Idealists Need Not Apply
If there's any remaining debate about the state of NCAA athletics right now, consider the following exchange between reporters and Mack Brown during a tour with Darrell Royal of the renovations at DKR-Memorial Stadium.
Media: What do you think of the arms race that it takes things like this [stadium] to stay competitive?
Brown: I would say that we have an arms race in society, and I think it’s a good thing because it means we’re making progress. Every business is trying to get better every day. If we ever get so that we’re slowing down, then we’ll be backing up. So, I’m not concerned. We are making more money than ever before. And to continue to do that, to support the other sports on our campus, we’ve got to keep making it. And you can’t make it without adding more seats and getting better recruits and winning and making more fans happy and getting them to come sit in the stands.
Media: There was time when this was considered almost a luxury, but now it’s mandatory to keep up?
Brown: It really is. In recruiting, everything changes every day. It’s tougher on athletic directors than ever before because money is tighter. It’s happening in every sport. Everybody’s trying to win the national championship in every sport. It’s not going to stop. That’s why we all got to continue to find ways to make money.
Whether you think this is a good or bad thing, Mack Brown's candor certainly precludes making the argument that the current landscape is anything but money-driven. The most admirable still play within the rules and try to compete without sacrificing other important values like education, character development, and the like. Still, there's absolutely no question at all that college sports are Big Business, capital 'B'.
For those who dislike what things have become, a word of caution before you finger-wag: there's no single group to blame. A not exhaustive list of factors responsible for the shift include: fans, media, professional leagues, the internet, coaches, tax cuts, boosters, and university regents.
Personally? I find things far from utopian, but on the whole not something I'm losing sleep over. Then again, I'm pretty disillusioned these days. There's a reason I'm a sports - and not political - blogger.
1 recs |
9 comments
Comments
I think the biggest change is the attempt to be competitive across all sports
ou used to be a football school, or a basketball school, and one sport drove the engine. The difference now is, you have programs like Florida who can win a national title in football and basketball, so the revenue is rolling in bigtime in TWO sports, and other schools are attempting to follow. When athletic directors realized that they could supplement football earnings by having a basketball program that did well in the Big Dance and really bring in the revenue, that really widened the gap between the haves and the have-nots. When coaches beganing earning 7 figure salaries, you knew the landscape was changing. Who will be the first 7-zero man? When coaches are earning over $10 million a year, the howling will really begin.
by Beergut on
Jun 21, 2008 6:22 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Every college football fan everywhere should read those quotes.
Richard Pittman
by Richard Pittman on
Jun 21, 2008 8:57 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
they need to have someone transcribe these releases
You know, the concession stands would make more than we would make in concessions in whole year.
I doubt Darrell Royal said it that way.
by Beergut on
Jun 22, 2008 12:23 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I could care less...
College athletics has been a business since the first AD realized he could charge admission to get into games and the first college president baited a donor by touting the football team. Nothing has changed but the number of zeros.
I will admit my tone might be a little different if my team wasn’t one of the Hatfield’s.
by rchorns on
Jun 22, 2008 12:56 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No issue per se
I haven no issue with Brown’s comment. I do find the number of sports offered at Texas embarrassing given the available resources.
In the past 15 years, Ohio State, Michigan, and Texas have won at least one MNC in football. All three schools maintain comparable athletics budgets. However, Michigan and Ohio State offer almost twice as many varsity sports as Texas.
For shame.
by milevin on
Jun 22, 2008 7:04 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
and it took a Title IX lawsuit to get texas to add some of the women's teams
like soccer
To be fair, I’m not sure there is sufficient interest at texas in all of the sports offered at Ohio State or Michigan.
Do they still have to go out and post flyers to get people to join the women’s rowing team?
by Beergut on
Jun 22, 2008 4:35 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My problem isnt necessarily where things are headed
It’s that the NCAA still maintains this facade that their all about student athletes, when it’s extremely obvious all the NCAA cares about is money. Bunch of jokers.
by the other Andrew on
Jun 22, 2008 3:05 PM CDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Dunno if it's been mentioned here before
but there was a pretty good article in the statesman about this last year.
UT is one of the 10 athletic programs in the country which is actually self supporting and profitable. Though the margin is close, that appears intentional on the part of the AD and budget leaders, so the academic side will not see a windfall from the athletic profits.
What matters to me though, is that the athletic programs are self supporting, and education/general program dollars aren’t necessary to keep sports teams going. It’s hard to get upset about the arms race when you’re winning, as we are, but it seems inevitable that adjustments will be made as other programs fall further behind and start to sacrifice.
by learned hand on
Jun 23, 2008 4:51 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
actually
I’m sure it’s been mentioned before considering how on the ball BON is, but might as well bring it up again for this discussion.
by learned hand on
Jun 23, 2008 5:10 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs












