Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Postgame React, Week 2: Texas at UTEP

The outcome was: Unimpressive. I started the summer thinking this team's likely deficiencies would net  2-4 losses. The annual end-of-summer surge of optimism combined with our season opening beatdown of FAU to make me think heading into El Paso that this team might challenge for the conference title. After last night... I'm back where I started.

On the one hand, it was a night game against a funky opponent whose fans thought they were in the Rose Bowl. On the other hand, the '05 Longhorns would have beat those Miners by 60. And this year's Sooners might have, too.

If there's a silver lining, I thought last night's contest was just plain strange, lacking any semblance of the normal flow of a football game--like a night visit to Lubbock or something. Of course, that's not much of a silver lining to hang your hat on: Texas gets Tech on the road this season in a time To Be Announce. Odds we'll kick off at 7 pm? 99 percent.

The Offensive MVP was: Fozzy Whittaker. The night on offense really belonged to Colt McCoy (20-29, 282, 4-1) and Quan Cosby (8-154-1), but the sparkling debut of Fozzy was most important. In terms of long-term value, his emergence was the story of the night.

When asked on the radio this summer about the offense, Whittaker was always the wild card I cited as the potential game breaker, and I always described his running style as "looking like he was being controlled by a joystick in a video game, his fluid hips and quick feet allowing him to change direction laterally with remarkable smoothness." He certainly looked the part last night, but I think the analogy can be extended a little further: Whittaker also emerges from piles of bodies without being tackled just as only happens in the NCAA Football video game series, in which brushing shoulders with defenders who don't secure the tackle is commonplace. The little dude's like a pinball, with a low center of gravity and strong legs.

I'm calling right now for at least two 50+ yard touchdown runs this year in which he appears lost in a pile of bodies before squirting out the other side to burst through the second level and gone.

The Defensive MVP was: Roddrick Muckelroy. Again. Christ, looking back at last week's piece, I needn't change much of anything:

Fellow linebacker Sergio Kindle was the most fearsome athlete on the field today, but Muckelroy was the only Longhorn  in the back seven who played consistently great football. Not only did Muck lead the team with six fourteen tackles (including one for a loss), but he was one of the only defensive players who was always right where he needed to be, whether it was backside contain or manning a zone in pass coverage or picking up a fumble to return for a touchdown.

The offensive Offensive LVP was: Greg Davis. Games don't just "lack flow" on their own. Generally, either the players are bumbling or the coaches are lost. In this case, we saw a version of the latter, especially on offense in the third quarter, when Texas time traveled to 2007, complete with the "We're gonna pass with McCoy whether it's a good idea, a bad idea, or a wholly nonsensical idea" game plan. Such incompetence doesn't ding a team like Texas A&M in the loss column against a squad like Arkansas State or UTEP, but if you're looking for reasons why losses may await the 'Horns against Missouri, OU, Texas Tech, Pokie State, or Kansas look no further than last night's disappointing stretches of offensive football.

Whereas Texas had no trouble picking apart the oh-so-soft zone Florida Atlantic sat in last Saturday, the chaotic blitz party from UTEP at times gave Greg Davis fits. I say Davis, instead of the players, because it was so clear that when whatever UTEP was doing on defense was what we expected, the result was a hugely successful play for the 'Horns. For example, the O-Line''s ability to open up enormous holes by pushing around the smaller Miners was apparent... but only when UTEP was doing something basic with their defense. As they mixed it up, our ability to dictate a play was mystifyingly neutralized.

Not only shouldn't that happen, but it provides our far more competent upcoming opponents with the game plan for defensive success. Brent Venables filled with drool at least two cheat-wagons last night.

The offensive Defensive LVP: MLBs. Both Jared Norton and Rashad Bobino were disappointments last night. I don't wanna talk about it. 

John Chiles Watch: 2 carries, 5 yards / 0-0 passing. He simply was not a part of the game plan, so the question is: Should he have been? In my mind, absolutely.

Greg Davis has this mistaken notion that when Texas is facing a hyper-aggressive defense, the only possible solution is to heave everything on Colt McCoy's shoulders and try to pass our way out of the pressure. Again: nightmare flashbacks to 2007.

Dear Greg: there are alternatives. They involve misdirection and using the defense's aggression against them--not just by trying to complete a deep heave (EPIC FAIL), but by, oh let's say... a reverse! Or a naked bootleg. Or any of a number of other things which John Chiles could have done to calm the UTEP defense. Part of the reason they so fearlessly blitzkrieged our offense is because we weren't giving them any reason to pause and consider alternatives.

Colt McCoy is doing a mostly great job with everything so far. But you know what? Chris Leak did a mostly great job with his offense as a senior, and Urban Meyer didn't conclude, "We can't use Tebow where he can help us. No." Gregory, please try using that which you have on hand. Thanks.

The Q Package: Non-existent. There was one neat play, in which Chiles came around on a fake reverse and was starting to turn down field on a wheel route which would have been wide open, but our line couldn't hold off the Miners and Colt threw the ball inside before Chiles could move into his peripheral vision. This package has potential, but we haven't seen it yet.

Cerberus Watch: McGee: 6-18-3.0, 0 TD / Ogbonnaya: 1-1-1.0, 0 TD / Whittaker: 12-72-6.0, 0 TD. The game plan sucked and the stretch plays to McGee were painful to watch, but I'm taking the Fozzy debut as my point of focus because I don't want to cry in my beer any more than I have already.

Foz-zy! Foz-zy! Let's just hope he's our central point of attack for the rushing game heading forward. He needs 15-20 touches per game, period.

Arkansas Fear Factor: 2 out of 10   (5) is the baseline. (-1) for this; (-1) for this; (+1) for Greg Davis' UTEP performance; (-1) for Fozzy's debut; (+1) for the distance between our secondary and Good; (-1) for Casey Dick's inability to throw a ball out of a wet paper bag; (-1) for improvement when Texas' coaches see the film and realize they crapped the bed.

Heading into next week I feel: Fine. If I weren't so locked in on this year as a training ground for 2009, I'd conclude from the above that my hopes in a Big XII title were depressingly far-fetched. As is, I see the potential of this team and I'm fine with bumps in the road to whatever extent they serve as lessons for improvement.

That of course requires the coaching staff to do their part, and you can't blame a Mack-Davis pessimist for seeing last night's game as a bad sign for the times ahead. I'll wait for more data to draw any long-term conclusions, noting only my to-do list for Greg Applewhite:

  • More Chiles to keep defenses honest
  • Whittaker to the starting spot and majority rush weapon
  • Steady development from Williams, Buckner, and Collins

0 recs  |  Comment 17 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

mystified

I too was pretty miffed at the play calling last night. Not because it was ineffective (it was effective for 2.5 quarters), but because it completely lacked any semblance of situational awareness. I get the feeling like the coaches try so hard to keep things under wraps that GD is probably hating himself for having called the pump fake to the bubble screen TD pass to Shipley. While there is something to be said about not tipping your entire hand, we need to be giving more looks than we are currently showing. Instead Colt continued to fling balls around while the running game struggles to get on track.

 I’m sure what we’ll hear from the coaching staff is that the UTEP defense was much better than advertised and had the line completely out of whack. However, what this game was was a return to the lackadaisical play calling and offensive scheme that barely worked against UCF & Ark State, and got us crushed by K-State and A&M.

The coaching staff needs to realize that their are times to be conservative and time to be aggressive. At times during this year the offense will have to be called aggressively in order to win.Regardless of whether it would “give away” I’d rather us get into that frame of mind now, rather than needing to get beat by CU or OU before we start seeing it.

by BMG on Sep 7, 2008 5:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i think

fozzy could’ve easily surpassed 100 yards that night if there were more running plays called. he was by far our most effective runner and was ripping off nice runs. why not run the ball more and control the clock in the third quarter when our offense was struggling?

by clra2 on Sep 7, 2008 5:57 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"outcome unimpressive"

I’m glad someone else said that, too. Overall, I wasn’t thrilled. Not that I think running up the score is a great thing to do to other schools, but we should have scored more points against a team like UTEP. At least, we should have played like we should have scored more points against this team.

The secondary continues to scare the begeebers out of me. We are in a conference with some of the best QBs in the country and I’m afraid they are going to pick this group apart. I read somewhere that Brown dropped the terms free and strong from the safety positions, using left and right so that the players know which area of the field to cover. Is he kidding? We can only hope the safety knows his left from his right…

by austin57 on Sep 7, 2008 7:56 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

greg davis simply takes games off

look at last night’s offensive gameplan. greg davis may as well have been at home sick all week with pneumonia. colt mccoy could have run practice and called last nights entire offensive game on his own. there was zero plan in place other than to run the 15 most frequently run plays in our play book with, as PB points out, no adjustments in response to any number of defensive schemes being used against us.

what is the point in discontinuing John Chiles involvement in the offense after a relatively promising week 1? There is none. It’s laziness. Greg Davis phoned this week in. And guess what? He got away with it because 1) our offense is good 2) UTEP is bad 3) we will win 9 or more games again this year.

Whereas Dwayne Akina was simply an ineffective defensive coordinator who had to be replaced, Greg Davis is a talented offensive mind who has the sad quality of being perfectly content to rest on his laurels, put his team on cruise control about 5 or 6 weeks out of the year.

I’m confident our offense will play inspired, creative football against OU, Missouri, Kansas and (possibly) A&M. Greg Davis will lay turds, however, against Rice, Oklahoma State, Colorado and Baylor.

by jtabor on Sep 7, 2008 8:01 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ok, but a ways to go

Offense Fozzy had a terrific game and I agree that he should probably be he starting RB. I really like have the combination of different type of runners. Some running styles just don’t work against some defenses. Quan gets MVP. Awesome game, particularly the 5 foot leap and grab and the TD later in the drive. He was fired up and pissed off that UTEP even thought they could compete. Colt had a pretty efficient game, but he had some poor decision making in Q3. Offensive line was pretty good a run blocking, but I think needs to get a lot better at pass blocking and defending the blitz. This goes for the RB’s picking up the blitz too.

Defense Defensive line had way too few sacks, but nice pressure. If they could just learn how to sack because they had him so many times. I really don’t care if they thought UTEP was going to be passing more, the defensive front needs to shutdown the run. This is freak’n UTEP for crying aloud. Their goal should be to limit opposing teams to less than 3.0 ypc and against teams like UTEP, FAU, Rice…this should be more like 1.5 ypc. One last note on the d-line is I’d like to see Kheeston Randall and Jarvis Humphrey more playing time. We’re thin at DT, and are going to be thin again next year with Miller and Lewis graduating after this season. Secondary has me so worried. They’ve got so far to go to be a dominating defense. Yes, I know no one expects the defense to be dominating this season, but that is the only standard at Texas. Frankly, I thought UTEP’s WR’s bailed the secondary out with so many dropped balls, otherwise I think they’d add another 150 – 200 yards passing.

Game planning On offense it was almost non-existent, but I think it was intentionally non-existent. Other than blitz pickup which needs more work, I don’t think they intended to do or show much else. Very vanilla offense. Q-package would’ve been wasted on this UTEP. Player execution is paramount in a vanilla offense, and it’s being used to develop and distinguish players and the starting line up when the real season starts against CO and OU. It’ll be pretty vanilla against Rice although I’m hoping Colt will get a big lead in the first half and give Chiles and Harris a lot of real playing time. Against Arkansas, Davis may not show much either since they’ve barely beaten Western Illinois and Louisiana-Monroe. But I don’t disagree that Q3 looked looked awful, and it would’ve nice to get a bigger lead earlier and give Chiles some real playing time. If you saw the zoom in on Chiles face in Q4, you know he was annoyed to just hand off the ball. Defense on the other hand has me worried. Muschamp for the most part probably wanted to stay pretty vanilla…moving people around to see how they do coming from a different angles and a few blitzes here and there. The problem is that the run defense was pretty poor against UTEP and pass defense was worse. He blitzed far more often than he probably wanted. You can’t do more complex schemes if you don’t have the fundamentals down. Blitzing and scheming just hides the lack of fundamentals which will get exposed by better teams later in the season. So this has me worried. For a little bit of reflection…Beasley looked awful his first 1-1/2 seasons and now we’ve got a whole mess of freshman in the secondary. Speaking of Beasley he was beat off the line on that one pass. What was encouraging is he was only a step or two behind, but he didn’t leap up to try to intercept or deflect the pass. He would’ve wiffed and compounded being beat off the line by allowing a TD. Overall this defense needs to grow up fast just to compete against the likes of OU, Missouri, TT (last game not withstanding because you know Texas is marked on their calendar every year), OSU, etc. Overall game planning might be interesting further down the season. The offense may need to take a chew up the game clock approach to limit the defense’s exposure whether this means more running (Greg Davis…yeah, right) or a lot of dinking and dunking. If the defense can hold, he can open up the offense.

Hook'em

by longhorns1 on Sep 7, 2008 10:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

BTW did you notice that Palmer had gone out

looked like he got cracked in a bad place and Beasley came in for him instead of Curtis Brown. On the play in question, the WR looked like he got the jump on Beasley. Wonder if that was some more live cross training. Palmer recovered and came right back in.

by whills on Sep 8, 2008 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

From reading the preceding,

I guess it’s good we didn’t win 28-27. I see your points; some are dead-on right. The one that kinda bugs me is criticism of the secondary.

Like we didn’t KNOW this group would struggle? It’s a surprise?

Beasley and the two Browns played last year. Three of the five safeties redshirted. This means six players WHO WERE IN the program weren’t good enough to wrest playing time away from Preston Foster and Erick Jackson and the rest of a unit that ranked 212th (or whatever it was) against the pass. We should expect the current group — in two games, under a new DC — to be Brown-Ross-Huff-Michael Grif-Cedric Grif?

When Mack and Co. put together a team with one senior DB and two juniors (one of them sidelined by injury), what was the likely outcome? Blame recruiting decisions made 2004-06.

by edsp on Sep 7, 2008 10:53 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Secondary

You’re right, the weakness of the secondary is not a surprise, but like it or not there is no sympathy for them in the Big 12. Player development is a problem with both recruiting and coaching. I like the trial by fire approach of Muschamp. Better now than later, and they still have a couple more training games before the real season is upon us.

One last note, I’d rather have this team than last year’s team. This team’s got heart and hustle and a ton of talent. Other than against OU in a loss and ASU in a terrific win and carry over into this season, can’t say last season’s team had much fight in them. Credit Mack Brown and Muschamp.

The pride and winning tradition of The University of Texas will not be entrusted to the weak or the timid.

Hook'em

by longhorns1 on Sep 8, 2008 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Safeties

The coaching staff knew last year that we’d be in this position this year. The young guys may not have been good enough to take playing time when the game was on the line, but there were opportunites to get them in games. Playing Thomas, Scott or Wells last year would have made more sense than burning Curtis Brown’s RS considering the 2007 and 2008 depth charts.

by Horncasting on Sep 8, 2008 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Preston Foster is an awesome name.

Sounds like an English aristocrat. But Brandon Foster sounds more like a cornerback.

Anyway, good points, but I don’t think anyone is expecting the world out of these guys. We’re just scared about whether they’re going to be ready to face the slate of talented Big 12 QB’s ahead of them.

by billyzane on Sep 8, 2008 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks

for correction on Foster. I knew it didn’t sound right but was too lazy to look it up.

by edsp on Sep 8, 2008 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The begining of a running game?

Fozzy seems to have better timing at hitting the holes on the plays that run up north/south.

Still the horns run to many east/west running plays, these can get shut down by any one of 4 or 5 player on the side of the field the plays goes toward. The north/south plays normally only need 3 good blocks to gain 4-5 yards with 6-7 D-guys in the box. Plus quick opening north/south run plays can negate some defensive team speed.

by Xerxes on Sep 7, 2008 11:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

vanilla beans, coaches, some spicy blitzes, and a few green players...

should not a create a gastrointestinal meltdown.

I read the whole game differently from you, PB. I thought the game demonstrated many positives and the team did many things it wouldn’t have last year. Yes there were still “rookie mistakes,” but those should still be expected at this stage. The whole thing reminded me of an NFL pre-season game in which the Horns were trying different personnel groupings and plays, and, on purpose, not really adjusting to what the defense was doing. Cosby was just so much better than their CB’s that it didn’t matter what the coverage was. I thought that some players just did not play well, and that the coaches had relatively little impact on the game. It wasn’t the plays, it was players. Most of the culprits on bad plays were the replacements for the starters, young players who are still learning how to recognize what they see on the field. So to get the controversy started..

Offensive MVP – Quan. He outcompeted every DB for space and for the ball and made brilliant in-route adjustments to Colt’s passes that helped many arrive on-time and in stride. He showed a burst I never saw last year.

Defensive co-MVP (how could anyone not concur on Roddrick Muckelroy) was Blake Gideon. He stuffed two different screen passes and his recognition got him in position for damage control on mistakes by Norton and Bobino at least six times. His hitting was more ferocious than Thomas, and between the two of them, UTEP stopped running slants and crossing patterns over the middle and, in the second half, settled for screens and passes to the flat, or challenging the corners in one-on-one up the sideline.

Offensive co-LVP’s: Vondrell McGee, Michael Huey. There was something wrong with McGee – he had no speed and never cut hard. I noticed in the MB-TF practice videos that he was practicing with a knee brace, so I wonder if he is injured. Poor Michael Huey. UTEP lined up three guys across from him, let them work out a routine for “So You Think You Can Dance” before every snap and then send 2 or all 3 every snap. Huey was a deer in the headlights for the last part of the second quarter and most of the third, and the consistent up-the-middle push had McCoy checking down too quickly and throwing off his back foot. If there was a flashback to 2007, that was it. The fake bubble screen and pass to Shipley in the fourth put it out of reach and eased up the pressure on Huey, but that is a problem that needs to be fixed. If not, it will be visions of 2007

Defense: First let me say that the secondary played well IMHO, given that the lone touchdown occurred on a blown coverage by Thomas, one of only three of four I saw all night. The defense played most of the night and 95% of the time after the first series in a 4-2-5, which seemed to limit Kindle’s appearances. The corners were playing primarily man-to-man with only rare safety help and only got beat a couple of times, mostly when they turned their heads the wrong way. These mistakes can be fixed.

Yes, the defense was awful in the first quarter and in the last 2 minutes of the first half. But note the zero points given up by the defense in the second half DESPITE the fact that the game was still close (28-13) and one or two mistakes by the safeties could have sent the place into apoplexy and visions of the UCF game would have danced before the Horns. But that didn’t happen. In fact when last year, when the game was in the balance, did the UT defense hold ANY TEAM scoreless in the second half?

Negatives
I concur about Bobino and Norton, in the sense that they still seem to be taking all the wrong angles on plays, which leads, especially on Norton’s end, to poor tackling and shoddy defense against Jackson the UTEP running back. Judging angles and adjusting on the fly is a vision thing, just like a running back. Normally you either “see” the field or you don’t, it’s not really coachable. So I see this as a strong basis for worry. If Texas runs a 4-2-5, they need to get Kindle in some sort of shape to defend the pass (which he is not now – he just chases the receiver rather than anticipating the route) or blitz, along with Muckelroy.

Our other problem, which no BONers seem to have noticed was the coordination between the DT’s and the LB’s. Whe you have small but quick DT’s and DE’s, you can’t just butt up underneath the OL and tie up blockers, hoping the LB’s will make the play. On almost every play, the DL slanted into the gaps, which put Roy Miller in the backfield on every play. The LB’s have to slant into the gaps left behind by the DL to create what coaches call “gap control” but instead, the LB’s often followed behind the DL, getting tied up with blockers instead of filling gaps – hence 10-15 yard runs by UTEP. Muschamp put a stop to that in the second quarter.

I still think the players are still VERY MUCH learning how to play Muschamp’s defense.

Offense. With a rookie in at LG and the dancing Miners blitzing on every play, of course GD cut back on the game plan. WR’s were wide open on every play, and running lanes were clogged. Why not pass virtually every play?
Result: Cosby’s greatest day as a Longhorn, Colt not having a particularly good day. ESPN2 showed scenes of him on the sideline late in the fourth and he looked totally ticked off, like he knew his decision-making was “Not Our Standard.” Despite his 3rd quarter struggles, Colt was making vertical passes with rhythm and precision like I haven’t seen since 2006

I was pleasantly surprised by Whittaker’s blitz pickups – he got pulverized a couple of times, but stuffed the LB’s at least 4 times. This was a major improvement over early fall camp. If he can get better and more reliable, look out!

The day of the Q-package is coming. As PB pointed out, there was a play that, had the center of the line gotten their blocking assignments right, could have resulted in a 30+ yard swing pass to John Chiles. There was another similar unrealized play with Chiles and Whittaker as split backs next to Colt, that also blew up due to a missed block by Cedric Dockery.

Overall, I thought it wasn’t a great performance, but a heck of a lot better than what we would have seen under similar circumstances last year. Sure, it’s not up to the Gold (2005) Standard, but then what team has been. Many things can get fixed as more young players get more experienced. Some, like our headless middle LB’s, may not ever get fixed, but with Gideon around to clean up the mess, that might not be as catastrophic as it would have been last year

by burnt in ny on Sep 7, 2008 11:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It doesn't sound to me like you read the game differently at all...

…You just chose a different lead.

I touched on this in the final paragraphs, but I still feel fine, for all the reasons you saw this as a positive growing game. The preceding “Whoa, there are the problems” motif was, I thought, a necessary second chapter to the “Ooooh! Ahhhh!” the performance against FAU inspired, both in me and others.

So I’ll quibble only with the characterization that the Postgame React represents any kind of gastrointestinal meltdown and agree with most everything else. There are many ways to tell the same story.

Thanks, as always, for the excellent commentary.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Sep 8, 2008 3:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry PB...

if I got a little overwrought with my metaphors. You’d think I wrote for the Statesman or something. I probably shouldn’t write comments at 2 am. I love this blog and appreciate all the effort you and the other editors put in on this site.

by burnt in ny on Sep 8, 2008 7:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very nicely done.

Good call my friend…

by mccoy12 on Sep 8, 2008 5:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

burnt in ny

Great stuff here. I think I know the game, and then I read this and you have five things I didn’t notice and probably wouldn’t if I watched the tape over and over.

Most fans, of course, have no clue what’s going on. Clearly, you do. The great thing is that we can learn from what you write. Now, if the OC . . . nah, that’s fantasyland.

by edsp on Sep 8, 2008 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs UC Irvine Gameflow (+/- stats included)
Horns_small
Thanks to our Men & Women in the Armed Forces
Small
The Aggies are doing just enough this year to give us a good upset.

Recent FanPosts

T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs Western Carolina Gameflow
Lemon_small
Pat Murphy resigns
Small
Orakpo says TCU can't hang
Clock_tower_small
The Weekly BON Hit Award Baylor
11-09_small
2009 Horns VS 2005 Horns....are we better? Equal? Worse?
Small
Vote for McCoy Saturday at Gate 25!
1994_brown_james_small
I am glad to say I've seen the greatest team of my lifetime...
Clock_tower_small
All I Want For Christmas
Horns_small
David Greene gets Colt McCoy just right
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Article on Texas-Western Carolina Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports