If Jason King's tongue gets any deeper up Stoops' ass...
... he'll be giving him a prostate massage.
Sorry to be so graphic, but come on. King's blathering on today about Sam Bradford being the best OU player of all time. The Heisman hype for Bradford is out of control. Reminds me of '05 and all the BS about USC being the Best Football Team of All Time -- at least until January 4, 2006. Texas deflated the hype machine then, and Vince showed up the pretender Reggie Bush. We probably won't get a rematch with OU this year, but I can't wait for the Sooners -- and Bradford -- to stink it up in Miami, and for Colt and Texas to come out smelling sweeter than ever.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
I'm probably just getting grumpy from reading all these complaint threads for the past 3 weeks...
… but Bradford is pretty f**king good, however you cut it up.
I’ll take class and small town West Texas charm in my QB over some guy who’s state vaunts him because they feel bad about what they did to his ancestors back in the day, don’t get me wrong – but Bradford sure can chuck that ball. Too bad he can’t run, or hold onto it when he does try.
I still think Colt should win the Heisman and every other award he’s up for because he (and his coach and team) exemplify teamsmanship and high standards of conduct, for the record.
To stimulate some debate, who do you think would be the best OU player of all time? He’s certainly got a case for himself – and he’s only a sophomore.
by TXinDC on Dec 4, 2008 9:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I suppose
But, look at the talent around him. I think the real Sam Bradford will be exposed next year when all of those playmakers leave, especially the offensive line.
It’s hard for me to take anything away from these Longhorn players. This is the guttiest team that I’ve ever watched. But the truth is that Colt is doing more with less. I suspect there are at least 5 other quarterbacks in D 1 football right now that could put up Sam’s stats this year considering the talent around him. Sam is still an exceptional athlete. BUT, OU could survive without Bradford. Texas would easily have 3 or more losses in Colt’s absence.
by SuperHorn on Dec 4, 2008 11:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree 100%!
I’ll take team over individual any day – in the end, a team wins the NC, not an individual.
by TXinDC on Dec 4, 2008 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Point taken
My concern is the runaway hype machine that anoints a Bush over a VY, a Bradford over a McCoy. All great players — and maybe it’s asking too much to let cooler heads prevail, and assuming that cooler heads will see the world as I do. If I cared more about OU, I might be interested in comparing Bradford to Heupel or White. How might he stack up against running backs like Steve Owens or Billy Sims? Do you get style points for decent barbecue? I’ll ask my Sooner relatives to ponder that one. I’d rather stay grumpy a while longer.
by NYCHorn on Dec 4, 2008 9:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand
I don’t understand why you guys think Reggie Bush was undeserving of the Heisman that year. Its not like he was Andre Ware, Eric Crouch, Gino Torreta. The Heisman voting does not take into account bowl games and rightfully so because too many guys would get punished for having one bad game and too many guys would get rewarded for having one great game after having done nothing the rest of the season. Now that’s not to say that VY did nothing that season he had a great season and any other year he would have won it. Reggie Bush deserved it and had a better body of work in my opinion. Get over it, he won the Heisman VY won the ’ship. Its one thing to discredit USC/ESPN its another to discredit Reggie Bush. He was a great and electrifying player who will go down as one of the all time greats in the college game and will certainly go down as a better pro player than VY.
by PrimeTime2012 on Dec 4, 2008 12:13 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Bush
Is an NFL bust. His gaudy numbers were a result of playing pathetic pac-10 teams, and we shut him down in the Rose Bowl. VY was rookie of the year. What’s next, hater? Going to trot out his Wonderlic score?
"Stats are for losers, I like winning games"
". . .switzer is a cracked out bitch . . ."-osu poster
by 98horn on Dec 4, 2008 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Reggie Bush was deserving
And so was Vince Young. In fact, we would argue Vince Young was MORE deserving.
Vince meant more to his team as the undisputed leader. He had nearly 3,000 yards passing and 1,000 yards rushing before the bowl season (he would surpass both marks in the Rose Bowl) and was the highest rated passer until after the bowls, finishing third. We played Ohio State at the Horseshoe and won and we obliterated virtually ever team we played, including a #7 Texas Tech.
Reggie Bush was a great college player. No doubt about that. However, I think his margin of victory in particular in the Heisman race showed how silly the reward can be, a product of just media hype and popularity. If Bush won by a slim margin, Texas fans would understand better. The fact he won in a landslide shows how much the media fawned over the Trojans all year. We’re just glad Vince Young made everyone look stupid at the end.
As far as pro players, we’ll see. Vince got hurt and the Titans had no reason to switch Collins out if they were still winning. Bush has had rough times running the ball but he has made some great plays in the passing game and in special teams. In either case, it’s irrelevant in a discussion about college football.
by TheElusiveShadow on Dec 4, 2008 12:36 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree
Vince Young’s timing was just really bad. There happened to be two worthy candidates that year, while most of recent history suggests that is rarely the case; in fact there is often no hands-down, stand-out player. Does anyone think that he wouldn’t have won the award over Jason White, or…. or um… uh… who am I kidding, I can’t even remember most of the people who’ve won the Heisman this decade.
The Heisman is a lot like the Oscar for best picture; it hardly ever declares a legitimate victor, it is mostly decided through politicking, and the winner is often completely forgotten two years later.
It might genuinely be a good thing if Colt doesn’t win it.
by BrooklynHorn on Dec 4, 2008 2:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bush
Even his coach didn’t see him as the best player in college football. He was only standing on the sideline on 4th and 2!
by Longhorn90 on Dec 4, 2008 1:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















