2008 Horns report card, part 2 - defense
With this earlier post, I began a breakdown of Horns players by position starting with the offense. While offense wins BCS rankings and gets most of the press, I believe this Texas team achieved its 11-1 record on the back of its defense. The key word here is evolution; the defense has undergone a remarkable transformation this year, a baby turning into a teenager. Mack’s transformation of his defense from a 4-3 run plugger that depends on play-making safeties to a flexible, fast, pressurizing bee swarm to combat spread offenses is now nearing completion. All that remains is to develop those play-making safeties and find at least one more linebacker, and this becomes a defense that beats teams up (like they did to Kansas).
What’s left, and the Fiesta Bowl provides a great intermediate target, is to complete the journey from teenager to man for the 2009 season. So where are the Horns in that process?
Defensive Tackle – All summer, fans worried that Texas would be too light and too shallow in personnel to hold up for the season. The show was billed as Roy Miller and the Munchkins, since 260 pound DEs (in 2007) Lamarr Houston and Aaron Lewis bulked up to 275-280 and converted to tackle in the spring. That show never made it out of focus groups; what we got instead was The Gatling Gun, a group of gap-shooting disruptors that played hell with opposing teams’ running games and produced 7 sacks and an astounding 52 quarterback hurries (only 3 less than that produced by the much more ballyhooed defensive ends). In perhaps their finest game, the play of the DT’s actually forced Missouri to shrink the gaps between the center and guards, equivalent to a big-time tightening of the derriere and capitulation by a spread offense. Instead of a weakness, DT was a team strength. Individually, senior Roy Miller was a god, with 26 quarterback hurries (only one less than Brian Orakpo), 4 sacks, and 46 tackles with 10 for losses. How he could not be on the All Big 12 defensive team is beyond me. Miller’s stuffing of the Jeremy Maclin opening-play reverse against Missouri was the statement play of the game and maybe for the year. Although much less heralded, Aaron Lewis played better than expected and looks to be a very good player for 2009. Lamarr Houston, one of PB’s “my guys” from the pre-season, was somewhat disappointing, given his athletic talents. Aside from the distraction from the DWI incident in September, I suspect it’s a case of “You can take the DE to DT, but you can’t take the DE out of the DT,” or something like that. Houston ran himself out of too many plays and seemed to struggle to hold position when double-teamed. On the other hand, he’s been plagued with a nagging foot injury that has diminished his explosiveness. Despite all this, he was undeniably disruptive, because 7 (30%) of his 20 tackles went for loss and he delivered another 11 quarterback hurries.
DT is another position where Texas has a considerable advantage over their hulkier, slower counterparts on the Ohio State offensive line. With time for his foot to heal, Houston, together with Miller and Lewis could emerge as the disruptive force that stops Beanie Wells before he can generate a head of steam or makes him bounce outside, where the Longhorns’ speed advantage can come into play.
Backups: A true freshman, Kheeston Randall began getting on the field toward the end of the season, and junior Ben Alexander played well enough to spell a starter now and then. To my limited eye, there was never a huge dropoff when either was in the game. Randall, with a year of strength training and some additional bulk, could be a serious player in the years ahead.
Grade A-
Defensive End. As of this writing, Brian Orakpo has won the Lombardi, Nagurski, and Hendricks awards for the nation’s best lineman, defensive player, and defensive end, respectively. Next, we’ll find out he’s won the Medal of Honor. Short of Orakpo, does Texas have any defensive ends? I think the answer to that question is a resounding yes. The "other" ends in the 2008 campaign, senior Henry Melton and sophomores Sam Acho and Eddie Jones combined for 8 sacks, 16 tackles for loss and 29 quarterback hurries. Not exactly girl scouts. I must say I am more than impressed with Henry Melton, who went from a sad sack of a sophomore running back that seemed afraid to hurt somebody to a consistent, motorized force at DE who may yet play in an NFL always looking for pass rushers. This depth and aggressive play from the opposite side of the line prevented consistent double teams on Orakpo and allowed the defense to develop a remarkable fluidity and unpredictability that is the trademark of Will Muschamp. All this aggressiveness did lead to a certain vulnerability to screen passes, especially early in the season, but you can’t have everything.
In their two most recent BCS beatdowns by SEC teams, speed and power off the edge from the opposing team’s DE’s completely overwhelmed the Buckeyes. With Orakpo’s knee healed up and Acho’s confidence peaked for the Fiesta Bowl, the Horns DE’s could very well be the heavy artillery that takes out the command and control of one freshman quarterback Terrelle Pryor. The key is not to sack him on every play but rather to collapse the pocket, making him stand and read defenses rather than run, free-lance and play sandlot football.
Backups: Although Orakpo and Melton seemed to always be on the field, Acho and Jones are not much of a drop-off. Their signature moment as a pair was the six-play goal-line stand against Kansas where each got a sack
Grade A+
Outside Linebackers – On one hand, we have Sergio Kindle, whose brutal tackles and pass rush kept the Horns in the game against Tech when every other player’s head was spinning demonically and has played like a beast ever since. I always think of him as "The Cleaner" for his tactic of delaying his pass rush until he sees that a. it really is a pass, and b. which way the quarterback might flush and then swooping in for the kill. He is easily the most disruptive and best pass-rushing linebacker in the Big 12. Then we have Roddrick Muckelroy, who has a different job of cleaning up draws, screens, dumpoff passes to running backs or fronting slot receivers who run hot routes. With all this responsibility, he is the first linebacker to record 100 tackles in a season and lead the team in tackles (by a wide margin in fact) since Derrick Johnson in 2004. He played monster games against UTEP, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech, but was dominated by Oklahoma State’s TE Brandon Pettigrew, and has virtually disappeared since the Texas Tech game (Colorado-Tech, averaged 11.6 tackles/game, but only 6 per game since). It may be that he’s injured but the team hasn’t reported it, but his on-again, off-again performances have left him off the All-Big 12 teams.
Given the Horns’ recent history of atrocious linebacking, this year’s play is a serious upgrade. But the team has been vulnerable to runs off the edge (see UTEP, Oklahoma State, and Baylor (incidentally Muckelroy’s worst game)) and good TE’s (Gresham, Coffman, and Pettigrew all had big games). It could be scheme-related, but somehow the outside linebackers seem a year away from being truly great. As a fan, I hope Kindle doesn’t turn pro, because I think he is still learning the LB position and could easily triple his signing bonus by playing another year for Muschamp.
This group needs to work out how to play the double TE set, because as sure as a Sunday morning, Ohio State will line up with 2 TE’s and pinch the DE’s, daring Kindle and Muckelroy to fight off the FB or make the right choice on a Pryor option play. While their athletic ability is unquestioned, their mental game needs an overhaul, or Beanie Wells just might wear out the UT defense.
Backups: Sophomore Keenan Robinson and freshman Emmanuel Acho have shown a few flashes, but neither has been on the field enough to tell what their potential might be. One encouraging sign of some quality depth is that Robinson was listed ahead of Kindle on the early depth charts in summer camp, until Kindle had shown Muschamp what he could do.
Grade: B (It’s a long way up from last year’s atrocity at all linebacker positions. Kindle is a difference-maker against spread offenses, but the defense has proved vulnerable to attacks on the outside LB’s in several games).
Inside Linebackers – Rashad Bobino and Jared Norton have shared this position all year. Bobino is the senior and a veteran of the 2005 championship year, but has been consistently ineffective throughout his last 3 years. Norton has a lot of athleticism, but has come up short in the smarts and pass coverage department repeatedly. Neither player’s play changed significantly from 2007, although both seem to have improved their ability to pick gaps and judge attack angles. The MLB position poses no real threat to offenses and has made few signature plays. In some games, particularly Oklahoma State and Tech, they seemed a significant liability with missed tackles, poor gap control, and being lost in pass coverage. This is a classic case of how experience may not make you a better player.
The Fiesta Bowl will test these two hombres in serious ways. Controlling their gaps in coordination with slanting defensive linemen will be key in any feasible plan for stopping Beanie Wells. Fans can only hope that they will "man up" for that job. Fortunately, the Buckeyes do not have an all-world TE to abuse them in pass coverage.
Backups: None
Grade: C (One of two remaining problem areas on defense. Luckily they have Miller & Co. in front of them).
Cornerbacks – This position has perhaps evolved the most during the year. The starters on the depth chart, Ryan Palmer and Deon Beasley, are likely the worst players (more on that later), and the subs, considering their youth, have been fairly spectacular. So let’s focus on the starters. Ryan Palmer seems to be the only DB with good enough hands to make an interception (he leads the team with 3), and in fact made a critical interception in blowing open the Baylor game. Nevertheless, his small size and lack of quickness and closing speed leaves him vulnerable to downfield blocking on outside runs. As the only senior, he was clearly the glue that helped hold the secondary together early in the year, but he is clearly ready to be supplanted by the wondrous Chykie Brown (more below). So now let’s turn our attention to the single most disappointing player on the team, Deon Beasley. You can see his talent in his ability to change direction. You can also see that he is the worst tackler on the defense, and the player most likely to be obliterated by a blocking wide receiver. Watching him be manhandled by Michael Crabtree and Dez Bryant felt like watching a movie on spousal abuse. Beasley versus the run on Roddrick Muckelroy’s side of the defense equals disaster. Interesting that the decline in Muckelroy’s performance has accompanied the period of Chykie Brown’s injury; hmmm… I think we have the point.
With Chykie Brown returned to health by the Fiesta Bowl, Horns fans can hope that Beasley gets relegated to the bench now that the team will not be facing a spread offense. Beasley versus the run is scary. Beasley vs. Beanie is called hide the children. While the Brown’s are not exactly the return of former UT great Quentin Jammer (who I thought was one of the best college cornerbacks against the run that I ever saw), at least they’re not afraid to knife through a double team or underneath some big clumsy pulling guard.
Back-ups The future is now with the Browns, Chykie and Curtis and a true freshman wunderkind named Aaron Williams. Because of injuries and spread offenses, these guys all got a lot of playing time early in the season, and gave us some of the best defensive plays of the year. Who can forget Curtis Brown leaping to break up a "go get it" pass from Zac Robinson to Dez Bryant of Oklahoma State. Who can forget Chykie Brown running up the sideline stride for stride, mano a mano with Jeremy Maclin of Missouri. Aaron Williams had FOUR blocked kicks, not including the one he blocked against Oklahoma that was called back for roughing (my A!!), and returned an interception for a touchdown.
Grade C+ (If it isn’t obvious already, I think Beasley is Texas’ worst defensive player and he drags an otherwise B-level group down with him).
Safeties – This group of all true or redshirt freshmen, led by starters Earl Thomas and Blake Gideon, has been scrutinized more than a couple’s first baby. Oh look, his first blown coverage! (Thomas against Florida Atlantic) Oh look, his first interception! (Thomas against OU). Oh look, his first blitz! (Gideon against Missouri). Mack must have regurgitated the pre-game dinner (if he ate at all) for every game leading up to Oklahoma, pinching himself to remember that, yes, we’re STARTING TWO FRESHMEN AT SAFETY. And one of them, the true freshman, IS CALLING THE PLAYS!! Even the casual fan knew about "the safeties" and followed their every burp and crawl. And then came the Tech game, where on the final two plays of the game, some little evil devil whispered in the ear of first Gideon (drop that interception, don’t you know you’re just a freshman!) and then Thomas (let go of that jersey, dude, you’re out of bounds and you’re just a freshman). As Texas fandom despaired, along came the Kansas game, where Gideon and Thomas formed a double-headed hammer, whacking on the Jayhawk receivers and tight ends, knocking Kerry Meier and Jake Sharp out of the game (yes I’m still impressed by that).
So if we forget all the baby babble and realize that, like all babies, our safeties after 12 games are all grown up now, the safety position has to be considered a success. Are they Eric Berry of Tennessee? Heck no! Are they as good as anyone could be in their situation? Heck yeah! I’m impressed that Gideon has gotten everyone lined up since the first game. I’m impressed that they make opposing defenses limit their throws over the middle. I’m impressed that, since the Oklahoma State game, they take good tackling angles (OK Michael Crabtree, yes that one bad one by Thomas). I’m impressed that, despite giving up big plays here and there, many of those were created by clever screens or by blown coverages and overrun plays by linebackers. I saw no uncontested post patterns, no ankle-breaking flops in front of juking midgets. I saw few short angles that allowed receivers to outrun double teams. So, dare I say it, I’m impressed!
That’s not to say that the safeties wouldn’t benefit from tip drills and former Ohio State and Minnesota Viking great Cris Carter’s video method on learning to catch a football. Three interceptions by the safeties in 12 games is not going to cut it. "Hands of Stone," was branded by the retired welter/middleweight Roberto Duran, and has no place on the football field. The safeties also need to learn how to chickenfight with and tackle low on big tight ends like Gresham and Pettigrew.
Against the Buckeyes, the Horns just need MOS, more of same. The Buckeye receivers are fast, but not faster than Jeremy Maclin or Manny Johnson. They’re definitely not tougher than Crabtree, and not as good an athlete as Dez Bryant. The Horns’ group kept the lid on all these characters (with the exception of one play) and I don’t see Robiskie and Hartline as nightmares waiting to happen. They will have to "man up" against Beanie, but the fans have seen significant man-evidence the last 3 weeks to feel confident about that.
Backups: Back in the summer, everyone wondered which of the four safeties, Thomas, Gideon, Ben Wells, or Christian Scott would start. So it’s not surprising that there is not a lot of drop-off in talent to Wells and Scott. What has been surprising is that Scott made such an impact when he came in for the concussed (call it what you want, coaches) Gideon against Kansas, it was like a medieval carpenter discovering the nail gun. With the debacle of the Pirates of the Plains fresh in everyone’s minds, the clamor for Scott to start issued forthwith. When asked why Scott hadn’t played more, Muschamp offered a one-word answer, "Preparation." Going deeper into the lineup, Nolan Brewster has played better in mop-up duty over the season, as he was lost in the first four games.
Grade B+ (Given where they started, "the safeties" performed better than anyone could have expected, even with ‘the drop" and "the jersey tackle")
Conclusions Given the vanguard of top offensive teams the Horns have played this year, being in the top 25 in scoring defense is nothing short of a miracle. This is a very good defense, that, with some coach cojones to demote Beasley and a subliminal sleeping tape on how to play linebacker for Norton, should be one of the top defenses in the country in 2009. Right now, it’s a defense no one wants to play, as PB predicted in the pre-season. As a "baby," Will Muschamp has schooled it through crawling, walking, running, training wheels, bicycles, to adolescents on motorcycles. A beatdown of Ohio State would provide its official driver’s license for 2009.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
7 recs |
25 comments
Comments
Once again, nice write-up
A few points:
- I believe Aaron Lewis is a senior. His loss combined with the loss of Miller and the possibility of moving Houston to DE again are the primary reasons we think getting McFarland is so important.
- One mitigating factor against voting for Sergio Kindle is there’s a very real possibility he may declare for the draft. Let’s hope not.
- If Earl Thomas could just hold on to the ball, he’s got the possibility of becoming an Eric Berry. He’s definitely smaller, but he’s got the ballhawking and big hitting skills.. Which is why I voted for him.
by jc25 on Dec 15, 2008 1:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You're right about Lewis
For some reason I kept seeing Lewis referred to as a junior by a couple of media articles.
With Lewis gone and Houston to DE this is a serious issue, Jamarkus McFarland or not. There is nothing at DT on the depth chart and with Jared Norton at MLB, the Horns become very soft in the middle on D. This could undermine much of the Horns’ potential success. With the commitment of recruit Alex Okafor at DE to go with Acho and Jones, I think they should leave Houston at DT, even if he is undersized. Certainly having McFarland to go with Kheeston Randall and Houston would be a huge help and might make things manageable.
by burnt in ny on Dec 15, 2008 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
upon further inspection
we’ll have what looks to be a redshirt freshman Jarvis Humphrey, who was highly recruited, and senior-to-be Ben Alexander ( I thought HE was the senior) back to go with sophomore-to-be Kheeston Randall at DT. If Devon Kennard also commits at DE in addition to Okafor, we can definitely leave Houston at DT. It won’t be a heralded group at DT, but at least we can survive without McFarland. Although survival is not really what we’re looking for if the Horns are to make a run at the 2009 MNC.
by burnt in ny on Dec 15, 2008 2:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Run at MNC
Regardless of what happens to McFarland, I doubt the DT or the D-line will actually be the peice that it comes down to. Although I believe McFarland is a solid prospect its difficult to judge how good of a freshman he’ll be. The biggest thing for a DT is being strong enough to fight off one or two blockers, and for the first season I would probably feel more comfortable with Alexander, Randall, Houston, and Humphreys because they’ve had atleast one year of working with maddog in the weight room.
Personally, a run of the MNC will be decided by how improved our LB play is next year, how dominant our secondary is, and if Muschamp has some additional layers to add to our defensive scheme now that everyone would have another season under their belt. We will probably be a little green to start the year at LB, because I believe that if Sergio is back next year it will be at DE. I’m not sure if either would be a MLB, but there is upside with Acho and Robinson. Also, Dravanti Johnson could figure into the equation at OLB to spell Muckelroy.
by BMG on Dec 15, 2008 2:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DT/DE
Not sure where all of the discussion about moving Houston back to DE is coming from. We actually seem to have more talent and depth at DE than we do at DT next year:
DE
Kindle – if he stays I agree with you that this is where he’ll line up the most
Acho
E. Jones
Carter
Okafor
D. Jones
Kriegal – probably ends up at DT, but may start at DE like Lewis/Houston did.
And possibly one of Kennard/Mims.
DT
Houston
Alexander
Wilcoxin
Randall
Humphreys
Derek Johnson (may be the strongest DT his first day on campus)
Calvin Howell
by Horncasting on Dec 16, 2008 2:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Job
- From the looks of it, Jamarkus seems headed to OU. I’m not sure our chances are 50/50 at best. However, the cupboard may not nearly be as bare as it seems. Alexander has played spot duty for the last 2 seasons, much like Roy Miller did prior to this year. Addtionally, Humphreys, and Kheeston Randall are there to go along with two incoming freshmen (Howell and Johnson). Assuming Houston stays at the position—which is not a foregone conclusion—there will be plenty of warm bodies to throw out there.
-Let’s also not forget the two touchdown saving tackles Earl Thomas made versus A&M. He chased down Mike Goodson on one, and Cyrus Gray on the other I believe. Thomas is the real deal. He has room for improvement as far as play recognition goes, and he is probably good for 3 or 4 more INTs this year if he works on coming down with the football. I expect a big game from him vs tOSU and huge leap from him next year.
by BMG on Dec 15, 2008 2:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I too was struck
by how confident and crisp those two rundowns by Thomas were. Those are the sort of plays that are never noticed by the media, but can be worth 8 points (2 field goals instead of touchdowns) or more in a game
by burnt in ny on Dec 15, 2008 2:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great stuff again burnt in ny
Appreciate your thoughtful contributions, which are exactly what FanPosts are for: substantial analysis.
by GhostofBigRoy on Dec 15, 2008 5:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
I knew PB would be submerged in finals, and everyone else seemed exhausted by the BCS circus, so I thought a little review might be useful.
by burnt in ny on Dec 15, 2008 9:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Put Scott on that list
Thinking about what he was doing in the Kansas game makes me scared of what he could do with a whole season under his belt.
He showed some real power.
by notsofst on Dec 15, 2008 9:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Granted it was only one impressive game
But I’ve also been wondering how C Scott will get on the field. To me, there are strong odds that Gideon is a four year starter – there are some virtues to being a known and reliable quantity – but Scott seems bring play making ability not otherwise present. Moreover, there seems to be a logjam of young talent at safety, and I don’t hold out much hope that there’s an impact MLB on the roster – or even that the position can be manned by anyone who isn’t superhuman in the Big 12 south.
Any reasonable speculation that Muschamp starts running a bit of 3-3-5 or even more 4-2-5 with a safety?
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Dec 16, 2008 6:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I love the idea of a 4-2-5
4- E. Jones, L. Houston, K. Randall, S. Acho
2- Muck, Kindle
5- Ch. Brown, Cu. Brown, E. Thomas, B. Gideon, C. Scott.
Doesn’t that seem to make more sense for next year? Not as an everyday lineup, but against the spread, that certainly seems more relevant than a 4-3 with Norton instead of either Scott or Gideon.
by ctex80 on Dec 16, 2008 8:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why not a 3-3-5
with Kindle switching between DE and LB depending on the down and distance.
by Wells on Dec 16, 2008 9:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If you do that,
then the personnel decision that you’re making is between Kheeston Randall and Norton, I’m assuming. With that lineup (Jones, Houston, Acho, and Kindle as the hybrid), it seems like we’d be to susceptible to the run with only Norton and Muck behind them. I love the idea of going back and forth between a 3-4 and 4-3 with Kindle switching alignments, like we did on several occasions this year. However, that was with 3 other linebackers and Miller in the middle.
by ctex80 on Dec 16, 2008 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree about the power run stopping
But I think it is a reasonable trade off when playing teams that run a spread offense and the need to be quick and have more options in pass coverage. Plus this allows us to cover our lack of depth at DT.
by Wells on Dec 16, 2008 3:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
UT played a lot of 4-2-5
this season, wih Palmer and Beasley on the field. I think the way Scott gets on the field is as the hybrid LB/S. He would need to be as effective playing at 215 lbs as at 205 and get a lot stronger because he would be taking on TE’s and the occasional OL. The other issue is whether there is sufficient coverage ability with three safeties on the field rather than three corners. The 3-safety 4-2-5 as a base defense against the spread would be extremely weak against two tight end sets where one of the tight ends was a Jermaine Gresham or Chase Coffman. Oklahoma State took the Horns out of the 4-2-5 with a spread by running Hunter off the edge behind just one great TE, Pettigrew.
Scott’s other issue is mental, and that might improve with more experience or a position on the field with more limited responsibilities. Muschamp wants to get the 11 best players on the field, and if Scott can get himself prepared mentally and cut down on mistakes, Muschamp will find a way.
One thing I’m looking forward to seeing in an otherwise meaningless Fiesta Bowl is how the defense handles a power running team in Ohio State. Our defensive personnel are now completely geared to stopping spread offenses and it will be interesting to see if Muschamp can cobble together something to attack a power I with a big back. Although it seems likely that we would play Florida for the MNC next year, we could also be playing Alabama or USC who are power running teams first and foremost.
by burnt in ny on Dec 16, 2008 9:13 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the insight.
Hadn’t thought of a lot of that, but totally makes sense. I guess that’s the difference between real life and Xbox.
by ctex80 on Dec 16, 2008 9:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A 3 cornerback 4-2-5 is actually a nickel. 4-2-5 refers to a three safety set.
I personally think guys like Gideon and Scott are well suited to cover guys like Gresham and Coffman. They’re not as big but they’re fast enough (Muck isn’t) and quicker. Guys like Gresham in particular are hard to cover because they’re both fast and big/strong – cornerbacks aren’t big enough and LB’s aren’t fast enough. Safties (especially Scott) are somewhere between LB’s and CB’s on the speed/size/strength scales. Scott might not be able to press a Gresham at the line but he would be able to play bump/tight coverage with him on pass and either prevent him from blocking the ILB or tackle the runner himself on running plays.
Fortunately it looks like Gresham is going pro next year.
Scott is a beast, I hope he can get in Muschamp’s good graces next season. Burnt in NY’s “medieval carpenter with a nailgun” simile is brilliant and apt.
by hodad on Dec 16, 2008 10:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Scott
Rumor has been that it is either is work ethic or execution in practice that have kept him off of the field. Hopefully the success he got in the little bit of playing time will motivate him.
by Horncasting on Dec 16, 2008 2:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
All of those TE's
will be playing on Sundays next year so we won’t have to worry as much about game breaking TEs in 09.
by aaronlybrand on Dec 16, 2008 3:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Curtis Brown
I still think he has a long ways to go to be a legitimate cornerback. He is a heck of an athlete, as he showed going up against a similar great athlete in Bryant. However, when he had to cover real receivers that run real routes he really struggled.
Hopefully the light will come on for him like it did for Chykie.
In his limited action, Aaron Williams looked like the best cover corner on the team to me.
by Horncasting on Dec 16, 2008 2:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not quite..
I’d have to go with Chykie. His physicallity really helped him stop receivers from getting a clean release off the line of scrimmage. That is what Beasley does the worst. He can’t keep anyone from blowing right past him off the line of scrimmage. I do see Aaron Williams molding into the ballhawking/special teams nightmare that was Nathan Vasher.
by aaronlybrand on Dec 16, 2008 3:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't see your post when I posted mine...
And I don’t mean to shortchange Chykie. Corner and DE are the positions that could set this Defense apart next year. And whatever you call Kindle.
by ctex80 on Dec 16, 2008 3:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Aaron Williams is going to be the best of the bunch, period.
Would love to see him start opposite Chykie next year.
by ctex80 on Dec 16, 2008 3:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Williams, Chykie, or Curtis, I’m just glad that we’re talking about two sophs and a frosh as UT’s top CBs RIGHT NOW. That speaks very well for next year’s defensive backfield, especially considering the three top safeties are all freshmen as well. Wow.
I actually wonder about the possibility of moving Scott up to MLB. Scott isn’t much smaller than some Auburn mikes like Dontarrious Thomas were, and remember, this is CFB, where a little size is often sacrificed for speed, depending on the coach’s philosophy.
by burntorangehorn on Dec 16, 2008 9:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















