Muschamp - Defensive Scheme vs. OSU
The layoff month before bowl season has got me thinking a little about what gameplan/scheme that Muschamp is cooking up for Pryor and the Buckeyes. I've heard that when Muschamp's full playbook is installed he has the ability to play either man coverage and blitz the hell out of the quarterback, or throw a lot of zone-blitzes at the quarterback to create confusion. I thought about this for two reasons: 1) Our defense, since the loss the Texas Tech, has gotten stingier and more aggressive with the called plays (i.e. more blitzes from the edge and from linebackers) and 2) Knowing OSU likes to run a more pro style offense, would this give Muschamp even more opportunity to confuse Pryor and throw a lot of zone-blitz or even blitzes to make him feel pressure and make some "rookie mistakes." Just thinking about this given that our defense has had a whole year to improve and now we have a month to game plan for a team that really isn't going to spread us out a lot with multiple passing lanes or passing situations, especially on 1st down. Let me know what you guys think. Hook 'Em Horns and OU Sucks!
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
Past UT defensive problem: mobile quarterbacks
I recall that pre-Muschamp, the UT defenses always had a bad time with mobile quarterbacks. E.g. K-State and TAMU. Just couldn’t keep ’em off the field. That, I think, is the biggest concern with Pryor, regardless of what offense they run. Of course, Coach Muschamp is now here …
The big advantage the current defense has over tOSU is overall speed. Buckeyes have not seen raw speed like this before. USC smash-mouthed ’em. UT will come from everywhere all the time. There is, I think, the same potential for a speed nightmare for Pryor this year like Rudy Carpenter saw last year.
Overall, containment is the key, against Pryor and running game. They do have a great back in Wells, but when they fall behind after Colt et al. show offensive speed, tOSU will be forced to pass. Then here comes Orakpo and Kindle …
I think whatever Mushamp does he has to do a few things:
1. Pryor is way too good of a weapon to blitz completely. He’ll get flushed out of the pocket and then he’ll take off and run. That being said I think that we might see a lot less of orakpo on a pass rush and more of him playing run contain while Kindle and the other Lb’s blitz. That way if Pryor tries to go outside the pocket Orakpo’s lateral quickness would take care of it(assuming the blitz is coming from the his right side).
2. Hartline and Robiskie are no Crabtree/Bryant but they have good hands and decent speed, kinda like Quan Cosby. I think if you leave them one on one then they have the intelligence to get open.
3. The key to the game for our defence is let Pryor beat you with the pass. Containing Wells would mean that our DE’s would be in run contain for 1st, 2nd and 3rd(if short). Pryor has not completed more than 13 passes in a single game this year so we should let him have the ball whenever he want. Collapse the pocket during passing situations and don’t let him scramble and we should have a good game.
4. If the LBs dont do their job in attacking the right gaps during Beanie runplays, then we are screwed. I like our chances if he moves outside to run. Our DEs(Orakpo and Melton) should do a good job..
will Muck play spy?
I don’t know how many opponents spied Pryor this season but presumably this is an option we will at least discuss. There are pros and cons to it but first look at our personnel: Bobino and Norton still struggle with taking good angles and not over-running plays. Since a spy is often at the second level with only DBs behind him this is not a job for someone who takes bad angles. Screw that up and the QB is waltzing all the way to the end zone or at least a huge gain. Kindle is too valuable as a pass rusher to play on his heels as a spy; given these facts and Muck’s role this year as cleanup man he’s the obvious choice. Though he wouldn’t be completely out of position to play the run, he would be more easily blocked, which may hurt us given their strong emphasis on the run. Bottom line to me is that he obviously can run but hasn’t figured out how and when to run smartly. Our DL is good enough that they should get good pressure, especially moving Kindle around. That and a mix of Palmer/Thomas blitzes should be pretty effective.
by the chairman211 on Dec 18, 2008 5:21 PM CST reply actions
Where this guy kills you
You will defintely see gap discipline this game. Muschmap will not give this kid a lane to take off and run. Wells or whoever is in the backfield will try and chip Orakpo on every pass play. You will also see him get double teamed. I would be surprised if Muschamp doesnt blitz and stunt off the other end, trying to make them adjust their protection. When they do he will punish them with pressure from the other end. Now they will try and use that line and power running game to use the play action pass throwing it deep trying to attack the young secondary down field. When its all said and done it wont matter. Pryor hasnt seen what he will get in 3 weeks. Pryor will be a fine college QB, but he will be learning instead of playing. Ohio State fans need to thank Muschamp for the lessons he will learn on this day.
by LEMILES on Dec 18, 2008 10:54 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
that's why i'm confident
definitely agree that gap discipline will be emphasized by the coaches, that’s why i imagine bobino and norton will definitely not be assigned to pryor. one reason i’m so confident in this game is b/c their passing game needs an effective play action to be effective. with orakpo on one side and kindle on the other end or blitzing from the LB position ohio state will not be able to maintain protection long enough for the play action to be a consistent threat. by the time pryor sets his feet a defender will be on him. the buckeyes gave up 25 sacks this year, 73rd in the nation. their only option is to try and out-muscle us.
by the chairman211 on Dec 18, 2008 11:13 PM CST up reply actions

by 
























