Evening Brewsky Says BOOM! Forever!
The Boom shall resonate indefinitely about the ATX. Even more than eight hours after hearing the news that everyone's favorite Youtube legend will be the next head coach of the Texas Longhorns (the money quote: "If I had left Austin, my wife would have stayed here."), when Mack Brown decides to mosey on over to the AD's office. There's no doubt that speculation about the length of Muschamp's stay began before the ink even dried on his contract. As did questions about a possible Muschamp ascendancy, or even the possible replacements.
Earlier in the day, I found myself wondering if the now-unemployed Greg Robinson might find his way back into a more flattering shade of orange. After all, I still credit Robinson's intensity in 2004 with Cedric Griffin's effort knocking Ohio State's tight end free of the potentially game-clinching catch in the Horseshoe.
That idle speculation was spectacularly silenced. Beyond the new rounds of speculation about how long Mack Brown will remain head coach (and the impact of this decision on Major Applewhite), the immediate question is how the announcement impacts the 2009 recruiting class. The first subject to consider is Jamarkus McFarland, whom I discuss later. After McFarland, though, consider that Texas still has offers out-of-staters and nationally elite defenders like corner Dre Kirkpatrick, defensive end Devon Kennard, and linebacker Jarvis Jones, who constitute the majority of outstanding UT offers for '09. Retaining Muschamp could be the final selling point for Austin.

Note to Steve Reesing. Last week, I wrote about Steve Reesing's irritation that the Longhorns didn't show interest in recruiting his son. Perhaps the man had a disturbing brush with reality Saturday morning as his son was outclassed by the Longhorn defense. Just as Will Muschamp and his merry band of marauders the Longhorns shut down Chase Daniel, the mostly second-team group of christian Scott, Sam Acho, Eddie Jones, and Kheeston Randall harassed Reesing into a 25-50 performance complete with four dropped interceptions by the Longhorns. The Lake Travis product resembled a frustrated hobbit as defender after defender clogged his passing lanes and forced him to throw ducks into the gusting wind like they were clays he was about to shoot down. When a quarterback would have no chance at moving the offense in practice against the first-team defense, you know that quarterback doesn't belong. And that describes Todd Reesing and dreams of a burnt orange uniform: They don't belong together. Sorry, Steve.
OU and UT battle for McFarland. As blazinken noted, the three-team race between LSU, OU, and Texas for the services of uber-recruit Jamarkus McFarland is now down to OU and Texas ($). There were rumors circulating that McFarland had taken LSU out of consideration after he and his family observed the, uh, debauchery associated with home games in Baton Rouge. However, McFarland has never been on the record substantiating that rumor, but did say that he eliminated LSU because of their depth at defensive tackle, while acknowledging that he may renew his consideration of LSU, if necessary.
OU has six defensive tackles listed on their roster (including Casey Walker, a 6-3, 285-pounder listed as a defensive lineman) and only one of them is a senior. Starters DeMarcus Granger is a junior, while Gerald McCoy is a sophomore, which means that McFarland is unlikely to compete for a starting job at OU next year. Meanwhile, Texas loses two of the three its three best defensive tackles (Roy Miller and Aaron Lewis graduating, while Lamarr Houston is a junior), meaning McFarland could start as soon as he walks on campus, although since he is Student Council President, he will not be able to enroll in the spring semester. He would likely compete with Ben Alexander, Kheeston Randall, and Jarvis Humphrey for the starting job opposite Lamarr Houston, none of whom have played much in their careers. If it comes down to playing time, Texas seems to have the edge.
Anyone for point guard? Perhaps the most pressing issue facing the 2008-09 Texas basketball team is the point guard situation. DJ Augustin accounted for 25% of the Longhorns' points, 24% of the made three-pointers, 42% of the assists, attempted 30% of the team's free throws, and was a 78% free-throw shooter on a team that shot 68% from the line. In fact, taking out AJ Abrams (81%) and Augustin, the team shot 61%, which is not good at all. Beyond the stats, Augustin provided intangible leadership qualities that can't be quantified, as well as handling the ball and taking shots at the end of games.
According to awiggo, AJ Abrams isn't the solution, since he still has a score-first mentality. I'm not sure if Abrams is the answer, either, but I think he deserves more opportunity than a game against Stetson before settling the discussion entirely. Ultimately, the greatest factor in the decision may be Abrams' ability to space the floor with his three-point shooting, the reason for his banishment to running the baseline and spotting in the corner.
With Abrams off the ball, Mason was able to run the offense effectively in the first game, much as he ran the offense effectively in the rare instances that Augustin sat. Mason's three-point shooting is so inconsistent that he doesn't stretch the floor as well as Abrams, meaning that he may be better serve the team by handling the ball. He also won't confuse his duties as much as Abrams, who will be asked to distribute and score will being the primary ball-handler. Instead, Mason will be asked to initiate the offense and feed the post.
The unknown quantity in this discussion is Dogus Balbay, who played in his first game as a Longhorn on Tuesday evening after serving a one-game suspension for his participation with a Turkish professional team. Balbay is known as a quick, "pure" point guard, who will likely be the catalyst for any Longhorn transition game this season. Augustin was an excellent decision-making on the break and that attribute could be as hard to replace as his myriad other contributions to the team.
Ultimately, each of the three candidates will likely run the team for stretches over the course of the season. Even when not playing point guard, Rick Barnes will likely involve Abrams more as a ball-handler and playmaker than the last two seasons, utilizing strategies like more dribble handoffs. Look for Balbay to receive significant minutes in the easier non-conference games to establish his capabilities and help him adjust to the collegiate game. If none of the three distances himself from the others, it could be point guard by committee the whole season.
Quick thoughts on the Tulane game and Balbay. I wrote the above passage last evening before finding myself otherwise occupied until now. After watching the team for the first time, it's clear that Balbay creates the most dynamic transition opportunities, as he displayed excellent vision as a passer, but also the knowledge to hit teammates in rhythm and in spots where they could finish. He also got to the rim, finishing well on several plays, but missing one layup and losing the ball when caught between dunking and laying it up. Regardless, as watching the OU-Davidson game (thoughts below) illustrated, putting your best shooter on the ball makes it harder for that player to search his shot, which impacts how much point guard Abrams will play.
The defense. Wow. How refreshing to see a Texas basketball team finally being able to get after it man-to-man. For the first time since the 2003-04, which seems a great comparison because of the depth of both teams and the loss from the preceeding year of the playmaking point guard (Ford and Augustin, respectively). Tulane often struggled to get the ball past the three-point line against the swarming Longhorn defense. Texas pressured, trapped, applied ball pressure, played passing lanes, and maintained positional defense on the rare occasions when the defense broke down. Coming from Indiana, I love the fundamentals of basketball and appreciate a defender maintaining position and verticality to force a tough shot as much as a perfectly stroked jump shot. The defense displayed against Tulane was truly the essence of a Rick Barnes basketball team.
KD checks out Curry, Warren, and Griffin. Kevin Durant found his way into the Lloyd Noble Center to watch the OU-Davidson tilt and marvel at the performances of Stephen Curry (44 points) and Blake Griffin (big-boy double-double with 25 and 21), who were both transcendent (no word on if KD threw his horns up at any point). As I mentioned above, the Davidson team moved Curry, the prolific scorer, to point guard this season after losing Jason Richards, who ran the team last season. As a result, the Davidson offense often struggled, as Curry sometimes forced his shots and at other times never found the ball in his hands again after initiating the offense. Good example of what could happen to AJ Abrams this year.
As a Chicago Bulls fan (before winning the lottery), I spent a lot of time hoping that Blake Griffin would declare for the NBA Draft after his freshman season. After watching him against Davidson, there's no doubt that the kid is ready for the NBA. To use a stupid cliche, he's a man amongst boys, leading Fran Fraschilla, not normally prone to hyperbole, to compare Griffin to Amare Stoudamire. Griffin, while not the outside shooter Stoudamire has become, still showed off his new bank shot from an angle a la Tim Duncan, and displayed the power/speed combination that makes Stoudamire so unique. Combine that with the tenacity to bring down any rebound in his zip code (Griffin totaled 40 rebounds in the last two days) and a handle that could put some wings to shame and there's no doubt that Griffin could find himself the No. 1 pick in the spring.
Final thought on OU: With super frosh Willie Warren (quite impressive), the solid Taylor Griffin playing sidekick to his older brother Blake, OU has a legitimate Big 12 contender on their hands. The rest of the squad may mostly be filler, but rest assured that the two Texas-OU battles in basketball will approach the fervor of the Cotton Bowl as much as it ever has.
Comments
McCoy and Granger
They both are expected to enter the draft this year.
In Mack Brown We Trust!
by Cyrus on
Nov 19, 2008 3:06 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Wasn't Chizik the DC
…in 2005 when we played in the Columbus? Idk just kinda bugged me, unless you mean Greg Robinson’s work with Cedric Griffin the previous season…
by tvr'11 on
Nov 19, 2008 3:21 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Correct
Chizik was the DC on the nat’l title run. I think he was crediting Robinson with the work he did the years before
by bignick573 on
Nov 19, 2008 7:53 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah I mean from the previous season
The whole defensive unit had to get to the ball before the whistle was blown.
by GhostofBigRoy on
Nov 19, 2008 9:42 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mack
We win another NC (2009 anyone?), and i see Mack going out in a blaze of glory. He’s been pretty consistant when asked about his future that 1) he wants to win another one, and 2) he’s not going to coach forever.
I’d like to know everybody’s opinion on whether you think Mack is the type of guy who’s looking to pass DKR in the all time wins column. At the current rate that would be about 6 years.
by rchorns on
Nov 19, 2008 9:24 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I really don't think Mack cares about those kind of things
2005 cemented his legacy. If he can win another MNC in the next 2 or 3 years, I think he will gladly take it and move into the AD’s office.
by the1austin on
Nov 19, 2008 10:00 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh dear, is it possible...?
Chris Simms : Major Applewhite : : Will Muschamp : Major Applewhite
I've been fuelin' my dreams eatin' greens and beans.
by 16thLonghorn on
Nov 19, 2008 10:02 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't worry
Our future says SAT stats are for losers!
Major will be great in the wings and we know he will always be looking to come back here. That way if anything happens to Muschamp (Anyone know of his NFL aspirations), we have a great backup plan after he (major) gets more experience.
by UTeze on
Nov 19, 2008 10:31 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As far as I know
Major’s assention to head coach was the figment of fans fanatical imagination.
Muschamp is 37, in his 11th year of coaching and has been a coach at 5 other schools, has won a national championship as a coach, and has coached in the NFL for a year.
Major is 30, in his 4th year of coaching and has been a coach at 3 other schools, each for a year.
Muschamp may not be qualified yet to take over at a program like Texas (side note: he isnt taking it over yet either), but if he is not, Major is even less so.
by BoddickerIsClutch on
Nov 19, 2008 10:27 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great point.
Major has a long way to go.
I've been fuelin' my dreams eatin' greens and beans.
by 16thLonghorn on
Nov 19, 2008 10:29 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hopefully
Major is next in line for Greg Davis’ job…when Mack steps down Davis should go as well, thus we can usher in the new era: Muschamp and Applewhite
by lazylonghorn on
Nov 19, 2008 10:35 AM CST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
↑ My thoughts exactly
I think Mack stays on for a few (five?) years, retires (not to AD post) and Muschamp takes the reins. Meanwhile, Applewhite moves to co-OC in a couple of years (two?) then is understudy to Muschamp until he leaves for the NFL (maybe ten years from now).
May Colt be with you. Yeah, that's right.
by bfaut86 on
Nov 19, 2008 12:57 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Davis gone earlier
i think davis leaves after next year to let applewhite have a few years under mack prior to muschamp taking over
wouldn’t suprise me if they are looking for giles to then take over the DC position
by ethan on
Nov 19, 2008 7:42 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought it was clever
As for a Mus-white controversy….I can’t imagine that sort of thing would brew, at least not for many years down the road.
by Kool Hand on
Nov 20, 2008 5:53 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2009 Recruits
I know we have offers out to the aformentioned out-of-state recruits in addition to McFarland, but do we have enough scholarships available if all commit? I know the likelihood of all the out-of-staters committing is highly unlikely: Kirkpatrick is pretty set on Bama, we may have a shot with Kennard, and I have heard Jones is pretty high on Georgia.
We currently have 19 commitments, and if we get, pessimistically, 1 of the 3 out-of-staters, plus McFarland that will put us at 21 scholarships. This of course assumes that none of our commitments are for grayshirts, and I am not aware that we have offered any of these except to Emory Blake (WR, Austin), who recently committed to Texas Tech.
Do we have that many scholarships?
As for McFarland and playing time, he will also have to compete with his DT brothers in his own recruiting class: Derek Johnson and Calvin Howell. Both are no slouches; however, I like his odds, and I hope he does too.
Garrett Gilbert: 2014 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year
by jordansb on
Nov 19, 2008 11:51 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes, the scholarships are (or will be) there
Horns have 19 commits. They lose 14 scholarship seniors (this assumes Jordan Shipley returns) and have five openings (factoring in the loss of Buck Burnette); in other words, they only have 80 on scholarship now. So they’re right on target now for those commitments.
At least two players (Oduegwu, Josh Marshall) could be physical casualties (keeping benefits but moving to non-playing status, which frees up scholarships). I’ll be surprised if one or more WRs and at least one OL don’t transfer due to lack of playing time. There are five freshman safeties; one could leave for the same reason.
And remember: these are year-to-year scholarships. Coaches sometimes don’t “renew” a player’s scholarship. I could name names from the recent past, but you can figure it out if you compare the signings lists to the yearly rosters.
by edsp on
Nov 19, 2008 4:43 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for the info.
Garrett Gilbert: 2014 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year
by jordansb on
Nov 19, 2008 5:53 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your Steve Reesing comments...
seem a little misplaced this time. I completely agreed with you last time, because honestly, I think it worked out best for Todd anyway. And while I don’t think there’s anythign wrong with being disappointed to not even get a look from Texas, I think bothering to mention that you harbor those feelings three years later is pointless.
But to come back after the fact and state that he simply “doesn’t belong” because he couldn’t generate much offense Staurday just makes no sense. Like most, I think Colt is better than Todd. But Colt wasn’t exactly going up against the same defense as Todd. And more importantly, Colt actually had an offensive line blocking for him. These things usually have an impact.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Colt is a better player than Todd. But if I’m a betting man – and say each QB switches sides this week for a rematch – I’d have very little reservations laying some cash down that the score will be pretty similar to the one we saw.
by hiphopopotamus on
Nov 19, 2008 2:27 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
Colt is better than Reesing, but Reesing is also better than what we saw Saturday. He was facing an angry defense who had something to prove and he doesn’t have the players Colt does around him. It wasn’t exactly a fair QB duel.
by TheElusiveShadow on
Nov 19, 2008 2:33 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
not a lot of class in those Reesing comments either
poor form.
by andy_wooster on
Nov 19, 2008 5:45 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wilbon PooPoos Muschamp Hire, Claims Racism
Michael Wilbon, on “Turico & Van Pelt Show” on ESPN Radio today called the Muschamp hire lazy and “suspicious,” and said that hiring him was racist because now they won’t have to consider any African-American candidates for the position when it opens.
by ahaley on
Nov 19, 2008 2:39 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Wilbon isn't usually like that.
Quite surprising. Obviously college football isn’t his strong point, especially not Texas football.
by hornalum08 on
Nov 19, 2008 2:43 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which Michael Wilbon are you talking about? nt whills
by jc25 on
Nov 19, 2008 2:49 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
probably makes more sense to link stories
http://www.eagletribune.com/pusports/local_story_183115515?page=0
http://www.uhnd.com/bb/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=6&msgid=99385
http://www.fanhouse.com/2007/09/20/mike-wilbon-calls-vince-young-a-self-absorbed-young-punk/
by jc25 on
Nov 19, 2008 2:53 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is it me or have claims of racism skyrocketed since a certain important date earlier this month?
That’s a controversial as I’m going to get.
by HornPossessed on
Nov 19, 2008 2:45 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's just you....
but if they do claim it, I think they have a point
by vy til i die on
Nov 19, 2008 3:42 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no, we've pretty always had these
constant accusations of racism being thrown around. You’re probably just paying more attention.
by andy_wooster on
Nov 19, 2008 5:46 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was going to make a joke earlier
about how someone was going to call this “racist.” Truth is more f-cked up than fiction, I suppose.
May Colt be with you. Yeah, that's right.
by bfaut86 on
Nov 19, 2008 3:52 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If this was a coaching search,
then we should (and I believe would) have interviewed every qualified candidate, regardless of race. However, this was not a coaching search. This was a calculated move to lock up an asset for the foreseeable future. Wilbon’s basic argument is flawed. A process cannot be racist if there is no process.
by ctex80 on
Nov 19, 2008 4:38 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Totally Racism
We didn’t even bring Tyrone Willingham or Ron Prince in to interview? Man that’s disgusting. As we all know, hiring a diverse candidate simply because of his diversity regardless isn’t racist but not hiring one for the same reasons is.
Living vicariously through Deon Beasley
by inVINCEable on
Nov 19, 2008 5:20 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It is not as simple
as your sarcastic comment makes it out to be, but this is a discussion that falls into the taboo things we avoid on BON.
by Wells on
Nov 19, 2008 6:20 PM CST
up
reply
actions
2 recs
Apparently the commenters
on this thread did not heed my warning.
by Wells on
Nov 19, 2008 9:33 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What the hell...
proud to swim home
by learned hand on
Nov 19, 2008 10:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m so glad somebody picked up on that one other than me that this can help our recruiting of trying to get Mcfarland and Kennard
by kcmorse on
Nov 19, 2008 5:40 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
not just next year
Correct me if I am wrong, but this deal works out to guarantee us at a minimum 6 years of Muschamp (5 as a head coach, figuring Mack Brown stays another year, which he undoubtedly will at least that). If I was a national recruit, I would be fairly excited that I would have a good chance to play in a consistent system under a great coach for my collegiate career. I think this move will pay huge recruiting dividends not long in the future.
by mrbubbles812 on
Nov 19, 2008 7:22 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
PB....
Are you still upset we weren’t able to get our hands on Griffin? :)
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
by ChiFan13 on
Nov 20, 2008 11:42 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Meant GhostofBigRoy....whoops.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
by ChiFan13 on
Nov 20, 2008 11:42 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs














