Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Brain's Game: Mike (Solomon) Gundy Edition

Grundy_copy_medium

What almost was...

Yes, that's Colt down there in Solomon Gundy's wake.  This was a game that everyone thought we'd have to give away to lose, and we nearly did, though not by the mechanism in which we were worried about, exactly.  I'm sorry, Mack, but you don't get to say you told us so, because if you had really thought that OSU was going to be one of the best teams we'd face all year, then we would have come into the game with something approaching the creativity and preparation that we saw for OU.  Instead, our game plan was to completely abandon the run game and put as much pressure on Colt as possible in a scheme with two big weeks of film out on it.  If we had a mortal at QB, we'd have scored about ten points in this game while OSU named their score against our ragged-tired defense that had to play 40 minutes of possession.  Look again at PB's third down chart, and then take a look at the play-by-play.  Notice a trend?  Colt McCoy (and Jordan Shipley) dragged our butts through this game.  It's decision time for Davis:  Gamble that Colt continues to out-perform almost every quarterback in history for the remainder of the season, or figure out a way to get him some help.

The rest is after the jump...

Star-divide

The crowd was restless.  The students were horribly late to arrive, and this was the first game that I've ever heard the west side of the stadium yelling "FIGHT!" before I heard anyone yelling "TEXAS!" on my side.  Until the fourth quarter, I heard little besides violent swearing directed at our defense.  The thing is, they may have had a point.  The biggest groans were caused when OSU was bouncing through our arm tackles in threes and fours.  Behind the offensive game-plan, that's the second biggest indicator that we didn't have an A game.

The fourth quarter brought a better attitude, though.  Just before the quarter started, the defense was walking back onto the field for the rest of OSU's field goal drive (right after the INT), and Eddie Jones and some others started riling up the crowd.  For whatever reason, this time it worked.  The crowd started roaring, and two plays later Kindle sacked Robinson on third down to force the field goal.  Later, right before Houston dropped Dez Bryant behind the line on fourth down, I could feel the stadium shaking from the noise. 

Mental timeout:  As I type this, some guys are sitting next to me saying that our schedule is easy from here on out.  One of them asked what about Tech, and another replied by twirling his finger in the air, whoopty-doo, style.  What the hell is wrong with you people?

One problem that I've noticed at the games lately is that the cheerleaders seem to be busy doing nothing while my section tries to start Texas Fight.  We'll go through Texas alone for about fifteen iterations before they even reach for their signs, and by the time they try and help out, it's already died off, and then they give up, too.  Whatever, I hope we don't find ourselves in a dogfight at home for the rest of the season anyway, but if we do, it would be nice to get the crowd involved.

There will be no lazy crowd Saturday night in Lubbock for Mack to blame for his team overlooking the Raiders, so you can bet that he'll make an attempt to have them ready.  Even now the Techsters are bottling their rage for game night.  The crime rate there will drop by 30-40% over this week as the populace discovers that they have something to talk about for once.  They'll blame the Longhorns for everything from falling through a parched crack in the ground on their way across a field to their yellow yards blowing away as they sit in their lawn furniture and inhale a few Natties.  Hatred and boredom are their distinct advantages, and they're something we'll have to overcome as we've done in our past two trips to the desert.  For my part, I'm going to spread this rumor in an effort to even the playing field of hate:  Does anyone know what happened to Colt's girlfriend that went to Tech?  I heard Graham Harrell stole her.

Yeah, I bet that's true...

0 recs  |  Comment 22 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Is Tech that much different than Missouri

Missouri was suppose to be “supermen in the spread” well rounded on offense and with a better defense than Tech thus rated in the top 5. Now the hype machine around the country is promoting Tech as the new “Missouri” this weeks Horns killer. That’s not to say Tech is not dangerous but Texas has just come through a three game streak where they beat better teams, so if they can keep it up they should beat Tech.

The Texas defense doesn’t get enough praise it just held the three of the best offenses in college ball to much less than their seasons average in points.

Why all the gripping about the lack of a running game? We get to see every week a historic QB performance and it is beating the best in country. If McCoy can complete more than 80% and get a many TD’s and incomplete passes I say shine on the running the ball and hold on tight and ride that hoss to the finish line

by Xerxes on Oct 26, 2008 11:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That which comes before the fall.

Watch that Tech-KU game again. Tech is scary good. Missouri did not have a ground game to speak of, and Harrell is a much better athlete than people give him credit for. Remember this Saturday when Zac Robinson scrambled away from potential sacks? Harrell has the ability to avoid pressure unlike Daniel. I think we have a good game going into Lubbock, but its far from a lock.

by pleaseplaykindle on Oct 27, 2008 2:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw Tech vs KU

was not impressed with KU, don’t know how they got in the top 25 and they were the strongest team Tech has played.
Tech has to play some real teams now in this next few weeks we will see how they match up to top 10 teams.

by Xerxes on Oct 27, 2008 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you kidding? Daniel has great athletic ability—much more than Harrell does. The difference will be the offensive line: Missouri was short on experience at tackle, and generally a bit weak on the line, while Tech has some big, strong, nasty guys. I think they’ll do a much better job of clogging against the blitz. They’re not in UT’s class as far as talent, but they’re fighters, and they just have to give Harrell a couple of seconds to hit those quick routes. The good news, IMO, is that they’re not quite good enough to hold off Orakpo, Melton, Miller, and Houston for the amount of time it takes for those deep passes that Tech so successfully uses to break/establish momentum.

by burntorangehorn on Oct 27, 2008 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Running game
Why all the gripping about the lack of a running game? We get to see every week a historic QB performance and it is beating the best in country. If McCoy can complete more than 80% and get a many TD’s and incomplete passes I say shine on the running the ball and hold on tight and ride that hoss to the finish line

Because most realize that that completion percentage is non sustainable. It is just too much to ask.

Think about Tech in 2006. Colt was having a very, very good year then as well but came back to earth at the beginning of the Tech game and it almost cost us. Having a one dimensional offense will eventually cost this team.

by Horncasting on Oct 27, 2008 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've been saying that about the completion percentage for a couple of weeks.

But it hasn’t happened. Frankly, it might not go down much. Just frickin’ awesome.

Don’t fret on running game. We’re taking what they give us. Yes, OSU strung things out going wide. The good things was it ate up time. If we’d been serious about running – that is, no option but to run – then we’d probably gone straight at them. I thought the running was more functional within the offensive strategy that specifically aimed at a running attack. Perhaps a fine line for many here…just saying.

I think GD will reconfigure the running for Tech. If you’ll remember last year, it was the running that was the killer in the first half, when JC had over 150 yards. He was injured and the Horns changed it up and played keep away the second half.

That extra 10-12% completion rate by Colt opens new options that the Horns didn’t have last year. In a sense, running has become our insurance…

by whills on Oct 27, 2008 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless something really bad happens

Colt numbers are getting better as the opponents have gotten better, that is not typical so this is not a typical situtation.
 What proof do you have that his completion rate is not sustainable? It has been sustainable against the best of the conference, 3 top ten teams in a row and he’s getting better. What if he does get better?
Why on earth would you look at a exceptionally successful passing game and then the mediocre running game and say we need to run more, that totally illogical if you want to win. This situtation is not like the past so can’t judge it like the past, you have to take it at face value and like Greg Davis bet your whole paycheck.

by Xerxes on Oct 27, 2008 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Late Students

A big part of the reason that the students were late is because the network went down at gate 25 (the main student entrance) and they weren’t letting anyone with an email ticket in. You either had to have a hard copy ticket, or they were telling people to walk around the side of the stadium to gate 30.

There was a lot of confusion and not everyone understood what was going on. Most just stayed in line and started chanting “Let us in! Let us in!”

by utcopt on Oct 26, 2008 11:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not the A game

I have to agree, Brain.

Some posts on BON this weekend indicated that Texas DID bring its A-game, but I disagree:
- terrible tackling, both on defense and special teams
- very un-special teams – not great returns for Texas, plus ridiculous coverage from the Horns. (Why can’t we put the ball through the endzone when needed on kickoffs? Why hasn’t Shipley fielded another kickoff return?)
- not the best game plan, including some very suspect GD calls at the end of the game and abandoning the run

Tech will be tough, especially if these issues are not addressed – and fast.

Watch out, I bite.

by EddieTheAlbinoSquirrel on Oct 27, 2008 8:15 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

A Game

I really think not playing our best game against OSU will help us prepare for Tech. I think we got enough of a scare we will come out prepared and focused. Last week was one of those games where the team did not have it and those are the games you must win to stay undefeated. USC did not have it against, OSU (the other one, not Ohio, The other other one), Fla. did not have it against ole miss. UGA did not have it against, Bama, etc.

I do not think Graham Harrell would steal Colt’s girlfriend….he seems like more of the C*ckblocker type to me.

by billb on Oct 27, 2008 9:10 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

4th quarter defense was outstanding

When the game was absolutely on the line, the defense came up big. I came away very encouraged by that. I don’t think we brought our A-game, either, but I was glad to see the defense rise to the occasion in the fourth quarter.

I hope I’m right in believing we just faced the best conference team we’ll play this year. It’s going to be a lot of fun watching the OU-OSU-Tech round robin in November.

Friends may come and go, but enemies accumulate.
- Thomas Jones

by beast in bama on Oct 27, 2008 10:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

HB,

if you were in the LRC writing this, I have to advise you to not to listen to anything Longhorn sports related. It will drive you mad at the ignorance of some ASE students who think they know what they’re talking about. Trust me.

ps if you weren’t in the LRC, then nevermind..lol

by vy til i die on Oct 27, 2008 10:57 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Bingo

Never written there before. Absolutely shocking. I guess some rocket scientists aren’t used to not knowing everything.

by Horn Brain on Oct 27, 2008 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gameplan

While I agree the OSU gameplan lacked the creativity and WTF (in a good way) moments of the OU game, I will defend Mack, Greg and Will by saying that we should hold something in the tank for Tech. I could be proven wrong Saturday, but I get the feeling that the staff really just believed that we could line up and beat OSU with Tech maybe getting the new wrinkles. I am far more afraid of that scene in Lubbock. Tech is the right team in the right setting to make it ugly for the Horns. That game needs the extra formation, new blitz, trick play…

So yes, the OSU gameplan was to rely on McShip to get it done. Just match up and win. It would have been far easier with better execution from the D and two fewer turnovers. Will gets to coach it up this week and reaffirm the concept that they are not yet the number one team. Colt gets to take stock in the fact that a victory could have slipped because of two mistakes that littered his sophomore campaign. The mantra should be that the number one only counts after the clock hit triple zero in the BCS title game.

Space for rent.

by Brian.HalcYoN on Oct 27, 2008 12:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

We had wrinkles!

Greg Smith caught a pass! First TE reception in how many games?

by BoddickerIsClutch on Oct 27, 2008 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

4th and goal

So why didn’t we go with our “big” package or whatever it’s called during that last 4th and goal at the end of the game? Or at least once during those 4 downs. It certainly wouldn’t have done any worse than what we did, and I think we could have scored and sealed the game.

by UT_BKC on Oct 27, 2008 4:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What on earth are you talking about?

Jumbo Package was in on 2nd, 3rd, and 4th down. The real question is why try and pass it on 4th, instead of feeding Cody the ball for a third time.

by BoddickerIsClutch on Oct 27, 2008 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

Cody had gained close to 5 yards combined on 2nd and 3rd, so chances are he’d have gotten the last half yard needed.

Just not very smart to throw in that situation. I realize that Colt is smart and they probably told him if a receiver isn’t wide open, then just throw it away, but you are still risking a sack, an interception that has OSU starting that last drive from the 20, or even worse, a pick 6.

by Horncasting on Oct 27, 2008 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t realize that was our Jumbo on 2nd and 3rd. I thought we had OB in at RB.

I agree. We’d already moved 5 to 6 yards running it. Run it again. At the very least, send Colt up the middle on a QB sneak.

by UT_BKC on Oct 28, 2008 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

GD said specifically the play wasn't executed properly.

This was via radio interview after the game. I didn’t record the game, so I don’t have a reference to go back and see who busted what.

So, Greg (and/Mack) got tricky. Considering the level of execution we had all day, it seems odd to pick a play that may have not been practiced that much. I applaud the deception but you have to ask in such a critical situation do you really need it.

I agree a CoJo run should have been the call, would have taken a little more time off the clock at the least, and had a more than even chance of success. Even a designated scrum – with pushing from behind – might have worked.

by whills on Oct 28, 2008 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ut_vs_fau_8-30-2008_049_small
Tebow Apologizes, Resumes Place at Right Hand of God

Recent FanPosts

Small
Notes from Mack Brown's Monday Press Conference
N1205698570_6375_small
The Purists vs. Objectivity
Small
K-State or Neb - who do you want?
Small
Throwback jerseys for A&M game
Texas_old3_small
Defense performance vs. non-conference
2401104_1__small
The Almost Perfect Day of College Football
Jackut_small
Can we stop talking about the Aggies now?
Small
Texas-Baylor 2nd Half Thread Photo Recommendations
Img_0095_small
This week's petition to the AP from OU
Elephantlogoorange_small
BCS System Alternatives

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports