Gamblers Anonymous, Week 3
Most important - Safe wishes to all of those dealing with Ike.
Here are my unscientific picks for Week 3. Last week went 9-3 (added the Aggy game, thanks to Takchevy and longhornglory). Please pick these apart or let me know of any blatant games I'm missing. Saturday (and Friday night) should be great.
Kansas +3.5 over S. FLORIDA
VANDERBILT -7 over Rice
Auburn -10.5 over MISS ST
Penn St -27 over CUSE
Michigan -2 over NOTRE DAME
OREGON ST. -12.5 over Hawaii
BAYLOR pick over Wash St.
FRESNO +2 over Wisco
Oklahoma -20.5 over WASHINGTON
Utah -24 over UTAH ST.
ARIZONA ST -22.5 over unlv
MICH ST -17 over Florida Atlantic
LSU -42 over North Texas
Games I'm not touching but curious (**my pick):
**MIZZOU -26.5 / Nevada
**Georgia -7 / S. CAROLINA
**VA TECH -6.5 / Ga Tech
**Cal -15 / MARYLAND
**TUALNE / E Carolina -13
**USC -10.5 / Ohio St
And I would have taken the Horns -23
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
1 recs |
14 comments
Comments
Although I am not a fan of USC, I think they easily cover the spread on OSU, Wells is doubtful for the game.
Not a fan of the Weak 10 either and think Wisconsin will cover the 2 points on Fresno
FAU- I don’t see them loosing by 17 to Michigan State. For some reason I think it will be within 7 points either way
Hope everyone dealing with Ike has a safe weekend.
Hook EM
by Longhorn in MO on Sep 11, 2008 2:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
couple thoughts
1) I would take Cal to cover over Maryland, since I watched both the Cal-WSU game (final score 66-3) and part of the MTSU-Maryland game (24-14). While I would expect both teams to regress toward the mean a bit, as it were, that leaves plenty of room for Cal to dominate. Factors working against them include a 3-hour time zone shift and a 9am start, but Cal has been working on east coast time all week so that shouldn’t be too much of a problem. Maryland will almost certainly come out harder, and they do have playmakers at RB and WR, but it is hard to see this one being competitive.
2) I would definitely take Penn State to cover against ’Cuse – the former simply dominated Oregon State last week, and the latter is almost unspeakably awful. The fact that this is a rivalry game (of sorts) ensures that PSU will not hesitate in running up the score against a team that has reliably given up huge yardage on the ground and in the air and lost by double digits to the Akron “Zips” last week.
3) Georgia over S. Carolina also seems like a good bet – granted, Spurrier won that one last year and has a history of upsetting ranked teams at least once a year, but it’s kind of hard to do that without any semblance of an offense.
4) Ga Tech should cover against Va Tech, if not win outright. The latter is completely impotent offensively, which certainly bodes well against a team that is only marginally so. Whatever the outcome ends up being, however, this game could be uglier than a jar of smashed a**holes.
5) Fresno State will not beat Wisconsin, even if they are at home and “fired up”. The fact that they won against a pathetic Rutgers means nothing – I watched that game in its entirety, and neither side looked pretty. I know Wisconsin is overrated as usual, but they have shown the ability so far this year to get yards on the ground and in the air.
6) Oklahoma over Washington would seem to be a lock – I know Stoops has bad karma away from home, (especially against Pac-10 officiating), but they are just too good. Plus, Washington just lost their top running back for the season.
7) USC is also looking good against Ohio State, especially since Beanie is “doubtful” as mentioned above. Taking into account the location, USC’s dominance against ranked teams, USC’s dominance against the Big Ten, Todd Boeckman’s inability to play well against tough opponents, etc., I don’t see this one being close at all. Then again, I did predict that Notre Dame would cover against SDSU…
hook ’em
by longhornglory on Sep 11, 2008 3:43 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
A not on Fresno/Wisco
Now avoiding that game after watching Rutgers last night. Their offense is atrocious. FS’s win in NJ looks much weaker now.
by Horndogger on Sep 12, 2008 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
USC-OSU
1) On paper, USC-OSU looks a lot more evenly matched than it really is… That slow, grinding Big10 style will get crushed by the speed and skill at USC. Especially now that The Bean has been ruled out, I don’t expect OSU to cross over ten points unless the game is out of hand in favor of USC. Much as I hate them, you could probably put the USC 11 defenders on one of the lower tier NFL teams with no dropoff. It is telling that the line on this game is 10.5, whereas UGA only has to give 7/8 to the unranked “other USC.” This game is a total mismatch, and will force tOSU’s program to either evolve or languish.
2) As mentioned above, UGA will walk on Spurrier and the Cocks. I’d give SC seventeen points, but I only have to surrender eight – what a deal.
3) Great dog pick is sitting out there in SMU +36.5. Tech is not going to win that badly. They couldn’t beat Eastern Washington by that much, come on.
by Tackchevy on Sep 11, 2008 3:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
BlowU
And OU at -21.5 or whatever is great. I can’t see that missing. I already have a good chunk in for this week, but I think that I’ll roll whatever I get out of UNC+6 and Kansas+3.5 into that game as well. It just makes too much freakin sense.
by Tackchevy on Sep 11, 2008 4:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
KU-SF
I want to go with Kansas + 3 or the ML, I really do. I just have this vision of Todd Reesing and receivers crumbling under noise and pressure @ SF, and their undersized line getting destroyed.
But then I think about them shutting down VTech, shutting out La. Tech last week, and putting up so many points all the time.
Poster picked KU. Someone convince me. I’m ready to go one way or the other, I just need some reason to justify the -110 on (what looks like to me) a coinflip…
by Tackchevy on Sep 12, 2008 9:00 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
KU/SF
I think it might have been BZ that said it in another string but everybody outside of Lawrence wants to take the luster off of what they did last year, and wants to sleep on them this year. Until they prove otherwise, I think that’s a big mistake. This is a good football team.
Also – as everyone in the country thinks, the Big 12 > the Big East. While generalizations like this one are dangerous to gamble on, I fully believe that the best 6 teams in the Big 12 can beat the best team out of the Big East.
by Horndogger on Sep 12, 2008 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The two I would not bet on
OU over Washington. Too many points. Under most circumstances, I’d accept this blindfolded. However, with Washington holding on to a little cosmic karma, Big 10 refs, and the problems OU has had on the road, suddenly 20.5 seems a bit much. If OU can’t get off to a fast start, watch out. No including any rain, which will make it worse.
The other is Michigan State over FAU. Too many points at this part of the season. Six games down the road I wouldn’t have a problem with this, but not now. The Spartans are in learning mode, FAU has the more mature offense and scoring capability. 17.5 is 10 points too much.
my 2 coppers
by whills on Sep 12, 2008 12:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Leaning your way on FAU now
But I feel pretty good about the Sooners. Washington has yet to see anything like what OU will bring. While our season motto is Consistently good to be great, theirs has something to do with Taking it on the road. They will be all over an overwhelmed Wash team early I think.
On a side note, looking forward to seeing how Locker fares against the OU defense too. Like Colt, he makes plays with his feet and with his arm so I’m curious to see how they gameplan for him.
by Horndogger on Sep 12, 2008 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Normally I'd be right with you on OU
The first quarter blitzkrieg will be the cue; that’s where the combo of OU intimidation and the speed of their attack just overwhelms most teams. If Washington can endure that and not get down much, then Locker has a chance to do some good.
Locker is slow compared to OU, but he can be tough to take down. His flexibility is an advantage if Washington can stay in the game. I just think, for the circumstances, the spread was a little too much.
I think Colt is somewhat faster, definitely quicker. So, that will be a good point of comparison to watch as a bit of an indicator.
The other point in my mind is that BYU’s passing did not overwhelm Washington. OU may have to fall back to more play action, which they do well enough, but this indicates a lower scoring game. I don’t pretend Washington is stronger than, say, Oregon. But they are desperate and need a win and some vindication. I was impressed by their final, pressure-filled drive. That had to do them a world of good as a team, even if the outcome was essentially stolen from them. Bitter, vindictive people can hurt you. Beating the spread against OU may not be winning the game, but it is a second line for salvaging some pride.
by whills on Sep 12, 2008 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think I have to disagree a bit on this one
I watched the Washington game last week, and they looked bad. First, BYU did move the ball on offense fairly easily – Hall completed 30 passes against that defense. Without some goal-line fumbles and drops, BYU SHOULD have put that game away by 2 touchdowns.
I realize Washington scored 27, but my perception is that was more attributable to a terrible BYU defense, a la Tech. I agree that Locker may be somewhat “slow”, but he is very slippery. Regardless, his passing accuracy is absolutely horrendous. I don’t see them scoring more than 14 on OU, and I really can’t see them stopping the thieves.
by PSUhorn on Sep 13, 2008 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I live in Washington
so naturally I see the Huskies play quite a bit. There pass defense is atrocious, and there run defense isn’t much better (at least what I saw from the Oregon game). I watched the 2nd half of the BYU game and had it not been for a fumble on the one yard line for BYU, the scored would have been a bit more lopsided. Still turnovers are part of the game, and the unsportsmanlike conduct penalty was total bogus, he threw the ball into the air and they called a penalty on him.
Still, I wouldn’t be surprised to see this ending close with Washington scaring the hell out of the sooners, but i just can’t see them pulling off the upset, there is just too much of a talent and coaching gap.
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
~Fred Allen
by Hook'em13 on Sep 12, 2008 1:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Colt
Better be more agile than Locker…. Grutze (the Cinn QB) is getting out of the hospital pretty soon I think.
by Tackchevy on Sep 12, 2008 3:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















