Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Doug Flutie's Hail Mary, And Why College Sports Matter

Special teams

Most of the discussions here have been about finding offensive gamebreakers and about the youth and inexperience of our defense, mostly the safeties.  However, we all know that special teams is very important (we had a good one in '05, although it unfortunately did not materialize as the advantage it should have been in the Rose Bowl), and I want to hear people's thoughts on how special teams looked.

It's a bit difficult to say much about the return game; I believe we only statistically returned two punts and two kicks against FAU.  I think Shipley and Cosby could do fine, but many question if we shouldn't use a more explosive option here that would also protect our two most experienced receivers from injury.  In any case,  Shipley gained 24 yards on his return and Malcom Williams gained 18, while Earl Thomas and Cosby combined for only six yards on two punt returns.  That's not much a sample size to say anything, but I'm sure there will be continued discussion about who should be fielding kicks.

Our coverage wasn't as consistent as I would have liked.  Punt coverage was fine, as FAU returned three for a paltry six yards, and on kickoffs, we did stuff them a couple times.  However, they had this quick little guy who was able to slice through and give them good field position on a two occasions, averaging over thirty yards per return.  As a team, they averaged 23.9 yards on 7 returns, which is decent but I guess nothing to be worried about, although we did give up three returns of at least 30.  Obviously, I'm nitpicking, but against FAU, we'd like to have that average between 18 and 22.

Hunter Lawrence kicked the ball fine, and I liked the fake field goal.  Having a quick guy like Shipley as our holder does give us the option of doing that more often on fourth and short.  Gold punted the ball decently (hopefully, we don't use him very often), and Colt actually matched Gold's long ball for the day.  Perhaps we should allow Colt to kick a 45 yard field goal and see if he can do it.

The blocked punt was definitely exciting, and I want to see more of a special teams impact than last year (at least, a postive impact).  I still cringe when I think about the two return TD's we gave up against K-state last year, and despite four interceptions from Colt, Rock M Nation's The Boy's numbers showed that we nonetheless should have won that game if not for those special teams gaffes.  He called it one of the flukiest games he's ever seen, statiscally.

I just have a feeling that if we are to beat OU, and perhaps Mizzou as well, we're going to have to win the special teams battle.  They both have more explosive offense than we do (on paper) and so we need to win the field position battle, which means consistent returns and coverage, accurate field goals, and solid punts.  A blocked kick would do wonders too.  If we give up a 99 yard TD return to Maclin like Illinois did, let's just say we'll have a much tougher time winning.

All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.

0 recs  |  Comment 8 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The fake field goal.....

Was one the best plays of the game for me. FAU knew it was coming and Mack decided to run it right at them. That was the kind of Texas football I’ve missed the last two years. As for kick coverage, I’m a little worried. This caused a lot of trouble for us last year and we can’t afford to give up field position later this season. Hopefully we’ll get a lot of touchbacks.

by escole on Sep 3, 2008 8:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that's Texas football.

We’re going to line up our deep snapper and pound it right down your throats! BOOM!

by Horn Brain on Sep 3, 2008 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blocked Punt

was a very good sign. We didn’t have 1 last year.

by Longhorns84 on Sep 4, 2008 8:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I kinda take the flipside approach

to special teams play, that being caution over explosion.

What I mean is that busting a return is great for momentum and, as you point out, field position. But I’m a lot more comfortable with the touchback on some occasions. I’d rather fair catch the ball than see somebody dancing around while the punt team gets 2-3 shots at punching the ball out.

Ball security is beyond critical in today’s offense-oriented game. Anything that can be done to assure ball possession is a plus. Anything that can be done to give your defense (the other guy’s offense) a long field is a plus.

We all saw what short passes did to last year’s defense. I think the same skills limitations — generally, lack of speed and quickness from the back seven on defense — worked against blocking kicks.

Given the apparently much improved speed and depth of the ’08 Horns, it makes sense to me kick off, and punt, high and short. That means going for a net of 35 yards on punts (35-yard kick, no return) and accepting starting position around the 25 after kicking off (at the expense of trying for touchbacks and maybe giving up 35-yard returns).

As for returns, yes, work in some of the younger players — but with an emphasis on catch first, secure second, run third. The offense will do fine, whether the drive starts at the 15 or 45; just be certain there IS a drive to start.

by edsp on Sep 4, 2008 1:41 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ball security
What I mean is that busting a return is great for momentum and, as you point out, field position. But I’m a lot more comfortable with the touchback on some occasions. I’d rather fair catch the ball than see somebody dancing around while the punt team gets 2-3 shots at punching the ball out.

Agreed. However, I don’t think you have to necessarily sacrifice good returns for ball security. Fair catching and taking touchbacks are just smart decisions for field position purposes when there is no reasonable gains to expect from returning the ball. If the ball gets booted 8 yards into the endzone, it’s a good idea to take a knee because you’ll be hard pressed to reach the 20 anyway. However, if the ball is only one yard in and your KR averages 27 yards per return, you get to start at the 26 rather than the 20. Six yards can mean the difference between a FG and a punt. Thus, while I agree that ball security is a bit more important than trying to bust the big one, I disagree slightly that our offense will be fine regardless of where we start.

The field position game is often thought as very old school thinking, ala Bill Parcells, but it is very important. I think The Boy has interesting numbers regarding how successful offenses tend to be depending on field position. Even if we grant that Mizzou has a more explosive offense than us, if they’re starting at their own 18 all the time and we’re starting at our 35, that could mean a world of different. I’m sure many of us remember Steve Breaston’s huge impact on the 2005 Rose Bowl; it seemed like Michigan started at midfield every series. Thankfully, we had VY.

by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 4, 2008 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

All points well taken

I tend to agree with you on the “sacrifice good returns for ball security.” I believe you can both utilize the return game and avoid turnovers.

But I think Boss Horn prefers the better safe than sorry approach. And since the KR options seem to break down as either seniors or freshmen (there not being any junior WRs or DBs on the team other than Beasley, and not many sophs), I guess MB feels more comfortable with his vets.

Another example of field postion was the !@#$#$^ Ohio State game in ’06 when their punter booted like the damn ball had helium in it after halftime. Buckeyes probably win anyway, but field postion (with an extremely unproven frosh QB) made the task impossible.

by edsp on Sep 4, 2008 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I forgot this

Good topic and information Elusive Shadow

by edsp on Sep 4, 2008 1:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I prefer points

I prefer seeing Shipley and Cosby on the bench during special teams. Don’t need to put our top 2 receiver in any more danger of getting injured…especially with the many other options.

I think now is the time to start cultivating an explosive return man that can give us a big plus in momentum and score in the games against tough competition like OU and Mizzou…Seeing the effect of Maclin’s TD return on that game makes me very envious…

by lazylonghorn on Sep 4, 2008 2:54 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bevo_small
Aggie Week: Let's hear your favorite Aggie joke.
T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs UC Irvine Gameflow (+/- stats included)
Horns_small
Thanks to our Men & Women in the Armed Forces

Recent FanPosts

Elephantlogoorange_small
Texas: Thanks.
Buddy_tower_48x48_small
Is aTm aware that Thanksgiving is two days away?
Images_small
Do not wish VY to be a Texan
Vandammeband_small
A Quick Look at Pitt
Chris_hookem_small
Thoughts After My Last Game at DKR (as a student)
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Texas-Iowa Game Preview
Small
Colt McCoy Selected as 2009 O'Brien Finalist!
Clock_tower_small
Mystery Recruit?
Small
earl thomas vs trent hunter

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports