Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Postgame React: Texas Tech 39 Texas 33, First Take

It was the best of times... It was the worst of times...

Tonight college football fans were treated to a classic. Even as a Texas fan, on the wrong end of one of the most devastating losses in program history, I dutifully salute the event for what it was. We won't be the ones watching it on ESPN Classic tomorrow morning, but a tiny part of us will be glad we were a part of it.

Texas. Now 8-1. Second in the South and needing help. Damn, man. That's hard to admit: After beating Oklahoma, Missouri, and Oklahoma State... someone else is in the catbird's seat? Yup. You, Tech. Got the best of us. All week, the details of this match up took a back seat to one underlying fact: Texas Tech had to win tonight... and they did. Congratulations--a ten gallon hat tip. And now... It's your turn at the top.

For Texas? Our turn at the top is over. Through one magical Saturday in Dallas we seized it, during two gut-wrenching weeks in Austin we kept it ours, and this week--finally--we lost it... just barely... in Lubbock. Texas gave 12-0 its best shot and fell short. All the credit in the world to Texas Tech: From the beginning, they made clear their intention to make a run of it themselves. And so they shall.

Now where do we, as Texas fans, go from here? The road forward, in two posts: (1) Tonight's Game (after the jump) and (2) The New Stakes.

Star-divide

TEXAS TECH 39  TEXAS 33

  • The game was won/lost in the 1st Quarter.  We have to start with this point. Have to. Texas fans are bound to look at the second half and wonder, "Could the Longhorns have (should have?) beat this Texas Tech team by two touchdowns? As good as Tech is... We can do better." And it's not an irrational thought.

    But if it's not irrational, Texas fans can't/shouldn't use it as Matt Leinart might to say that the "Best Team" didn't win. Why? If Texas showed in the second half what it's capable of doing to Texas Tech (when confidently attacking and properly executing), Texas Tech showed in the first half (and first quarter, in particular) what they are capable of when properly attacking and executing. For as "flat" as Texas looked in the first half in Lubbock, in truth we looked bad because the Red Raiders whipped our offensive line's ass, our offensive coaching stumbled horribly out of the gate, our receivers succumbed to the Lubbock atmosphere, and Graham Harrell delivered from the get-go.

    Honestly, the game may have in some measure been decided when that Tech special teams player made a beautiful snag of his punter's kick at the Texas one-yard line. From there, Greg Davis farted away two points in a senseless I-formation run, we lost another three points on the subsequent drive following the punt, and Texas Tech seized that early momentum to keep our defense on the field for an eternity in building a 19-0 lead.

  • What if Colt starts that first drive from the 20?  I really can't help but think that the entire game may play out differently, BUT... I bring this up not to plant any seeds with Longhorns fans looking for easy outs but rather to hammer home that Tech made the plays to win:

    1. The grab of the punt at the one by that Tech special teams player was not an easy play; that ball was rocketing towards the end zone for a touchback, and would have skipped right in without a perfect snag.
    2. From there, the Tech defensive line owned Texas, secured a safety and rattled McCoy throughout the rest of the first half. Texas' ineptitude? Was Tech-created.
    3. One ingredient I insisted Tech needed to win this game was a fast start. They certainly got it, but the key to the fast start was to parlay it into something tangible. And they did. On both sides of the ball.
    4. Perhaps no play better illustrated how Tech had rattled the Longhorns when Jordan Shipley let a 50 yard pass squirt through his hands. That doesn't happen if Tech doesn't land the game's first uppercut.
    5. End result of Tech making all the plays in the first half? A 19-0 lead and 22-6 advantage at the break. Enough to weather Texas' run. Texas Tech made the plays in the beginning that allowed them to win at the end.
  • Tonight's loss is on the coaches as much as the kids. On the one hand, Greg Davis and Mack Brown's team suffered in the first half because the players failed to make some basic plays we normally expect them to make. In particular, I wonder how much of a role the multitude of dropped balls played in how things unfolded over the first 30 minutes. Shipley's drop on the deep ball was devastating. Collins' and Buckner's early drops contributed to the desync-ing of McCoy.

    But it's vitally important that the coaches not attribute the team's first half malaise solely to a lack of execution. They, too, have to shoulder a big chunk of the blame. Among the sins:

    1. The I-formation goal-line run made no sense.
    2. The pass to Greg Smith (??) was a dreadful sign of Greg-Mack's early mindset.
    3. The too-little-too-late deployment of Fozzy in a Race-To-40 football game was, in retrospect, a mistake.
    4. With Ruffin McNeil honed in on our bread and butter, we were too slow to show more.
    We can and will go over in more detail some of the mistakes, but I take this bullet point to note that Texas beat Oklahoma because it approached the game with a "F-ck you--no one thinks we can beat these guys" approach. After jumping on Missouri, we last week saw the coaches slide a bit towards "Protect" mode. Tonight, the first half approach was a too-conservative one that left the Longhorns scrambling to catch up.

    Which... fine. I can live with the imperfection if and only if there's a lesson learned: Texas got to #1 by being the aggressors against OU. Then, at its best against Missouri and OSU, held on for the same reasons. And in the second half against Texas Tech, very nearly saved the day when they resumed the assertive role. So... yeah, Mack. Yeah, Greg. It's hard when everyone guns for you each week. But the most important antidote we've got is to be the ones gunning ourselves. Tonight we didn't do that until too late.

  • No, really: That was the most important lesson of the game.  I'm going to stay with the preceding point for a minute, because it's so vital to everything heading forward, this season and next. I have to say that I empathize with the coaches, insofar as I know the thinking--not irrationally--was that "The horses we've been riding have gotten us this far, so..."  But we saw tonight the trappings of that paradigm: If that Colt-Shipley-Cosby-OG Perfect Passing Pony Show is disrupted even a little bit, the whole rodeo is prone to fail.

    And it did--Texas was a disaster on offense in the first half. And it wasn't until they showed some diversity in the second half that things got rolling again. Fozzy and Malcolm, nearly heroes. Alas, a day late, a dollar short. So if our coaches can be forgiven for having the "Dance with the ones who brung ya" mindset to start this game, the key to achieving the Big Goals heading forward involves an evolution above and beyond the delicate Pony Show which finally met its match.

  • Quan Cosby's injury may have... helped?  Though losing Cosby helped ensure the Pony Show's first-half failure, it may well have led to a huge development heading forward. Without Cosby's injury, Shipley never returns that punt for a touchdown. And without Cosby's injury, Malcolm Williams doesn't break out as that deep threat this offense desperately needs. Conclusion:

    1. We'll be best with Cosby in the "Sub-B" role.
    2. Shipley (or another explosive playmaker) should return punts.
    3. Malcolm Williams is your new Split End.

    This has the potential to change everything on offense heading forward. Though Colt's insanity and the team's 8-0 start forced us to shrug aside one of the summer's most pressing questions, the lack of a true deep threat meant that we were (literally) counting on McCoy completing 80% of his freaking passes to Shipley, Cosby, and Ogbonnaya to win. With Williams a legit deep threat, this passing attack becomes something different altogether.

    In other words: We lost tonight's battle, but in reality, winning The War (2008 and/or '09 title goals) at some point had to include evolving on offense to more than we've been to this point. Tonight, in losing the battle, we may well have positioned ourselves to win the war.

  • Ten Texas-Texas Tech game thoughts. In no particular order:

    1. Graham Harrell was great tonight. He really was. I thought our defense did a pretty damn good job, all things considered, and Harrell just made some incredible throws--including several that, had they not been absolutely perfect, would have meant no points for Texas Tech. He earned it tonight.
    2. Fozzy's time is now. You'll find no bigger OG fan than I, but the evolution of the offense is upon us. We got as far as we could with the Perfect Pony Show; it's time now to evolve to something greater. And that involves Fozzy. Lessgo.
    3. Titles are in Texas' future because of the development now of Curtis Brown, Aaron Williams, Blake Gideon, and Earl Thomas. We lost tonight because they're young, but we're on the verge of special because these kids are being battle-tested for greatness now.
    4. Deon Beasley is the biggest disappointment of the team this year. I hate to say it, but it's true. (4a. We've missed Chykie Brown badly the last two weeks.)
    5. Michael Crabtree is so, so, so much more than a big time athlete. He's a pure, perfect wide receiver. He uses his body so well and has phenomenally amazing hands. What a player.
    6. In retrospect, the offensive line's turnaround from one half to the next is all the evidence I need to pin a lot of Texas' early struggles on the coaching staff.
    7. Forgive the stupid cliche, but you could literally see the light come on for Malcolm Williams tonight. Forget that two receptions resulted in touchdowns; even if they hadn't, you could just see him playing with confidence and purpose. He's arrived. We're a lot better for it.
    8. Earl Thomas and Blake Gideon both blew it on Tech's final drive. Don't forget, though, Texas fans: They're freshmen, and we knew coming in they'd have their tough moments. However painful this loss, Texas football is better off for suffering through these growing pains. We're on the right track with this young defense growing up on the job.
    9. Sergio Kindle was in his element tonight. If OSU turned him in circles a bit, tonight he was able to do what he does best. He was a difference-maker throughout.
    10. The officiating was truly, horribly unfair to both teams. I won't just say Texas got screwed, because that's not the point. Even if we were to show objectively that Texas was on the short end of the stick, when the officiating was as insane as it was tonight--both teams lose. From the tackling Tech offensive line (not a hold!) to the awful pass interference call that benefited Texas, this crew was as bad tonight as it was in Dallas. The Big 12 should be ashamed.

I'm going to stop here on tonight's game and pivot into a post on the new stakes. More on this game is likely in subsequent posts, as well as during a radio podcast with Barking Carnival's Scipio Tex, which we'll broadcast live tomorrow night at 8 pm CT.

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

nice

good write up. agreed on all points.

I think Colt learned a lot in this game too. First taste of true prolonged adversity this year for him and it took him a bit to get unfazed by the first punch. Harell seemed just a little more even kieled all night. Colt will be even better because of this game just like Harell was for his growing pains sophomore and junior year.

I’ll be the first to say it here too: perhaps this game keeps Colt at UT next year. Silly hypothesis really b/c it will ultimately come down to what kind of advice he gets, but I think tonight again showed that he’s got plenty of work to do, even mentally. And he obviously needs to have every mental aspect of quarterbacking down if he’s going to play at the next level with his only average or slightly above average physical skills.

by Michael Bean on Nov 2, 2008 2:17 AM CDT reply actions  

PB thanks for this. I think I can finally go to sleep.

I’m so proud of this team. They win as a team and lose as a team. We knew this year was a rebuilding and growing year; yet we could still make it to a BCS bowl. Pretty good for what many thought would be worse or just slightly better than 2007.

by girlslikefootball2 on Nov 2, 2008 2:30 AM CDT reply actions  

One thought about the rebuilding...

I know we all expected this to be a rebuilding year in preparation for a championship run in ‘09, but with seniors Cosby, Miller, Orakpo and Melton departing, dare I say it, maybe the run should’ve been this year instead of next? The young guns in the secondary will be experienced vets, the LB corps will be a beast, but the D-Line will sorely miss Orakpo, Miller and Melton. That’s 3/4 of our current starting D-Line.

All in all, I’m proud of this team. The team showed tremendous heart and determination in clawing their way back into the game.

by HornsFaninCalifornia on Nov 2, 2008 2:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I had similar thoughts

Our most substantial concern for next season stems from the fact that our conference schedule in 09 is chronologically identical to this one, but the geography is flipped. This means we’ll have the exact same 4-game stretch, however the first three weeks will be played away from Austin (in Dallas, in Columbia, and in Stillwater). So I question whether our growth and improvement into next year will sufficiently outweigh the increased difficulty in schedule, because as tough as this October has been, at least we played the meat of it at home.

The other concern, of course, is Will Muschamp. Consider that he could very well be absent as soon as next year, and it is certain that we will not retain Colt beyond 09. So we might, in the coming years, be asking ourselves what good all of this talent is in the secondary and in the receiving corps if we don’t have a reliable QB or a fiery defensive coordinator to maximize their potential?

Now, its entirely possible that Mizzou and OU will be substantially less dangerous without their QB’s next year, and a weakened Big XII may, in fact, prove to be a suitable stomping ground for a 12-0 campaign, but damn this loss in Lubbock, because I’m beginning to wonder if our best chances hadn’t somehow congealed this year.

by BrooklynHorn on Nov 2, 2008 3:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're correct, Brooklyn,

on the “flipped geography” comment. But you fail to take into account what figures to be a siginifcantly weaker Mizzou team (which by reputation doesn’t have a big home-field advantage anyway). Tech will be much weaker with the QB (and probably Crabtree) gone. OU loses its OL and several receivers; Sooners will never be down, of course.

What this means is that the killer nature of this part of the schedule will be much less savage.

We could see the air come out of UT’s ballon after the 1H of the Missouri game. The team that took on Tech was significantly battered even before Orakpo went out. What hurts is this loss is in Week 10, which gives OU’s Week 7 loss less “impact” on poll voters.

by edsp on Nov 2, 2008 3:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I was just going to post this

 Schedule should be easier next year. Missouri, Texas Tech, and OU should all be down. OU has too much talent to fall far, but it could be a long time before TT and Mizzou are this good again. Ok. State actually had a pretty young team this year. That game in Stillwater is probably our toughest of the year.

  That said, I agree with HornFaninCalifornia. I think we’ll be worse next year, especially if Muschamp leaves. Even if he stays we’re probably going to worse on defense. Some of that should be offset by a general worsening of the conference, but we are going to have less margin for error.

by andy_wooster on Nov 2, 2008 3:35 PM CST up reply actions  

the time to win...

is always now. 8-0 is hard to achieve. their are no gaurantees next year.

by DaGoose on Nov 3, 2008 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

we have a lot of good DEs, but

DT is a position that Texas will need some help on.

by Longhorns84 on Nov 2, 2008 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

yea I died a little on the inside tonight

but still feel confident in our chances at a Big 12 title. Crazier shit has happened and if we only drop to the 3-5 range we could still have a lot more to play for. I was talking to a friend of mine right after the OU game and he asked me if I was nervous for Mizzou. I told him no, crazy shit goes down in Lubbock so Tech would be who I’m nervous about. And I was right. Our team fought and had the chance to come out on top but just couldn’t muster the win. I believe we showed we can fight through adversity against anyone in the country with our 4 week gauntlet and hopefully we don’t get fucked by human voters. We were this close to escaping with a win. Michael Crabtree is a thief. But congratz to Tech for the win, although I lost a TON of respect for their fans when they rushed the field 2 times before the game was over. Totally classless.

by clra2 on Nov 2, 2008 2:56 AM CDT reply actions  

Same here

It hurts to lose, but this one moreso because of not only how it happened, but because of the timing. Timing is everything in the BCS and had this loss occurred earlier in the season, it may not have hurt this team’s conference and national championship aspirations as much as it does late in the season.

Keep your heads up high. This team still has three games left and they won’t be gimmes either, so enjoy the ride and let the cards fall where they may.

by HornsFaninCalifornia on Nov 2, 2008 3:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry to see it... honestly

Being a PSU homer I was counting on Alabama to drop a pile on some field somewhere and I couldn’t believe what I saw tonight in Lubbock. I can sympathize with you guys after having our hearts ripped out in Michigan in ’05 and I really wish you guys the best for the rest of the year. Good luck and I hope we can still meet in the MNC in the next year.

If you can smile when things go wrong, you have someone in mind to blame.

by TheMightyErik on Nov 2, 2008 3:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Beasley

I don’t know what has happened to Beasley. When he first got starting time, he would often be thrown at a lot of the times because he was a young inexperienced corner. But, he occasionally made spectacular plays that showed he had incredible potential and many times he looked like the best defensive player on the field.

Now, he still gets thrown at a lot, but the spectacular plays are not there. In fact, the receivers seem to have an easy time catching against him. Does he not fit in with the attitude of this defense or were we just so happy to see defenders make the smallest play that we saw him as playing better than he really was?

by JohnsonUT on Nov 2, 2008 7:53 AM CST up reply actions  

PB…great as always. A couple of thoguhts.

1) We need to recruit a TE that actually tries.
2) If your performance in defeat tells you anything, I am more impressed with The Colt than I was at any other time this year.
3) This team has serious deficiencies that we all knew but hoped would be overcome or hidden. Obviously, we’re hoping that the young guys become big time in the next year or two.
4) Michael Crabtree=Michael Irvin (without the cocaine as far as I know…)

by DreadedOne on Nov 2, 2008 7:52 AM CST reply actions  

WRT #1, we have. His name is Blaine Irby and he will be back next year. We could have used him tonight.

Space for rent.

by Brian.HalcYoN on Nov 2, 2008 9:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Blaine Irby

Never guaranteed that he’ll be back next year 100% even after successful surgery and rehab. Statistically, your knee is never once what is used to be and more susceptible to re-injury. Meaning he’ll be a tad slower and probably more cautious out there which can effect his play. Don’t mean to be a downer, but look at people like Culpepper (used to be very mobile not at all now) and what Tom Brady is going through right now. 80% of knee surgeries end up with some sort of infection just like Brady and possible career ender.

by HornsFaninCalifornia on Nov 2, 2008 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Irby and Marshall should be available next year.

Marshall would have been the #2 catching tight end, but got injured before the season even began.

by BoddickerIsClutch on Nov 2, 2008 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Need the doctor that Ship has...

if he has been slowed, I’d hate to see how fast he was in High School.

We're Texas...and you're NOT

by Bevoboy94 on Nov 2, 2008 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Beasley

I don’t know what has happened to Beasley. When he first got starting time, he would often be thrown at a lot of the times because he was a young inexperienced corner. But, he occasionally made spectacular plays that showed he had incredible potential and many times he looked like the best defensive player on the field.

Now, he still gets thrown at a lot, but the spectacular plays are not there. In fact, the receivers seem to have an easy time catching against him. Does he not fit in with the attitude of this defense or were we just so happy to see defenders make the smallest play that we saw him as playing better than he really was?

by JohnsonUT on Nov 2, 2008 7:54 AM CST reply actions  

Refs

Yeah, they were awful. But what really bugs me is that someone in the league office must think they are the best, since they have been assigned the two biggest games this year. And after all the screaming by Mike Leach last year, you’d think the Texas game would get special consideration.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Nov 2, 2008 9:30 AM CST reply actions  

Tough loss.

My neighbor went to Tech so naturally, this is as big a football high as he has ever had. When asked how many times I have felt that good, I had to pause to think about it. We are spoiled. Off the top of my head, the times I have been that elated after a win:

1) VY breaking OU’s will to end their recent domination
2) The OSU come back at DKR (being at the game helps).
3) Rose Bowl against Michigan
4) at Ohio State
5) Rose Bowl against USC
6) OU this year

We have been there. Tech hasn’t and now they start their run though the gauntlet. I wish them luck, this is a great team. However, the list presented above shows we are a great program.

It was an incredible game, it was College Football.

Space for rent.

by Brian.HalcYoN on Nov 2, 2008 9:59 AM CST reply actions  

classless?

ffans to be considered classless for storming the field after biggest victory is school history? i will admit they were stupid, very stupid, at the end concerning the timing of the field rush but calling them classless is just playing into past and present sterotypes.

by orangebloodvampire on Nov 2, 2008 10:04 AM CST reply actions  

Gonna agree

As a general matter, the “classy fans” card is bandied about way too liberally among rivaling fan bases. There are truly classless acts, but then there’s just run of the mill team fandom, which manifests itself in myriad ways—storming the field, within-bounds opponent heckling, gloating, etc.

Each fan base has its share of assholes, classy fans, and everything in between. Some may be worse than others, but unless we’re talking about Columbus, Ohio-level thuggoonery, most of the stuff typically cited is to be expected.

My take, anyway.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Nov 2, 2008 10:08 AM CST up reply actions  

Classless might not be the correct word.

My thought is (and kinda refered to above) they do not know how to act like they have been there before. This was their biggest home game ever. They have rushed the field many times before (just not with time on the clock). While I can think of only one time in the past 20 years we may have tore down the goal post (I was in Desert Shield for the U of H game), we use to go on the field AFTER the game (not storm the field) for the Eyes (way before the natural grass was put in). While it is natural for a fan base to celebrate a major victory, it’s how you act in your celebration. We as Texas fans see no reason to go on the field anymore after a game to celebrate (the couple of 100 Austin/UT/Texas finest make us think twice).

atm could have called us classless after we beat them in B-CS and some of our fans went on the field in ’95. Now the corp did their fake army stuff and beat up our females, but I digress.

Act like you have been there before.

We're Texas...and you're NOT

by Bevoboy94 on Nov 2, 2008 10:43 AM CST up reply actions  

that label was not given to them. they earned it

if you storm the field, tear down your goal-post, march it across the field and throw it at the opposing fan section, you are going to earn a reputation. tech bloggers were begging the fan base to behave in the week approaching the game for this very reason. The picking up of back to back unsportsmanlike conduct penalties at the end of the game was exactly what other BigXII fans have come to expect from Tech, and just reinforces what folks already think of them.

Does it matter? No. Did Mike Leach give a shit that he had to kick off from the 7.5 yard line? F*ck no.

by jtabor on Nov 2, 2008 3:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Never Again

I can pretty much guarantee you that Blake Gideon never drops another interception that easy in his entire life. The defense did a damn fine job all game, but thats one of those plays you never forget in your life.

by Cowboy Faithful on Nov 2, 2008 10:44 AM CST reply actions  

Twice In One Year!

Having adopted my wife’s New England Patriots I have felt the agony of defeat on the last drive twice! The football gods have forsaken me!

by HornsFaninCalifornia on Nov 2, 2008 11:07 AM CST reply actions  

Tech Fans

I have no problem with fans storming the field in celebration as long as they do it correctly, as in no time left on the clock.

by HornsFaninCalifornia on Nov 2, 2008 11:08 AM CST reply actions  

Does anyone else feel empty inside?

Sometimes my wife tells me not to be so emotionally invested in my teams. But it’s the greatest feeling (outside of family of course) when your team succeeds. When your team loses it pulls your heart out.

by HornsFaninCalifornia on Nov 2, 2008 11:20 AM CST reply actions  

Can UT complain to the Big 12 about the lack of holding calls?

In the NBA, teams do this all the time. They send game tape to the commissioner’s office so they can at least get some feedback. It’s actually worked plenty of times (one that comes to mind is Rockets vs Mavs 2005 1st round playoffs)

I figure if we can let the Big 12 know that they are consistently missing holding calls by sending them tape, the refs might pick up on that.

by goingforthecorner on Nov 2, 2008 11:35 AM CST reply actions  

It wasn't just one game

it’s a trend not to call as much holding. But some of the bigger, stronger slower linemen have to to stop the smaller and quicker pass rushers. Since that’s what the horns have on the d-line we see it every week.
You pretty much have to tackle a rusher to get the call. But the holding and grabbing the jersey outside the chest area and hooking and tripping don’t seems to get much attention. In one of the slo-mo replays of Harrell you could see clear as day the linemen’s arm around Millers neck and pulling him back. no one said a thing. The refs are letting it go. It wasn’t just this game, it’s the whole BIG XII. some could check the number of sacks and holding calls year to year and see if there is a change.

by Xerxes on Nov 2, 2008 12:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Might as well not have a holding penalty altogether then

Our D-Line was blatantly held on every play in full view of the refs

by HornsFaninCalifornia on Nov 2, 2008 12:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Even my Tech-fan neighbor was baffled.

He could not believe the lack of holding calls. He is a realist and knows his guys were getting beat with out some pretty “clingy” blocking techniques.

Space for rent.

by Brian.HalcYoN on Nov 2, 2008 2:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Not 1 Holding Call on Tech

I don’t recall 1 holding call against Tech. I saw numerous take-downs and aggressive use of hands by Tech’s O-line in the first half particularly.

Other thing concerning me is our DB’s getting engaged by receivers & not breaking off to make plays. Confess I’m not as familiar with what’s acceptable for receivers holding or not.

by HalfmileHorn on Nov 2, 2008 2:21 PM CST up reply actions  

I slept last night

for the first time in a week. I did not want to get out of bed, but did. Now, I just feel so empty.

May Colt be with you. Yeah, that's right.

by bfaut86 on Nov 2, 2008 11:40 AM CST reply actions  

a little late in adding this...

But I know how you feel…

I was at the 2002 Tech/UT game in Austin. THAT was a classic too. And yes as exciting as it was TECH came out on the wrong end of the scoreboard. Unranked Tech came into a ranked opponent’s house and went toe to toe with them.

BJ Symons played that game on a blown knee. Vince Young played and stunk up the joint only to have Chance Mock bail him out and IMHO win that game for you guys. We then missed sending it into OT by three feet with a missed FG….And NOTHING can take away the fact that that was a GREAT GAME.

by Tortilla Pirate on Nov 6, 2008 10:03 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_57_small
Y'all Can Still Call Me GoBR
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Happy NSD Aggies!!!!
Jersey_front_small
A Recruiting Reminder

Recent FanPosts

Caters-lizard-help-03_181614_small
Next Big Rivalry?
Ff_519532_xl_small
No love for Shakeem Jefferson
Small
Texas Women's Basketball
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Nike helmet redesign
Horns_small
Rivals 100 released
Small
Don't mess with Texas.
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Defense)
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Offense)
Small
Big 12 Expansion is Back!
Small
Miles Onyegbule...why not TE?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8