Short Girls In Boots
I'm standing with friends outside DKR on a fall Saturday during my junior year, impatiently waiting for a few stragglers from the tailgate to catch up, when two particularly awe-inspiring young ladies in jean skirts and cowboy boots casually saunter by. As 21 year old boys are prone to do, we find ourselves not at all subtly gawking, and after they've passed I turn to my friends and stammer, "All girls should be required to wear skirts and boots."
No sooner have I finished saying 'boots' when I feel on my shoulder the firm slap from an unmistakably gigantic hand, and as I turn, I see a Bunyan of a man--he looks like a burlier Big Tex from the State Fair grounds--gliding past me in impossibly large strides. But he's looking back and when he's sure he's got my eyes he says, "Not short girls, son." He winks and disappears into the stadium, gone as quickly as he appeared.
BEATING OKLAHOMA: TEXAS' LONE STAR ADVANTAGE
I was reminded of that story when reading The Elusive Shadow's Fan Post on "Keys To Winning." It's a fine post, with numerous arguments I find to be right on-point. Except one:
2. Run the ball consistently well.
I'm going to go ahead and assume Fozzy will not play, probably because he has to go to the Bat Cave and fight some more crime. Even if he does, we don't need to be looking for homeruns. We just need a good enough run game to keep Oklahoma honest. A consistent 4.5 ypc will do the trick. Also, I think Colt has to run the ball effectively as well. Seven carries for 45 yards for some key first downs will do.
This has quite a bit to do with our offensive line. They need to explode off the line and push downfield.
My week has more or less been limited to four activities: brief writing, making fun of OU via Photoshop, sleep, and thinking about what Texas' offensive game plan should look like. And the more I've thought about it, the more confident I've become with what Big Roy and I first discussed on Sunday evening:
Spread the field. As much as possible. Make Oklahoma defend sideline to sideline, with as many defenders occupied in man coverage as possible. Among other things, that gives Colt the best opportunity to be a playmaker. And he's It, right now.
The second thing I'd do which I cannot understand why we haven't/don't is use screens better. Everyone hates the bubble screen, but as a concept, we probably need to use screens of all types against Oklahoma--using their aggressiveness against them. A great offensive game plan will turn weaknesses into strengths: In Texas' case, that can mean showing our bread and butter to entice a hungry defense to overpursue. I have every confidence that Oklahoma will be over-locked in on what we've shown so far this year. It's up to Davis and Applewhite to use it against them.
It's against that backdrop that I'll nod in agreement with Elusive Shadow that Colt needs to be an effective runner on Saturday, but I don't think Texas should monkey around using tailbacks to try to pick up yardage from our straightforward zone rush plays any more than a short girl should expect to look good in boots.
The unfortunate truth is that Fozzy is an unknown at best, out of commission at worst, and our offensive line simply isn't going to do any downfield exploding on Saturday. Not only has this unit been off-and-on against inferior defensive fronts, but--more importantly--Texas would play right into Oklahoma's defensive strength by trying to execute our straight zone run game. There won't be much there.
Both of these defenses are good enough that long, deliberate drives advancing 5 yards at a time are losing propositions. Instead, the chess match on Saturday revolves around making the opposition defend the entire field, creating favorable match ups, and hitting some home runs. Go back over last year's play-by-play from the Cotton Bowl and look at where all the points come from--big plays. And for Texas, that meant big passing plays: Texas' first touchdown was keyed by a Finley 55-yard reception, the second score by a 58-yard Finley catch, and the third by a 16-yarder to Nate Jones followed by a 29-yard completion to OG. And even the infamous Drive That Almost Was (Charles' fumble) was boosted by a 14-yard Finley reception and 26-yard catch by Blaine Irby.
Though heading into this year Oklahoma's four stud receivers and steady offensive line make them better equipped for home run derby, Texas is hardly up a creek with no paddle. The one big--and important--advantage the Longhorns will have on offense is the ability of McCoy to make plays with his legs. As great as Bradford is throwing the ball (and don't kid yourself, he's great), he is a stand and throw guy; that's at least some help to Will Muschamp as he tries to implement a winning game plan. No such luck for the Brent Venables, who along with looking eternally constipated can be made uncomfortable if... if... Texas spreads the field to force the Sooners into some difficult choices: double Cosby/Ship or spy McCoy?
I was comforted to see the always insightful Scipio Tex weigh in with similar thoughts this week. From his own "How We Win" piece:
What does 4 wide do for us?
When you open up the field against OU, you make them declare their intentions. By alignment, by disposition, by intent...The more receiving personnel you put on the field, the less ability OU has to double Shipley or Cosby. In fact, they really can’t unless they go dime (6 DBs). Suddenly we’ve just created a viable running game running zone read. Ta-da! Say they outnumber us at the LOS and blitz but stay in dime to eradicate a running game and pressure Colt. Fine. Now two of the most canny receivers in college football can operate in space while a mobile QB buys time...
4 wide opens running lanes for Colt. Run your inside WRs on outs and your outside receivers deep and it’s amazing how the grass can open up in front of a QB. Suddenly pass rush discipline becomes important and OU pressures a bit more methodically.
Bingo. And Texas fans on Saturday should know pretty quickly whether or not the offensive coaching staff has a plausible plan of attack for the day: If we open up trying only to do what's worked against intramural defenses, pray that Muschamp's kids keep the Sooner scoring machine in check for as long as it takes Davis to try something new.
Ideally, though, Greg Davis and Major Applewhite sat down this week, looked closely at what's actually going to be in front of them on Saturday, saw a short girl, and concluded, "No boots."
0 recs |
46 comments
|
Comments
I think forcing man coverage
could be huge against OU. I was able to comment on it the other night, but didn’t get a catch. Playing press man coverage forces cornerbacks and linebackers in pass coverage to turn their back on the quarterback, meaning they react far slower to Colt McCoy scrambling out of the pocket or running the draw play that has been effective this season. Playing four wide receivers forces more players up in coverage, making Colt even more dangerous because, frankly, I like the physical match-up of Colt these days against opposing secondary players. If OU plays soft man coverage it feeds into the strength of the Texas offense, which is hitting quick underneath routes using the uber-accurate McCoy and Cosby. That’s what we’ve seen from the offense so far this season.
As for using a spy against McCoy, having to deploy a resource just to keep McCoy from his off-schedule scrambles means more space to operate in for the Texas offense. Ryan Reynolds said the other day that OU isn’t planning on doing anything unusual to stop McCoy, which, of course, comes with a grain of salt. It wouldn’t surprise me, though, for the OU defense to play McCoy straight up, believing in their scheme and athletes enough to play their base defense. All that comes back again to spreading the field.
By the way, great story about the game. Probably be a great guy to knock down a few beers with and shoot the shit. It’s amazing the things that happen in life that you just can’t make up. And I have to say that I agree with him about the short girls and with you about jean skirts and denim skirts. Keep it fine, Texas ladies.
by GhostofBigRoy on Oct 10, 2008 12:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Fair points
I agree that we should not force the run game and I definitely don’t think we should dream about simply lining up and smacking OU with loads of downhill run plays. However, while I like our defense better than OU’s, I am skeptical that relying so heavily on Colt on an athletic defense is a good idea. He is human, after all, and losing Irby gives him less options to go to. At the least, we need to run the ball well enough to keep the OU defensive line from simply pinning their ears back and going after McCoy. I’m fine with a relatively small number of carries for our tailbacks, but they have to be ones that count.
I agree about the screens. Screens are often not popular among fans (more so among Longhorns due to Davis’ love for the WR screen), but it’s definitely something we need to utilize with what we have.
I think Bradford can be heavily affected by constant pressure. He normally has all day because of his O-line, and thus teams are forced to blitz to bring any sort of pressure and he can read those and get rid of the ball fast. If our front four can get in the backfield on a regular basis, he doesn’t have near the mobility of Colt and he’ll be in trouble. I think he’ll have trouble reading blitzes because we can bring them whenever we want, rather than being “forced” to because we can’t get anyone near him. Thus, Colt’s legs is definitely one of our biggest advantages this game and I may be wrong: He may need more than 45 yards rushing.
by TheElusiveShadow on Oct 10, 2008 12:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well said
In any case, thanks for being the convenient excuse for me to raise a point I’ve been thinking about all week.
That’s what you get for being our most prolific Fan Poster.
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Oct 10, 2008 1:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correction on Girls/Boots
I think only short girls should wear boots.
err, no, that’s not quite what I meant to say. Lets try again —
I think short girls should wear only boots.
Better.
by pleaseplaykindle on Oct 10, 2008 1:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Darnit, PB
All this high-falutin talk about foosball is fine and all, but you can’t title a post “Short Girls in Boots” and not give us any good pics of short girls in boots. That is torturous. And while some may argue against them, I’m 6’2" so any girl under 6’ is a short girl to me…
So much for Bolivia...
by Kahuna on Oct 10, 2008 7:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Second that
Yeah PB, let’s get some pics on here, for gosh sake.
by HalfmileHorn on Oct 10, 2008 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's actually a little terrifying
To do a Google Image search for good boots pictures with the Safe Filter off. Unless you like S&M.

--PB--
by Peter Bean on Oct 10, 2008 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Roger that ...
That’s kewl PB, you the Man!!
by HalfmileHorn on Oct 10, 2008 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
clarify?
can one of y’all please shed some light on this ‘short’ thing, for the height-challenged? I’m 5’5" – too short??
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 7:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No
I mean short. 5’5" is dandy.
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Oct 10, 2008 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thank you for clearing this up!
was afraid I was gonna hafta toss some favorite boots for a sec … don’t want to go about unintentionally misrepresenting my fine home state…
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
short?
No, you are not short. Short is less than 5’1.
I know short.
by dimecoverage on Oct 10, 2008 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
'k ...
but I still don’t get the joke … sorry, lib arts degree …
BTW, who gets the bead on Ryan Reynolds? He scares me …
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but I still don’t get the joke...
You didn’t miss it, there really isn’t a joke. Once the OU game gets here, we tend to reminisce about past weekends. Just part of the fun.
I assume Peter was just doing the same.
by dimecoverage on Oct 10, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep ...
I too stayed in those big hotels in Dallas with 20 or so of my closest friends (and some new ones I think we made in the West End …) for ou weekend. It’s better to enjoy the game (and the pre-and post-game um, activities) if you know you don’t have a 3-hour drive back down 35 immediately afterwards …
"When you get to the end zone, act like you've been there before."
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
You’re not missing anything. It was just a surreal moment, when this enormous man hears me swoon about girls in boots and decides to point out, essentially, that boots make short girls look a little shorter.
Anyway, the anecdote served as a nice comparison for Texas running game, which if we try to wear much tomorrow, will similarly exaggerate our weaknesses. (Except that being short isn’t a weakness, of course.)
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Oct 10, 2008 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Although...
Watching Oregon St. (USC game) and Colorado with their short running backs (at least by today’s standards), I’m rethinking stature. At least where football is concerned.
by dimecoverage on Oct 10, 2008 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
height was never really a factor for one Emmitt Smith, either.
but I’m pinning my hopes for tomorrow on Coach Will’s fire-breathing defense.
"When you get to the end zone, act like you've been there before."
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ironically
I prefer short girls to tall ones. Which is dumb for someone 6-2.
So it goes.
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Oct 10, 2008 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So do a lot of tall men.
I’ve never understood why, either. Always entertaining when some guy at least 6’5 asks you out. Good for a laugh.
by dimecoverage on Oct 10, 2008 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
perspective?
I guess it depends on whether you would be the one looking up or the one looking down! (and no, I’m not being nasty here).
"When you get to the end zone, act like you've been there before."
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Either way...
hard on the neck. I
by dimecoverage on Oct 10, 2008 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks ...
it’s right outta Coach Royal’s mouth. One of my faves.
"When you get to the end zone, act like you've been there before."
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
quote
I had forgotten about that one. Mt favorite is, “Sometimes you have to suck it up and call a number.”
by dimecoverage on Oct 10, 2008 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"If worms carried pistols, birds wouldn't eat 'em."
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Oct 10, 2008 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
love that one!!!
okay, now that everyone has gone and googled Darrell Royal quotes, I’m going to lay off of these.
"When you get to the end zone, act like you've been there before."
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don't have to Google...
We have most of them memorized. :-)
by dimecoverage on Oct 10, 2008 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm so proud ...
of my Texas heritage!
"When you get to the end zone, act like you've been there before."
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Time to rehash
my favorite quote about DKR, from Dan Jenkins.
“I think I know as much about football as the next man, as long as the next man is not Darrell Royal.” Jenkins – one of the best sportswriters ever – also said DKR was the smartest coach he ever met.
by Longhorn in Canada on Oct 10, 2008 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's funny
but it sounds like we all have more confidence in our defense than our offense in this game. Back in August when I was making fun of one of my friends, who was a Buckeye fan, about the USC game and he was making fun of me about this game to a friendly game of NCAA09, I remember saying we’d basically have to outscore OU in order to win. Now I seem to think we have to pressure Bradford to win. Oh what a difference a month makes.
Anyway seeing how everyone on the face of the planet thinks we have absolutely no shot at winning this game (a ton of “experts” are predicting a double digit win for the Sooners), I really do hope that our team plays with more intensity, kind of like the 05 NC against USC, and try and prove everyone wrong.
by clra2 on Oct 10, 2008 8:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Colt
I don’t think ou will let Colt run on them. VY wasn’t able to run on them, so I really doubt Colt will be able to. Colt has to beat them with his arm.
The key to winning the game is getting pressure on Bradford. If Texas gets pressure on him and confuses him, they will win for sure. The next important thing is the turnover battle. Texas can’t turn the ball over more than ou, if they do…Texas will lose. I think Texas plays a great game, and wins 28-24.
by Longhorns84 on Oct 10, 2008 9:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Second that
Colt’s primary running success (and potential most beneficial) will come from pass plays, if he diagnoses closed receivers quickly enough. And he needs to keep the ball in the correct arm – they’ll be looking for the easy knockout fumbles.
I see the hardest part of the game when we’re on D, fou’s no-huddle offense scares me.
by HalfmileHorn on Oct 10, 2008 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
pressuring Bradford
I know a lot of people have talked about how getting pressure on Bradford is key for our defense, and obviously its important, but after his performance against TCU, I don’t think we can rely on that. I think constant pressure will be important, but we simply can’t bring 5 every play. TCU sacked Bradford 3 times and knocked him all over the field. He threw for over 400 yards. Pressure alone won’t solve the problem, we need some good coverage schemes. Some young DBs are gonna have to man up Saturday.
by jw4425 on Oct 10, 2008 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isolate the secondary
they need to run more play action to hold the LB,s in so the underneath zones are open. OU will act like us and play the secondary deep so they don’t give up anything deep. If the linebackers are held in the wide receivers can go on underneath routes for completions. One thing both Shiply and Cosby is get good yards after the catch. the same for running backing out of the back field. All the running back are pretty good away from the line and can pick up 6-12 yards on passes underneath and last week we saw what happens on a running back pass with a little luck.
Roll McCoy out , the OU defense is keying on McCoy to run it will hold the coverage on that side of the field for a split second enough for receivers down field to get a step. If McCoy fakes a run and steps back or pumps short, a receiver could get deep if the out side is in man coverage and bites on the fake.
the Horns O-line can do pass protect but doesn’t run block as well. With the size and speed of OU defense slow developing running won’t go anywhere. Draws might actually work after ten of so pass attempts. If those first passes are short and underneath and with the quick release of McCoy, the OU pass rush will get so intent on the passer it can get burned.
by Xerxes on Oct 10, 2008 10:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly...
“If McCoy fakes a run and steps back or pumps short, a receiver could get deep if the out side is in man coverage and bites on the fake.”
When comparing Colt to VY, Vince used this to devastating effect at times and I susppect that Colt can too since he is a threat to run.
1 Peter 2:17
by HornsFan87 on Oct 10, 2008 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would guess
the Sooners want, make that DESPERATELY want, Colt McCoy to run. The way to defend the triple option was/is to make the QB keep the ball, then beat him senseless. OU’s big, fast defenders can do that much more effectively than the FAUs and Rices. I wouldn’t be surprised if OU left lanes for McCoy expecting to get blind-side and back-side hits from safeties or pursuing LBers.
Honestly, I don’t think running the ball, except with Cody Johnson in short yardage, makes much tacitcal sense. As you point out, spread the field, force one-on-one coverage, find the best matchup and do it over and over. As Kansas State found favorable matchups in that debacle last year, find ’em.
But, sigh, we know who fashions our game plan and we know creativity and surprise aren’t usually part of the script.
by edsp on Oct 10, 2008 11:29 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
PB - Ew.
Why post the stuff about the girls in boots? Caveman.
by BufreTX on Oct 10, 2008 12:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Peter, hide your hetero tendencies for the common good!
Wouldn’t a caveman prefer short girls? They’re portable!
________________________________
I will give my shirt for Tennessee today.
by Holly Anderson on Oct 10, 2008 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh my
I was dreaming that I was watching two supposed college football programs that are utterly devoid of any offensive skill, and during halftime, Dr. Lou was giving a rather insane pep talk and managed to predict a Texas win while taking a subtle dig at Longhorn fans…oh wait. That actually happened.
Old (Game)Cock is predicting a win for us…now I know we’re screwed.
by jc25 on Oct 10, 2008 3:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
saving grace ...
at least we’re not on the cover of SI going into tomorrow’s battle royale …
"When you get to the end zone, act like you've been there before."
by txex92 on Oct 10, 2008 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sweet baby Bevo, he's giving a pep talk in Austin next weekend. Gerber carrots all around...nt whills
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Oct 10, 2008 6:31 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sweet baby Bevo
God, what a line. You are living up to your name.
by Longhorn in Canada on Oct 10, 2008 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
PB
My week has more or less been limited to four activities: brief writing, making fun of OU via Photoshop, sleep, and thinking about what Texas’ offensive game plan should look like.
So wait, you’re not using MS Paint anymore?
by Shake on Oct 11, 2008 10:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
























