Morning Coffee Is Ready
Depth a mile wide and inch thick. On Wednesday Mack Brown fielded questions from the media, including several questions about the plethora of 'ORs' (sixteen, if you're counting at home) littering the early-release depth chart. Said Brown:
It might mean that both those guys are ready to start and we just haven't picked one yet. Either/Or gets confusing to some people, us it's a really good thing...
I really think it's a great positive. The ones that don't have any are either lying to you or they don't have any depth. What we have done here is we've won a lot of games because we've had really good depth, and we've got great morale on our team. That's what Either/Or does, it gives two guys a chance to play.
Perhaps. In theory, this theory has some credibility, but there are other--more ominous--possibilities: the coaches could be poor at identifying the best talent, or there may exist a lack of a standalone talent at a given position. The latter question is the one which will be worrisome as the season progresses, as Texas will need several players to separate as 'must haves' on the field for this team to be more than just good.
For the opener, what Mack says is fine--good, even, if a lot of guys really are 'close'. The depth chart against Oklahoma, however, had better feature better definition.
Kirk Bohls' crystal ball. Austin American-Statesman columnist Kirk Bohls published his annual predictions column today. Though Bohls' writing is painful to read at times (this year's lead: "Just more than a day remains until we learn if Howard Schnellenberger was right about the Texas football team being softer than the NBA salary cap." Aaaaaaaagh! --ed), his predictions column last year was eerily accurate, so much so that I'll peer closely at what he's selling this season. Among the guesses:
* Roy Miller could lead the team in tackles
* Adam Ulatoski second team All-America
* McCoy: 2,600 yards, 26 TD, 11 INT
* Negligible tight end pass-catching contributions
* Blake Gideon can and will play.
* Texas will block three kicks
* Texas beats OU and A&M, drops to Mizzou and Tech
* 10-2, Cotton Bowl
Most of it sounds eminently reasonable. Two quibbles:
1) Bohls writes: "Ryan Bailey will not only keep his job and should — come on, Mack, show him some love after beating Nebraska and Oklahoma State. He will nail field goals on 21 of 25 tries." Did Bohls forget Mack's awarding of a scholarship to Bailey prior to last season?
2) And: "The Longhorns will be slightly worse on offense than a year ago, much better on defense than a year ago and play harder in '08." I agree on two out of three, but Texas won't win 10 games if it's worse than a season ago on offense. I'm not sure you could pay me to watch the first three quarters of last season's Nebraska game again. I do agree with Bohls insofar as he's suggesting the offense looks a long way from elite at this point, but for things to work out this year, the offensive line play must improve dramatically, Colt must be sharp, and one of the receivers has to emerge as a field-stretcher. We can't be worse than last year on offense and still win ten games. Not in the Big 12.
Darrell K. Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium on steroids. Fans will get their first look inside the revamped and expanded stadium this Saturday, but fans can get a good advanced look through this Statesman preview. 10,000 new seats in the north end zone have stretched capacity to 98,000; according to MB-TF, a few $65 tickets still remain.
C'mon now, slacker. One little call for help and community action and we get... this? Weak sauce. I'm gonna keep pushing this, so y'all step up now and do your part: Grab a player, keep an eye on him, and let us know--once a week--how he's doing. You can do it. Doooooooo it.
The Gregory Gazelles© are back! Tempest Horn steps up to remind us the Gazelles are back in action this weekend... and it's televised. Newbies who haven't taken the plunge and watched one of these things need to set aside the skepticism and tune in before passing judgment. If I'm around the TV either tonight or Sunday, we'll get an open thread up and running.
Tonight: vs USC, 9:30 p.m. (CSTV)
Sunday: (likely) vs #2 Stanford, 12:30 p.m. (CSTV)
Last call for Pick 'em. It's not too late to sign up for BON's pick 'em league. If you're signed up, make sure your picks are in by tomorrow morning. If anyone's having technical difficulties, fire an email to jim@funofficepools.com.
Take us home, Earl. Finally, let's finish the Friday notes with a little Earl Campbell love:
WOOOOOOOOOOOO FOOTBALL!
Read Related
Comments
Earl Campbell
I was about to argue with you about whether last year’s opening day offense was worse than this year’s, but then I played the EC clips and suddenly I’m overcome by rapture.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
by Caradoc on Aug 29, 2008 9:34 AM CDT 0 recs
Yes, indeed ...
I just watched the EC clip, absolutely spellbound. Great shots beating ou in his Senior year & atm (only pass I think he caught in college for an easy score). That Monday nite TD run against Miami brought goosebumps up on my arms – that one always does.
Well Done !!
by HalfmileHorn on
Aug 29, 2008 2:20 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Theres a difference in consistancy and end of year stats
I imagine the hes right and we will drop a little in our overall stats. But anyone who watched our games last year hopes for better consistency.
I wouldnt be surprised if we drop out of the top 15 in scoring and total offense (yes we were #14 and #13 respectively last year) but would gladly trade that for a little more consistency.
Would that make our offense worse or better? Technically worse, but effectively better. I think Kirk was being technical.
That’s my story, and I’m stickin to it.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Aug 29, 2008 9:38 AM CDT 0 recs
How can the OL be much better and the offense worse?
Bohls knocks down the INTs but cuts the possible yardage gained.
Does not compute. 404 404 404 404 404 404
by whills on
Aug 29, 2008 1:04 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Because our offense was so driven by the big play last year.
What Im saying is, overall, would you have considered our offense good in the two game stretch of Nebraska and OkLite?
Theres two ways to consider it.
One, look at the result.
NU – 545 Yards (above average)
OkLite – 589 Yards (above average)
All well and good.
But how did we do through 3 quarters?
NU – 289 Yards
OkLite – 254 Yards
Thats pretty weak. Our offense was lopsided, where we would tag along until breaking the big plays. I think we could be more consistent with better production in the first 3 quarters, and much less in the fourth quarter, and I would call it a better offense, even if the final numbers aren’t as large.
McCoy specifically, he had more TDs, less picks, and less yards then that in 2006. Personally I think he gets around 3k yards, unless he sees less reps this year due to Chiles.
by BoddickerIsClutch on
Aug 29, 2008 1:34 PM CDT
up
0 recs
whills, you are exactly right
Bohls says running game will be as good as last year’s, just more spread around. OL will be better. We know the OL and WR are MUCH DEEPER. WR will be better because instead of just Shipley, Cosby and the gifted but limited Nate Jones, there will be 4-5 WRs who can catch and run and share time, thus keeping everyone’s legs better rested. The QBs are back . . .
By Bohls’ logic, the only place the offense is weaker is TE.
So how could this possibly compute to a weaker offense? The offense may run up fewer yards because of an improved defense and more chances to use the second team and walkons and run the middle and run out the clock. (Think the walkons played last year only against Rice and maybe a series against TCU.)
My view of the game at the collegiate level today is that the offense IS THE defense in many respects, because a good offense (1) scores and thus takes the heat off the defense; (2) moves the ball, thus giving the defense more rest; (3) holds the ball, improving the field position for the defense, while also (4) keeping the opponent’s QB and WRs and runners on the sideline.
by edsp on
Aug 29, 2008 4:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Fozzy
Didn’t see this posted anywhere else on the site so I figured this was as good a place as any to put it. Looks like Fozzy is doubtful for the FAU game. It was reported in the Chronicle a few days ago and confirmed on Rivals.
Regarding Bohl’s comments, it’s would seem to be a huge contradiction for Colt to put up the numbers he is projecting, specifically the low INT amount, but for our offense to be worse this season. If Colt’s numbers are better, then the OL is probably better, which you’d have to believe would mean the running game is a least good, if not great.
by Horncasting on Aug 29, 2008 10:05 AM CDT 0 recs
Visa Moment
1. Weighing the pros and cons of Mack’s inability to define his starters……mild anxiety
2. Kirk Bohl’s passing over Brian Orakpo for a 1st or second team all-american….slight outrage
3. DKR’s expansion….10,000 x $65 X 7 games is a lot of money
4. Pick’em League….10 minutes of my time a week for a shot at a $150 football
5. Watching Earl Cambell blow up linebackers, defensive backs, and unknown members of the media on the sidelines…..priceless
thank god for texas football
by BMG on Aug 29, 2008 10:16 AM CDT 0 recs
Orakpo--
Actually, he does say that Orakpo will be 1st team. In fact, he says:
“The only first-team All-American will be defensive end Brian Orakpo after his 13-sack year.
The first UT player drafted next April will be Brian Orakpo.
The best-looking football specimen is Brian Orakpo.
We like Brian Orakpo.”
by crocodile235 on
Aug 29, 2008 2:46 PM CDT
up
0 recs
hi
hi to all the members of this.
This is Davis Wilson for you.nice to meet u all.
——————————————————-
Davis.
by Daviswilson on Aug 29, 2008 11:06 AM CDT 0 recs
hahahaha
Come back after football season.
by the other Andrew on
Aug 29, 2008 11:48 AM CDT
up
0 recs
WTF?
hi to you davis wilson of clinic.
This is Bombilla for you all natural wife boob. hope train meet you in dark night.
——————
Bombilla.
It's Mean to Ween
by Bombilla on
Aug 29, 2008 11:50 AM CDT
up
1 recs
Thanks for the memories, PB
One benefit of being old – I got to see Earl in person, as well as many times on TV, It was apparent just from looking at those tree trunk sized thighs that he was a power runner. The amazing thing was his speed. I believe the only Longhorn at the time faster than Earl was Johnny “Lam” Jones. Not too shabby.
You can see from the Oilers clips that Earl could outrun most NFL defensive backs. Or maybe they just didn’t want to get in his way. My favorite shot comes at the 5 minute mark. Earl is at a complete stop, with no momentum, and proceeds to put the Ram defender on his butt. Priceless is right.
by Longhorn in Canada on Aug 29, 2008 11:26 AM CDT 0 recs
Earl Clips
Man…I’m hungry for sausage all of a sudden.
It's Mean to Ween
by Bombilla on
Aug 29, 2008 11:52 AM CDT
up
0 recs
That was six-time pro bowl LB Isiah Robertson.
The announcers that game made a big deal of it, showing it over and over, because Robertson along with Hacksaw Reynolds were among the best in the game, and Earl was just a rookie. That play and the Monday night Miami game made Earl a star.
I don’t think there was ever a player who went through so many jerseys. The collegiate rule when he was at Texas allowed lighter, more tear away jerseys (due to the heat). Earl went through jerseys like Bombilla goes through sausages, and NCAA changed the rule in the name of fairness (and no more excuses). But even in the NFL his jerseys were ripped to shreds, like at the end of that play. I consider Earl and Jim Brown as two of the strongest RBs ever to play the game. They didn’t tear Brown’s jersey as much because, well, he’d kill ’em.
by whills on
Aug 29, 2008 1:30 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Strongest RB's
Earl’s era was a little before my time (I was maybe 5 or 6 at the time Earl was destroying the SWC). However, I’d like to add John “The Diesel” Riggins tp the list of tough SOB’s.
And for the record, I do love me some sausage!
It's Mean to Ween
by Bombilla on
Aug 29, 2008 2:50 PM CDT
up
0 recs
John
Was before my time, but if he was anything like Tim, he must have been a helluva RB.
by BoddickerIsClutch on
Aug 29, 2008 3:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I was really afraid to click the sausage link.
I am glad to see it is not another grundel.
by billb on
Aug 29, 2008 4:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
We be up on sausage.
We had a sausage stuffing machine that had been in the family for 125 years. Living on a ranch, we had plenty of deer and would get the wild hogs on occasion (2:1 with garlic). Deer sausage, jerky, and jerky sausage (smoked and dried like jerky in a smokehouse) made up a great part of my life. And fish – we all fished – and had a big garden. Simply great food, natural before natural was cool.
So, for the record, I do love me some sausage, too.
by whills on
Aug 30, 2008 5:25 PM CDT
up
0 recs
re: earl
I happened to have on DVR the 1976 SWC highlights. Watched ‘em today and I’d have sworn that wasn’t EC wearing No. 20 - so thin, from the TV perpspective. I interviewed him at Oilers camp two years later and he looked the Earl we remember, so he must have put on 20+ pounds after his junior season. I’d rank him the No. 2 player in school history, though comparing RBs to QBs to CBs to LBers is about impossible.
by edsp on
Aug 29, 2008 4:35 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The other way
Earl actually dropped about 20 lbs after his junior season. He was frequently injured – hamstring troubles before his last year. He worked extra hard in the offseason, beginning ‘77 around 220 lbs. Much faster & didn’t need to leave games. He had extra incentive in trying to win the Heisman.
He put on weight again, after his senior season.
by HalfmileHorn on
Aug 29, 2008 4:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I have to agree here, edsp
I put VY #1 and Earl #2.
My judgment is simply based on how much a player attacked and terrorized the opponents. As HST would say, they were the water buffaloes and they stomped on the earth – and anyone between them and the goal line.
by whills on
Aug 30, 2008 5:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I would say
1A and 1B. But as a contrarian (and an old fart) I still have to put Earl as 1A.
DKR was not a believer in playing freshmen. When he started, freshmen were not eligible, and he made it clear that he thought that most freshmen were not ready to play college ball. He did say, however, that Earl was the only player he had ever seen that was ready to play in the NFL right out of high school. Fortunately for Texas, the NFL didn’t allow that.
Then again, after looking at the highlights from both, I’ll just put them at tied at #1, with Ricky close behind. If we ever get another football player good enough to make us reconsider who’s #1. we will be really, really lucky.
by Longhorn in Canada on
Aug 31, 2008 12:11 AM CDT
up
0 recs
DKR
While it appears to be structurally complete, I drove by yesterday and there’s a banner outside the north end zone section saying that it would be complete in NOVEMBER 2008.
The new food court area is suffering from a lack of, um, internet access.
The real question: Can I run down from section 113 and make it to the alumni center, pound a couple of beers, and make it back before halftime is over??
by SelimSivad on Aug 29, 2008 11:42 AM CDT 0 recs
Something's missing...
I read Bohl’s column and the thing that jumped out at me was the unspoken predictions…
-If we beat ou but lose to Mizzou and TT then go Cotton pickin….
-ou must go 11-1 and win the Big 12 Championship
-Mizzou goes undefeated, loses to ou in B12 Championship and gets a 2nd BCS bid for the Big12…
If Mizzou loses one game, loses to ou and ends 11-2, how could anybody pick them over the Horns after we’ve come off a season ending obliteration of the aggies and they just lost their last game! (You could also argue likewise if ou loses the Big12 Championship with the added fact we beat them.)
Of course it’s all just a load of hooey at this point in the season. But Bohls is just smug enough some times that somebody needs to call him out.
Hook Em!
by Margaritaking on Aug 29, 2008 12:35 PM CDT 0 recs
Back to my point
When you compare this year’s team to last, you need to take into account the possibility of injuries — like when we lost Sweed, Pittman, and Arakpo for big chunks of the season. So figure we lose a top starter on both sides of the ball. How do we look then?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
by Caradoc on Aug 29, 2008 2:02 PM CDT 0 recs














