma State |
| Linebacker Play | Oklahoma State |
| Secondary Play | Even |
| Special Teams Play | Oklahoma State |
Texas won in large part because Colt-Shipley-Cosby-Ogbonnaya are near-unstoppable in the short passing game. Though our historical superiority over OSU makes it hard for some Texas fans to admit, in truth--given that Texas was outplayed in several key aspects of the game by an impressive Cowboys squad--this turns out to be quite a win to appreciate. Really. I'm comfortable saying that's the best team Texas has played this year.
Game thoughts after the jump...

Close call... Reviewing the pregame prediction post and the three variables for an OSU win: (1) The Cowboys didn't get a special teams touchdown but took two kickoffs into Texas territory; (2) Kendall Hunter didn't break that long touchdown run but torched the 'Horns for 161 yards; (3) OSU ended two Texas drives by turnover.
Don't crucify the defense... Is our defense as good as they were in the first half against Missouri last week? No. Did Mike Gundy do a phenomenal job of making our defense defend the entire football field today? Absolutely. Did Will Muschamp nonetheless have a solid day today? I'd argue yes, for the following reasons:
- The defense was without Chykie Brown today--a huge loss.
- All anyone talked about this week was OSU's offensive balance, which was definitely on display today. And which meant that unless the opposition has a phenomenally elite defense, they've got to strategically pick their spots. Muschamp bet his wad on "No big plays." It was the right move.
- Dez Bryant before OSU's final desperation drive: 4 catches, 37 yards.
Put another way: one big play collapse by the defense today and Texas is probably 7-1. As it was, Earl Thomas forced a fumble in the red zone, Dez Bryant was doubled all day (forcing Robinson to go to the excellent-but-less-explosive Pettigrew), and the defense held the Pokes to a field goal in the 4th Quarter. Ballgame.
With that said... The tackling was suspect, the middle linebacker play was at times phenomenally bad, and OSU provided the blueprint for how to attack this unit: Be physical and aggressive with our line, always assign a blocker for Muckelroy, ignore Norton-Bobino, and attack Beasley-Palmer where you can. Granted, most teams don't have the personnel to do what the Cowboys were doing, but Longhorns fans need only look ahead a week to see what may be the defense's toughest test of the season.
Shannon Woods and Baron Batch provide enough of a rushing threat from the tailback position to keep a defense honest, while the Tech passing game at its best is a tour de force. Above all else, however, the Red Raiders will have to hope their offensive line can perform as well as OSU's did today: If the Cowboys had emerged victorious, I think they may have been the MVPs. This, from a group I thought would see their success-to-date stymied. Wrong.
Colt McCoy's almost brilliant day. We saw two mistakes from Colt in the red zone today that were straight out of 2007: the pass off his back foot that Cox intercepted (mercifully nullified by a late hit penalty) and the fumble after holding the ball too long in traffic. If nothing else, it was a reminder (to him, to us, to the team) that he can't do everything, all the time.
Amazingly, however, outside those two plays he nearly was freaking perfect. Oklahoma State spent the entire first half playing zone and, with our running game in the toilet, Colt worked the gaps with surgical precision, hitting Shipley, Cosby, and Ogbonnaya over and over and over. Though OSU made some excellent second half adjustments on defense, McCoy was so good that Texas was able to hang on, chewing up clock with one improbable third down conversion after another. Even though it didn't result in points, the 7-minute fourth quarter drive won the game for the 'Horns. At that point, we needed to keep OSU's offense off the field... and we did.
McCoy finished the day completing 38-45 passes for 391 yards and 2 touchdowns. At least four of his incompletions were drops. He had absolutely no help from the running game. And he wasn't derailed by any of his mistakes. The kid's a winner. When it's all said and done 14 months from now, the bar room debates about whether McCoy or Vince Young is Texas' all-time greatest quarterback will be fun. And appropriate.
The offense beyond McCoy. I honestly thought the offensive line had turned a corner against Missouri--so much so that I expected the Longhorns to wear out OSU's defense a bit with the run. Wrong again. We ran our zone stretch play for a grand total of about 3 yards, Ogbonnaya was frequently running towards the sideline searching for somewhere to cut up field, and McGee--despite doing a great job trying his damndest to cut up the field in what was his best effort on the season in many ways--was constantly swimming upstream.
Fozzy? Nowhere to be found. I'm done making any predictions about the guy. If he was available, the coaches must not have trusted his ability to pass block, or... something. I have no idea. I'm just gonna assume he's hurt again and leave it at that.
Texas on third down. The difference in the ballgame:
| Distance | Play | Player |
| 3-2 | Pass +3 | Williams |
| 3-14 | Pass +22 | Kirkendoll |
| 3-5 | Pass +0 | McGee |
| 3-8 | Pass +15 | Shipley |
| 3-5 | Pass +12 | Ogbonnaya |
| 3-2 | Rush +9 | McCoy |
| 3-6 | Pass +11 | Cosby |
| 3-2 | Pass +34 | Ogbonnaya |
| 3-4 | Pass +6 | Shipley |
| 3-1 | Penalty +15 | N/A |
| 3-11 | Pass +12 | Cosby |
| 3-3 | Pass +5 | Shipley |
| 3-6 | Sack Fumble | McCoy |
| 3-9 | Pass +20 | Shipley |
| 3-G2 | Rush +1 | Johnson |
Coaching? Even after asking Texas fans not to be unfairly harsh on Muschamp and the defense, I thought the staff as a whole didn't have its best game today. The special teams were incoherent (A high, tweener kickoff that Cox still gets to field? Really?), the outside run support was embarrassing, and Greg Davis didn't respond terribly well to halftime adjustments made by the Cowboys.
On the whole, everyone seemed a little tense today and for a while it really felt like things might end as they did two years ago against Texas A&M--with a game winning drive by the visitors that we can't answer before the final gun. I didn't think it was a poor performance by the coaches... More like, hmm... I guess I'd say it felt like we played to survive. The flow too often seemed reactive, in contrast to the Cowboys, who I thought were both exceptionally well prepared and playing to win throughout.
At the end of the day, though... Texas won. The Longhorns were just good enough where it counted and the team moves to 8-0. Oklahoma State is a damn good football team. I'm thrilled the team survived today.
The crowd? I'm interested to hear some reports from those in attendance today. Impossible to tell for sure from the telecast, but it sure seemed like a passive, often shellshocked fan base. Frighteningly reminiscent of T+1 2006. Yes? No?
Awards. It wouldn't be a post-game wrap without some awards:
- Offensive MVP: The roommates. McCoy-to-Shipley was a scene to remember today. From the fade in the end zone, to the beautiful double move on the fake screen, to the numerous third down conversions, these two were incredible.
- Defensive MVP: Earl Thomas. With each game, he's more and more aware of where he's supposed to be. Which, as the team's best playmaker in the back seven, is most excellent.
- Play of the Game: Earl Thomas strips Kendall Hunter. On 3rd and 10 from the Texas 27, OSU tailback Kendall Hunter breaks free for a first down and maybe a score but loses the football when Thomas manages to pop loose the football, which Sergio Kindle recovers at the Texas 9.
- Stat of the Game #1: Texas 1 penalty, 10 yards. When you're not at your best in several other areas of the game, the importance of a near-penalty free day is amplified.
- Stat of the Game #2: Texas Time of Posession 33:38. With no running game to speak of, Colt McCoy keeps OSU's offense off the field for the majority of the game. Huge.
- Stat of the Game #3: Oklahoma State 1-for-5 on 3rd Down (2nd Half). Just enough to win. Just. Enough.
Hallelujah. Texas, #1 for at least one more week. Congratulations...
Comments
Colt McCoy is a problem.
I have no interest in my team playing against him, epsecially the way we played against Kansas in the 1st quarter, A&M in the 1st half, and Nebraska for an entire game. The only way I see Tech beating Texas, given Muschamp, is if we hold your team to something like 35 points. And I don’t know if we’re capable of holding your team to something like 35 points (nor do I think we’re necessarily capable of putting up 36 points against the Texas defense).
It’s a problem, you have a good team. I have absolutely no idea where this year’s Colt McCoy came from. He’s very good, and in a lot of ways this looks a lot like the Texas team that rolled us in 2005.
by Skin Patrol on
Oct 25, 2008 9:15 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not so fast my friend.
Your guys have the uncanny ability to spread the field in such a way that defense’s are always back on their heels. By the 7th play of your drives, tongues are wagging. The TT O-Line are monsters and do a great job of giving Harrell enough time to consistently check down to the 3rd pass option.
Yes, Colt is having a magic year, but do not think for one minute that your guys won’t be ready to bring it especially since we saw the recipe today for playing Texas.
Note the consensus BON’er poll on front page regarding game fear factor. Tech is the real McCoy this year and it should be a prime-time barn burner next week.
by TXStampede on
Oct 26, 2008 4:37 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I totally agree
but the one thing OSU proved they were not only able to do, but clearly excel at doing was running the football. Graham Harrell is not nearly as mobile as Zac Robinson nor Batch as strong as Kendall Hunter. If Tech can’t run the football this game could play out much like Missouri if we come out strong. I’m not saying we’ll be up 35-3 at halftime, but their O-line will have to play spectacular and the running game will need to be there for them, if not its just another shootout that will come down to which D can stop the other offense two or three times.
by jacobb23 on
Oct 26, 2008 11:45 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
getting close to mistake free football
consistency and efficiency put points on the board (and more 90+ yards drives). Only 3 dumb mistakes, one penalty, one fumble and one interception (and 4 dropped passes). It would not have been close if they would not have given the ball up twice.
Okie state scored less than Missouri or Oklahoma, say what you want about the Horn’s defense they gave up 35 to OU, 31 to Missouri and 24 to OK st. that’s progress against 3 top ten teams, all three are way above average offensive teams.
by Xerxes on
Oct 25, 2008 9:26 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Great Analysis PB...
Besides the win, the silver lining of the game being so close is that being tested like we were gives us some specifics (run defense, tackling, offensive line blocking, etc.) to work on and should motivate the team all that much more to prepare for Tech. My hat is off to the boys for making it this far in the schedule undefeated. Its nice for once not having to plot out what other Southern Division teams need to lose so we can go to the Big 12 championship.
by mtntrance on
Oct 25, 2008 9:34 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
was at DKR today
first off, it was brutally hot. I’m not sure if anyone mentioned it on the air, but it felt like we in the 90’s. Our d line and LBs were manhandled and Chykie would have been helpful. Glad we won – OSU will kick the crap out of OU.
by BMG on
Oct 25, 2008 9:52 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The drag is
we are still merely playing for our DIVISION at this point. If we trip up in Lubbock: just one loss; we go from driving for the MNC back to hoping for help just to win the Big 12 South. I certainly don’t want to waste another victory against OU a la 2006.
With that in mind, beating Tech next week is going to be a tall order. Not only is this their validation game, this season might be their last shot at joining the “big boys.” They are going to come out swinging and we will have to dig in and fight with everything we’ve got.
Disciplina Praesidium Civitatis.
by zamm on
Oct 25, 2008 9:56 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No way does Tech go undefeated.
They still have OSU and OU at Norman. They are just starting the gauntlet we have been entrenched in since OU weekend. Tech doesn’t have what it takes to make it through unscathed.
by the1austin on
Oct 25, 2008 10:26 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the same will end up being said about UT.
by Tech92 on
Oct 25, 2008 10:52 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The difference is that UT is 3/4's of the way there. Tech has just beaten one ranked team
And Kansas now has three losses. They are not who we thought they were! Tech had their best game of the season today, no doubt, but let’s see how they do with three legitimate Top 10 teams.
by the1austin on
Oct 25, 2008 11:06 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Texas..
is the best team in the country. No doubt. That’s why they’re #1. Sometimes #1 gets beaten. Tech has thrived on the lack of respect and the doubt this season. Comments like the1austin is making were all Tech saw from aTm and from KU. If Tech wins, they will have beaten the best team in the country, and a team that has proven they deserve to be in these types of games.
The upside for Tech is that before every game so far, everyone has dismissed them, badtalked their defense, and guaranteed that this was the game they would lose. After every game, the same people (and the Big 12 hating east coast media elite) have then trashed the team Tech just beat by saying “well, they just weren’t that good”. That is what some folks are now saying about Kansas. But they just won’t be able to say that about Texas…
or will they?
My prediction… if Tech pulls out a win at home in the Jones against #1 Texas, next week at this time some media types will be saying, “Texas may not have been as good as we thought”. It goes without saying.
I disagree. Texas is as good as we think. Knowing that will help Tech. Texas and their fans dismissing Tech can only be in Tech’s favor.
Just a thought.
Peace
... I'm just sayin'
by antiswarm on
Oct 26, 2008 6:15 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I hate Mike Leach.
I just do. Having said that, I believe he has created a monster in Lubbock. He has created a phenomenal football team that can run with the Big Dogs any day, but his greatest contribution at Tech is that he has created this massive feeling of “Us vs. Them” mentality that serves to drive the Raiders with a burning hatred.
This game scares the hell out of me.
Big Bill "You never lose a game if the opponent doesn't score." Darell K. Royal
by Hook em Titans on
Oct 26, 2008 11:52 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow...
Good post. I like to hear some emotion before a big game. Leach is a mad genius, but he reminds me of droopy dog. Nothing surprises him. Aliens could come and land during his press conferences and ask him what he would do about intergalactic relations, and he would… without skipping a beat… give some quotable answer as if there was nothing at all wrong with the question. He is a strange dude, and he is certainly going to be the kind of guy you love or you hate.
You have a great team, and if they do their business and take Tech seriously, they should win. I don’t know if the team is going to take Tech seriously though, and that could be a great mistake.
Peace
... I'm just sayin'
by antiswarm on
Oct 26, 2008 2:07 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I must have missed where A&M fans were saying this Tech team wasn't good and we were going to beat them
where are their examples of that?
Did I say Tech has no defense? Yes. And after their play against Nebraska, no one disagreed with me.
One of the keys to the texas-Tech game will be texas’ ability to handle McKinner Dixon.
by Beergut on
Oct 26, 2008 4:37 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
crowd
was pretty into it, but it was hot and there just werent enough consecutive awesome plays on D to get the crowd jacked up.
by the other Andrew on
Oct 25, 2008 9:59 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Observation
Sergio Kindle was non-factor (1 tackle). OSU did an outstanding job of neutralizing his aggressiveness and athleticism. I’m not calling out Kindle by any means, but it never seemed as though he was able to make those game changing plays we have been accustomed to seeing. Plus as PB noted the outside run support was not there, and I would have to watch the game again to see if he was the culprit.
by Hookem4life84 on
Oct 25, 2008 10:05 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
crowd
It was an above average game as far as noise. I think the 4th down at the end of the game was the loudest I’ve ever heard the crowd. However, overall it was not as loud as Missouri game for sure, specially on 1st and second downs.
In Mack Brown We Trust!
by Cyrus on
Oct 25, 2008 10:13 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
People watching USC vs. Arizona game?
tied at 3 3 middle of 2nd quarter.
In Mack Brown We Trust!
by Cyrus on
Oct 25, 2008 10:15 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm watching
Besides hoping USC loses just because I despise that school, I really want Mike Stoops to win just so he’ll keep his job. Most sooner fans feel they have not been the same defensively since he left, and if true the last thing I want is for him to return to OU.
by Hookem4life84 on
Oct 25, 2008 10:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I hope Oregon State wins out and USC finishes 2nd in the Pac 10
by the1austin on
Oct 25, 2008 10:26 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
3 recs
I rec'ed that!
In Mack Brown We Trust!
by Cyrus on
Oct 25, 2008 10:27 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i'm wishing for USC getting beat as well.
As a side question, do you want Greg Robinson back? I don’t have an opinion on that btw.
In Mack Brown We Trust!
by Cyrus on
Oct 25, 2008 10:29 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wouldn't mind
He was the original DC that brought in the aggressive defense and pretty much changed Mack’s philosophy on who he hires at that position (except for putting Akina in there last year).. I guess in some respects we can credit Greg R. for the Chizik and Muschamp hirings. So to answer the question, and of course assuming Muschamp leaves, I would say yes. Unless we can get Auburn’s DC.. just kidding, sort of
by Hookem4life84 on
Oct 25, 2008 10:50 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The problem of hiring HCs for DCs
is that they may not have the fire, I think. That’s why I’m not sure if Mike Stoops or Robinson will be as good of a DC as they were in the past.
In Mack Brown We Trust!
by Cyrus on
Oct 25, 2008 11:14 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good point
You’ve got me thinking now.. I can’t even think of anyone who has made that transition and been successful. There has to be someone, although it may be because it is not common to go from a HC back to any coordinator position, especially in college.
by Hookem4life84 on
Oct 25, 2008 11:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cutcliff did it on offense. He got Tennessee to score points after getting the boot at Ole Miss
As for a DC, I can’t think of any either….
by the1austin on
Oct 26, 2008 1:06 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How bout that SEC D?
So how are the SEC fanboys going to spin the LSU-Georgia game?
I agree about that last 4th down, was the loudest I’ve heard.
by ryanlionrah on
Oct 25, 2008 10:23 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't forget Kentucky gave up 63 to Florida. Even with SEC speed at every position.
by the1austin on
Oct 25, 2008 10:27 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe you're not aware.....
of Kentucky’s significant losses to injury. They lost their leading WR Dicky Lyons for the season. Then leading rusher Derrick Locke, who is also the team’s second-leading receiver, will miss the remainder of the season after knee surgery. Then DT Myron Pryor, leader in TFLs and sacks, couldn’t play due to a high-ankle sprain.
How would our Longhorns do without J.Shipley, C.Ogbonnaya and B.Orakpo??
--- All roads to the Big-XII Championship lead through OU/RRS. It's not just another game! We're all about championships here. ---
by HornChamps on
Oct 26, 2008 1:28 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"They are who we thought they are"
overrated and over-hyped
by Hookem4life84 on
Oct 25, 2008 10:28 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thoughts
I’m still completely shocked that OSU went away from the run on their last non-desperation drive. Hunter and their line were absolutely killing us. I had the same revelation as PB that OSU was going to drive down the field and consume the entire 5 minutes left and there was nothing we’d be able to do about it, ala A&M 2006.
Yes, it was really hot. I felt like a dumbass for carrying in a sweatshirt.
I’m not sure what everyone is expecting from the crowd. I again thought it was really good. Really, really loud when OSU was on offense.
I can’t believe we didn’t block that punt in the first quarter. From my vantage point it looked like there was no question he was going to get it.
I normally don’t comment on the refs, but the blatant holds are getting out of hand. Also, Dez Bryant keeping Beasley from getting the INT in the end zone was the most obvious offensive pass interference I’ve ever seen.
Back to struggling running the ball with our RB’s. Silver lining is that it may allow Fozzy a shot again. Chris O. is still nails on blitz pick up and being in the right spot in the passing game.
The call on our last offensive play was terrible.
I just don’t understand how our kick coverage can be this poor this far into the season. Also, how is it we were kicking 40% of kickoffs out of the end zone in the first 4 games, but not can’t get it past the 5.
8-0 baby. Night game at Tech is next. Scary.
by Horncasting on
Oct 25, 2008 10:29 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Observation:
Fozzy may have been saved for Tech. Is there any reason they would have left him out of the OSU game entirely in an attempt to use him as a surprise/change of pace back against Tech next weekend?
"Either we need to re-calibrate our rectangle, or Alfonzo Marquez is not having a good night." - Josh Lewin
by utlonghorn24 on
Oct 26, 2008 4:29 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Absolutely not. If he could go (and block) he would have been in. nt whills
by BoddickerIsClutch on
Oct 26, 2008 4:55 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tight game, not much game experience
IMO that is what kept him on the sidelines. At this point the coaches don’t have a good feel for what type of ball security they have with him running the ball. Just a guess.
If he wasn’t 100% healthy then that I agree with holding him out. OSU was laying some major licks on our guys.
by Horncasting on
Oct 26, 2008 7:58 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Earl Thomas was good...
… but Curtis Brown also deserves praise. Dez Bryant is a pretty tough assignment for your first collegiate start, and Brown (and Deon Beasley when Bryant was on his side) did a very nice job. One of my favorite plays from the game was early on when Brown was manned up on Bryant with no help and jumped about 12 feet in the air to break up a jump ball. He’s gonna be a good one.
Great, great football game by both teams.
by Sweed4Heisman on
Oct 25, 2008 10:30 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good situation for Brown
Bryant does not run great routes and is not asked to. A significant number of his 10+ yard receptions are simply jump balls. From a freakishly athletic standpoint, Cu. Brown probably matches up better with him than any CB in the Big 12. I’ll bet Bryant was shocked to see a DB that could jump with him.
by Horncasting on
Oct 26, 2008 9:48 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Today's Crowd
All, I am a noob to BON. But I have been reading for a few years. I am a season ticket holder, and my seats are on the west end of the stadium in the far left hand corner of the endzone. These are great seats!
Anyway, I want to respond to PB about the crowd. For me the crowd was very loud today, but I did not go to the Mizzou game. Agree that it seemed that UT was just holding on today and looked tired. But, here are a few things I want everyone to think about:
1. Texas has played Three very good undefeated teams in the last three weeks! And to everyone’s suprise, won all three games! Even the Jeff Ward said before OU, that if they (UT) treat the four games as a four game playoff and win 3 of the 4 it would be phenominal. And, just look we have beaten the first 3! Something everyone 3 weeks ago did not in the slightest bit think Texas could do! The goal is to win! And we all need to remember that style points really don’t matter!
2. I don’t know about you, but the tech game scares the hell out of me! But, I agree Graham Harallel is more than a douche! Teaxas needs to keep this in mind during the game and get after him! If I remember right he was as much of a douche during last year’s game here in Austin!
3. Getting back to PBs question… Yes the crowd seemed out of the game today! especially in the first half! But, the reason I believe thsi is true is something few if not anybody has talked about on BON. Starting this year, the powers that be at UT moved the Longhorn Band out of the student section and put them in the Southern Endzone. Being a former band member in high school, I beleive that a lot of people overlook how much a marching band supports their team. Also, I am a native Austinite, 4th generation on both sides of my family and having never left Austin I have been to many many games, especially when I was a kid in the 80s. Sorry about the ramble here, but the bottom line is moving the band is a Big mistake, especially in tight games like this one today. The Longhorn band used to serve as the heartbeat of the games and would help to pace the crowd! PB, the crowd is loud but not coordinated! Even Texas Fight was off today, yes it was very strong in the fourth quarter and had an effect!
Which leads me to this! There were times today, and I have observed this in other games this year, where The crowd as a whole was not behind the team! Today’s game was the first this year that I have witnessed most of the crowd staying until the end of the game, sure this was only because the game was decided in the last thirty seconds! Somone on another BON thread today wished that DKR was as loud as the horseshoe, it is… It is just that now with all of the high tech at DKR, godzillatron, etc. People seem to not pay attention to the momentum of the game! Thus, in a game such as this where momentum is critical the team does not get the absolute whole hearted support from the fans!
How do we fix this?
1. Start a petition through the student organizations to get UT to put the band back in the north endzone!
2. We all need to realize at this point that 2005 is over! Sure 2005 was awesome, if you told me when I was a kid that Texs would again be National Champions in my life time I would, have said that would be great but, David McWilliams! Give me a break! Anyway this 2008 team that we have is just that a team! I love VY, but he was a freak! ANd you all have to agree that 2005 would not of happened without him. This 2008 team is much different, they play as a team and win or God forbid lose as a team! So, quit you complaining, and support your team! They need it! And if we do not do a better job of supporting them they will falter, and we will not be able to see this team play for it all this year!
3. We are currently #1, and we’re Texas folks! (Get your horns up! Dammit!) We have a target on our backs for every game every year, doesn’t matter whether we are #1, #25 or unranked. Teams are going to come after us with everything they have!
Overall, this year we have surpised many, Shock the Nation Season Anyone?!?! Given this run of 3 wins out of 3 that many thought we could lose all three! I believe that we are looking really good right now!
Rant over! For those of you that read this, thanks! I look forward to discussing UT football with you all in the future
P.S. BTW, we had 3 students from Stillwater that sat in front of us today! ANd yes they were excited for their team, and supported there team! Honestly if were not a UT fan I am not sure I could come to DKR, with 100,000 Longhorn fans even not at our best that is just plain intimidating! Anyway these kids were great! In fact one shook my hand at the end of the game, and said good game, you have a good team! ALso, I think it was awesome that we as a crowd, chanted beat OU! To the pokes at the end of the game, the crowd is about 90% right now! Loud, good to the other team, but not completely coordinated!
Hookem! it’s 10:29 and OU still sucks! OSU on the other hand is a much better team!
by TheBigB on
Oct 25, 2008 10:30 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Lack of Coordination
The crown seemed really quiet on 1st & 2nd down, them stepped it up on 3rd downs. I though the crowd was also really loud in the 4th quarter.
I agree about the band. I was in Section 11 and just couldn’t hear them at all.
One thing that struck me during the game was how out of sync the scoreboard operator seemed. The screens around the stadium were constantly showing De – Fense but the do Texas crowds ever chant that? Then the crowd would start Texas Fight, then the scoreboard operator would put it up, but it would be out of sync with the rhythm of the crowd, then the crowd would kinda start to follow the scoreboard and it would get much less synchronized, rendering the chant ineffective.
When neither the band, nor the scoreboard operator can drive the crowd, it is just harder to get a really loud crowd, especially when the defense is continually giving up first downs and the offense doesn’t have many big plays.
Between the band, the scoreboard, the style of play and the heat it was probably a perfect storm for a quieter crowd.
by Kineslaw on
Oct 26, 2008 12:30 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
DKR Crowd comments
Relative to the ou game this year, overall the collective incarnation of the crowd was a 84 year old man taking a nap and mumbling in his sleep. The exception being possibly a nightmare of the retiree during the 4th quarter OSU drive, 2, maybe 3 Texas! Fight! s and very few defensive plays. Again, this is in comparison to the constant vigil of Texas fans at the Cotton Bowl, which should be the standard. I believe we caused 1 late snap total.
Agreeing with TheBigB, if the band were maybe closer to the student section, we would hear D-FENCE a lot more.
I don’t think anyone really looks at the screen to watch for chant cues during defensive drives.
The crowd starters should be the cheer leading squad, which today did not do very well on continuing Texas Fights usually started in the student section. It was very disappointing to start Texas! on the Northeast side of the stadium, with few people replying on the West side. More loudness can be achieved by employing better tactics. Can we somehow challenge the cheerleaders to do a better job at this:?
I’ve noticed that one way the Jumbotron excites the crowd during defense is by showing defensive players who are waving the ‘be loud’ signal to the crowd.
Excitedly nervous in 08.
by Ultra Horn on
Oct 26, 2008 1:06 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Can't speak for others
but I had to go jog after the game to bring my heart rate DOWN. Kinda wish this had been Tennessee and Cal on Thursday night so I could watch and enjoy. Very hard to enjoy this one.
Oklahoma State was really good. Told my brother they played a near-perfect game, other than just having no answers for the short passing game and not being able to stop four long UT drives. Texas didn’t play badly at all; this was not the DOWN game a lot of us feared. Cowboys were just that good. As PB points out, OSU won the LOS; that usually determines the winner.
Scary stat: McCoy completes 84% IN A HOME GAME and Horns are still fortunate win. Parting thoughts: I’ll take 8-0. And OU still sucks.
by edsp on
Oct 25, 2008 10:40 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Disagree
Texas didn’t play badly at all; this was not the DOWN game a lot of us feared.
Not to take anything away from OSU….but, our kick coverage was horrible and lead to both of OSU’s first half scores. Our running game and overall OL play was bad. Run defense and tackling was as bad as it has ever been this year. 2 turnovers, and lucky to not have another INT. Fumbling to end a potential game winning drive. Only 7 second half points. I think a significant portion of our team had a pretty bad game.
by Horncasting on
Oct 25, 2008 11:08 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Corwd....
Was not at DKR. Zac Robinson said after the game that the crowd was not loud and had no impact at all on them. Player press quotes on MB_TF is where you can find it. This is unacceptable y’all.
by Texas_Fight on
Oct 25, 2008 10:42 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not completely true
I was at the game today, and OSU had a costly false start penalty in the third quarter because of the noise. DKR was crazy during that penalty! Read my post above… The DKR crows is loud, but not always coordinated with the volume!
by TheBigB on
Oct 25, 2008 10:59 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
PB
I’d like if you could do an analysis of our run game, or lack thereof. I know you dont want to talk about Fozzy, but we desperately need something to open up here. We have no threat to run the ball when we need to. Our run game is Shipley running five yards downfield and turning around. We must find out a running game and immeaditely. Im not sure if it’s the O-line or what, but we cant keep on thinking we can dink all the way down the field for the next four games. We just need something on the ground to take some pressure off, but IDK what we can do to be honest.
by Texas_Fight on
Oct 25, 2008 10:48 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You are missing the point
Two of the last three teams we have played OU and OSU, have good (I admit not SEC good) defenses. This is one of the reasons for problems with the running game! I believe the second is GD’s conservative play calling, especially today! Bottom line is we need to find a better way to use all of our talent, not just OG, Ship and Cosby!
by TheBigB on
Oct 25, 2008 10:53 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I could be wrong,
but it seemed we ran the counter a good deal against Missouri and it worked great. I didn’t notice it at all today, every run seemed to be run parallel to the line of scrimmage for 15 yards and hope to cut it up somewhere (and OG just kept running to the sideline and never cut it up at the right time).
by tdwalsh on
Oct 25, 2008 11:06 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OG missed his running lanes several times
but otherwise had a great game.
I posted in the fanposts section about the lack of holding calls and it was rampant again this afternoon. I noticed we got away with a pull or two, but I still can’t believe what goes uncalled game after game.
Texas '06.
by afrokinger on
Oct 25, 2008 10:54 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Great game?
2.2 yards per carry on 11 carries (most carries on the team).
73 yards receiving. Take out the gimme at the end of the half and he had 39 receiving yards.
This is a very, very subpar game by the starting RB at UT.
by Horncasting on
Oct 25, 2008 11:13 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Eh
He had a couple 3rd down conversions and was great in blitz pickup.
Texas '06.
by afrokinger on
Oct 25, 2008 11:16 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
very, very subpar?
whatever
In Mack Brown We Trust!
by Cyrus on
Oct 25, 2008 11:20 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Low expectations
You’re expectations of production by the starting RB at UT are too low if you don’t think that game was well below par. 27 yards rushing on 11 carries? Almost 2 yards below what OSU had been giving up per carry on the season? Pedestrian numbers in the passing game? He did a decent job of doing the things that have made him a good 3rd down back and he did pick up one 3rd down receiving. As the starter and getting most of the carries/snaps….not so much.
by Horncasting on
Oct 26, 2008 9:36 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Crap...
D’Marco Farr just predicted us to beat Tech.
Disciplina Praesidium Civitatis.
by zamm on
Oct 25, 2008 11:01 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
'Will' gain momentum
On Gameday after the Penn State/Ohio game The penn fans were chanting WE WANT TEXAS over and over. Lets keep our heads straight, I have enough faith that Texas will be prepared of Lubbock.
by JMCG on
Oct 25, 2008 11:05 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Knock on wood! Let;s not talk NC Games yet!! After Tech, with only KU, Baylor, and the Fake Army left, then I think its safe
by the1austin on
Oct 25, 2008 11:35 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Read Pat Forde's article on espn.com
It will make you cringe. He says we are one win from South Beach, talk about a jinx. Then if you want to get mad just read the comments from the drunk jealous morons.
by Hookem4life84 on
Oct 26, 2008 12:04 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Im just saying
given the chance, I like penn St, the program, the coach and so on. nice classy matchup were it to ever happen
by owenh on
Oct 26, 2008 12:42 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the coach, and historical relevance of their program may be classy, but their fans are generally regarded as a bunch of drunken fratboy assholes.
by Displaced Longhorn on
Oct 26, 2008 2:10 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tech has the worst fans I have ever encountered.
by the1austin on
Oct 26, 2008 1:07 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Awesome! That’s by design. It’s football, not the library. We hope you have a terrible time in Lubbock and have no desire to ever come back. Have a rep as a good and sweet fan means you’re not much more than a p***y. Man up, the1austin.
by Tech92 on
Oct 26, 2008 1:41 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
respectfully
there is a difference between being loud and intimidating inside the stadium, when your team is on the field, and disrupting the other team on offense, and just being obnoxious a-holes and jerks to the opposing fans before, during and after the game, inside the stadium and out.
Tech has not learned the difference.
The fact that you hope opposing fans never return to Lubbock just shows how skewed your priorities are.
by Beergut on
Oct 26, 2008 4:49 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
2 recs
During my college hunt year I applied to Penn State and did some research on it. The most remembering thing in my mind as of today is a comment made somewhere on college discussion forums:
“I made 950 on SAT and got it. I don’t wanna go there”
by justfr1day on
Oct 26, 2008 11:15 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hell Yes
Big play by the Arizona D. I say go play action and go for the TD on the first play
by Hookem4life84 on
Oct 25, 2008 11:08 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
RE: Crowd noise
First, just like seeing people leave the Rose Bowl when Texas was down 26-38, it blew my mind how many people from my section left when the game was at 28-21. Seriously.
That said, while there were some bright spots, the crowd could have been a bit more into it today. The section I was sitting in (4) had a large number of older alumni, so there was a lot of complaining about people standing up throughout the game, which I absolutely despise. Its a college football event, and if crowd participation plays a part in Texas either going 7-1 or 8-0, you bet I’m going to stand up for the entire game and get loud. Kind of made me envious of the other side of the stadium (the 20s sections), who managed to get the Texas part of the Texas Fight cheer frighteningly loud.
But, it was also incredibly hot at the game, and while I drank 5 bottles of water throughout the game, and didnt have any beer or liquor beforehand, I can understand how some people not in the shade would have been a little less boisterous as the game went on. I’m sure glad we won though; Texas took their lumps today, I would expect that this eye opening victory causes them to realize that because Tech is undefeated in the South as well, this next week could be just a tad important.
"Stats are for losers, I like winning games."
by bendj on
Oct 25, 2008 11:45 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i agree
i was dead center north end zone, i had to command several hundred people to stand the eff up on defensive third downs.
"...think about it: why would they lie.?..if you're dead, you can't smoke."
by burntorangenance on
Oct 26, 2008 2:33 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nonsense
I had a respectable amount of consumption prior to kickoff, didn’t get shade until singing The Eyes of Texas after the game, and stood up the entire time except halftime. There is no excuse in a close game.
by ryanlionrah on
Oct 26, 2008 8:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dodged A Bullet............
for sure. make no mistake this was a quality team we beat today.
The two turnovers were costly but we survived them.Quan and Shipley were money.Who can fault Colt fighting for the extra yardage when he got stripped for the fumble.
We overcame a lot and emerger victorious.
After watching Tech and Kansas today I feel that we have more horses than they do and we will wear them down and pull out a W in a barnbuner.
This team, and especially Colt just refuses to lose and i for one am enjoying the ride.
by TCB Orange Dino on
Oct 25, 2008 11:59 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I can
“Who can fault Colt fighting for the extra yardage when he got stripped for the fumble.”
Had he been 1 yard from the 1st down I wouldn’t fault him for fighting, but he was still 4 or 5 yards from the first down and once he fought off the first strip attempt from behind he should have gone down, instead he stayed up, either spun himself or got spun around, and then stayed up to allow the second successful attempt.
I love the fight, but he had to know we really needed at least the field goal at that point.
by tdwalsh on
Oct 26, 2008 12:20 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow...
After watching Tech and Kansas today I feel that we have more horses than they do and we will wear them down and pull out a W in a barnbuner.
Wow, you got that from watching the Tech game? It will be good for Tech if more people (including the UT coaches and team) did.
I think most people watched that game and got a big dose of reality, which is good for whatever team plays Tech next. Overconfidence going into Lubbock may not be a good idea.
Peace
... I'm just sayin'
by antiswarm on
Oct 26, 2008 6:27 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
???
Overconfidence going into Lubbock may not be a good idea.
You might want to heed your own advice.
by vy til i die on
Oct 27, 2008 2:40 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Absolutely beat a great team today BUT
I can understand the tackling problem sometimes because they’re young and they’ll learn, BUT..when we have a big Cody Johnson who’s been lights out in short yardage situations we need to use him. I understand every now and then its ok to try and fake out the D. against OU on 3rd and 1 we run that scramble and colt throws a pick we get back by a break. we ran another play like that and colt threw a pick only to get another break on a stupid OSU penalty. Memo to Mack Brown- ITS OKAY TO RUN CODY JOHNSON ON THIRD AND 1!!!!
by jacobb23 on
Oct 26, 2008 12:07 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
OSU is everything Mizzou was supposed to be
…and more. They were freaking good, seriously. That’s a top 10 team right there. It was closer than I would have liked, but a win’s a win and hell, at the start of the year, we expected to lose a few of these. This season is already a success, everything from now on is just gravy.
As for playing not to lose, I definitely felt like that, both on offense and defense. On defense it made a bit more sense. This was one of the best offenses in the country. Based on how our offense has been playing, I think the gameplan of not giving up a big play, especially to Bryant, was a good one.
However, on offense, it felt a bit like the Greg Davis of old. I mean seriously. We opened the game with what? 3 screen passes? I understand wanting to control the clock, and we did a remarkable job at that, but in the second half especially it felt like we were back to the old Run Run Pass (Punt) phiosophy, only this time without the punts thanks to clutch 3rd down play.
My biggest complaint was personnel on the running plays. McGee is not the answer. Chris O. had some big runs on crappy defenses, but he’s still the same unspectacular runner he’s always been. If Fozzy isn’t hurt, he needs to be getting some playing time. And if not, let’s at least get more reps for Cody Johnson. Can anyone explain to me why he’s been relegated to the jumbo package and nothing else? Does no one on the coaching staff remember the Rice or Arkansas games? He’s a solid back who’s going to get positive yards. He’s not going to slip in the backfield repeatedly for a loss cough McGee cough. Why isn’t he getting playing time? I don’t understand it.
And then there’s the special teams….
It wasn’t a bad game, OSU was just that good, but it was a letdown from the near-perfect level we’ve been playing at. We haven’t had much chance to bitch about things yet, so we might as well take advantage, right?
As for the Colt vs. VY argument. VY is untouchable in my opinion. There’s no point in making comparisons. It’d be like a manliest chest competition between anyone besides Tom Selleck and this:

by Meekrob on
Oct 26, 2008 12:51 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
wow.
Tom Selleck. Just…wow. (and not a good wow.)
by jacobb23 on
Oct 26, 2008 1:09 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Some observations/opinions
1. From what I understand Curtis Brown started for the first time in place of Chykie Brown or possibly Palmer? and what a solid performance he put on!
2. Opposition kick returns scare the crap out of me. There weren’t just missed/weaksauce tackles, I believe somehow there was a lack of tackle attempts. ksu 2006 anyone?
3. Speaking of missed & weak tackles, it seems like out of the past 3 total games, the dline and dbacks were the least motivated during this OSU game. I wonder if this was due to the inferior crowd today in the span of the last 3 games? A superior and well-balanced OSU team? Great game plan by Gundy? Overconfidence? The heat? Or possibly Muschamp movement talk?
4. The running game performance we put on today was as combination of results of the running backs work, offensive line’s performance and OSU’s defensive unit. With such a great running game, the OSU defense has very good practice material. If I had the choice of improving one offensive unit(rbs, wrs, ol,qb), it would definitely be the offensive line.
5. The McCosbley triumvirate remains in rule of DKR and college football. All hail!
Excitedly nervous in 08.
by Ultra Horn on
Oct 26, 2008 1:35 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
*replace ksu 2006 with ksu 2007. nt
Excitedly nervous in 08.
by Ultra Horn on
Oct 26, 2008 1:36 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
shipley and cosbey took some shots today.
when they were slow to get up i held my breath until i saw them walking.
by clra2 on
Oct 26, 2008 1:44 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
NEED SOME HELP...
I’m not too blog savvy. How do I add a picture from my computer to my comment? When I click on the “Image” icon, it asks for a http:// URL. I just want to attach a file.
I’ve got a decent pic of Cosby’s 2nd quarter TD catch I’d like to share.
Hook 'em Horns
by LonghornWSO on
Oct 26, 2008 1:37 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
go to www.uploader.ws, click one of the 4 or so browse buttons, go to your file. click upload. you can get the http:// link from the box titled “URL List” (or any of the other boxes, you just have to cut out some extra stuff)
by Displaced Longhorn on
Oct 26, 2008 2:18 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Watching the replay
of game this morning.
We scored 2 touchdowns in the 2nd quarter. Both were executed flawlessly.
The McGee zone read off left tackle had perfect blocks and was a great great north-south play. Our run blocking worked when we needed it most.
The 2nd TD, and arguably the greatest TD play since Williams grab against MO, was a spectacular individual effort. Quan literally turned his back on the football dead into the sun and catches the ball on a full-reach, falling backward, feet over head, very memorable reception.
This will be one of the plays I will remember for a very long time because it epitomized why Colt is so dang good. He has 2 of the all-time great UT receivers who just do not drop passes.
by TXStampede on
Oct 26, 2008 5:46 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Here's the pic
of Cosby’s 2nd quarter TD catch. Only he could make that catch. I took this pic from Section 119 (the upper northeast section).
http://uploader.ws/upload/200810/Cosby_TD_Catch_2.jpg
http://uploader.ws/upload/200810/Cosby_TD_Catch.jpg
Hook 'em Horns
by LonghornWSO on
Oct 26, 2008 8:43 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Damn it.
Try these instead:
http://www.uploader.ws/upload/200810/Cosby_TD_Catch.jpg
http://www.uploader.ws/upload/200810/Cosby_TD_Catch_2.jpg
If you’re still getting a 404 Forbidden like I was, you’ll have to take my word for it. It’s a pretty good “moment in time” action photo of Cosby catching the ball in mid-air, on his back, with the OSU defender flailing in mid-air.
Hook 'em Horns
by LonghornWSO on
Oct 26, 2008 8:52 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Great shots
That’s amazing. Did you take those?
By the way, to get around the 403 error, do this:
1) click on the link
2) when the error page appears, put your cursor in the address bar and hit enter to reload the image
I think the error relates to the fact that it’s a link.
by mikey 4 on
Oct 26, 2008 10:49 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that's a great shot.
love the different angle and “click” point, plus, as mentioned below, shadow.
Mikey 4’s instructions make viewing possible.
by edsp on
Oct 26, 2008 2:06 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I hate playing Okie St.
Is there anyway we can at least move them to the Big 12 North, so we can at least have a 2 year break from them once in awhile. Honestly I am not surprised by yesterdays game at all. I was not even comfortable when it was 14-0. Every year Oklahoma State gives us a huge scare which most of the time it is a Texas qb leading an amazing comeback.
This years Okie St. team is hands down by far the best team they have had since Barry Sanders was lining up in the backfield, which was the last time I think they were ranked as high as well. I saw this game coming from a mile away. The fans were way to overconfident and seemed to of forgotten how the last 4 or 5 games with Oklahoma State has gone. I cannot believe Texas fans were actually predicting a Texas blowout (read Pat Forde’s article at espn.com and you can see what Mack had to say about this), I just knew this was going to be a game where Texas struggled and if they won, that Texas would escape. That is exactly what happened and everyone should be thankful.
Now having said all that, this is exactly what this Texas team needed. Remember they are not going to be all pretty and comfortable like the Missouri game. Every team that has gone through a NC season, knows that there were one or two games that were ugly wins, but most important they were wins. This was definitely Texas’ worst showing of the year (well maybe the UTEP game was), but they got the W and that shows what this team is made of. Even with adversity and not being dominant, when you are able to come out and get a win, shows a teams character.
I have no doubt that this team will be pumped and ready to go next Saturday night, it is going to be a good one, and fellow Longhorn fans, can we please keep our mouths shut? and let the Horns do the talking on the field.
by HornsRiverine on
Oct 26, 2008 7:05 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
This was the toughest game of the year.
We should be thankful OSU is not in the north. I don’t want to play them again this year. No mas. Next year is soon enough.
Second, this site is for news, analysis and, yes, speculation. It’s the fun part. Telling fans to be quiet is not going to happen. You can use cautionary tales and an avalanche of cogent info, but even that doesn’t stop the most enthusiastic of us.
The team always does our talking. The only thing we can really hope – especially with a young team – is that both the players and the coaches are well grounded and execute well. It’s really the uncontrollables – TOs, penalties, weather, the other team’s state of mind, the wayward bounce of the holy spheroid – that create the nature and flow of a given game, not the peanut gallery. We can help, we can facilitate, but we don’t win or lose the game.
I’m thankful for this win. The Horns did what they had to. OSU played us as tough as tough as they could. Champions earn their title, most often the hard way. This was a 12-round split decision.
by whills on
Oct 26, 2008 1:28 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tech cocky?
Go check out the Tech blog and those guys are already acting like they are going to the NC. Jeez talking about having no respect for the #1 team in the nation.
by HornsRiverine on
Oct 26, 2008 7:58 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not real sure
what you’re talking about. Texas Tech played their best game to date and we’re pretty proud of it. I’m not sure where we’re talking about going to the national championship (other than here, but the point of his Fan Post was that Texas Tech played at a very high level), but for the first time in a long time Texas Tech was almost perfect on offense and the defense stepped up and played really well (something we’re not really used to seeing). If you think DTN doesn’t have respect for the Longhorns then I’m not sure you’ve been reading our blog. Personally, I think UT and OSU are still #1 and #2 in the Big 12, while I’m pretty suspect of OU’s defense after the past 3 weeks.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
by Seth C on
Oct 26, 2008 10:20 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What?
I see Texas getting plenty of respect over there. In fact, we’ve been on here saying that Texas is the #1 team in the nation because they are THAT good. Being excited about playing a great game against a good team, and saying that IF your team plays that well again they can beat anyone in the country is not disrespecting Texas at all.
Let me say it here… again. Texas is the #1 team in the nation and for good reason. It is Texas on this blog that is blowing off Tech. You just had a poster post a fan thread claiming that Texas had finally finished their run against balanced offensive juggernauts. No one at Tech is looking past Texas. 70% or more of you here are blowing off Tech, and I for one hope you continue to.
Listen, there are two main things that will contribute to a Tech victory in Lubbock:
1. If Texas trips up… at all. They need to play nearly a perfect game, which means you need to score on virtually every drive without a turnover. If I were your coaches, I would assume Tech is going to do so, even if they may not.
2. If Texas players come into the game with an attitude of dismissing a very good Tech team.
I warned the overconfident KU fans not to do what many of your fans here are doing. Mack Brown himself said that many Texas fans were “stupid” because they had the luxury of not watching film of OSU. I suggest some of you watch the film of the Kansas game.
Granted, KU is not Texas. Texas gets all the respect from us it is due.
It seems that HornsRiverine wants Tech fans to genuflect and go ahead and predict a loss. I don’t think Texas fans did that in your game against #1 Oklahoma. That would just be stupid.
I predict a Tech win, because I don’t believe Texas players or their fans have any idea what to expect in Lubbock. If Texas comes in with the right idea and mindset, they will win. I don’t think they will.
Peace
... I'm just sayin'
by antiswarm on
Oct 26, 2008 11:39 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Any Texas fans that disregard Tech are idiots.
I guarantee the team won’t.
Tech scares the hell out of me every year, and none of those teams were as good as this one.
by Meekrob on
Oct 26, 2008 12:17 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Couldn't agree more.
Especially after what they just did to Kansas on both sides of the ball.
by Horncasting on
Oct 26, 2008 12:41 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The disrespected underdog card doesn't work...
…when you’ve got one of the top five or six teams in the country. You might consider taking that one out of the deck.
By and large, we’re not underestimating Tech, and I’m sure the players aren’t after a timely wake up call. Perhaps you may wish to consider if you’re underestimating Texas?
proud to swim home
by learned hand on
Oct 26, 2008 12:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sure it does
The disrespected underdog card doesn’t work…
…when you’ve got one of the top five or six teams in the country.
Just look at our game against Missouri when most of the talking heads called for us to get upset at home. I think the team went into that game with a chip on its shoulder having been picked to lose my most of the mainstream media in back to back games.
by Horncasting on
Oct 26, 2008 12:43 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You are the one I am calling out anitswarm.
This morning as I woke up, I did the same thing I have done all season. I got on bon to check out what I missed during the evening talk. Now with what is coming up as Texas’ biggest game of the year (I say that because of this being the last game of this 4 game stretch), I saw that Tech fans had a blog along with bon, so I jumped on there to see what Tech fans are saying. Did not have one intention of going on to talk shit and I did not leave one comment, in fact the only thing I said about it is a few posts above this one. You have every right to feel your team is going to win, I know this is the best Tech team that has ever taken the field and it will probably be ya’lls best shot at a Big 12 and possible NC. The thing that kind of pissed me off, is that you actually predicted the score of 49-24, I honestly believe with that kind of prediction that you are cocky. If you do not believe what Texas and its fans are coming into next Saturday night you are mistaken. Remember in ’06 Colt had to lead a game winning drive, hell in ’02 Tech actually upset the Longhorns in fact I think the score was 42-38 and Texas was ranked #5 at the time. So if you think no one knows about Tech you are mistaken, in fact Tech has not been that far under the radar for the last couple of years. Now I am not disrespecting Tech at all and I know what they are capable of and I am not even predicting a Texas win, but come on 49-24, that is cocky. If you think Tech team that got taken to OT by Nebraska can hold Colt and this O to 24 points, you must know something that the rest of the world does. It will be a good game, just remember if Tech pulls the upset you do have to look forward to OSU and OU.
by HornsRiverine on
Oct 26, 2008 2:50 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Could care less about OSU or OU this week. It’s all UT.
by Tech92 on
Oct 26, 2008 2:57 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I watched your game and OSU/Penn State...
…and I feel pretty comfortable saying Oklahoma State is better than either of the Big 10/11 teams I watched last night.
We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats
by TB on
Oct 26, 2008 9:15 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
thanks meekrob
I needed a reminder of the raw power that is Tom Selleck. It is similar (yet more perfect) to the power in that Pokes squad (his chest hair would’ve thrown one more touchdown to beat us).
Good post-game review PB. I agree 110% with this being the best team the ‘Horns have faced all season. And did anyone notice how friggin’ HUGE that team is?! Brandon Pettigrew was grown in a lab. Their collective wang must be over a mile. Anyway, they were an awesome team.
by bevoshapedwaffles on
Oct 26, 2008 9:38 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Concerns must be addressed.............
Concerns that must be addressed
1. Kickoff returns – reminds me of the Michigan Rose bowl where they kept running back kickoffs to the 50 every time. Saw same issue against Missouri and exposed yesterday by OSU. Texas would have a great drive and build momentum and special teams play on the kickoff gave it away. Tech has a great return team and could change the game – we cannot give the ball to Tech constantly near midfield.
2. Tackling. I know Will was upset with this yesterday, especially the amount of arm tackling and Texas tackles where we "assumed" the OSU player would go down and not follow through. Do this to Crabtree and he will kill you.
3. Running game. We kept trying to go with a sweep run that really never worked. Most disappointing was inability to push ball into end zone at end of game with first down near the one. We must be able to run ball on Tech (like last year) and have long drives resulting in touchdowns that eat the clock and keep Tech offense off the field.
Finally, I was at both the Missouri and OSU games and the crowd noise was very different. Also, the OSU band OWNED our band – they played after almost every play and I think our band plays after each quarter or only a big play.
by texascfo on
Oct 26, 2008 1:17 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Im glad the band doesn't play constantly.
Many high school bands (in Texas at least) play nearly constantly and I think it is really distracting. I don’t know how you feel about NBA games and the constant noise, but I hate it. Our band is very enjoyable and plays just the right amount IMO.
by hornalum08 on
Oct 26, 2008 6:04 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Respect for Tech
won’t be an issue. My concern for Texas is the physical toll the last three games have taken.
Not to knock Tech at all, but playing Kansas, Aggies and K-State (plus Nebraska) is not the same as playing NoU, Mizzou and Okie Heavy. I fear Quan and Ship are just physically beaten up and beaten down. McCoy took a pounding yesterday. No alibi intended.
You go where the schedule says go, play ‘em in that order. I’m sure OSU fans and coaches believe they’d be unbeaten and No. 2 or 3 in the country if the Texas game had been in Stillwater.
by edsp on
Oct 26, 2008 2:12 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
gameplan on both sides was solid and well executed
there’s been a bit of nitpicking about the running game, run defense, and tackling but over all it took nothing short of a great gameplan and effort to be OSU. It will be a shame if OSU doesn’t get into a good bowl game this year because if they continue to play like they played against us they deserve it.
I thought the Horns did exactly what they needed to do on offense yesterday. They controlled the clock with a ball control passing game. Who cares if the running game didn’t work? It was sufficient enough to help keep the offense going. Frankly, we won’t be able to drop 50 on everyone and OSU came ready to play. They wanted to stop the run and force us to play the % game, hoping to seize on turnovers to pull the upset. The horns took what was given to them and couldn’t be stopped in the short passing game. Save for the McCoy fumble and the busted play on the goal line and the ‘Horns win that game by 18 points instead of 4. Some times the execution isn’t as crisp as it needs to be, but the offense did its job while leaving some room for improvement. We’re really splitting hairs at this point to criticize them — three 80+ yard scoring drives is huge.
Defensively, the ‘Horns took OSU’s best shot. The game plan was simple, take away Dez Bryant and make OSU earn every yard without a big play. Amazingly we handled Bryant without our best cover corner on the field. Pettigrew was huge but there’s a reason for it — he’s all big 12, mind you.
The biggest issues I saw were the relative ease OSU had taking Bobino/Norton out of the play by having Muckelroy focus on Pettigrew in coverage. It seemed like on ever run, one of the linemen dropped their block assignment and took Bobino out of the play. Let’s make no mistake though, we’ve always known Bobino’s shortcomings so this shouldn’t come as a surprise. Just because we’ve allowed 50 yards/game on the ground doesn’t mean we’re run stoppers — particularly when our opposition to this point was pass heavy. Going into this year I felt like our d-line would be susceptible to a power running game and fortunately for us we don’t face many of those in the Big 12.
Looking forward to Tech…OSU exposed some of our weaknesses but I’m not sure Tech has the personnel to exploit them. Pettigrew was a mismatch all over the field, but Tech doesn’t posses a TE anywhere in his realm. Furthermore, after facing Iglesias & Manny Johnson, Jeremy Maclin, and now Dez Bryant we know we can execute a game plan to try to contain a guy like Crabtree. There is nothing that Tech has shown on defense that leads me to believe they will be more successful than OSU or OU at slowing down our offense. Tech will need a special effort in every phase of the game to win.
by BMG on
Oct 26, 2008 3:12 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Respect for OSU
The Cowboys executed very well both on offense and defense. Any struggles either team had can largely be blamed on the other.
by 71grad on
Oct 26, 2008 3:13 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Couldn't agree more...
Well said… this was two great teams “slugging it out” to paraphrase whills in his comment above. Texas’ struggles can be blamed on how good OSU was, not on Texas being bad… although I have to admit we can tackle better on kickoffs and on opposing RBs. But that would be my only criticism. Frankly games like this tend to galvanize teams if everyone comes out healthy.
I thought OSU would be a hard game and I was right. If the Tech that played Kansas this past weekend shows up, we are in for a difficult game. I think we still win, but we had better not underestimate the Red Raiders, if we do we could lose the game. They are much better this year than the iterations of Leach’s previous years. BTW, I think our offense will score, it is our secondary that worres me. If we cannot get pressure it will be a long night.
1 Peter 2:17
by HornsFan87 on
Oct 27, 2008 9:01 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We wont turn the ball over 5 times.
That people are all ready to jump off the Colt bandwagon after a 2 turn over performance, should be an indicator of how well we have been protecting the ball.
And before everyone freaks out at Techs Kansas performance, realize this, they didn’t do exceptionally better than their yearly average (against the 91st SOS, mind you) except in the turnover department.
Statistic : Yearly average : Kansas Game
Scoring : 48 : 63
Rushing : 138 : 138
Passing : 418 : 418
KO Return : 24 : 26
Total D : 347 : 315
Scoring D : 21 : 21
Harrell did better than he has been, but the offense wasnt doing anything spectacular outside of what it has already done. Kansas coughed the ball up 5 times, and still made Tech’s scoring D average.
by BoddickerIsClutch on
Oct 27, 2008 4:32 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Crowd was better than you portrayed
I thought the crowd was good. Most people stood the entire game, even in sections with a lot of older people. I’ve been going to home games for the last 8 years, and this is definitely the most consistently involved crowd I can remember. It was loud too.
by thestos on
Oct 26, 2008 4:34 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Perception is reality regarding crowd noise
and both the UT staff and players commented publicly how impressed they were with the participation and compared it equally to the Missouri game. Enough said.
by TXStampede on
Oct 27, 2008 7:17 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs












