Lamarr Houston got arrested this morning
by Cyrus on Aug 31, 2008 8:20 AM CDT
49 comments
For suspicion of DWI.
http://www.kvue.com/video/local-index.html?nvid=277802
WTF dude?
F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K F\/<K
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
0 recs |
49 comments
Email
Print
Comments
more here
Perhaps the most recognizable mascot in sports, and certainly the toughest looking, Bevo is a fixture
by run Bevo run on Aug 31, 2008 10:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Kick him off the team
Period. Gone. Set an example for this year.
And I don’t care about and don’t want to hear about “second chances” and “forgiveness”.
Let him transfer to Sam Houston State, or wherever for his shot at redemption.
by sc99p on Aug 31, 2008 10:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn, overreaction much?
Houston has no history of being a trouble maker. He’s a college kid who was celebrating the victory and he made a mistake. There needs to be stern, swift punishment, but no need to fire up the electric chair.
by the1austin on Aug 31, 2008 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
Don't want to hear about second chances?
Are you new to American sports, or America in general?
by goingforthecorner on Aug 31, 2008 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
no DL depth
mack usually goes about a 3 game suspension for this kind of thing right? Hopefully he’ll be back for CU.
by owenh on Aug 31, 2008 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds great
Let’s ruin his life to make an example!
In Mack Brown We Trust!
by Cyrus on Aug 31, 2008 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pathetic
Kick him off the team
Absolutely.
by bfaut86 on Aug 31, 2008 11:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Probably 3 games
Ala Kindle and Melton last season.
I will be shocked if he is kicked off the team. Yes, drinking and driving is a huge deal and Houston deserves to be punished but this is the first time he’s been in trouble, the precedent of three games has already been set, and Muschamp will probably make the next few months the most painful of his life.
--AW--
by awiggo on Aug 31, 2008 11:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Very disappointing
I hope Muschamp makes his life hell for a while, and that there are no third chances after a 3 game suspension.
by Texas Sized BS on Aug 31, 2008 12:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Make him run a lap and get his a$$ ready for UTEP we cant afford to lose any more Defensive players
by MJY6087 on Aug 31, 2008 12:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Deflating
After that badass win, Coach Boom’s and the Major’s debuts, this is shameful. Now instead of a week of ramping up for Miner, this will be the focal point for a lot of people.
by Kool Hand on Aug 31, 2008 12:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding me?
Will we ever escape this trouble?
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3562451
Anyway, for the people that think kicking him off the team will “send a message”, you really think THAT of all things will suddenly prevent other players/students from drinking and driving (as opposed to numerous reports of drunk driving related deaths)? The only message it’ll send is try to focus better when you’re driving drunk so you don’t get caught.
At best, it’ll be a wake-up call to the other players, but it’s not going to stop them from drinking and driving, seeing how a bunch of other UT students do the same. Ideally, it would “send a message”, but months from now the message will have been deleted from their inbox.
by goingforthecorner on Aug 31, 2008 12:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
3 games. done and done. move on.
growing up in austin, I can say that I think it’s just too tough for these kids to be local celebs in a crazy fun party town like austin especially when they come from po-dunk, TX. it’s not easy to stay out of trouble there. too many temptations.
JP in south Baltimore
by thejahpaul on Aug 31, 2008 1:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Innocent Until...
There’s a little concept in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. If the allegations are true, this is very disappointing, but let’s not overreact.
RECRUITS: Jordan Leslie (Tomball TX Tomball); Jaime Peebles (Klein TX Klein).
by 98horn on Aug 31, 2008 1:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
DWI
With DWI you are guilty until proven innocent.
by JohnsonUT on Aug 31, 2008 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
purty much
someone tell him to get bobby earl smith
JP in south Baltimore
by thejahpaul on Aug 31, 2008 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been in minor traffic accidents
I was never put into jail for being under the influence. Maybe that’s the current precedent?
Perhaps the most recognizable mascot in sports, and certainly the toughest looking, Bevo is a fixture
by run Bevo run on Aug 31, 2008 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So What?
APD has a long history of bias against UT students in general and UT athletes in particular. See, e.g., the trumped up, baseless, and uterly false charges of assault against Chiles this summer. Given APD’s track record, Houston may only be guilty of driving while black.
RECRUITS: Jordan Leslie (Tomball TX Tomball); Jaime Peebles (Klein TX Klein).
by 98horn on Aug 31, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
im pretty sure he is guilty
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
~Fred Allen
by Hook'em13 on Aug 31, 2008 1:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
oh, okay then
as long as you’re sure
JP in south Baltimore
by thejahpaul on Aug 31, 2008 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really
Were you there? Are you qualified to administer field sobrietey tests? Are you qualified to interpret the results of a field sobriety test? Do you know what horizontal gaze and stagmus is? Are you a judge in Travis county that’s heard the evidence against him? Has Houston had the benefit of counsel in open court? If the answer to any of these questions is no, then you don’t know he’s guilty.
RECRUITS: Jordan Leslie (Tomball TX Tomball); Jaime Peebles (Klein TX Klein).
by 98horn on Aug 31, 2008 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
from what i have read
he was driving under the influence. and no i was not there, but i doubt that they would be making a big deal out of it if he wasn’t under the influence.
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
~Fred Allen
by Hook'em13 on Aug 31, 2008 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Available Info
I’ve read what’s the news reports today, too, and there’s not alot of information out there. We know that APD arrested him after a traffic accident, and that’s about it.
RECRUITS: Jordan Leslie (Tomball TX Tomball); Jaime Peebles (Klein TX Klein).
by 98horn on Aug 31, 2008 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
my question is
why would they say he was driving under the influence and why would they arrest him if he wasn’t?
Texas defensive tackle Lamarr Houston was arrested and charged with drunken driving early Sunday morning after being involved in a traffic accident, Austin police said.
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
~Fred Allen
by Hook'em13 on Aug 31, 2008 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
tough decision
Assuming Houston is guilty of what is indeed a serious offense, the unfortunate reality is that coaches have to walk a fine line in meting out punishments. True, it is important to set an example for other players, fans, and the general public, but at the same time coaches are held responsible for how well their teams perform on the field even more than off. Without question, Houston is one of our best players on a thin defensive line, and booting him off the team could cause an uproar if Texas drops a lot of close games this year. This, coupled with the fact that Houston has no prior history of this kind of behavior AND the precedent that has been set in the past with Melton and Kindle, means that a 3-game suspension is the “correct” punishment as far as I’m concerned.
Any further problems on Houston’s part, however, should result in him being kicked off. I don’t expect that this will be a problem when everything shakes out.
by longhornglory on Aug 31, 2008 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
Assuming he is guilty, (last time i said i thought he was guilty got everyone a little…angry?) anyway, three game suspension will probably be the correct course of action. kicking him off the team as sc99p suggested is a bit premature at this point considering he is a first time offender.
by the way, isn’t it ken ruckers job to make sure things like this don’t happen? Not to clear on that. Is he in charge of all the players or just the freshman?
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
~Fred Allen
by Hook'em13 on Aug 31, 2008 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to defend Houston in particular
But the whole, the cops wouldnt arrest him if he wasnt guilty mentality is terrible, and completely un-American.
I hope you never serve on a jury.
Courts decide guilt, not police.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Aug 31, 2008 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
your taking what I said out of context
What I meant was that DUI’s are pretty self explanatory misdemeanors. If he was being charged with say burglary (ring any bells?), I wouldn’t automatically assume that he was guilty because it is a crime that isn’t quite as straight forward as a DUI. I assume that they had evidence to support their actions and would not have arrested him otherwise. Of course the phrase “i assume” is fairly ignorant of myself, I am choosing to assume the worse out of the situation and prepare for upcoming events of the season and not blindly hope that he will be proven innocent by a jury.
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
~Fred Allen
by Hook'em13 on Aug 31, 2008 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
… the easiest way to communicate that is, IMO, to just say you think it’s highly probable that the charge will stick, given the nature of the offense.
by Horn Brain on Aug 31, 2008 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
what i am trying to say
Is that given the circumstances that it his highly unlikely that it was made up. look at the circumstances, he was driving around at three in the morning on a Saturday night after a win partying with his friends. I am not saying that every time there is a crime the police are right, I am saying that given the circumstances in this particular offense that he is more than likely guilty.
With what I know I wouldn’t charge guilty as a jury, but as a bi standard it looks to me as if he is guilty.
That is all i was trying to say, and people took it as if i said “What the police say goes.” and that wasn’t the point I was trying to get across.
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
~Fred Allen
by Hook'em13 on Aug 31, 2008 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can be arrested on the charge
For two very regular reasons:
1) Not agreeing to take the field sobriety tests which is a common response for many reasons including:
2) You techincally only have to fail one sobriety test to get yourself arrested, and the horizontal gaze and stagmus test in particular is completely based on the word, intepretation, and expertise of the officer giving it. Not the least to mention that its very possible to have outside influences affect the results of the test. In addition, the other tests while a possilbe indicator of DUI, are also not conclusive on their own. Which is why in general, the results do not hold up in court on their own, because they are not sufficient evidence of guilt.
So I still maintain, while they may be just reason to be arrested on the charge of DUI, guilt is still strictly up to the court to decide, even in a DUI. Or its even possible that he was unjustly arrested, which does happen, afterall police are fallible humans just like everyone else.
Im not saying that he was innocent, and Im not saying that there wasnt sufficient evidence to arrest him. All I am saying, is that in a murder, drug possession, copyright infringment, prostitution, treason, or even DUI, being arrested is not proof of guilt.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Aug 31, 2008 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
can we stop arguing now, its giving me a headache. And I seem to be getting no where.
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
~Fred Allen
by Hook'em13 on Aug 31, 2008 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This thread needs come comic relief... Let's look at Texags
One guy has confirmed that A&M will only win 2 games this year.
Another thread has already given up on Mike Sherman, and is calling for Gary Kubiak to save the program.
Another, I’m not kidding, is seriously pondering “de-friending” McGee and Goodson in protest of their effort against Arkansas State.
One guy actually bought the domain name “www.uncanfran.com”
The winner for craziest person goes to betaag07 for taking a stand against a fellow Aggie for incorrectly shouting “uncover” and not “concentrating on the game/yells.” The guy actually turned around and asked another guy at a game “do you think that’s a tradition?” Apparently, if an Aggie leaves his hat on during a yell, fellow Aggies yell “Uncover” at them until they take it off. You couldn’t make this stuff up if you tried and yes there are multiple threads on “uncover” Nazi’s…..
by the1austin on Aug 31, 2008 2:12 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Favorite Quote...
…from TexAgs: “we would be a thriving powerhouse if we had more traditions. Get rid of fraternities, girls, and I guess moms too, then my friends we are set for the national spotlight.”
It made me giggle.
by HornPossessed on Aug 31, 2008 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Karmahorns?
How ironic a name you choose for posting that someone’s life be ruined before a fair trial to decide their guilt. Watch your back, buddy.
by Horn Brain on Aug 31, 2008 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
There is...
No place for this if he is guilty. I say “if” due to the fact that he is innocent until proven guilty.
If he is guilty then in order to be fair, he needs to get exactly what Kindle and Melton got. After that no mercy, you are out. I hope Muschamp makes an example out of him… maybe it will be the last time he ever gets into trouble.
1 Peter 2:17
by HornsFan87 on Aug 31, 2008 4:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Really, ...Really
If I could, let me inject some sanity. Who cares about football??? Someone may or may not have been operating a vehicle less than sober. Nothing kills more people than vehicles, nothing… end of argument. So really, football is a tertiary concern. This is truly a low point for BON. Really…
by Longhorny on Aug 31, 2008 6:30 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Your right
we should really get rid of cars.
by Wells on Sep 1, 2008 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
And I fact checked your argument
Nothing kills more people than vehicles, nothing… end of argument.
Acording to the CDC, the following things killed more people in 2005 than auto accidents (42,636 car accident deaths in 2005):
Diseases of heart ………………………. 652,091
Malignant neoplasms ………………….559,312
Cerebrovascular diseases ………… 143,579
Chronic lower respiratory disease….. 130,933
Accidents (unintentional injuries) . 117,809 (Which car deaths count in, so 75,173 non auto related accidents)
Diabetes mellitus …………………………. 75,119
Alzheimer’s disease …………………….. 71,599
Influenza and pneumonia …………….. 63,001
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis …….. 43,901
If we go word wide, then you add in others like AIDS, Malaria and infant death due to perinatal conditions.
by Wells on Sep 1, 2008 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I heard Dennis Quaid tell 60 minutes
That medical mistakes kill more people a year as well. Misapplied drugs due to similar labels, or misread prescriptions/charts and the like. 100,000 a year according to the star of Dragonheart.
I dont know where his figures are from though, but car accidents are no where near the top killer in America.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Sep 2, 2008 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow
Mae him 4run some bleachers, at the least.
If he is guilty, three game suspension.
End of story.
The people who want to kick him off make me laugh. What color is the sky in your world?
by Beergut on Aug 31, 2008 8:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Blue
and idiots should not get to play for Texas on scholarship when they do this kind of asshole behavior. I assume a lot of you on this site enjoy a drink or two, now and then (as do I), but this really isn’t such a little thing as all of y’all seem to be making it. Just my opinion.
by bfaut86 on Sep 1, 2008 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a bit surprised with some reactions here
It’s a DUI. He didn’t assault anyone or steal anything. He made a decision to drive home while tipsy (and really, many college students have done that), and he got caught. It’s dangerous and it’s stupid, and he should be punished, but there’s already precedent for that, and it does not include completely booting him off the team.
He’ll get suspended at least a game, possibly three, and then it’s done. We don’t even know if he’s guilty. Obviously, if he does something like this again, the consequences will be greater, but it’s a first time offense.
by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 2, 2008 9:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
