Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Lessons from Jeremy Maclin

Readers of the college football blogosphere may be familiar with the work of The Boy, who blogs at Rock M Nation, posted some "Beyond the Box Score" entries over at SMQ, and also wrote a preview about Texas that is nothing short of excellent.  I had a conversation with him about Missouri and Jeremy Maclin because I was interested in learning more about their offense and how they used him.  Maclin is emblematic of the seismic shift in college football in regards to skill players and Texas could learn from him.  Many thanks to The Boy for taking the time to communicate with me, a lowly poster.

Star-divide

1.  Besides his obvious incredible speed, what do you think differentiates Maclin from other players of his size, who may also be as fast as he is?

Honestly, one thing that separates him from others as fast as him is that he's 6'1, 200. He was only about 185 or so last year, and he's bulked up to take some more pounding, but he's certainly not Trindon Holliday-sized.  Beyond that, though, his vision is simply unbelievable. It really comes down to that--vision, instincts, and unbelievable speed. He set the freshman record for all-purpose yards without really knowing how to run routes. They say that's what he worked on in the offseason, and if he actually becomes a better route-runner, wow.

2.  My recollection is that Pinkel took his offense from Todd Dodge when he was at Southlake Carroll.  Is that correct, and if so, how has the offense evolved since then?

I think they had a pretty good relationship with Dodge, but Pinkel didn't actually specifically take the SLC spread. What they did, though, was create an offense adaptable for both Brad Smith types and Chase Daniel types. They adapt based on the personnel around them, and that's the main reason a) Chase Daniel came to Mizzou and has succeeded like he has, and b) Jeremy Maclin caught 80 passes, had 51 rushes, and even threw two passes. When Blaine Gabbert (or whoever else) takes the reins from Daniel, the offense will focus more toward the new guy's skill set (which, in Gabbert's case, is having a bazooka for a right arm).

3.  How has the offense been adapted to suit the skills of Maclin?  How does Missouri like to use Maclin in terms of where he lines up, do they put him in motion often, and how so?  How do they like to get him the ball?

Whoops...just answered that one. They lined Maclin up in the backfield a lot, and they sent him in motion for a quick sweep a lot too. At the beginning of last season, they had Martin Rucker taking a direct snap as part of a short yardage, fullback-QB-TE-and-RB-in-one setup. It stopped working after a while, and they stopped using it, but they've shown the willingness to give unique talents plenty of opportunities. And Maclin's possibly the most dynamic talent Mizzou's ever seen.

4.  How often do they use him as a decoy? Does Missouri have a set of complimentary plays they like to run with Maclin tokeep the defense off-balance?

Well, let's put it this way: in the Cotton Bowl destruction of Arkansas, Jeremy Maclin had 3 catches for 32 yards and 5 carries for 26 yards.  Meanwhile, Tony Temple carried the ball 24 times for 281 yards. Mizzoulines up as many big-time athletes as they can at one time, and tells you to pick your poison. Jeremy Maclin is likely to see double- or triple-teams much of 2008...and what that means is, Chase Coffman and Tommy Saunders and Derrick Washington and (when he's healthy) Danario Alexander could see big-time stats because of it. They're not going to force the ball to Maclin when he's triple-teamed--they're just going to move to their other weapons and move the ball down the field.

The Stage

With the proliferation of spread offenses around college football, the traditional pigeonholing of talent as a running back or wide receiver is archaic.  Speed and a creative offense willing to take advantage of that speed are paramount.  Look at Maclin, Percy Harvin, Trindon Holliday, and Joe McKnight as examples.  None of those guys could carry the ball 25 times a game.  It's likely you aren't going to ask any of them to catch a quick slant across the middle on 3rd and 5.  But they are invaluable because of their versatility.  The Boy is right, by putting as many of your best athletes on the field at the same time, you create incredible problems for defenses.  It's all about how an offense can force a defense to over-allocate its resources, leaving other parts of the field vulnerable.

The Implications for Texas

This discussion draws out several points of interest for Longhorn fans:

  1. Speed kills.  Bludgeoning teams with two-tight end sets has its place, but get the most speed on the field as possible.  Watch The Run by DeSean Hales.  Looks like he has a combination of speed, vision, and instincts, no?  While Maclin's skills may transfer more easily, there's no doubt that Hales would be a threat when touching the ball in space.  Maclin didn't even know how to run routes last year!  And it didn't seem to hurt him that much.  How about John Chiles?  Speed, instincts, vision?  Check.  Should this guy be standing next to Mack Brown most of the game?  Didn't think so.  Speed covers mistakes.
  2. Flexibility.  Just like Texas did adapting the offense to Vince Young, now Greg Davis must adapt the offense to players like John Chiles, Fozzy Whittaker, DeSean Hales, and DJ Monroe.  Be honest in your assessment of whether the current offense is maximizing and featuring the talent that you have.  Instead of using vanilla game plans against the Rices of the world, use those games to throw a bunch of your creative plays on the wall and see what sticks.  Take 2008 as a learning season, a test run so to speak.  The transformation may not be complete until 2009, but. it. must. happen.  
  3. Forgive mistakes.  PB mentioned in a Morning Coffee recently that coaches often become too afraid of players failing spectacularly.  Young players make mistakes.  Playmakers erase mistakes.  I think that mantra needs to be beaten into Mack Brown's head.  Playmakers erase mistakes.  Erase them.  As in, you no longer need to worry about those mistakes.  Jeremy Maclin appears to have made a few with his route-running.  It looks like Missouri survived them, huh?  Maybe the coaching staff will make a mistake, or a play will stop working, like the Rucker package did.  Move on.  

All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.

3 recs  |  Comment 13 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

About mistakes

I totally agree with you that we need to let the less experienced but more talented players get the ball. Especially on kickoffs and punt returns! We need a guy who can take one to the house, and not a guy who just won’t fumble it. DJ Monroe, Desean Hales, Curtis Brown…. any of these guys would give us game changing abilities back there. Quan doesn’t scare anyone.

by texasfan05 on Aug 27, 2008 12:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Please, a little moderation

on the freshman-kick returning issue. Granted, using the only two veteran WRs on the squad as the primary KRs is a gamble. But not as big a one as using true freshmen for those jobs.

There is a middle ground: There are four returning CBs, including a pair of third-year players and a fifth-year man. Several of the receivers have been in the program at least one year. I love the concept of turning Hales or Monroe or Whittaker loose in space, and that’s what underdog teams must do to try pull off upsets. Favored teams don’t need to take those gambles.

As to the guts of GhostofBigRoy’s post, great stuff. Cutting-edge ideas keep defenses guessing. Just as we hope the cutting-edge defensive concepts being introduced this season will pay off big.

by edsp on Aug 27, 2008 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree about the middle ground

While I would love to see a more explosive player (Hales, Monroe, one of the Browns, etc.) field punts and kickoffs, I understand Mack’s reluctance to use someone who might mishandle a kick. I caught the end of the replay from last year’s OU-CU game and Colorado scored the game-tying touchdown late when Reggie Smith fumbled a punt near his own goalline when he had nowhere to go if he caught it. Can’t afford those plays in big games. Mack also mentioned earlier this fall that there are a limited amount of reps that you can give each player on special teams because they take away from their positional reps. That’s a problem with the limited amount of time they can practice.

by GhostofBigRoy on Aug 27, 2008 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In all fairness to Quan...

I really didn’t think he was that bad of a returner last year. Nothing grand, but not bad. Our special teams coverage was a whole lot worse than our return game.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 28, 2008 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Insightful post. Really enjoyed it.

Texas would be smart to make comparable moves.

There is a window in the second halves of the ooc games (Arkansas perhaps excepted) for the young players to field punts and kick offs.

Got you on the practice problem, but that is a golden opportunity.

The hard truth is, you never know when you might have to put someone else in there. Therefore, using the ooc games is a natural.

I think we’re gonna see enough to see some of their ability.

by whills on Aug 28, 2008 1:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with most everything you say

But I can see one potential problem, and it’d be good to look at the NFL.

The NFL, because of its more even talent field, is charged with being “less creative” than college football. NFL apologists argue that this has to be because cute tricks and gimmick offenses will get you pummeled in the pros. I love watching the NFL too and I think there’s room for more creativity than some people think, but I think we can all agree that the NFL tends to be a lot more traditional than CFB. EVERYONE is fast in the NFL, people think that the best way to attack speed is to run right at it. A good example at the college level would be the 2006 Rose Bowl. Most of USC’s big-time plays couldn’t crack our fast defense, and Reggie Bush was held in check. What killed us, and what then subsequently opened up the pass game in the second half for Leinart, was the constant beating courtesy of LenDale White. So some may argue that to look to compete with the best, it’s better to concentrate on a more rigid definition of “run the ball and stop the run” than more creative gameplans do. There may be big games where one team’s speed is significantly higher than another’s (Florida vs. Ohio State in ‘07), but generally speaking, you normally don’t see that large of a difference among the top teams. The “creative” gameplans will give you points and flash against lesser teams but it won’t prepare you for the big boys.

I don’t agree with all that, but I’m just playing devil’s advocate here for those who prefer a more conservative philosophy. I’m with you guys; I want to see Chiles and the rest of our playmakers see the field in creative ways.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 28, 2008 3:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

agree with you

on running the ball and stopping the run

People can talk all they want about new strategies and being creative, but the basics of football still remain being able to runt he ball on offense and stop the run on defense. If you can’t do either, you will be a bad football team. If you can simply do both, you will be a good football team.

When the top teams tangle, especially when two spectacular offenses are facing two spectacular defenses, the running game and special teams normally makes the difference.

Think of all those classic games between Florida State and Miami in the late ‘80s – late ’90s. Why did Miami often win? People will point to the failure of Florida State’s special teams, but the real answer is that Miami was able to pound on FSU’s defense with their running game. Both Miami and Florida State had explosive offenses in those years, and they both fielded phenomenal defenses. Everything else being equal, the team that would win when they played each other was the one that could continue to run the ball well.

All this is to simply say that being able to pound the ball via the running game stil has its place. Remember LSU-Florida last year? How did LSU win? By pounding Florida’s defense with Jacob Hester play after play after play in the 4th quarter. There comes to a time when you have to just tighten your chin strap, and saddle up and pound the rock.

by Beergut on Aug 28, 2008 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

disagree w/The Boy
I think they had a pretty good relationship with Dodge, but Pinkel didn’t actually specifically take the SLC spread.

Maybe he doesn’t want to take credit away from Pinkel, but they took that offense directly from SLC and Todd Dodge. They adjusted it in 2007, however. You’ll notice that Daniel began taking snaps from 7 yds deep int ehs hotgun, which is basically I-back level depth. This was to give him more time to pass the ball, b/c it took the defensive rush longer to reach him. They eventually adjusted the offense to suit Daniel better, but to suggest they just took some ideas from SLC and Dodge is disingenuous. They brought in the whole system, and it wasn’t a system that Brad Smith was really suited for, so the part about adjusting their offense for Smith is also incorrect. They installed that offense for Daniel, with an eye to the future.

by Beergut on Aug 28, 2008 7:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I do believe they CONSULTED with Dodge...

…but they consulted with a lot of people, including, I believe, Urban Meyer. So let’s not pretend like it was 100% SLC’s offense. It was enough of SLC’s offense to bring Chase Daniel to Columbia, but a lot more input went into it than that.

(And Pinkel has said that if they’d been more familiar with the spread concepts initially, they’d have pulled more from Rich Rodriguez’ concepts when Brad Smith was there…which would have been frickin’ lovely, but oh well.)

http://www.rockmnation.com
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by Bill C. on Aug 29, 2008 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I really don't want to get into a long, drawn out argument about this

I watched Daniel several times when he was at Southlake Carroll. When he began playing as a true freshman and then took over as a starter as a sophomore, he was still running the same offense he ran in HS. The scheme was the same.

You can talk about “consulting” all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that Daniel was running the same offense he ran in HS.

(And Pinkel has said that if they’d been more familiar with the spread concepts initially, they’d have pulled more from Rich Rodriguez’ concepts when Brad Smith was there…which would have been frickin’ lovely, but oh well.)

Y’all didn’t have the RBs needed to make RichRod’s spread option system work, even with Brad Smith. I do think that Smith didn’t have the arm strength to fully utilize the SLC scheme when it was implemented.

Unless you have seen something in the media about it (link?), I don’t think Mizzou going to SLC’s offense had much to do with Daniel coming to Missouri. I think the unwillingness of texas to recruit him (until they realized Perriloux was using them for leverage with LSU) had mroe to do with his decision to go to Missouri.

by Beergut on Aug 30, 2008 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

my only point of contention

…was that they didn’t just say “I like SLC’s offense—let’s use that.” They consulted with a lot of teams and implemented one that was very similar to SLC’s. I think we’re mostly on the same page on this one. I’m just not agreeing that we ‘took’ the offense from SLC.

And I do realize that Texas not recruiting him (until Perrilloux flaked out, anyway) was the biggest reason he ended up at Mizzou…but once Texas was out of the picture one of the main reasons he chose Mizzou was the offense we ran…that was the point I was trying to make.

http://www.rockmnation.com
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by Bill C. on Aug 31, 2008 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

OU 2-0 vs Mizzou

You can erase mistakes with speed against inferior competition or a clueless secondary (like the Horns’ last year), but a good defense doesn’t give you enough explosive plays to do that, which could lie at the heart of why Missouri couldn’t beat OU last year, despite beating everyone else. Mack and GD really want players who know what they are supposed to do and for whom the risk of a bad play is far far less than the odds of a big play. Football is still a possession game.

I think the proliferation of spread offenses is leading to smaller, faster defenses which are more vulnerable to power. The successful offense in the next 3-4 years is one that can exhibit both speed and power. The Horns have that chance with players like Chiles, McGee, and Whittaker (speed) and power (McGee and Cody Johnson). If McGee doesn’t fumble, I look for him to get the majority of snaps at RB because he has both speed (4.3 forty) and power – GD: “he moves the pile..”

by burnt in ny on Aug 29, 2008 8:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The blueprint for beating MU...

…is quite simply generating enough pressure from your DEs that you don’t have to blitz and can drop 7 into coverage to make Chase Daniel both confused and paranoid. OU and, to a much lesser extent, Illinois, were the only teams capable of that last year, which is why OU beat us twice and Illinois was able to end up keeping it close.

This year I think the only teams who seem capable of following that blueprint are Illinois and Texas, though neither have proven to have an Auston English-level DE…yet. It could happen. And we’ll find out about one of those two teams in about 34 hours.

http://www.rockmnation.com
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by Bill C. on Aug 29, 2008 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ut_vs_fau_8-30-2008_049_small
Tebow Apologizes, Resumes Place at Right Hand of God

Recent FanPosts

Texas_old3_small
Defense performance vs. non-conference
2401104_1__small
The Almost Perfect Day of College Football
Jackut_small
Can we stop talking about the Aggies now?
Small
Texas-Baylor 2nd Half Thread Photo Recommendations
Img_0095_small
This week's petition to the AP from OU
Elephantlogoorange_small
BCS System Alternatives
Small
Mock BCS talk between Fla, Bama, Tex, Iowa
Clock_tower_small
Weekly BON Hit Award osu
Small
TCU?
Small
Boise St.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports