Attention Human Voters: The Case for Texas
OU has just delivered a beatdown of Texas Tech that is going to be tempting to use as reason for moving OU ahead of Texas on your ballots. This is a reasonable instant reaction. OU played well. Of course, Tech played terribly, and not all of that can be credited to OU. But I beseech every one of you human voters to stop, read this, and contemplate what you're doing before you do it. Because there is most definitely an excellent and convincing case to be made for Texas being ranked above OU and Texas Tech.
As you know, Texas, Texas Tech, and Oklahoma played a round-robin as they do every year and all three came out 1-1. Tech played 1 game on the road and 1 at home. OU played 1 at home and 1 on a neutral field. Texas played 1 on a neutral field and 1 on the road. Which one of these is harder than the other 2? Had Texas played Tech in Austin, would the Longhorns have won? I don't know because Texas didn't play Tech at home, just as they didn't play OU at home. That's got to be worth something. Advantage Texas.
So let's look at the losses. Tech lost in epic, blowout fashion tonight. OU lost by 10 points on a neutral field. Texas lost on a touchdown pass with 1 second left in the game (1 play after dropping a sure-thing interception) on the road. Advantage Texas.
Texas played the most epic 4-game stretch off teams in probably 20 years, in which they beat OU, Missouri and Oklahoma State, all top-11 teams at the time. And in the 4th game of that brutal stretch, on the road in a hostile environment at night, they didn't fold like Tech did tonight; they battled on their last, weary legs and lost on a last-second touchdown pass. Neither OU nor Tech had to go through even a 3-game stretch the likes of which Texas blew through on their way to Lubbock. Advantage: Texas.
Let's look at the wins. OU has not yet played Oklahoma State, which both Texas and Tech have beaten at home. Texas beat Kansas by 28 points in Lawrence (35-7), Tech beat Kansas by 42 in Lawrence, and OU beat Kansas by 14 at home (where all of OU's big games have been this year....well, except the one they lost...to TEXAS), giving up 31 points in the process. Advantage Texas over OU.
OU did beat TCU and Cincinnati, two decent teams. Have to give them that. Of course, they also played two of the worst teams in football. I would have said "two of the worst teams in D-1 football" except Chattanooga is actually one of the worst teams in Division 2 football, with a pathetic 1-11 record. Oh and the other team? Washington, which lost today to Washington State and is now 0-11. Tech played TWO division 2 teams. Texas played none, and actually played an SEC team. There's something to be said for not being able to take several weeks off to stay fresh for your later games by playing a D-2 team or the equivalent of one. Texas has not played one of those teams and has not had a week to take off. Oh, and beyond that, Texas beat the ever living crap out of Missouri, a top-15 team than neither Tech nor OU have beaten this year. Advantage Texas
Oh, and one more thing. If you're like most voters and you've moved Tech out of the equation after their terrible performance tonight, and you're deciding between Texas and OU, agonizing over who should be ranked ahead of who, let me remind you of one thing. On a beautiful October Day in Dallas--not Austin, not Norman, Dallas--Texas beat Oklahoma by 10 points. If you were ever thinking to yourself, "These two are close, I wish I had a some neutral, objective way of determining which of these teams was better," well, I think this might be it.
Think about this: if Texas and OU end up in a 2-way tie for the Big 12 South, Texas wins. But then, if they end up in a 3-way tie with Texas Tech, OU might win over Texas, not by virtue of doing anything different than what they already have, but simply by virtue of Tech having 1 loss in conference instead of 2. What Tech does or doesn't do should have nothing to with whether Texas or OU wins the Big 12 South. And only the BCS can make sure that it doesn't by ranking Texas ahead of OU. And that means you, human voters.
It's the Battle Cry of the University: Remember the Cotton Bowl! 45-35 on a neutral field. Advantage Texas.
5 recs |
192 comments
|
Comments
you're sneaky
So who are we sending this to?
Perhaps the most recognizable mascot in sports, and certainly the toughest looking, Bevo is a fixture
by run Bevo run on Nov 22, 2008 11:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think now the discussion becomes about OU and Longhorns. Again I am going to guess there are idiots who are going to vote for the “hotter” team. All I could see was that Tech to me seems like Mizzou….overated.
We on the other hand went to a very hostile environment and nearly won..the “nearly” doesnt matter as I would think based on the stupid voting that has been happening. Besides we also cannot forget that we played at a strech where as others had weeks off between crucial games..will that matter ..atleast I hope so.
Brad Edwards one of the un-biased guys thinks BCS we will still be @ 2…remains to be seen.
The other thing that irritates me is the style points…………It is basically per my perspective " insult the living crap of the other team"
by MN_longhorny on Nov 22, 2008 11:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think in Re:
three way tie, the discussion was always about Texas-OU. The issue will be whether voters treat it as such, as UT would be much better off with a 1:1 comparison of UT:OU rather than a Tech:UT:OU comparison that adds emphasis on UT’s loss to Tech. I think UT is much better off framing this as narrowly as possible. This is UT’s resume vs. OU’s resume, and thus needs to overcome the head-to-head record. There could hardly be a worse result for the Tech/OU game, from a UT standpoint.
I apologize that my football team put you in a bad spot last night.
by Skin Patrol on Nov 23, 2008 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Its just unbelievable to me that this is even a debate. 45-35.
A win should count more than style. That being said I am not looking forward to looking at the polls tomorrow.
by mtntrance on Nov 22, 2008 11:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
65 to 21 will stick in their minds more unfortunately
Guaranteed to work 60% of the time, every time.
by poteet76 on Nov 22, 2008 11:09 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
bullshit
my first born shall be named vy
by hookemkp on Nov 22, 2008 11:13 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
ESPN is already saying both OU and Florida should jump us
And plenty of voters will feel the same way. I just have a bad feeling that this won’t end well for us.
by chief on Nov 22, 2008 11:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If only...
OU would of won this game on a last second field goal. That would of been my dream scenario
Guaranteed to work 60% of the time, every time.
by poteet76 on Nov 22, 2008 11:15 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Draw Lots
Should all 3 teams win next week (hardly a given) they would all be 11-1 and 1-1 against each other. A win is a win and a loss is a loss and I agree that “style” points shouldn’t count. In reality, the fairest thing to do is simply draw lots and go from there.
by DoubleB on Nov 22, 2008 11:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
NO!
Fairest thing is last team not to go should go just like the good old days.
I’m just kidding but seriously that would be great.
by Skin Patrol on Nov 23, 2008 1:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The other awesome thing would be…we win out. Tech drops to Baylor and OU drops to OSU…wouldnt that be something….It doesnt matter what you do as long as you can do outstanding in Nov…seems to me that all the bleak headed voters remember only November….pathetic..
by MN_longhorny on Nov 22, 2008 11:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Tiebreakers and other thoughts
We only need TT to lose to Baylor. Texas would then have the tiebreaker over OU. A bit of sports trivia…in the old SWC era, I think the last team to represent got the tiebreaker with all other things being “equal”. Maybe we should keep it that with with TT going to the Cotton Bowl.
Regardless of who we want to win the national championship (TEXAS) and heisman (McCoy) , is anyone else bothered by the excessive direct lobbying by ABC/ESPN? Both Herbstreet and James each have votes. They, Herbstreet in particular, not only state how they plan on voting, but tell other voters that they should vote the same way. This isn’t very different than the media and politics, but then do we really want politics dictating the national champion and heisman winner? I’m not so naive to think there’s no politics involved in sports, particularly when polls are involved, but it’s just one more thing that irks me about the system.
One last thought…since the BCS is always being tweaked after every year, how about if they drop the “not more than (2) teams from any given conference” clause. This was a carry over when there were only (8) teams in the BCS, but now that there are (10), they should either increase it to (3) or drop altogether. I’m sure there will be lots of resistance by Pac 10, ACC, and Big East.
The pride and winning tradition of The University of Texas will not be entrusted to the weak or the timid.
Hook'em
by longhorns1 on Nov 23, 2008 6:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Every bit of these campaigns strike at the heart of the BCS.
If there are not two clear-cut leaders, #1 and #2, the conflict resolution capabilities of the BCS are extremely suspect. This is little different over the old end-of-the-season polls. That is, subjectivity ruled the day, not objectivity, when the votes got extremely tight.
So, this shows just how bankrupt the BCS is; it is merely a revised take-off on the old bowl system, idealized for two teams but functionally unworkable for more than that. Notice that we’re completely ignoring Boise St. and Utah despite their undefeated records.
If we had a functional play-off, then we’d be arguing who and how many would get in, who would be screwed to be #9 and/or #17. But there wouldn’t be any questions about whichever team won the playoff. They would be the champion without question. And frankly, we’re probably not going to be able to say that this year. Not everyone will get to prove their mettle.
by whills on Nov 23, 2008 2:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
we need some luck
yes, but i hope the bible boys in baylor can give tech a loss next week. tech always lose at least 1 that they should’nt have and this aint your daddy’s baylor team. and Okie lite to do to OU what OU did to TT. i know that we that this scenario is a long shot but i feel something special in the air. the gators could be in a trap game with Florida ST. and the iron bowl could go our way as well. there you go our dream season ends with a Natl. Championshilp game against USC
by kcc28 on Nov 22, 2008 11:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Baylor
Pull off the upset. I have faith in you!
by seth78 on Nov 22, 2008 11:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i like the way you think kcc28
Guaranteed to work 60% of the time, every time.
by poteet76 on Nov 22, 2008 11:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I wouldnt call TCU and Cincy decent....I think they are both top 20 to 15 teams
The Ralphie Report - Shoulder to Shoulder...All Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Nov 22, 2008 11:25 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
they are conference champions
in bottom tier conferences. TCU would barely beat baylor IMO. and Cincy i couldnt even tell you what conference they are in off the top of my head. not a very good argument for OU
by kcc28 on Nov 22, 2008 11:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
better than FAU, Arkansas, UTEP and Rice....
but I root for the Buffs so what do I know. The SEC argument isnt valid when it is Arkansas but it will be interesting to see. The pollsters will have a tough choice. Can you really put OU ahead of Texas when Texas beat them on a neutral field. that is all the post needed to say. The tough thing is that OU lost early and in this day of instant gratification and short memories, it is going to be tough to put OU not at the #2 spot. Big 12 should throw Missouri out and give us what we all want: an OU vs Texas rematch
The Ralphie Report - Shoulder to Shoulder...All Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Nov 22, 2008 11:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
but . . .
beating Rice and UTEP is a good argument for Texas?
The entirety of the schedules of all 3 teams are comparable. Tech’s might be a bit weaker, but I think OU’s is stronger. Maybe you disagree, but I think we’re really splitting hairs here. They all went 1-1 against each other and an incredible 10-0 against everyone else. The whole argument above is frankly spin. The reality is that there is no fair way to pick one of these 3 teams to advance to the Big XII title game and a possible National title berth.
by DoubleB on Nov 22, 2008 11:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
These arguments shouldn't matter when there is a head to head game to look at.
Why are we comparing who the two teams have played? Texas beat OU! That has to be the argument.
by the1austin on Nov 22, 2008 11:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and Texas Tech can say the EXACT same thing to Texas and Oklahoma can say the EXACT same thing to Texas Tech.
It’s not a 2-way tie. It’s a (projected) 3-way tie. If someone loses next week, you’re argument becomes relevant.
by DoubleB on Nov 22, 2008 11:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DoubleB, I agree with you
but I think you’re neglecting to look at how each team lost:
OU to Texas by 10 on a NEUTRAL field
Texas to Tech by a last second score in a hostile environment
Tech to OU in a blowout in a hostile environment
by hooked on texas on Nov 23, 2008 12:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DoubleB, you are obviously right on the surface...
But you also have to remember that Texas didn’t get Tech or OU at home. Tech got Texas at home. OU got Tech at home. Tech lost by 44 points on national television. Sadly, Tech is no longer in the discussion.
by the1austin on Nov 23, 2008 12:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A loss is a loss
It’s funny how you mention the score diffrence on UT-OU but not the other two games, hmmm. Yes, last second but by 6 points.
by Big12 rocks on Nov 23, 2008 9:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, TCU is our brethern Southwest Conference rival
Along with SMU, Rice, Houston and of course TT, A&M, Texas and don’t forget Arkansas and Oklahoma.
by gy2020 on Nov 23, 2008 1:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
only way to settle this
is to make the big 12 championship a rematch of the RRS. screw Mizzou and let’s see a rematch! Game of the Year pt 2!!!
by clra2 on Nov 22, 2008 11:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
ESPN College Gameday just had BCS projections
Brad Edwards has Texas at #2, Florida at #3, OU #4. And, Mark May is actually arguing for Colt McCoy to win the Heisman trophy.
by the1austin on Nov 22, 2008 11:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I turned it off after I heard Mark and Lou stating the case for Florida and OU to jump TX.
I wish I would have kept it on.
by mtntrance on Nov 22, 2008 11:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Mark/Lou vs. Herbie/Craig James whom have ranked TX over OU. Let’s keep on coming…
by GoHorns1 on Nov 22, 2008 11:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If there's one opinion I trust regarding the BCS, it belongs to Brad Edwards
Obviously, there’s one week of games left to be played, but Edwards’ initial projections give me more confidence than I had at halftime of the OU-Tech game.
by Sweed4Heisman on Nov 22, 2008 11:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, now those of you who rooted for OU
got what you wanted. While I will suffer watching OU in Miami for the MNC game, at least I won’t have to watch it thinking I wanted this!
Yes, there is still a chance for us, if Okie lite or Mizzou can beat the land thieves, and if the Baptists or Mizzou can beat Tech. Anyone want to lay odds on this?
Moral of this story: Never never never pull for OU. It is an abomination. You will suffer in hell for your moral lapse.
by Longhorn in Canada on Nov 22, 2008 11:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I did get what I want
Texas still has a shot to win the Big XII South.
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
by circa1015 on Nov 22, 2008 11:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So be it..
If OU is in the MNC, so be it. I’d rather see them there than TT. TT was exposed for what they are.
by drycreek on Nov 22, 2008 11:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
please view this

Perhaps the most recognizable mascot in sports, and certainly the toughest looking, Bevo is a fixture
by run Bevo run on Nov 22, 2008 11:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
or this
Perhaps the most recognizable mascot in sports, and certainly the toughest looking, Bevo is a fixture
by run Bevo run on Nov 22, 2008 11:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My thought is Tech
should not be include the 3-way tie 1-loss discussion by the way they lost tonight. But anything can happen when it involves with human factors. So, we should say a prayer for Baylor. A miracle from deity. A huge upset in lubbock.
by GoHorns1 on Nov 22, 2008 11:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Calm down
A lot still can happen. It’s the BCS for cryin out loud. Let’s not take it out on each other. All this talkin is moot if we can’t take care of business this Turkey-day.
I personally believe Mack will talk the voters into giving us the edge if it ends up being a 3-way tie.
Gobble gobble gobble!
by fiddycent on Nov 22, 2008 11:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Call me optimistic
but I see Texas beating A&M and OU beating OSU and Texas staying ahead of OU in the BCS rankings. I think a lot of the voters have “a thing” for Texas and Colt McCoy this year. I think we haven’t been punished like we might have in years past. Having said that, my biggest fear is not getting jumped by OU but is having to go to Kansas City and play outdoors in December and beat a good team twice with so much on the line. For what it’s worth.
by kellen on Nov 22, 2008 11:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
This is why we need a playoff
There are too many teams with similar or identical records. Comparing other games played is too difficult and non-conclusinve. They only way we can tell who is the better team or deserving to move forward is to play and decide on the field who gets to go to the championship. Play on the field, winner moves on.
So OU and Texas should play a playoff game to decide who should go to the BIg 12 CG.
Oh wait. They already have. Winner moves on.
by drycreek on Nov 22, 2008 11:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If I am a voter
I have to protect myself. In other words, if I choose to send Texas to the MNC where they lose by 3 touchdowns and OU demolishes someone in a BCS game, I can at least fall back on the head to head win as my method of reasoning. If I choose to overlook the head to head win and send OU to the MNC where they lose by 3 touchdowns and Texas kills someone in a BCS game…what do I say to the screaming hoard of Texas fans then?
by kellen on Nov 22, 2008 11:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
If ou beat Florida in Miami, and we beat USC in the Fiesta, we would finish 1-2, BEHIND a team we beat, with the same record as them.
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 12:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
AP will vote us #1
Split National Championship
by drycreek on Nov 23, 2008 12:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Corso ranks Texas 2nd, OU 4
Herbie ranks Texas 3, OU 3.
Good signs….
by the1austin on Nov 22, 2008 11:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
New Big 12 Tie Breaker
In place of current Tie Breaker 5, in case there are more than two tied teams and none of the previous tie breakers have decided a division champion, I propose to take the top two teams of all the tied teams as ranked in the BCS, and then use the head-to-head result between these two teams to decide.
by drycreek on Nov 23, 2008 12:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
In the case of a 3 way tie, the tie-breakers should be used to eleminate one of the teams, thus leaving the other 2 teams to be compared head-to-head. This rule is utilized, but only sometimes. It should be the case for any tie-breaker used, except for if 1 team had beaten the other 2 teams head-to-head.
This is from the Big XII rulebook
If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 7 will be followed until a determination is made. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.
by R00T4UT on Nov 23, 2008 3:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The narrative helps...
… in this case, I’ve heard about five times now that Tech should be eliminated from the discussion from the way they lost tonight. If that’s the way the media looks at it, then scoreboard is on our side. Corso and Herbie said that that’s what motivated their top fives, and that is good for us. Also, Colt is the defacto Heisman frontrunner unless you jump Bradford over him for throwing 19 passes in a blowout, that helps us.
GoHorns1, he meant four. Herb has us three and OU four.
As I typed this I heard Lou and Mark May both say OU should be ahead of us… stupid; mesmerized by shiny things.
by Horn Brain on Nov 23, 2008 12:07 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Lou/Mark vs. Corso/Herbie/James… it’s fun to watch… Let’s keep on coming..
by GoHorns1 on Nov 23, 2008 12:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think this is correct.
If this becomes a narrow discussion of the merits of OU’s resume vs. Texas’ resume, UT is in a much better spot. A three way tie only draws attention to the UT loss. If Tech is out of the discussion, I think UT is in a better spot.
It is a strange set of events. An OU win on a last second field goal, or some such, would’ve been great for UT. PERHAPS, though I’m skeptical, a blowout of this magnitude could likewise be positive for UT, if only because it serves to take Tech further our of the discussion.
I believe OU will finish above Texas, though.
by Skin Patrol on Nov 23, 2008 2:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OU will pass Texas in the BCS Standings- as they should.
Friends,
I am a BCS expert, and college football genius for that matter. Let me just say that Texas has had a great season. They have a great team but lost their chance for the BCS title by losing to Tech. OU owned that same team tonight and will pass Texas in the BCS standings as they should. Texas beat OU. However head to head means nothing in three way ties.
Now I will say Longhorn fans are not the brightest people in the world, so I’ll try to explain this so even you boys can understand it. OU had a much better schedule then Texas. Texas decided to put the cupcakes of the world on their schedule and now caught up to them. So when OU passes Texas tomorrow in the BCS, don’t start whining OK? You are just going to have to settle for playing in the Fiesta Bowl, and accept OU is winning the Big 12 South.
by BCSExpert on Nov 23, 2008 12:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You know what would be great?
Is if OU and Texas could settle it on the field.
Oh wait, Texas beat OU 45-35 at a neutral field!! Oh, but maybe Cincinnati beating Pitt should be the deciding factor, right?
by the1austin on Nov 23, 2008 12:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
didnt u just say we beat those looners by double digit?
by GoHorns1 on Nov 23, 2008 12:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry to say
that I agree. All the posters that talk about the logical reasons that UT will end up ahead of OU are missing the point. Logic has nothing to do with it. They think that because we beat OU we should be ahead of them. That’s nice, but OU should be ahead of TT who should be ahead of us who should be ahead of OU who should…
Hope like hell that I’m wrong, but I see Visor Bob in the MNC game, laying another giant egg.
by Longhorn in Canada on Nov 23, 2008 12:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Very few geniuses
are unaware of the distinction between “then” and “than.” Perhaps you were educated in Norman?
by BrooklynHorn on Nov 23, 2008 12:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
is it just me
Does anyone else realize that we may have a big 12 championship game between two teams that Texas HAS ALREADY BEATEN? How can anyone justify putting two teams in that both lost to Texas? Seriously, the fact that we owned the big 12 north champ should trump anything else ou has done.
by wishiwasalonghorn on Nov 23, 2008 12:20 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
SOS
Look at top ranked teams each team has played
Texas: #11 Okie State, #12 Mizzou
OU: #15 TCU, #19 Cincy
I’d say Texas has the edge when it comes to strenth of schedule. In conference or OOC doesn’t matter, only quality of opponents.
In the end if OU goes to the CCG, we will have beaten both teams in the CCG. Makes sense to me that we shouldn’t be there; we’ve already played both of them and know who’s the best in the Big 12. The CCG is for second place in the Big 12.
by drycreek on Nov 23, 2008 12:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
bravo
so if ou plays mizzu for the big 12 title….its really just to see who is second place?……. I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!
by wishiwasalonghorn on Nov 23, 2008 12:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you are about to get lit up my friend!
The Ralphie Report - Shoulder to Shoulder...All Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Nov 23, 2008 12:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Drycreek, OU also beat #2 Tech. and Texas beat #1 OU.
Let me repeat that. TEXAS BEAT #1 OU!
by the1austin on Nov 23, 2008 12:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
quit whining texas
Friends,
Here’s the deal. OU put TCU and Cincinnati on their schedule and those are ranked teams. Texas did not. They do not deserve to win the Big 12 South. Now stop whining, and be gentlemen and congratulate OU on a great win. We all know Texas fans are not very bright. The least you can do is to show some class for your Big 12 South Champion- and that is the OU Sooners.
Have a great night
Kevin Parnella
Noted College Football Expert
by BCSExpert on Nov 23, 2008 12:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
you are about to get lit up my friend, ignore the post above...I meant it for BCS expert
they dont want to hear it
The Ralphie Report - Shoulder to Shoulder...All Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Nov 23, 2008 12:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure OU scheduled Cinci because they thought they were going to win the Big East..
Even so, I’ll take a win against MiZZOU over a win against Cincinnatti any day of the week.
And, if I remember correctly, Texas beat OU on a neutral field by 10.
by the1austin on Nov 23, 2008 12:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wont ou just be co-south champs if they go?
by wishiwasalonghorn on Nov 23, 2008 12:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
I think the BCS would see it that way if OU loses to Missouri.
The pride and winning tradition of The University of Texas will not be entrusted to the weak or the timid.
Hook'em
by longhorns1 on Nov 23, 2008 6:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Then
Why haven’t I heard of this guy? It’s like Rush proclaiming himself a boon to humanity. Or TimeCube guy annointing himself the wisest ever. That said…I can see the magpie voters overlooking the head-to-head, focusing instead on A) how OU has been blasting people, and B) the OOC wins, which, to be wholly honest are leaps and bound better than UT. It will be depressing to watch, but I feel it coming.
by Stuck in the Plains on Nov 23, 2008 9:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not too bright, are you?
Schedules are set well in advance, for the most part. OU didn’t have a crystal ball that Cincy would be ahead in the Big East, nor did Texas know that Arkansas would be down.
What a pretentious idiot.
by TheElusiveShadow on Nov 23, 2008 6:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Next Best Option
I believe the only way to settle this big debate is handicap the records. Remove the best win and the worst loss from each team and observe the body of work. Assuming there are no upsets at the end of the season, it would look like this:
Texas Ranked Wins: #1Okahoma, #11 Missouri, #6 Oklahoma State
Texas Ranked Loss: #7 Texas Tech
VS.
OU Ranked Wins: # 2 Texas Tech, #12 Oklahoma State, #16 Kansas, #24 TCU;
OU Ranked Loss: -# 5 Texas-
by CaliforniaHorn on Nov 23, 2008 12:35 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Bizarre.
So OU’s loss counts but UT’s loss doesn’t? When you say “Remove the… worst loss from each team” it looks like you only mean remove OU’s worst loss. Also, OSU is better when Texas beats them than they are when OU beats them? Why? You guys beat OSU at home, right?
It doesn’t seem very fair to me to say that losing to Tech is irrelevant and beating Tech is irrelevant. That’s bizarre. I assume you forgot to strike the OU Ranked loss?
by Skin Patrol on Nov 23, 2008 2:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Strength of Schedule
I know the fans here aren’t going to want to hear logical reasoning, but here goes.
By the end of the season, if the three teams are still tied, OU should get the nod because yes, the did have a better strength of schedule.
The important game is not going to be UT’s loss the TT, but the UT’s slim victory at home versus OSU. If OU goes on the road and beats that same team, above any/all arguments you can stack up, then OU will get the approval over UT. That’s going to be THE key deciding point.
I, as a lifetime Sooner fan, will of course root for another demolition up in Stoolwater. And with it, a #2 or #3 ranking, and a trip to KC.
However, and it is very difficult for me to say this. If either OU loses, or doesn’t get the votes that they should have earned to be in the top 3, and Texas does go on to KC, I will root like mad for them to go on and beat the SEC. JUST like I did in the Rose Bowl. Only time I ever have rooted for the burnt orange, but I’ll root for my conference every day of the week. Boomer Sooner, and if need be….. said through tight lips Hook’em horns.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:36 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
well
to be honest i would be pulling for ou against any sec team as well… i hate ou but i love the state of texas more than anything, and as we all know ou’s football team has a few texans on it. maybe the sec will learn texas kids are fast too
by wishiwasalonghorn on Nov 23, 2008 12:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If OU wins
more of those good Texans will go there instead of UT. OU post-season success only hurts our recruiting. There is no reason to root for the conference when it hurts us.
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
by circa1015 on Nov 23, 2008 12:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
very true, and i hope that doesnt happen
thats one of those unfortunates that has always eaten at me. for me, at this moment though, i am so tired of hearing how florida talent is sooooooo much better than everyone else, including texas kids, i would love to prove them wrong
by wishiwasalonghorn on Nov 23, 2008 1:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is interesting
“The important game is not going to be UT’s loss the TT, but the UT’s slim victory at home versus OSU. If OU goes on the road and beats that same team, above any/all arguments you can stack up, then OU will get the approval over UT. That’s going to be THE key deciding point”
What about us cruising by Kansas, nearly shutting them out, and clearly not running up the score when we could have? That was in Lawrence. KU lost to OU in Norman by only 14. Why doesn’t that count?
by TheElusiveShadow on Nov 23, 2008 6:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
doh
It’s pretty obvious to anyone with a brain that in a 3 way tie situation, OU is the Big 12 Champion. Saying otherwise frankly, makes you an idiot.
by BCSExpert on Nov 23, 2008 12:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hit the ignore button with this guy.
Don’t take the bait, he’s not here to have a legitimate discussion.
by the1austin on Nov 23, 2008 12:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BCS Expert, for the kind of discussion you want..
I recommend www.texags.com or www.hornsfans.com.
Enjoy.
by the1austin on Nov 23, 2008 12:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually it doesn't
Since you can’t make a logical argument you must not be much of an expert and are the likely idiot. Just saying you are an expert, does not make you one. Let’s hear some argument that make sense.
Compare Texas’ wins over Mizzou and Okie State to OU wins over TCU and Cincy. Texas clearly comes out ahead.
by drycreek on Nov 23, 2008 12:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
completely seperate from the crap this guy is spewing
I’m genuinely intrigued by his fascination with smart/dumb. His name is BCSExpert, he is touting his own knowledge of college football, and all of his posts call other people idiots in some way. Apparently, despite the elementary display of personal expression, and the complete lack of backing up of any of his statements, saying he is smart makes his opinion worthwhile.
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
by circa1015 on Nov 23, 2008 1:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why does every ou fan ignore the mizzou game?
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 12:43 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
ranked ahead of TCU and Cincy. Do they suck too?
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 12:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps
Perhaps I didn’t clarify.
The Big12 North doesn’t compare to the Big 12 South.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And
And we beat them twice last year.
And watch in two weeks, we’ll be glad to go (to their house basically) and beat them again.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If only we'd played a real powerhouse, like UT Chat? Or Washington? Really?
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 12:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You did!!!
UT did. I watched that wonderful UTEP game. Such awesome competition.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh
Oh, and Rice as well. Amazing prowess.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Play for second place
Please go to KC and beat Mizzou, to see who is the second best team in the BIg 12. Texas already beat Mizzou and OU THIS year.
by drycreek on Nov 23, 2008 12:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And a shame you couldn't beat us
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Nov 23, 2008 12:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But
We’ll still be in KC, and then in Miami
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A shame you couldn't beat Texas on a neutral field.
by drycreek on Nov 23, 2008 12:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Y'all
Y’all were the better team that day. Beat OU fair and square. Got no one to blame but ourselves.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Must be Longhorn math???
You’re NOT the BEST team if you don’t have the BEST record.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Who cares about last year?
We beat TCU last year. Do we get extra points for that? How about for beating a highly ranked ASU team in our bowl game? We beat the best college football team of all time in January of 06, can we count that?
by Horncasting on Nov 23, 2008 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, all barbs aside, what is the rational ou argument?
That you are the hotter team right now? That TCU + Cincy + nothing + nothing > Fla Atlantic, UTEP, Arky, and Rice? Please help me here, because other than that, what argument could you make? Just please, give me something legit.
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 12:52 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i think their argument would be
well espn said we were great and they know everything
by wishiwasalonghorn on Nov 23, 2008 12:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Argument with presumption
As I said before, THE telling point in all this discussion will be next week’s OU-OSU game. Texas barely beat OSU at home. By OU winning on the road, PLUS the destruction of the same team that Texas lost to, plus the higher valued non-con wins, this will be valued as the determining factor
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If y'all blowout osu, then I'm afraid there will be alot of voters who feel the same way.
However, I think that you have to look at head to head and quality of loss. You are acting as though those factors aren’t even applicable.
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 12:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And once again, our IN conference schedule was tougher. Which gives you a marginal
schedule advantage, at best.
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 12:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wash
Dude, the North is a wash this year. I know Texas is happy with the victory over Missouri, and you did kick the snot out of them. But, do you really think Missouri will give any of the 3 a game? I think even TTU will smoke them.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 1:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not the point. the missouri game is a CONFERENCE game always viewed more heavily than
easier non conf games.. so when in conference OU and Texas both play about the same strength in conference, slight edge to texas..OU’s non-conf isn’t that much better considering OU didn’t have to play Mizzou. Mizzou would easily dispatch Cincy or TCU.
by jacobb23 on Nov 23, 2008 1:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OR
Or, let’s flip it around…
Texas beat OU. NO argument. But barely beat OSU on their own home field, and then lost (though barely) to TTU.
The analysis is within the Big 12 South. Texas hasn’t done bad, I’m not throwing stones, but if you put the teams into different uniforms and showed me the scores and how they played. I’d go for the OU clad team, and so will the voters I believe.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 1:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here is the dilema...
If ou goes to the national title game, beats, let’s say, Florida, and Texas goes to the Fiesta and beats USC, then you would have ou 1, Texas 2, with the same record, when Texas won head to head, neutral field. How in the world do you justify that?
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 1:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Justify
I justify it by saying it’s the same reason that Oregon State is going to the Rose Bowl. They lost more games than USC, BUT they’ve won their conference.
Texas can say all they want about being AS GOOD as or even BETTER than Oklahoma, if OU does do as you say. BUT, OU will have won every other game, and Texas did not.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 1:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So you are saying that because Tech beat Nebraska in overtime,
ou is better than Texas? Really?
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 1:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That has nothing to do with it
I’m saying that if Texas doesn’t drop an interception at Lubbock, we aren’t having this discussion.
I could also say that Stoops shouldn’t have punted the ball back with 6 minutes to on 4th down, he should have gone for it.
If’s and buts are meaningless.
OU didn’t just beat, they DEMOLISHED the lone team that beat UT. Rubbed their noses in it and made them like it. Whether you like it or not, it counts.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 1:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Justify part 2
To elaborate about Oregon State, what I mean is, who is the overall better team?? More than likely, USC, but they lost that day to a team that has even more losses than they do.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 1:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Once again,
You are basing your evaluation of Texas and ou on the outcome of games that neither of them played in.
by ctex80 on Nov 23, 2008 1:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
excellent point
i never in my wildest dreams….or should i say nightmares, thought of that but that is a very real and scary possibility
by wishiwasalonghorn on Nov 23, 2008 1:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rice does have 8 wins..... nt.whills
We're Texas...and you're NOT
by Bevoboy94 on Nov 23, 2008 11:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
as far as ou in a bcs bowl
i would love to see an ou-boise state rematch! bitter rivals!!!!!!!
by wishiwasalonghorn on Nov 23, 2008 12:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I pride myself on being a logical and rational college football fan so here it goes..
If OU had beat Texas back in october, i would not want to go to miami without a chance to give the payback back to OU. I find it completely absurd that just because OU is playing hot right NOW that they get the nod over a team that beat them fair and square. Strength of schedule is fairly even..I don’t think a ton of people would expect UM to lose to either TCU or Cincy…(pure speculation) This is exactly why college football needs an 8 team playoff. It’s just absurd and rediculous that Tech with one-loss, may get dropped to the Cotton Bowl or maybe even the holiday!! Insane thought number 2..Texas or OU won’t get a shot at the title game because of WHEN a team won its games? Absolutely insane.
by jacobb23 on Nov 23, 2008 1:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
OU punter Mike Knall says, 'Hook 'em'

Source: NYT
by TexasTexasYeehaw on Nov 23, 2008 1:06 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
He's doing the OU sign upside down.
Must be a closet OSU fan.
by Horncasting on Nov 23, 2008 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Big Ten has a good tiebreaker
The third tiebreaker in the Big Ten is one the Big 12 should implement:
If there is still a tie for the championship, or if the tied teams did not play each other, the team that played more games against Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) teams shall be eliminated.
But the bottom line remains: if a head-to-head win isn’t good enough to keep us ahead of OU, well then that’s just messed up.
by BigTexBD on Nov 23, 2008 1:23 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
But the bottom line remains: if a head-to-head win isn’t good enough to keep us ahead of OU, well then that’s just messed up.
Correct. If that is true, then we might as well not even ask for a playoff.
by drycreek on Nov 23, 2008 9:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Teams should be punished for playing 1-AA (sorry, FCS) teams. There is a reason they have a separate division for those teams, because they should not be playing eachother.
by R00T4UT on Nov 23, 2008 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The rankings are not that complicated even a sooner should be able to figure them out!
Texas beat OU head to head. Florida lost at home to ole miss. Alabama is still undefeated. 1. Alabama 2.Texas 3. Florida 4. Oklahoma…. why because being undfeated means something (obviously). Wining head to head means something and loosing at home to a 7-4 team means something! Blowing out the fraudulent 2 team at home means something. I would be more likely to put Florida at 2 had the loss been on the road. Simple logic from the human voters would be nice! With that said we still have games to be played. Here is to hoping for a Baylor win and an OSU win! Or better yet a playoff so all of this BCS bull**** can be decided on the field! Hook EM!
by IbleedBurntorange on Nov 23, 2008 1:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
If
“Blowing out the fraudulent #2 team” does indeed mean something, if for the sole reason that that is the sole team that beat Texas. Beat this same team by SIX touchdowns.
So, simple logic tells me that hmmmmmmmmm……….. If Texas were ‘that good’, shouldn’t they have been able to at least WIN the game against TTU?
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 1:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can we also say
In the 2nd half of UT vs OU we outscored big bad OU 25-7, dominated them to win 45-35? We were down 28-20 at half. It was a clear case of overmatched over 4 quarters – and OU’s big, bad O-line getting waxed by Orakpo, Lamarr Houston, Roy Miller, et al? Ou was up by 21 fast tonight. But when OU got hit back in the mouth repeatedly by a resilient team, they got beat. Our down game this year was an awful 1st half at Tech, which we STILL overcame to take the lead at the end – you know the rest – IF we had killed more time on 4 downs to the TD but Vondrell got it on 2nd – IF Gideon just rolled that ball on his chest and fell and IF they just held Crabtree up and tackled him on the two …
by shadyrock on Nov 23, 2008 1:34 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agree
I agree with you. If Texas had taken care of business, we wouldn’t be having this argument. UT beat OU. OU played a poor second half.
But you can if and but any game. The point is, Texas did NOT beat TTU. Just like OU did not beat Texas.
The more you insult TTU, the more you demean your own loss. And the more you praise TTU, the more value you give to OU’s demolition tonight.
Texas will be the unfortunate victim of winning early, and losing late.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 1:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Been fun
It’s been fun discussing with you guys.
No matter how it turns out, I wish you well. If Texas hangs on to go on to KC, I’ll root for them in Miami. I hope you’ll do the same for OU if we’re the fortunate ones.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 1:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ou is not the resilient team
and will fold again, just as they did against USC & LSU, if they make the championship game. Big Game Bob is just Home Game Bob & has lost his excellent asst coaches. The Big XII should be represented by the team that fights to the end, not the one that cruises and runs up points. The RESILIENT team. Because the Gators will run it up on you, because OU has a glass chin and will not respond. Ut will go in to fight to the end and win.
by shadyrock on Nov 23, 2008 1:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lost his excellent assistant coaches???
I’m sorry, I didn’t know he lost them. I thought they were all promoted because he mentored them so well. What is it now….like 5 head coaches that he brought up and soon to be a couple more. I believe UT hs also done its fair share of running up points this season. I believe McCoy has been left in the game as long or longer than Bradford.
by Big12 rocks on Nov 23, 2008 9:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
IF that were true..........
Then UT shouldn’t have allowed Tech to drive on them at the end of the game and score the winning touchdown.
Not terribly resilient in that one, were you?
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 2:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That game went to the last second.
Of all the on loss teams Texas had the closest margin of loss and greatest resiliency. Texas also played an away game after three highly ranked teams where OU’s victory tonight, though impressive, was after a bye and at home. Texas beat OU convincingly. I even think OU is playing the best in the big 12 at the moment but the overall body of work is most impressive, at this point with Texas. Next weekend’s OU/OSU game could change that.
by mtntrance on Nov 23, 2008 2:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you guys should get in.
Personally, I think you guys should be in the Big 12 Title Game. You beat OU by 10 on a neutral field, although you can technically say you guys played on the road as you were the road team that game. You lost to Tech on a fluke play and pummeled Missouri. I think you guys are way too worried about OU jumping you. I, honestly, don’t see it happening. I think the head to head will be more significant than anything else.
I think the best way to break the three way tie is to do like a score difference like they do in soccer. Baiscally, you add up the number of points you scored versus the two tied teams and subtract them from the points you gave up versus the two tied teams. So in your case your score difference would be 4 [(45+33)-(35+39)]. OU’s would be 34 ((35+65)-(45+21)). Tech’s would 38 [(39+21)(65+33)]. Or you could do an overall season score difference add up the points scored versus the points allowed. I know you guys wouldn’t win the Big 12 South title, in either instance, but that is a fairer way to break the tie breaker. It might encourage more running up the score, but at least there is some sense to it.
by PrimeTime2012 on Nov 23, 2008 2:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
UT ahead of OU - YEA RIGHT...
I can’t believe that you stupid longhorns are even reading this uninformed one-sided article. First of all, when OU lost to UT by 10 – OU had been controlling the whole game until the 4th quarter —-it wasn’t a dominating performance to say the least. When UT actually started moving the ball against OU was when a backup (Crowe) took over for an injured senior captain Reynolds at linebacker (it was this backup’s first minutes to record as a player)! Without that loss, OU’s defense would’ve continued to bend but not break.
Second of all, don’t even consider Arkansas an SEC team (or at least a good one who barely beat Div. II LA Monroe by a point) and don’t even try to say that UT has had a tougher schedule!! After OU’s game this coming Saturday against OSU – OU will have beaten 4 top-ten teams (Cincinatti, TCU, TTU, & OSU) while UT would have only beat 3 top-ten teams. It does not matter that UT beat Kansas when they were ranked as they were so highly overrated that it hurts to even think about!
Third of all, every UT fan is scared shi*-less for good reason!! OU will jump you guys in the polls either today or next Sunday and will kill Mizzou in the Big 12 Championship game (putting OU’s win total to 5 over top-10 teams)!! The rest is history…
Oh Yea – good luck trying to suck McCoy’s cock enough to win him the heisman – it’s going to the QB of the team that makes it to the Big 12 Championship Game!!!
by OU-sooner Man on Nov 23, 2008 3:03 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
So you're saying that the Heisman will go to
Chase Daniel as well as the qb of the team that represents the Big XII South? You’re aware that it can only go to one player, right?
by seth78 on Nov 23, 2008 3:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gloat all you want
but a football game is 60 minutes. OU did not finish – Texas did. End of discussion. Period.
You guys get 1 signature win and you think you are God’s gift. OU played focused and intense tonight but you have to admit that the Raider team you played did not bring their “A” game.
Now, as for your trolling, foul-mouth, way over the top posting: GET A LIFE!
This is why Longhorn Nation dislikes OU so much. It’s not the players or coaches but it is, in fact, without a doubt, your arrogant, over-rated, very narrow minded, supporters. I for one appreciate you bringing your smack to keep the homer fires burning.
Great win for your team…it’s 6:01 a.m…..and OU “fans” still suck!
by TXStampede on Nov 23, 2008 6:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Last second
Texas only last to TT at the last second in a game without both Cosby & Fozzy who would’ve moved the chains for us more consistently and without Miller and Orakpo and Palmer You want to whine about losing guy?!! Essentially, a banged up Texas lost at TT in the last second on the last game of a tough (4) game stretch whereas Texas beat OU at near full strength.
The pride and winning tradition of The University of Texas will not be entrusted to the weak or the timid.
Hook'em
by longhorns1 on Nov 23, 2008 6:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Logic Broke all up and Down For YA
The south depends on three game, the favored teams listed first:
A) Texas Tech vs Baylor
B) Oklahoma vs Oklahoma State
C) Texas vs Texas A&M
If all three favored teams teams win the highest ranked team in the BCS standings will go to the championship game.
If A only is an upset, Texas will go to the championship
If B only is an upset, Texas Tech will go to the championship
If C only is an upset, Oklahoma will go the championship
If two are an upset, the winner of the third will go to the championship
If all three are an upset, Texas Tech will go to the championship, as Oklahoma and Oklahoma State would be eliminated after the first round of head to head.
by Oklahoma Horn Fan on Nov 23, 2008 3:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sagarin has Texas #1
Early CPU result has Texas moving up two spots.
by Forty on Nov 23, 2008 6:03 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
OU moves up one
From #5 to #4 in his rankings.
by Forty on Nov 23, 2008 6:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think this is good at all
OU went from 4.91 points to 1.21 points behind Texas. They are only 0.27 behind #2 Texas Tech. I think a road win over OSU which is #11 in his rankings will jump OU to #1 and at worst #2
by DoubleB on Nov 23, 2008 8:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I really wish we were discussing whether we were getting a 3,4 or 5 seed.
Space for rent.
by Brian.HalcYoN on Nov 23, 2008 7:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Nightmare scenario
Now that Baylor sneaking up and beating a flat Tech team now seems at least plausible…
(1) Texas beats A&M, in ho-hum fashion
(2) Baylor upsets Tech
(3) OU routs OSU
(4) Texas beats Mizzou, again in ho-hum fashion
Is it possible Texas wins the Big XII but OU goes to Miami?
Shoot me now.
by Hopkins Horn on Nov 23, 2008 7:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I thought of that myself. .
but I doubt it. In that case, the head-to-head argument really starts to hold water. The extra conference game is a huge advantage with the computers as well.
by DoubleB on Nov 23, 2008 7:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely not.
If Texas wins the Big 12 and has the head to head win against OU, we’re going to Miami.
by billyzane on Nov 23, 2008 10:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The glass is half full
Either way fellow Horn fans, we will be playing in one of the two BCS bowls that anyone will watch or care about. Playing USC or Florida, being poised for another serious run in 09, and Will in the house for a long time. Life is good.
by BossierTex on Nov 23, 2008 8:31 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i think OU is going to get dinged for their bowl
games in the past
of course i’m rooting against them
but i think that weighs in the minds of voters too
just like what osu has done in bowls weighs against them
by abcdmetrius on Nov 23, 2008 8:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
A few bad apples
Every forum has a few bad apples and this one is no exception. TXSTAMPEDE talks about how bad the Sooner fans are yet his conduct is horrrible! These are all excellent football teams and even the best of them have a bad day. Texas had one against Tech and OU did against UT. I believe even Florida and USC can tell you that. The question is who the better team is right now. That is very hard to pick between OU and UT. Yes, UT beat OU earlier this year but OU is playing at a level way above where they were then. UT is playing very well also. Yes, UT would win if it is a two way tie but if it is a three way tie, head to head goes out the door as it should. Remember… Tech beat UT. Yes, it was on a last second play but every win is a win and Tech shouldn’t been in a position to beat UT but they were because UT was outplayed in that game. Ok, ok, now you say that UT was at the end of a long strech of very hard games and that they still almost wn. Almost winning doesn’t count….ever! TXSTSTAMPEDE also made this comment to an OU fan “but a football game is 60 minutes. OU did not finish – Texas did. End of discussion. Period.”
He is absolutely right, 60 minutes and not one second shorter! Texas did not finish against Tech or this discussion wouldn’t matter. Start rooting for your team more and quit bad mouthing these other great teams or their fans! Being obnoxiuos does not impact the polls at all and it is not what any of these schools represent or want!
by Big12 rocks on Nov 23, 2008 8:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Couple of responses
First of all, OU did not have a bad day against UT. They played as well as they have in almost all of the other games (TTU excluded) and got beat by a better team. You cannot make the same argument with UT vs. TTU due to all of the dropped passes, dropped INT’s and other unforced errors. Don’t get me wrong, TTU played a great game and deserved to win, but there is no denying that was our worst game of the year.
Second of all, college football is not about who is the best right now – hence no playoff. It is a sudden death from the opening kickoff of the opening game and when it comes down to the situation we have right now, the entirety of each team’s season is what should be taken into account.
by Horncasting on Nov 23, 2008 10:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
One thing that has struck me as interesting is that UT fans seem to think Tech played the perfect game and still barely won. Tech played far from perfect…there were several drops and other miscues that led directly to drives stalling. So, yes, UT didn’t play great (possibly due to what Tech was doing??), and Tech did play well, but left about 21 points on the field as well. So while it was a tough loss for Texas, it wasn’t because Tech had a once-in-a-lifetime game. That close to perfection game was saved for the OSU game. And wasted last night.
By implying that Tech isn’t really that great, you kind of argue against yourself. Shouldn’t you win no matter what against lesser teams? Is the UT loss to Tech to be compared to Florida’s loss? For your arguments, I would suggest you imply that Tech is awesome and you still nearly beat them. Sounds better that way…
by Tech92 on Nov 23, 2008 4:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have never seen anyone state that Tech played a perfect game
Enough with that argument.
Texas fans are claiming that it was our worst game from an execution standpoint, and I dont think there is any arguement on that point. We played our worst game, and we lost. You guys played a decent game, and won. Grats to you.
The difference between Tech and Texas is, we both played a shitty half of football in our losses, but Texas was good enough to come back and make it a game.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Nov 24, 2008 9:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
3 teams in the BCS
One of the guys on ESPN last night was saying that it is possible to have 3 teams in the BCS. It didn’t sound correct to me, but I wanted to be sure.
He more or less said if OU loses to Mizz, Mizzou gets the Fiesta for winning the Big 12. Then, it’d be possible that UT could be pulled up to the National Title game. But neither of those count as an at large bid, so OU/TTech could still grab an at large.
Is that true? I’m leaning towards ‘No.’
by UT_BKC on Nov 23, 2008 9:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
No then yes.
Evidently, some BCS officialls initially said no, but changed thier mind and said yes, it would be possible.
by pleaseplaykindle on Nov 23, 2008 9:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Two non-con champions in the MNC
Three teams in the BCS is only possible of two teams from one conference, neither of which is the conference champion, are ranked 1 and 2 at the end of the seaons. The two teams would go to the MNC, and the conference champion would still get invited to another BCS game.
In our case Mizzou would have to win the Big 12 and OU and Texas would somehow have to be 1 and 2 in the BCS (i.e. big mess in the SEC).
by drycreek on Nov 23, 2008 9:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It cant happen this year
Theres no way a 2 loss team is making the MNC this year.
Last year, if say two South teams ended up at 12-0 and 11-1, and the undefeated team lost to the north, and all other conference champs had 2 losses, then it would be possible. But it aint happening this year. No one can survive a second loss and make it to the MNC with USC, PSU etc staying at one loss.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Nov 24, 2008 9:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A few bad apples-continued
I apologize. I picked on one person the last post and did not mention the horrible things said by OU-Sooner Man but they were so bad they shouldn’t been allowed to post. I don’t believe in censorship but I do believe in decorum. Be a little classier!
by Big12 rocks on Nov 23, 2008 9:07 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sheesh am I late...
…to this party. Agree completely and was thinking along same lines as BZ although he seems to have put the argument together in a particularly cogent fashion..
There really is no objective case for OU to be ahead of us, although a blowout of OSU next week might allow for that.
FWIW, and as implausible as it is (Bama loose to Auburn and beat Florida) I’m positively giddy over the prospect of playing OU in Miami. We are less talented on offense and are"a year away". We’ve already beaten them and last night notwithstanding Big Game Bob is not back (thrashing an overawed Tech at home isn’t the same thing), the pressure on them would be enormous and the upside for us would be much greater than the downside.
marshalld
by duras on Nov 23, 2008 10:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
TT is out of the discussion
So it gets down to who is better Texas or Oklahoma…….
Who won the head to head game ?
Who played the toughest schedule based on wins and losses ?
Both answers are TEXAS by a wide margin.
HOW TOUGH IS THIS ?
I'd rather you just say thank you and went on your way.
by MeatchickenHorn on Nov 23, 2008 11:35 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
But beating the number two team by a million very recently carries a lot of weight. I think many voters will look at the UT loss and say, well, it was almost three months ago and OU is clearly not the same team. Fair? I don’t know, but it’s the possible reality. Losing late hurts, but impressing late helps. OU is ahead in the human polls, and the team Texas lost to got beat. That won’t help.
by Tech92 on Nov 23, 2008 4:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It was 6 weeks...
…ago and OU is a different team at home.
marshalld
by duras on Nov 23, 2008 7:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Coaches vote OU #2
Read it and weep, Longhorns……
http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/poll?poll=Coaches
Also got 4 #1 votes. And none for Texas.
by TexasSooner on Nov 23, 2008 12:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Congrats?
Lets see if OU doesn’t lay an egg in Stillwater.
by goingforthecorner on Nov 23, 2008 3:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Which shows how bad the system is...
There is absolutely no way OU should be ranked ahead of Bama. Even though I think OU would kill Bama, it is inexcusable.
by jw4425 on Nov 23, 2008 4:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















