Big 12 Football Report, v 1.2
A weekly report on the weekend of Big 12 football.
Previous reports: Week 1
THE RUNDOWN
BIG XII SOUTH
- Texas 42 UTEP 13 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
You didn't think it would all be pretty, did you? Hopefully not, as the Longhorns were actually outgained by the Miners last night (412-404). The game was an oddity, neither as close as the final stats nor wide as the final margin might indicate. The best news for Longhorns fans has to be the exceptionally strong start from quarterback Colt McCoy, who's sitting on video game numbers after two games: 44-58, 504 yards, 7 TDs, 1 INT, 185.2 QB Rating. Of course, he's not exactly been playing in Varsity mode--Florida Atlantic's defense let UAB's Joe Webb rack up 326 yards this week, while UTEP's defense was scorched for 484 total yards by Buffalo a week ago. If the strength of Texas' opponents suggests holding off on a parade would be prudent, there's no reason to feel gloomy, either. Mighty Casey hasn't come close to striking out.
- Oklahoma 52 Cincinnati 26 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
Whether or not they match some of their predecessors' success, you could make the argument this is Oklahoma's best team on paper. Maximum evil. The Sooners racked up a ridiculous 592 yards of total offense against Brian Kelly's Bearcats, taken seriously for--if anything--their defense. Demarco Murray barely broke a sweat in rushing for 5.9 yards per carry, as Oklahoma rode the arm of Sam Bradford (29-38, 395 yards, 5 TD, 2 INT) to a comfortable win. As I wrote this summer, don't hold your breath for Bradford to cool off. Not when he's got five senior brick walls giving him all day to find the open man.
- Baylor 51 Northwestern St 6 [Box / Recap / As Told At YouTube]
Ah, the sweet smell of picking on the weak guy--the slump buster. Weak opponent or not, my new favorite non-Texas player--true freshman quarterback Robert Griffin--was outstanding yesterday, passing for 294 yards on 15 of 19 passing, including 3 touchdowns and no turnovers. Throw in 42 yards on 10 carries for good measure and we can mark off "dominates weak competition" on the Robert Griffin path to stardom checklist.
- Oklahoma State 56 Houston 37 [Box / Recap / As Told At YouTube]
Not taking the Oklahoma State offense seriously yet? That might be a mistake... So ridiculous were the Cowboys offensively on Saturday that the standard video game analogy breaks down; it was sillier than that. This was more like The Matrix and the realm of the jaw-droppingly impossible: 699 yards of total offense, including 379 rushing on 51 carries. Kendall Hunter needed just 22 carries to rack up 210 yards, while Keith Toston added 78 more on 8 attempts, giving Oklahoma State two rushers who averaged over 9 yards per carry. Not blown away yet? This oughtta seal the deal: in the third quarter, the Cowboys scored 28 points on 20 offensive snaps. Bow down.
- Texas Tech 35 Nevada 19 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
The True Believer segment of the Red Raider fanbase are gloating this morning after Tech's defense put in a "dominating performance" against Nevada Saturday. That might be generous, given the 6.0 yards per play allowed to the Wolfpack, but Ruffin's Riders deserve credit for standing tall when it mattered most: As Tim Griffin notes in the above link, Nevada was inside the Tech 26 yard line on 8 separate occasions in the game's first three quarters, but came away with just 4 field goals from those drives. They picked the right game to show up, too, as Graham Harrell was uncharacteristically off the mark. The senior missed on 27 of his 46 pass attempts, had just 1 touchdown pass, and turned the ball over twice. On the bright side, Texas Tech ran the ball well (5.6 yards per attempt), something they must do well for Mike Leach's system to succeed against strong competition. Tech moves to 2-0, and with home games against SMU and Massachusetts to close out the non-conference season, they'll open Big XII play 4-0 on October 4th in Manhattan.
- Texas A&M 28 New Mexico 22 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
To give you an idea of how fortunate A&M was to win this contest, the Aggies were outgained by 134 yards by the Lobos and got 7 of their 28 points on an interception return. To be fair, an injury to Mike Goodson early in the game hamstrung the Aggies' rushing attack, but, they also caught a huge break when they lost quarterback Stephen McGee for the game, as well. Had Grass Stains McGritty been in there for four quarters, it seems likely A&M would be 0-2. Game ball goes to Jerrod Johnson, the 6-5 redshirt sophomore from Humble, who found the end zone three times through the air. As a Longhorn fan, the likely end of the McGee era is a bitter one, the opportunity to wax him in Austin this November now lost. Should Johnson become the A&M starter heading forward, McGee will finish his career with a winning record against Texas. Life is incredibly unfair.
BIG XII NORTH
- Iowa State 48 Kent State 28 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
Snicker all you like at the Cyclones' season-opening opponents; my goals for this team are less ambitious. Namely: don't embarrass the Big XII. So far, so good, as Iowa State avenged their 23-14 loss to Kent State a year ago, doing their part in the conference's 12-0 Saturday. Not that anyone should be doing any chest-thumping: only Oklahoma played a BCS conference opponent, and the rest of this week's fodder combine to make a who's who of ineptitude. Or, in many cases, just: "Who's that?"
Saturday's Big XII Opponents
Cincinnati
UTEP
Nevada
New Mexico
Houston
Northwestern St
Eastern Washington
Louisiana Tech
Southeast Missouri St
Montana St
San Jose St
Kent St
- Nebraska 35 San Jose St 12 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
Sometimes, it's best just to step aside and let someone who saw the game put it into words. Take it away, Corn Nation: "While Nebraska looked more confused than a bi-sexual Lou Holtz in the first half against San Jose State, the second half (okay, I’ll be honest - fourth quarter) was far more promising."
Some metaphors help you understand. Some terrify the mind. After reading this one, I may need to see a therapist to get out of my head the mental image of a drunken Lou Holtz prowling a bar, hitting on everything... WAIT. WHAT IF I WENT TO SEE A THERAPIST AND IT WAS DR. LOU???!? [curls into a ball, sucks thumb, cries hard]
Our father, who art in Heaven, hallowed be thy name...
- Kansas State 69 Montana State 10 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
Moving on, or trying to: this image is gracing the front page of kstatesports.com more nightmare fuel what is going on today hellllllllllppppp!!
Um, Montana State sucks. Hard. But as TB notes at Bring On The Cats, good opponent or not, it's a huge relief for K-State fans to see Josh Freeman playing mature, mistake-free football in the early going. The Co-Big XII Player of the Week last Saturday, Freeman was again exceptionally efficient against a bad foe, completing 16 of 21 passes for 288 yards, with 2 touchdowns and 0 interceptions. The Wildcats also blocked two MSU punts in the rout.
(I'm honestly a little scared to keep going with this report. What am I going to be terrorized by when I look up info on Missouri? I'm not kidding when I say I'm expecting to accidentally stumble across a YouTube of a tiger biting off whole the head of an infant.)
- Missouri 52 Southeast Missouri State 3 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
If you're wondering why this week's report contains YouTube clips meant to serve as metaphors for these games, the lion's share of the credit goes to the Big XII North's astonishingly bad scheduling. There's simply nothing to say about an epic beatdown of a school none of us knew existed prior to yesterday. Might as well throw up a clip of a cop beating some homeless dude, write, "Sorta like that," and be done with it. So there ya go.
- Kansas 29 Louisiana Tech 0 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
Though not exactly a big name opponent, the Bulldogs are a Division 1 opponent of reasonable competency. Jayhawks quarterback Todd Reesing was especially excellent yesterday (32-38, 412 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT), but the ground game troublesomely failed to take hold for the second straight week. Kansas picked up just 126 yards rushing on 33 carries (3.8 per attempt), as the search for a replacement to Brandon McAnderson continues. The Jayhawks travel to Tampa to face 19th-ranked South Florida next Saturday Friday, an opponent they may struggle to defeat without help in the ground game.
- Colorado 31 Eastern Washington 24 [Box / Recap / Blog Coverage / As Told At YouTube]
Colorado matched their division-mates in the scheduling department, but missed the memo explaining the game should be a blowout. The Buffs trailed 21-7 at the half, needed 17 fourth quarter points to avoid a disastrous upset, and scored the winning touchdown on an interception return with 1:44 left in the game. Cody Hawkins was reasonably sharp for CU (28-38, 261 yards, 3 TDs, 1 INT), but freshman Darrell Scott was repeatedly stymied, finishing with a meager 39 yards on 13 carries. The Buffaloes get a week off to regroup, but close out their non-conference slate with home games against West Virginia and Florida State--neither of whom are world beaters, but will require a better effort than what CU got yesterday. Scott's struggles highlight what looks like the biggest obstacle for Colorado this year--overcoming a young offensive line with little experience.
WEEK 2 AWARDS
BEST WIN: TEXAS TECH, OVER NEVADA Oklahoma was more impressive over a better opponent, but the nod this week goes to Tech, who likely needed this solid win more than Oklahoma did a blowout over the Bearcats. Nevada not only may win the WAC this season, but as Tech's strongest by far non-conference road opponent, the road win gives the Red Raiders confidence they'll need as they gun to be more than the Big XII South's third-best team.
WORST LOSS: N/A 12-0, baby! Sit the f*** down, Montana State.
TOP PERFORMER, OFFENSE (TEAM): OKLAHOMA STATE Goodness gracious the Cowboys rolled Houston's defense hard. Among the notable accomplishments, the Cowboys were 10 of 13 on third down, had four touchdown drives of less than two minutes, four touchdown drives of four plays or less, and 699 yards of total offense.
BUM STEER, OFFENSE (TEAM): COLORADO The Buffs out-fail the Aggies because A&M both played a tougher opponent and can plausibly blame the injury to Goodson. Colorado was just plain mediocre against a 1-AA opponent. As noted above, the biggest problem is on the offensive line and if the rushing game suffers in conference play, the Buffs are going to struggle mightily to keep up with the racehorses on the other side.
TOP PERFORMER, OFFENSE (INDIVIDUAL): KENDALL HUNTER & DEZ BRYANT, OKLAHOMA STATE How do you choose between Hunter's 210 yards and 2 touchdowns on 22 carries and Bryant's 236 yards and 3 touchdowns on 9 catches? You don't.
BUM STEER, OFFENSE (INDIVIDUAL): DARRELL SCOTT, COLORADO Screwing with Mack Brown in your recruitment is... not smart.
PB'S POWER RANKINGS
Last week's rank in parentheses.
1. Oklahoma (1) - They are Evil. But they are very good. And all but guaranteed to be 5-0 on October 11.
2. Missouri (2) - The Tigers next host the team Tech just beat in Reno; a blowout looks eminent.
3. Texas (3) - The upside of this team is apparent; how quickly they'll get there remains the big question.
4. Texas Tech (4) - Ask any Tech fan whether they would have preferred to beat Nevada 65-60 or the way they actually did and they'll answer the latter.
5. Oklahoma State (5) - We knew the offense could be outstanding. We remain doubtful the defense can be anything other than awful.
6. Kansas (6) - The trip to Tampa will tell us a lot about this year's Jayhawks. Finding the running game is critical.
7. Nebraska (7) - Only Colorado's flop against an even weaker opponent saves them from being the division's dogs for the week.
8. Kansas State (9) - Through two games, Josh Freeman has been the player his most fervent believers argue he can be. The rest of us will wait for an opponent with a pulse.
9. Colorado (8) - Only last week's win over a 1A opponent keeps them from falling behind Baylor.
10. Baylor (11) - RO-BERT GRI-FFIN! [clap clap clap-clap-clap]
11. Texas A&M (10) - It is so unfair we did not get to see A&M go 0-12 with Stephen McGee. So. Unfair.
12. Iowa State (12) - Baby steps, ISU. Baby steps.
1 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
Giving OU to much credit.
PB, you are giving OU a little too much credit. While they are the best team so far in the conference, they don’t look like the best team stoops has rolled in Norman. The 2003 which collapsed at the end of the season looked the best for the first 11 games of the season. I don’t think they are that good defensively. Teams will be able to move the ball on them and Bradford is a statue at QB.
If you can get pressure on him i.e. WVU you can slow them down. For me, their key weapon is Gresham who is an absolute monster. He seems to torch every team he plays. For us to slow them down we have got to find a way to take away Gresham from Bradford.
Don’t get me wrong my fear factor for OU is like 20 out of 10, because I don’t really know just how good this Texas team is, but OU is not going to blow us away.
by longhornboy on Sep 7, 2008 8:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Fair point
Again, I just said you could make the argument. It’s too soon to say one way or the other, but they look loaded offensively like never before, especially with those five senior OLs.
As for Gresham – yikes. Scary, scary football player.
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Sep 7, 2008 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
just out of curiosity
How much did Lamarr Houston’s absence make a difference on the D-Line’s effectiveness last night? Seems like Aaron Lewis didn’t get a whole lot of production at all – would we all be carping less about sloppy D about if Houston had not sat out?
by longhornglory on Sep 7, 2008 9:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It made a difference
especially in the run defense. Texas was slanting into the gaps between offensive linemen most of the game and Roy Miller got penetration, but Lewis never really did. He also had almost no pressure on the QB. I think it made a big difference in letting UTEP get their feet under them and into an offensive rhythm in the first half.
by burnt in ny on Sep 8, 2008 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, at least you have A&M closer to what we should be
I think our weak OL and our issues on defense will have us looking like the ‘06 2-10 Colorado team by year’s end. Hope I’m wrong, though.
This is an improvement from last week’s outlook of 0-12, though. I’m now staring 1-11 in the face. We might get by Army.
Re: OU’s Jermaine Gresham, Stoops once compared him to Adrian Peterson, but at TE. This is high praise for him. He might be OU’s best TE since Keith Jackson was winning All-American awards there.
Re: Baylor’s Robert Griffin. Basically, Griffin is just what they need at Baylor. In the first year of a new system with a new coach, with the current talent on campus, Baylor wasn’t going to a bowl game this season. However, Griffin gives them an exciting X-factor on offense, someone to actually come to the game to watch play. Building a fanbase is a good first step for Baylor. Griffin gives them a chance to win some shootouts, which is really all they can ask for this season.
Granted, Northwestern (LA) State sucks, but a blowout win is a blowout win. This is the first time Bayloe has scored 50+ in a while, I believe.
Re: Missouri and Okie State: I think both of these teams are more alike than you think. Ridiculous offenses, horrific defenses.
I think Kansas is about to come crashing down to earth against USF.
I do think the fact that Arkansas can pass for 300+ yds per game should worry you a little with your secondary.
by Beergut on Sep 7, 2008 9:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
army just lost to New Hampshire
so I don’t think you have a whole lot to worry about there…
by longhornglory on Sep 8, 2008 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How do you find the time
to write this ON TOP of the earlier piece looking at UT-UTEP. My hat’s off to you.
Great stuff, incisive, funny, the kind of information and analysis daily newspapers (or, going way way back) the weekly Texas Football Magazine newsletters used to provide. Neither exists anymore; well, the first exists, but on life support.
Agreed: OU looks scary, but they were a near-unanimous pick to win the Big 12. That kind of team should be scary. Ohio State and Clemson were similar picks, and do not look scary.
As for the weakness of the Big 12 schedule, two points: (1) Why play anybody tough, even if you can find ‘em; the only penalty a team pays for a weak opponent is the lost opportunity to improve players’ skills; (2) Some of these games are the result of the addition of a 12th game on short notice in early 2006. I expect some of the I-AA’s to disappear in another season or two. Of course, the Big 12 may have to designate one MAC or Sun Belt opponent as a “league” game.
by edsp on Sep 7, 2008 10:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
True
You’re absolutely right, and I think Wells has previously articulated this argument well: It’s not necessarily in a team’s interest to schedule hard. It sucks for the fans, but it’s not exactly irrational either.
Thanks for the kind words, as well. Have enjoyed your comments the last month.
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Sep 7, 2008 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't buy the weak non-conference schedule argument, honestly
In all seriousness, almost every BCS school schedules weak non-conference schedules. In a system where there is no playoff to determine the national champion, and one win can disqualify you from consideration (unless your name is LSU and the year is 2007 and the media really, really, REALLY likes you), there is nothing wrong with scheduling a I-AA opponent for a glorified scrimmage in your first game. Granted, you have your exceptions like USC-UVA or Clemson-Bama, but those are few and far between. Even after playing a tough opener like Clemson, Bama still has some sweet, sweet cake to feast on later. The SEC, for all their hype as the toughest conference in the land, regularly feats on cupcakes.
Yes, it sucks for the fan who shells out big bucks to see his favorite team play, but I have never had a problem attending a blowout win over a weak opponent. At least one team is playing well.
I think the ideal non-conference schedule is a “bought” win to open the season, so the team can get its legs under it and adjust to the new season, a midly competitive second game (ala Rice or UTEP or New Mexico for A&M), then a name team to get the fans excited and the team ready for conference play (Miami in A&M’s case). With the addition of the fourth non-conference game, you pretty much have to add another “buy” win to fill out that fourth game.
My suggestion for teams with open spots on their schedule is to look into the patriotic option: Call up Navy or Air Force or Army. Your fans will enjoy a home-and-home with any of those schools, you get the patriotic gameday warm fuzzies from playing an academy school, and Navy and Air Force will offer enough of a challenge to keep it interesting.
I must also say, I wait 8 months out of the year for college football season; I’ll be damned if I’m going to complain about who is playing who when it arrives.
by Beergut on Sep 8, 2008 12:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you
I have never had a problem attending a blowout win over a weak opponent. At least one team is playing well.
With that argument in mind, maybe they should schedule some high schools or Long John Silver impersonators. I guess that’s where we are.
The problem with your ideal non-conference schedule is that most fans aren’t interested in watching a crappy game just to watch the offense or defense. If the team has already played a crappy team, then they have one game they can take their kids to, the kids will stay interested because there is a lot of scoring.
Schedule two of these and fans are still buying season tickets as long as they think the team is good. If the team isn’t good, then people aren’t going to shell out for the season ticket, and they’ll avoid the crappy games. Over the long haul, it’s not good for the game, not good for the school.
Whenever you reduce the quality of the product, it costs you. It may not be today, but it will cost you.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
by corn blight on Sep 8, 2008 7:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think...
Nebraska fans would sell out the stadium to watch the Huskers play a middle school team. But that’s just my opinion.
We'll carry the banner high!
by TB on Sep 8, 2008 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair statement
but the thing is… if we don’t improve, that sell-out streak may fall. it won’t this year, but give it another 5-7 season or 6-6 season, and more crappy games, and it will happen.
Nothing lasts forever.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
by corn blight on Sep 9, 2008 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Ideal Schedule
It will never happen, but…
I always thought that it should be part of the BCS that some portion of the non-conference schedule should be required to be with other BCS schools.
With the current 12 game schedule, Id like to see 2 of those be BCS required opponents.
Maybe you could even be a little more suave about it and make one of them come from the top half of teams in terms of win percentage from the previous year and one from the bottom half, selected at random.
Then schedule whoever you want as your first two tune-ups, but your conference schedule, and your 2 BCS games are taken outside of the college’s decision making, and at least 10 games a year are with BCS quality opponents. And eventually youd get those Texas vs MIchigan, or Florida vs USC type games that everyone but the coaches should love.
Oh, and mandate that all conferences are required to play championship games.
I think you’d see a lot less undefeated teams (have there been that many anyway?), and while not a playoff, at least a better cross matching of teams for the championship games than we have now.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Sep 8, 2008 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I too love Robert Griffin
I wish he was turning around the UH program right about now.
by jc25 on Sep 8, 2008 9:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Sherman cut a commanding figure on the sidelines?
The silly-looking agric-blob, shrouded in a maroon tent, didn’t look like he was doing much coaching at all, the few times I cut over to that game.
I'll never forget ol' what's-his-name.
by Horntod on Sep 8, 2008 11:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Darrel Scott
…can suck it. And it’s Dar-ril. I love this Kids In The Hall sketch…
It's Mean to Ween
by Bombilla on Sep 8, 2008 11:57 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Time to get over it
Shoulder to Shoulder...The Ralphie Report - All CU, All the Time http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Sep 8, 2008 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I look forward
to Sergio Kindle reminding Darrel Scott of the mistake he made.
It's Mean to Ween
by Bombilla on Sep 8, 2008 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are there many better names than Darrill?
Yes, there are 17 better names.
17 better names that Darrill?!
No, only five.
by Meekrob on Sep 8, 2008 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bum Steer award for Darrell Scott???
Give it to the CU offensive line. No where to go. He had 2 ridiculous runs and some good receptions out of the backfield.
Shoulder to Shoulder...The Ralphie Report - All CU, All the Time http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Sep 8, 2008 2:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Giving Tech too much credit, I think.
Actually I think I’d prefer to have beaten Nevada by the same margin but a much higher score. Graham Harrell has the worst game of his career in his 26th start? That terrifies me. The defense gives up a thousand yards? Offense gets outgained?
All the Nevada game did was made me wonder whether we’re bad… on both sides of the ball.
by Skin Patrol on Sep 8, 2008 10:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs



























