top ten teams
Pick your own top ten teams for 2008.
1.Ohio State- Last year the buckeyes were a young talented team that made it to the national title for the second year in a row (granted it was a weak college football year, but this year doesn't look to be much better). I figure with that much more experience, if they can get past USC they have an easy schedule to the national title.
2.Georgia- The bulldogs have a talent loaded team and quite a bit of experience, but they have one of the toughest schedules in the country. They will almost certainly lose one, maybe two games.
3.USC- They have Pete Carroll, need I say more?
4.Oklahoma- Veteran O-line, S. Bradford, Bob stoops, easy schedule. If they can beat Texas, tech and manage not to screw up a game, they could be playing for the national title....again
5.Florida- If Florida can beat Georgia, we might see tebow in the national title again.
6.V. Tech- toughest game is against BC. What more can ya say?
7.Missouri- had a good year last year, if Chase Daniels can keep up what he started Missouri could be dangerous.
8.West Virginia- I would have them rated higher, but with the loss of Rich Rodriguez, they may not be the same team.
9.Texas- Texas has a tougher schedule this year than normal, and has an extremely young defense and no game breakers, but we have an experienced backfield (with the exception of the rb) a soon to be great o-line, and a new fiery coaching staff who can hopefully get the players up for games and come up with an actual defensive scheme.
10.Texas Tech- Michael Crabtree and Graham Harrell will blow away opponents threw the air, and open up the running game. The question is, how will their defense hold up?
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
22 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rock solid......almost
My only gripe is your number 1. Yes they got exposed by Illinois LSU. But they play in the Big Ten, which is kinda like the SEC but totally different. They should not have been there. But they have hegemony on their side. I definitely don’t want see another blowout in the BCS.
We're 50% good to go.
...we have an experienced backfield (with the exception of the rb)...
We have game breakers. We just don’t their names yet.
We have one (1) fiery new coach and one (1) very laid back, football-brainy new coach. Otherwise it’s the same old spit spewing forth….
Let’s see:
DL: Rack (Sr, 3L), Roy Miller (Sr, 3L), Lamarr Houston (Jr, 2L), Aaron Lewis (Sr, 3L), Henry Melton (Sr, 3L), Eddie Jones (So, 1L), Sam Acho (So, 1L)
LBs: Rashad Bobino (Sr, 3L), Sergio Kendle (Jr, 2L), Rod Mucelroy (Jr, 2L), Jared Norton (Jr, 2L)
DB: Deon Beasley (Jr, 2L), Ryan Palmer (Sr, 3L), Ishie Oduegwu (Jr, 2L), Curtis Brown (So, 1L), Chykie Brown (So, 1L)
(I may have missed a few but as HB so graciously pointed out I’m a day older and my eyes are feeling it.)
While there are redshirt and true freshman pushing for playing time, esp. at safety, that will really be the only position with a lot of youth. As can be seen, the DL is long of tooth and the LBs are all upperclassmen. So extreme youth is not the case except at safety.
So with these minor corrections in order, geez, let’s move them up to #8. Just get rid of West Virginia altogether. And Virginia Tech, too.
And Tech, OU and Texas – no way all three. OU and perhaps Texas can survive a loss to each other and make top 10 in most years, but not Tech. We should treat Mizzou like another country.
game breakers
I agree..Texas has plenty of game breakers, but we haven’t had a chance to see them yet (its comin’)!
1) Georgia
2) ou (weak schedule)
3) Florida
4) USC (all tough games at home)
5) Ohio State (big 10 team..enough said)
6) Missouri
7) Texas (tough schedule)
8) LSU
9) Kansas (tough schedule)
10) Texas Tech (my overrated team)
The top ten will change a lot, because some of these teams have tough schedule and some have really easy schedules. I think we all know the best teams don’t play in the championship games anymore, its the team with the more managable schedule (ou and ohio state).
5 Big 12 teams in the top 10? .nt whills
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jun 17, 2008 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions
5/10 >>>> 3/10
Three teams from a single conference is actually pretty common if you go back through the AP rankings, and the big 12 would be a good contender for that this year. In 2006 the SEC and the big 10 had 3 teams in the top 10. In 2005 the SEC had 3, in 2003 it was the big 10, in 2002 both the big 10 and the big 12 had three teams in the top 10.
Half of the top ten from a single conference though, Im not sure thats ever been done, or could be done.
Four teams from the big 12 finishing in the top 10 in 2008 in an admittedly crazy year (Texas barely squeaking into the 10 spot), I dont see the big 12 being that much stronger than it was perceived to be in 2008, and there the 5th ranked team was Tech at 22. The SEC had 5 in the top 15, but only two in the top 10.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jun 17, 2008 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions
5 Big 12 teams!
The only reason I put Tech on the list was because there really isn’t any other team that stands out to me. I refuse to put Virginia Tech on any top 10 list of mine. They are by far the most overrated team every year. Kansas is a good team, but the tough schedule they have will be there biggest enemy.
Imo..
Whoever comes out of the Big East and and the ACC, either one has a far better chance of being in the top 10 than a 5th Big 12 team.
I agree Kansas wont get there either, I think Missouri will be there out of the north, but I just cant see three Big 12 south teams finishing in the top 10.
VaTech has to find some semblance of offense, but with how crappy the ACC is looking, they could easily get to a bowl game with one loss. BC might have the easier road this year, as all their tough games are at home, but I wasnt particularly impressed with them last year, and dont know anything else about them except they lost their stud QB who likes to puke in the last two minutes of games.
In the Big East, we could easily see a one loss WV team as well, as the only team that can stop Pat should be Auburn, and they get them at home.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jun 17, 2008 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Va Tech.
Va. Tech might finish in the top 10, because of the crappy conference they play in..but they are not one of the 10 best teams in the country. The top 10 is suppose to be the 10 best teams, and I don’t think it is anymore.
My bad
Question was not specific to the polls, which was how I took it.
In the words of Boston, Carry on!
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jun 18, 2008 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions
i meant
that the most of the DBs are still fairly young and inexperienced and that we have A LOT of freshman DBs that look to be really promising and that will push for playing time this year.
Me no like-ah tha gatahs this ye-ah
I think everyone is counting on the defense improving a lot more than they’ve shown the potential to do so. I’m thinking of the evisceration at the hands of Michigan, where after a full season the DBs still blew coverages nearly as often as they held them. Knowshon Moreno will remind everyone of that, all while making us pine for Jamaal Charles. On my first glance, I thought Texas would be lucky to slip into 10th the way we did last year the way we look now, but if another season started right after the end of this one I’d have us as a top ten team in that preseason, and I think we have a shot at going 10-2 in the regular season. I’ll pick to predict the final as best I can, as in, after all the bowls.
1.) Georgia’s on my mind – If they get through the SEC with one loss, ESPN will get them here (Not saying they’re biased towards Georgia, just saying they always over-expose teams with big preseason hype). 13-1
2.) USC – They’ll get here after they beat the Bucks for the second time in the Rose Bowl, 2 losses to PAC-10 nobodies will keep them out of the CG. 11-2
3.) OU – This is where they’ll end up after another Stoops egg is laid in the CG. Everyone will wonder why we didn’t put USC in the CG again. 12-2
4.) Mizzou – loss to CG participant OU in the Big 12 TG this year will not leave them out of the BCS again… Unless Texas’ cash does. I’m guessing they’ll win their bowl and bounce back up here with OU. 12-2 (One of those losses is to TEXAS, baby!)
5.) Florida – They’ll jump up here at the end with a Sugar Bowl victory once their defense gets its head on straight. If Tebow comes back, watch it – this will be who we’re trying to play next year. 11-2
6.) Texas – We lose to OU and Tech, then get the nod over Mizzou to the BCS from our head to head. This is insane, and I award myself no points for my blind optimism. That’s probably why I said we beat Mizzou but still rank below them. 11-2 (ELEVEN? We go to eleven! Mack Brown says just make 10 louder. Oh, man that hurts my stomach.)
7.) Ohio State – These guys will climb up to ‘respectability’ when they go home to beat on the Big Ten and burn their war couches. They’ll get another shot at SC, but it’s going to be like that time you got out of the hospital after trying to jump your four wheeler over a creek and then tried it again. Voters won’t be quite as cruel as gravity, though. 11-2
8.) WVU – I think they should win the Big East even without Rich Rod. Why? Two words: Pat White. Believe it. A win in their BCS should have them up here even with three losses. 10-3
9.) Whiskey-onsin – I hate these guys, but all they’ve got to do is not fail at football to get into the top ten with the Big Ten the way it is. A very mild 11-2. Like Chipotle’s pico de gallo.
10.) Va. Tech wins the ACC – F all the preseason mags that have Clemson here. Clemson is where Fail takes naps when it’s off duty. Maybe Texas beats them in the Orange Bowl, maybe WVU, whatever. 11-3 or 10—4. Who cares? It’s the ACC.
Maybe a few of those should be flipped around due to head-to-head or momentum or something, but I’ve reasoned this out to myself and I don’t have a real serious problem with this top ten… Except, of course, for Texas being in it.
#1
I’m gonna go with Georgia at 1, although I’m gonna be pissed if the SEC wins another championship.
game breakers
i know that texas has game breakers, but mack & company are not using them properly (john chiles 2nd string qb!). maybe applewhite will open up their eyes
Re:
Not really sure if this belongs here, but since OU is being discussed as a top 10 team…
I admit I haven’t been following it too closely, but SMQ’s freshmen quarterback study was mighty interesting. Of particular interest is this quote:
In fact, the most obvious trend in year two is a movement toward the mean, in both directions. Bad and mediocre passers improved, sometimes greatly, but guys who were hot out of the gate almost universally regressed. And it just so happens that the point of departure for diminishing returns is right at last year’s national average for pass efficiency: 136.6. Of the 31 guys performing below that mark as freshmen, 26 improved as sophomores, most of them substantially, although the majority remained below average. Of the ten players who outperformed the average as freshmen, eight regressed in their second year, six of them falling below the average. To paraphrase Big Ten Wonk, the lesson here would be: whatever you think of him, for predictive purposes, regress your view of your young quarterback to the mean.
This is hopeful news for those hoping that Sam Bradford follows the Colt McCoy career path. He still has all the aforementioned weapons: a senior-laden o-line, a home run threat at RB, and quite a few receiving weapons at his disposal, but here’s to hoping that the statistics pull Bradford down in our favor.
by jc25 on Jun 17, 2008 11:45 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Link
Here’s the SMQ link:
http://www.sundaymorningqb.com/2008/6/17/553536/freshman-quarterback-revie
I think that is a valid observation
but the real key for Bradford – as for Colt – is the offensive line. If OL is strong and healthy, then the second key will be the receivers. OU must replace their deep threat (Kelley) but they have Iglesias returning for the numerous short throws. It’s not so much the QB, it’s the OL and receivers.
The thing not mentioned is that everyone discovered that you must get pressure on Bradford to knock that percentage down. It’s a pretty simple equation.
It works for Colt and probably Mizzou and Kansas, too. However, fashioning such a defense can play into the hands of running teams, so this will be an critical development. That is one of the reasons defensive coaches must be creating two separate styles of defense. Teams like OU who can run and pass effectively will move to the top of the heap. But teams like CU might get an added bonus, especially again teams with lesser stores of talent for a wide array of adaptive defenses. That is, many can’t do both without being spread thin.
Will drop by SMQ this evening for his always informative reviews.
As a Sooner I think we almost universally expect Bradford’s numbers to regress quite a bit from the season he had last year, but like you said, with the talent that he has around him (especially the oline) I think he will have just as good of a season. While we have plenty of talent behind him, Murray staying healthy is going to be crucial.

by 




























