Big 12 Football Roundtable
A new Big 12 Roundtable, courtesy of Crimson and Cream Machine.
1. Who are some of the new faces that emerged in the spring who could be serious playmakers for your team this fall?
Offense: For Texas fans, the question is especially relevant in light of the departure of its three top offensive playmakers to the NFL - Jamaal Charles, Jermichael Finley, and Limas Sweed. For the Sooners in the audience, that means Texas lost its top tailback, tight end, and wide receiver from a season ago.
As far as replacements go, I'm not one who believes there's much (if anything) to be learned from spring practice. With the depth chart supposedly wide open, we won't have a good grasp on who might best become a playmaker for Texas in '08 until late August at the earliest. More realistically, we won't know if Texas has a playmaker problem until conference play begins the first week of October. Players I'll frantically be watching for game-changing ability: John Chiles, DeSean Hales, Malcolm Williams, Vondrell McGee, and Foswhitt Whittaker.
Defense: I'm already in love with this Texas defense, both for how it sets up in 2008 and its potential for dominance in '09. The Longhorns will lose Brian Orakpo (DE), Roy Miller (DT), Aaron Lewis (DT), Rashaad Bobino ('MLB'), and Ryan Palmer (CB) after this year. Orakpo and Miller are potential All-Americans this season, but the rest are either already passed on the depth chart or about to be by younger, better players. By 2009, the optimist in me sees Deon Beasley ready to be a Thorpe candidate, the young Wells-Scott-Thomas trio at safety ready to shine, a terrifying (for opposing offenses) Kindle-Norton-Muck linebacking trio, plenty of talent at defensive end, and only one question mark - at DT.
2. What is your biggest concern following the spring?
If it's not obvious from above, I'm calmer about Texas football than I have been in years, in large part because I see Texas as well-positioned for 2009, in large part through a building year in 2008. That's not to say we won't be good in '08, but the situation looks even better for a year from now.
For the upcoming year, I'm worried deeply about finding playmakers on offense, but see this year as a good trial run on a host of potential skill position contributors while our offensive line rounds in to shape. By this time next year, Texas' O-Line will be among the country's best, and if we've done our job in '08, we'll have an idea of how to score enough on offense to take advantage of what could be one of Texas' best defenses in a decade.
3. Any major changes (philosophy, coaching or personnel) that you are concerned or worried about?
All the trends in philosophy/coaching/personnel are positive right now. After a soul-crushing 2007 season, I just don't have it in me to be pessimistic that the changes we saw post-A&M aren't going to lead to better results. I may be proven a fool, but for now, I'm donning my Optimist Cap with pride, looking forward to an interesting, productive building year in '08, with greedy eyes on '09.
4. Looking over the 2008 schedule, which home and away game will be the most difficult?
Home: Missouri travels to Austin the week after the Red River Rivalry for a game in which Texas' top three linebackers will need to be healthy and its green safeties all grown up. I'm worried, too.
Away: Same as always, the most important game away from Austin will be the showdown with Oklahoma. The Sooners have a loaded offense and enough defense to be considered rightful Big 12 South favorites. If Texas has BCS aspirations in '08, this is the big one.
5. Time for your way too early predictions (Yes, you can change them in August). Rank how you see your division finishing up next season.
1) Oklahoma
2) Texas
3) Texas Tech
4) Texas A&M
5) Oklahoma State
6) Baylor
The Red Raiders own a three-game win streak over A&M; if they win this year's tussle in College Station, I see them as the next-in-line behind the South Division's top two teams.
Texas' schedule increases in difficulty from a season ago, and though there exist too many quesion marks to pick the 'Horns for the South, I do like Texas to have a solid season, finishing the year a team no one is eager to play in '09.
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
We're gonna miss those guys
But I feel relatively comfortable with the RB and WR positions, if only because we have a number of young guys with potential at both. That’s obviously no guarantee, but the more options we have, the more confident we can be that someone is going to step up.
I’m concerned with the TE position, though. As far as I know, we don’t have anyone with Finley’s playmaking ability, and the TE is often a critical “security blanket” for the QB.
All that said, I think the single biggest factor affecting our offense in 2008 is the development of the O-line. Experience plays a big role here, which is encouraging, but I guess this is something we’re just going to have to follow as the season progresses.
by a0nyme on Apr 29, 2008 2:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Analysis
You are right on the money for where I am too Peter. I really want to the offense step up and I think they can on at least some cylinders, if not all, especially the O-Line. I think Colt will have a much better year in 2008 throwing the ball, and will be poised for 2009 to make a serious run for it all… if the offense shapes up like I think it can. We need to see someone develop as a deep threat as well in 2008 for 2009 to shake out like the possiblities suggest.
I am not worried about the defense at all… it will be very good in 2008 and just downright wickedly nasty in 2009. I hope Will Muschamp stays a while.
1 Peter 2:17
by HornsFan87 on Apr 29, 2008 11:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Your biggest loss is going to be Finley, believe it or not
I think you’ll miss Charles from a playmaking standpoint, b/c you have no one on your roster currently who comes close to his level of badassedness, but with everything texas asks their TEs to do in this offense, I think you’ll miss Finley the most.
JMO.
by Beergut on Apr 29, 2008 1:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Id agree...
Only we never used him.
Its tough to say we will miss 575 yards, and 2 TDs. His potential was way above that, but we didn’t use him.
Hell take away the OU game, and he put up 426 yards and 1 TD. That sort of production is replaceable.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Apr 29, 2008 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would have loved to see Finley get more receptions.
You are right that sort of production is replaceable.
I felt like Finley was under-utilized. But what killed me was that Finley was an under used offensive weapon during the 2007 season. I was also waiting for plays that utilized him. He was dangerous.
Having him in position was a potential dangerous offensive weapon for this team. But if you never (or hardly) use a weapon that you have, then you’re still only dangerous. You’re keeping that potential in your holster. Meaning that it is just a threat. It’s when you use that weapon, changing from potential to kinetic that you could do some more offensive damage. We should have used him more.
It's a Horns' world. Even Aggies play hoops with a burnt orange ball.
Is it football season YET?
by Speedway on Apr 29, 2008 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that whole comment
can be stated with just your last sentence.
by Wells on Apr 29, 2008 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you forgot to mention
that he was, in fact, not utilized a whole lot. just kidding, not tying to be a jerk
by owenh on Apr 29, 2008 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tight ends
Egregious mis-utilization of both Finley and Bennett. Something both sides of the “Lonestar Showdown” can agree on.
by jc25 on Apr 29, 2008 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As long as he was on the roster
There was still a chance for us to properly utilize him next season and get massive production. Now there isn’t. To me, that’s a big loss regardless of what happened last season.
by a0nyme on Apr 29, 2008 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
fancy schmancy software?
Shouldnt this spiffy new software allow us to have the same story mirrored on multiple blogs and get other blog reader’s replies from, say, Crimson Machine posted here. Community!
Is that too much to ask? This isnt communist russia. Is this communist russia?
by the other Andrew on Apr 29, 2008 6:48 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Buffs Spring Report
Here is our report on the Buffs.
by Jon Woods on May 1, 2008 11:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
something just hit me...
who knows what color salmon is? i dont. ive heard its supposed to be pink or something? i know salmon is a fish and that is that. next other foods that are being called colors…CREAM! this is a fancy way of dolling up the color white. so with all of that in mind i give you this
cream:oklahoma
::
salmon:gay
(a short alibi: no offense to homosexuals. and im sorry for having to lump the okies into that boat with you)
by texfan23 on May 6, 2008 1:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

























