Longhorns Slip in Lubbock
The world did not end in Lubbock. The #5 Longhorns (24-5, 11-3) did lose a game, though, and will now need help to win an outright Big XII title. Texas Tech (16-12, 7-7) took down the Longhorns, 83-80, to improve their impressive home record to 6-1 in conference play.
First off, congratulations to the Red Raiders. They played hard, executed their offense efficiently, rebounded better than expected, and, most importantly, knocked down their free throws with the game on the line. Texas did not shoot the ball well nor did they defend the Tech motion offense effectively, but, to me, this was more about Tech winning this game than Texas losing it.
What does it all mean? Well, Texas is now just a half game up on Kansas with the Jayhawks hosting Kansas State this evening. Assuming that Kansas wins tonight, KU and Texas would be tied at the top of the Big XII at 11-3 with two games to go. Texas hosts Nebraska on Tuesday and Oklahoma State on Sunday. Meanwhile, Kansas finishes with Texas Tech at home on Monday and at Texas A&M on Saturday. Depending on which Aggie team shows up on Wednesday in Waco, Texas A&M may be playing their final regular season game against KU just to get to .500 in conference. In my opinion, Texas has the easier final week but just slightly. It is more likely that both teams will finish at 13-3 and share the conference title. If that is the case, Texas would still be awarded the #1 seed in the Big XII tournament and could potentially avoid both Kansas and Kansas State until the tournament final. This is significant because this year’s tourney will be held in Kansas City.
As far as the NCAA tournament, this loss makes achieving a #1 seed in any region very, very difficult. The ACC winner, Memphis, Tennessee, and UCLA all look to be ahead of Texas at this point. Now, there is still a full week left plus the conference tournaments, so anything can and likely will happen. Texas just needs to keep on winning by getting back to playing lock-down defense, taking better shots on offense, and practicing sinking meaningful free throws. This loss does not ruin an entire season, nor should it raise too many questions about this team going forward. Like in the Missouri game, Texas ran into a fired up opponent that played and shot the ball at a high level and fed off their home crowd.
I will forgo the usual recap format and just make a few additional points.
• We did not lose this game in the final possession. The fact that this game came down to a final possession shows the true character of this team. The Horns could have easily folded down 12 points in the final minutes. They did not. Texas fought hard the rest of the way on both ends. Unfortunately, Tech was outstanding from the line and Texas couldn’t recover from a very deep hole.
• Foul trouble killed us. Justin Mason and Connor Atchley sat out most of the first half with two fouls each. Without Mason’s grit, the defense struggled and without Connor, the offense turned stagnant. Clint Chapman, Alexis Wangmene, and Dexter Pittman all provided largely hollow minutes off the bench. Even Gary Johnson was off today. Our bench has developed nicely over the last couple of months and has saved the Longhorns in a few games. This afternoon, though, the bench play was poor. Also, it sure would have been nice to have AJ or Damion on the floor in that last possession.
• DJ Augustin played well but not as well as his 30 points would indicate. He had at least five turnovers, took contested shots, and finished with just a handful of assists. It was obvious from the start that a lot of the Longhorns were cold, but DJ still could have done a better job of getting easy looks for his teammates. Don’t get me wrong, the only reason we were in the game was because of his offense. I just want to point out that Texas is a tougher team to defend when we have a more balanced scoring attack.
That’s all I’ve got for now. Don’t have much time this evening and will be working tomorrow. I am very disappointed but am quickly realizing that all our goals are still out there.
Post your own comments here.
--AW--
0 recs |
17
comments
Read Related
Comments
in terms of ncaa tourney
this game was the difference between a #1 seed somewhere away from the south and a #2 seed in the south. both sound good to me but a #1 seed just looks better. at least the final 2 regular season games are at home. i will be extremely disappointed if we somehow let the big 12 regular season title slip away from us.
by clra2 on Mar 1, 2008 6:12 PM CST 0 recs
loss was a blessing in disguise
by HornsNation on Mar 1, 2008 6:23 PM CST 0 recs
Little early
Nothing is guaranteed. While I agree that the loss will hope the kids refocus, I disagree that this significantly helps our possiblity of playing in Houston.
First, there is still another week in the regular season and all the conference tourneys. While we all like to speculate, nothing is guaranteed.
Also, if we assume that Memphis is a possible #1 seed in Houston, you are also probably assuming that the Tigers are the overall #1 seed. Therefore, if the NCAA strictly follows their S curve seeding pattern, then the #2 in Houston will have to be the worst #2 or eighth best team overall. Geography will play a part though. Would the committee put Texas in Houston even if they were in their eyes the fifth or sixth best team? Maybe, maybe not. Would the committee ship Texas to Charlotte if the Horns were ranked as the fifth best team, so that they could potentially matchup with the weakest #1 in the Elite Eight? I have no idea.
The point is Texas needs to win and let the seeding take care of itself. Houston is certainly desirable but far from a certainty.
by awiggo on
Mar 1, 2008 7:27 PM CST
up
0 recs
Agreed...
I doubt if any of the players on the team are concerned about what seeding or what area of the country they end up in. Although, I'm sure they certainly wouldn't mind ending up in Houston.
Who's to say ending up in Houston might end up meaning an early exit because of a bad matchup in the second round? You can't plan the region you would like to play in just because the travel is more convenient or the fan base gives you an advantage. At most, it's a luxury if it ends up that way. I would like to think that I root for a team that can win anywhere on any given night (and I believe that after seeing them beat UCLA at Pauley).
by UTAth on
Mar 1, 2008 9:53 PM CST
up
0 recs
Never fun to lose
I agree with the assessment that the world did not end. Our push in the final 3 minutes was really fun to watch. Had we played solid D with about :42 seconds left we might have had a shot to tie/win at the buzzer.
It would be nice to win the big 12 championship outright, though.
Way to go, Pat. Career victory number 3 or whatever.
Horns need to bounce back and defend the Drum.
Hook 'em.
by jimmer on Mar 1, 2008 7:12 PM CST 0 recs
a loss by any other name....
regardless of what I saw tonight, and while he is still somewhat in a slump, I just can't help but being impressed by Damion James hustle. The kid goes after out-of-bound balls in the 1st quarter like it comes down to his career. He seems to put more effort on the court than almost anyone besides DJ Aug.
by UTrumbo on Mar 1, 2008 9:37 PM CST 0 recs
Not concerned about the loss as much as
our poor defense. We've played very good defense the last few games, but the defensive effort today was terrible. We weren't swarming on defense like we have been. We rotated poorly as well.
by longhorn00 on Mar 1, 2008 10:06 PM CST 0 recs
Re:
For hose who complain (namely, Bill Simmons) about Barnes' lack of offensive coaching prowess, this game seemed like a good piece of evidence. There were too many plays in which there was no passing, either into the post or around the perimeter. Even the a few of the good plays (Mason's layup drive and a couple of DJ's acrobatic "Steve Nash" fadeaways) were of this fashion. It's not rocket science; if players aren't getting touches, it's harder for them to get into an offensive rhythm.
For all of DJ's strengths, the one key weakness I see in him (and this is something I've brought up before) is his inability to make the entry pass into the post (this, if you remember, was Simmons' biggest complaint...that Durant always seemed to get his touches 25 feet in the basket, despite his ability to post up just about anybody). It's normally not a huge issue, because him and Mason (and even Abrams, to the extent of his floater falling) are quite adept at getting into the paint for a shot or a pass. However, in situations where the outside shot isn't falling, some dedication to the post play would be nice.
Granted, DJ doesn't have the best weapons for this. Connor (besides the sky hook) doesn't have any post moves, and Gary Johnson's shot wasn't falling today. But this is an area where I think the young guys can help out. Granted, it seems that everytime Johnson or Pittman check in, Barnes runs an immediate entry pass to the post for them. But it after that first posession, it becomes primarily a dribble-penetrate offense for the Longhorns And yes, I noted that DJ did throw an entry to Wangmene, whereupon Wangmene promptly traveled. I honestly think that with our shooters, more post play through Johnson, Pittman and the two freshmen would be beneficial. It would a) boost confidence, b) give Augustin a chance to rest, c) free up shooters, and d) most importantly, shake up our offense a little.
In particular, I'd like to see Damion James catch the ball anywhere but 18 feet from the basket at the top of the key. It just doesn't look like he's getting in the flow of the offense, besides seemingly fighting and pulling down every other potential offensive rebound. Yes, I know he wants to play the perimeter, but he's got the body and the ability to bang around inside, so why not take advantage? Those inside the arc jumpers just aren't falling for him right now, so get him inside a little.
Ok, mini rant over. I thought it was a hard-fought game by Texas, and they just couldn't get their shots to fall enough to win the game. They're still in good position to make a run through the Big XII tournament and through March, so let's keep rooting for our boys. Hook 'em!
by jc25 on Mar 1, 2008 10:19 PM CST 0 recs
Agree
in situations where the outside shot isn't falling, some dedication to the post play would be nice
If we live and die with our FG% from outside then we will lose games to inferior opponents. Obviously, an inside game gives us higher percentage shots and the opportunity to pick up fouls. We could have used a little of both yesterday.
by BFAUT86 on
Mar 2, 2008 9:52 AM CST
up
0 recs
Status on Johnson's injury?
If it wasn't for James fouling out, he would not have played at all in the entire 2nd half. I think he knew he wasn't going to play the rest of game, and that might be why he was out of it (and fouled when he didn't need to).
Then later on when he went for a jump hook, did he even jump? He was stuffed by the rim.
I have a bad feeling about his ankle.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 1, 2008 11:36 PM CST 0 recs
At this point
I think anything less than a share of the Big 12 regular season championship would be a disappointment. This loss gives us a much needed sense of urgency for our remaining two home games.
Nebraska has been playing some great ball recently (other than today) and has a big guy in Maric. We need our big guys to step up defensively and not get in foul trouble.
I'm going to call it right now: Texas A&M will beat Kansas at home. When A&M is motivated at home in front of a hostile crowd, we know what they can do. They kicked our ass and they just beat this Tech team by a million. If KU can lose at Oklahoma State, it's not unreasonable to say that they can lose @ A&M.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 1, 2008 11:41 PM CST 0 recs
Tech won't make the tournament
but if they got to play every game at home, they'd probably be a Sweet 16 type of team.
Even if we somehow forced OT, keep in mind that James and Abrams had already fouled out, and DJ, Mason, Johnson, and Atchley all had 4 fouls.
The value of playing at home is unbelievable and simply unquantifiable.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 2, 2008 12:06 AM CST 0 recs
Question
Here are the locations of all the 2 seed games:
East - Raleigh
West - Anaheim
Midwest - Washington D.C.
South - Omaha, Nebraska
If you're the committee and you want to reward Kansas, wouldn't you want to put them in Omaha as a 2 seed in the South regional? Shit, we may not end up in the South regardless of our seed.
This means that we really need to win our conference (at least share), and we probably need to beat KU in the Big 12 tournament (but doesn't the committee basically ignore the Big 12 championship game?).
We need to persuade the committee to reward us over KU. We need to win out the rest of the way and hope KU loses @ A&M and/or loses in the tourney. Hopefully there's credibility within the committee and they don't reward KU over UT (even if we win out) because they're a basketball power with a bigger tradition.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 2, 2008 1:21 AM CST 0 recs
Not how it works anymore
The first and second round destinations are not tied to the regional ones. The NCAA changed this a few years ago.
For example, Kansas could play their first and second round games in Omaha but play their third and fourth in Charlotte or Detroit or Phoenix. They are not tied together.
The closest possible protected seed destination for the Horns would be Little Rock this year.
The others are Anaheim, Birmingham, Denver, Washington DC, Tampa, Raleigh, and Omaha.
by awiggo on
Mar 2, 2008 1:32 AM CST
up
0 recs
I see, thx for the clarification
by goingforthecorner on
Mar 2, 2008 4:10 AM CST
up
0 recs
We must foul too much or something
I'll always feel like something is amiss when I look at the box score and see we got 13 free attempts to their 43. About 10 of these were in the last 2 minutes from our intentional fouling, but that still leaves them shooting far more than twice the free throws we had. We killed them in rebounding and 2 pointers.
The Horns scored 20 points in the final 2 minutes. I think that is outstanding. We lost to another team we should be much better than, and I find that upsetting. Also, we are going to need Conner Atchley on offense. Can he please start taking those pills before every game and not just when we are playing a number 2 team? Augustin seems to be the only one that can be counted on to show up on offense.
by montresor on Mar 2, 2008 9:26 AM CST 0 recs
Missing the front end of a one and one
will also make that stat look worse.
by Wells on
Mar 2, 2008 9:21 PM CST
up
0 recs




















