Brief look at the '08 schedule
From what I gather from "experts" and non-Texas fans alike is that us Longhorns should expect something like a 9-3 or 8-4 season this year. Given our "rebuilding" status and the toughness of the schedule, most seem to think it is unrealistic for us to leap atop the Big 12, much less the national race. Our schedule looks like this:
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]> <object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui> </object> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--> <!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->
Florida Atlantic
at UTEP
Arkansas
Rice
at Colorado
Oklahoma
Missouri
Oklahoma State
at Texas Tech
Baylor
at Kansas
Texas A&M
A few thoughts:
-If we drop a non-conference game, it may be a painful season. We don't have a tough non-conference schedule, with Arkansas being our best opponent. The Razorbacks are in transition, and they come to Austin, so there's no reason for us to lose one of these. I'm fairly sure that we'll be 4-0 when we start the Big 12 schedule.
-As has been noted many times before, our Big 12 schedule is a killer. There's not an "easy" game on here, except for Baylor and possibly OSU. Colorado will be looking to pounce on us, OU and Mizzou will present the toughest portion of the schedule, we have to go to Lubbock, Kansas wants to prove they belong in the Big 12 elite, and A&M would love to ruin another season for us.
-That being said, there's not a team on the schedule that I think outmatches us in talent. Texas and OU remain the two most talented teams in the conference, and we are certainly capable of beating every single team that we'll face. However, that's only talking from the top to bottom; there are teams, like Mizzou, that return more starters from last year.
-I may be mistaken, but I remember when we dropped two straight conference games in '06 there was a lot of talk that it was the first time it ever happened in the MB era (or at least, it was a while before it last happened). We've done it now twice in a row. It may be three times in a row this year, with back to back games facing Oklahoma and Missouri. Mack better prepare his players.
-On Mizzou: This game will be interesting, to say the least. If we beat OU, then one could make a legitimate case that we'd be well prepared to face the aerial attack of the Tigers, while a loss to the Sooners will have everyone guessing. On the other hand, while it's often the frustrating habit of Mack to wait until we've lost to make significant changes, the changes often do come after said loss and thus we may be fired up and ready for Missouri even if we drop the game against OU. At least we get them ni Austin.
-Teams that can air it out: OU, Missouri, Tech, Oklahoma State, and Kansas. We're starting two brand new safeties and our corners besides our starters have not seen significant time. Small wonder why we have high hopes for the defensive line. In many ways, this season's success will depend on how well they get to the quarterback without help from blitzers.
-For the time being, it would seem that shoot-out games would not be good for Texas. But who knows will step up during the season on the offensive side of the ball.
-If we do make the Big 12 title game, we'll most likely be facing a team for the second time (Mizzou, Kansas, Colorado), and it is always tough beating a team twice in the same season (see: '01 Big 12 championship game, the cause for many an attempted suicide for Longhorn fans). I doubt that Nebraska and K-state will win the North, and we can safely check off Iowa State.
So what's my "realistic" prediction for this year? On the one hand, I'm going to be patient with this team and the growing pains it will likely endure. On the other hand, we're Texas, and we don't settle for consolation prizes. Thus, I predict that our D-line will be sick, we'll have playmakers arise on offense, Colt will have a good year, our secondary grows up and fast, and we beat EVERY SINGLE TEAM on our schedule.
Take that for a "realistic" (which means more or less the same as "homeristic") projection.
Okay, to be 100% honest, I think a realistic aim is to go 10-2 during the season and grab an at-large BCS berth. But that definitely will not be easy.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
0 recs |
18
comments
| Add your comment
Comments
Defense
I think we really only have to replace our safeties. Palmer was a good suprise last year, and Beasley played quite a bit. The LB’s should be an upgrade, and our DL should be great. I know we will be playing a lot of 5 DB sets, so that means the young guys will be on the field a lot. The Browns will be covering teams 3-4 receivers most of the time, and I think they can do it.
I agree with the 10-2 prediction.
by Longhorns84 on
Jul 21, 2008 6:04 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
Not at Large at 10-2
BCS limit is two teams from each conference, so I would say no chance at 10-2…Not this year.
However if Texas can go undefeated through their first 6, I say they win out…I don’t think thats too bold…a blue collar effort, but not too bold.
by Longhorny on
Jul 21, 2008 7:03 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
why not
The Big 12 championship game loser never gets an at large because its a fresh loss. If Texas only loses 2 games, they will be in great shape to get an at-large BCS (as long as the loss isn’t close to the end of the year). I’m looking for the Big 12 championship still though!
by Longhorns84 on
Jul 21, 2008 7:34 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
What?
Other than that time OU played for the national championship following a loss in the ccg.
by Bob LaBlog on
Jul 22, 2008 5:46 PM CDT
up
reply
1 recs
your right..my bad
but they shouldn’t have!
by Longhorns84 on
Jul 24, 2008 8:09 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
context
Yeah, given that OU made it to the championship game and that the South has pretty much won every year against a North team that had no business in a BCS game, its a pretty unremarkable pattern. Missouri is the only possible example of this, and they got ripped.
by jw4425 on
Jul 23, 2008 2:20 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
A longshot at two losses
but not impossible. There are a lot of different scenarios in which we could make it with two losses.
If we win our first six, that’d be awesome, but it far from guarantees an undefeated season. We still have challenging games after OU and Mizzou.
by TheElusiveShadow on
Jul 21, 2008 11:22 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
10-2 regular season...
... could put us in the Big XII CG if we beat OU. I’m not sayin’... I’m just sayin’... Seriously, though, Tech should threaten the Sooners, and A&M occasionally played OU tight even under Fran at home. The 12 is just too tough this year to rule out the CG with 2 losses.
by Horn Brain on
Jul 21, 2008 7:12 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
I agree
I just think ou has too weak of a schedule this year. I REALLY don’t think a&m is going to be very good this year. The a&m offensive line is going to be HORRIBLE!
by Longhorns84 on
Jul 21, 2008 7:36 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Dude...
Have you read the EoT yet? Stoops is great at losing to cruddy teams.
by Horn Brain on
Jul 21, 2008 7:51 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
I agree
but A&M hasn’t been good the past two years either, yet they’ve beat us. Rivalry games are tricky things to predict sometimes.
I think it is highly, highly, highly unlikely they’ll beat us three times in a row, especially in Austin, but the fact they’ve beaten us the past two years with mediocre teams is pretty embarrassing in the first place. I would hope we don’t overlook them and suffer the same consequences.
by TheElusiveShadow on
Jul 22, 2008 10:01 AM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
tech
plays horrible on the road. They will lose to ou, and gainst Kansas, and might lose against K-State (my upset special).
by Longhorns84 on
Jul 22, 2008 8:21 AM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
OSU
is not a gimme game at all. watch last years game. were lucky we didn’t lose by twenty points let alone win.
by Hook'em13 on
Jul 21, 2008 10:06 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
Agreed
It’s not a gimme game, but compared to other parts of our schedule, it certainly is easier. Also, watch last year’s game… and other years as well. They’ve built leads and we’ve come back. For some reason, they have a severe mental disadvantage when they play us.
by TheElusiveShadow on
Jul 21, 2008 11:19 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
until everything is right in the world
and we have beaten A&M, I’m not looking past it.
by owenh on
Jul 22, 2008 10:01 AM CDT
reply
0 recs
We've lost to A&M?
The past two years?
I must have blocked that out…..
by texasfan05 on
Jul 22, 2008 7:55 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Wait..............................what???
last 2 years??? sigh…does Trump still have a comb over???
by Longhorny on
Jul 22, 2008 7:59 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs















