Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The USA TODAY/Bloody Elbow Top 50 MMA Fights Ever, I


Morning Coffee Talks Strategy

Tim Tebow wants an embedded journalist. I approve. When earlier today I heard Thom Brennaman’s boyfriend is coming back for his senior season, my first thought was, "Damn…. Maybe Percy Harvin and Brandon Spikes will decide to come back, too, setting up a repeat run for the Gators reminiscent of their 2006-07 national title run in basketball." But as I sat down to write this morning’s notes an entirely different thought popped into my head: Oh this could be good for Texas... Real good.

Talking to Big Roy on the phone earlier tonight, we were discussing some of the similarities between 2004 and 2008, and whether any of them suggested for next year’s Texas team a season like 2005. Though it didn’t occur to me until just now, I have to say: Tim Tebow’s announcement may just set up yet another impossible-to-ignore parallel. The Gators are now all but guaranteed to start the 2009 season the consensus #1 team in America, a strong start will guarantee talk early and often about the Gators' potential to be the Best Team In The History Of Ever, ESPN's Shelley Smith may just find herself issued a season-long set of blue and orange knee pads, and Texas... could find itself the #2 team in hot pursuit. I've read this story before.

Did I mention that next year’s title game is in Pasadena?

Mysticism aside, Mack Brown hasn't over his career proven himself a particularly strong front-runner. Tim Tebow’s return could do wonders to prep both Brown's and the 2009 Longhorns’ attitudes for a get-nasty, prove-‘em-wrong title run like that which we saw last the last time college football's champion was crowned at the Rose Bowl.

Star-divide

The game behind the ganme. While reader Longhorn In Canada probably overstates my case, I can agree that the Titans’ loss on Saturday presented an excellent reason to revisit my December post about Jeff Fisher’s usage of Vince Young. Though a day after my article Kerry Collins made untenable the idea of being aggressive with Vince Young’s assignments (say, inserting him as a starter), there was little in Tennessee’s win over Pittsburgh that suggested to me the Titans were so set on offense that they could or should rest on their laurels.

I don't dispute at all that on Saturday Tennessee was doomed by bad luck with red zone turnovers and may well have won the game had Chris Johnson not been injured in the second quarter. Even so, I re-raise this issue not in defense of myself but to point out how the original strategic point bears relevance to Texas football fans looking forward to 2009 and beyond. In particular, I’m interested in how the Titans’ Saturday struggles speak to why Jeff Fisher’s passive approach towards offensive improvement was a failure.

Even where we can all agree that Kerry Collins as starter was the right move, in moving beyond that Jeff Fisher essentially had two options: (1) Continue conservatively by banking on the status quo, which was heavily dependent on A+ defense, Chris Johnson, and mistake-free football from Collins, or (2) Aggressively try to improve that status quo by finding useful ways to deploy Vince Young, who -- for whatever his flaws -- cannot reasonably be limited to "Starter instead of Collins" or "Not used at all." Fisher (predictably) chose the first path, the Titans caught a few bad breaks against the Ravens, the team scored just 10 points, and the group’s outstanding regular season was squandered in a home loss. Hindsight may be 20-20, but the point was never that Jeff Fisher needed to turn to Vince Young unnecessarily, but that they’d be better prepared for the playoffs if they did so at least in some capacity: Either the Titans thrive as Kerry Collins plays great football, the defense dominates, and Vince Young as an offensive supplement winds up a luxury Fisher doesn’t need to deploy, or.... During the playoffs the Titans find themselves in a particular situation in which Young’s well-established talents are of use and the Titans are better for it.

While we don’t know whether strategically working Vince Young into the offense would have rescued the Titans from the misfortunes which plagued them against Baltimore, we can say that Jeff Fisher’s unwillingness to adopt a proactive "improvement strategy," as I’m calling it, foreclosed the option when the nightmare scenario in fact unfolded with Chris Johnson’s second quarter injury.

Sound familiar? While both Fisher and Collins are to be commended for their 2008 seasons, the failure to think aggressively about ways to use what Vince Young can offer (and working to implement those talents in support of the offense) is exactly the kind of mistake I was talking about when discussing opportunities I didn’t want Mack Brown and Greg Davis to squander. And just as hyper-defenders of Brown/Davis miss the point when pointing to what we’re already doing well, so too do Titans fans who only talk about why Fisher was right to go with Kerry Collins as his Main Guy. The victory is shallow, because a team'sultimate success will be measured by its ability to beat the best, when it counts the most. And in that regard, settling for good and hoping for the best is a strategic failure.

Leave no doubt. Let’s finish this point, because it’s an important one for framing how we talk about what (even indisputably successful) football coaches need to do better. One of the smarter moves I thought Jim Tressel made in the Fiesta Bowl was his aggressive attempt to use Todd Boeckman against the Longhorns. While Boeckman’s general mediocrity hardly allowed him to punish the Texas defense, the strategic impact of the tactic helped the Buckeyes in not at all insignificant ways. Consider the domino effect:

  1. Boeckman's competent passing ability forced Texas to honor the pass as legitimate option.
  2. Texas was therefore less able to hone in on the Buckeyes' ground attack.
  3. Texas' defenders were critically hamstrung in their efforts to get used to Terrelle Pryor as a runner (OSU's best offensive plays of the night). OSU's diversity made adjusting to the unique angles a defender has to take on him all the harder.

In evaluating Tressel's offensive game plan, then, the point is not that Pryor was clearly the more effective offensive player, but that Jim Tressel (by strategically using Boeckman as a legitimate passing threat) succeeded in making the task for Will Muschamp's defense more difficult. At that point in Pryor's young career, an offensive attack exclusively featuring TP under center would have in important ways helped both Will Muschamp (play caller) and his defenders (pursuers). Etc, etc.

Though OSU's offensive game plan wasn't a masterpiece, for the purposes of the point at hand the key takeaways for Mack Brown, Greg Davis, Jeff Fisher, or anyone else lies in appreciating, first, that aggressively seeking improvements in your offensive strategy is imperative, and second, that doing so should be a consistent, sustained, season-long process. Failure to do so at all (The NFL in general/Jeff Fisher) is indefensible. Doing so only as a last resort (Tressel) renders the effort suboptimal. And only doing soin full force against the best (Davis/Brown) misses a crucial part of the point in doing so at all.

As you start to think about a 2009 title run to Pasadena, let that sink in, Texas fans. This issue isn't black and white -- Mack Brown and Greg Davis had an indisputably terrific season in almost every regard. But where we can dismiss the "sunshine pumpers" vs "haters" debate is that point where I can high five a fellow fan for what we did accomplish and point to those things which didn't work out and need to serve as lessons for summiting the mountain heading forward. The OU game plan was an absolute gem; the tentative approach during the first half in Lubbock needs to serve as a lessoned learned... The 12-1 season was one for the ages; the erosion in "strategic attack" (once we became favorites) must inform our approach as frontrunners in 2009.

Assume nothing, settle for nothing -- whether underdog or favorite. Losses are losses and bad luck is bad luck.... but never leave oneself open to the criticism that more could have been done. Balls to the wall. Be all you can be. Whatever it is... take it to heart: Start in the spring, carry it over at 7 a.m. throughout the summer, and ride it hard from the first game to the very last, whether it's Wyoming, Oklahoma, Texas Tech... or Tim Tebow himself.

0 recs | Comment 17 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Agree with the 2005 analogy

Only problem is if USC also finds a way to run the table, we won’t be in the Rose Bowl. ESPN will hype up Florida vs USC as much as possible and will do their best with persuasion to hope the humans vote those 2 teams 1 and 2.

by goingforthecorner on Jan 12, 2009 11:34 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The shoe at night

I know its a long shot, but I’m hoping Ohio State cuts all that talk with a win over those jokers in Columbus.

"Stats are for losers, I like winning games."

by bendj on Jan 12, 2009 11:38 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You make an excellent point

about Trojans in Columbus. They also have to visit Berkeley, South Bend and Eugene — 4 tough road venues. And USC’s defense will be almost entirely new.

by edsp on Jan 12, 2009 3:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, I'm sure he would.....not.....just another overhyped defense....

similar to USC….not bad, but not perfect like some tend to think. Titans offense isn’t exactly scary….

by SneezyBeltran on Jan 12, 2009 5:49 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Re:
Oh this could be good for Texas… Real good.

Here’s 9 more reasons why:

1. 2008 preseason #1: Georgia
2. 2007 preseason #1: USC
3. 2006 preseason #1: Ohio State
4. 2005 preseason #1: USC
5. 2003 preseason #1: OU
6. 2002 preseason #1: Miami
7. 2001 preseason #1: Florida
8. 2000 preseason #1: Nebraska
9. 1998 preseason #1: Ohio State

Since the inception of the BCS, only two teams have started and ended at #1: USC in ’04 and Florida State in ’99.

by jc25 on Jan 12, 2009 11:38 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Problem...

That’s a 5 year span between those two occurrences, and guess what? It’s been 4 years since that happened last… =\

"Either we need to re-calibrate our rectangle, or Alfonzo Marquez is not having a good night." - Josh Lewin

by utlonghorn24 on Jan 12, 2009 2:08 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I could not agree more

The NFL is the same way, only one #1 seed has won the super bowl in the last decade….Its my experience that being the favorite usually isn’t a good thing.

by GoComets! on Jan 12, 2009 12:30 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So all of the parallels...

Texas, fresh off a last second bowl win over a perennial Big 10 powerand a one loss season, returns a freak at QB. The award winning defensive force of nature graduates, but a young secondary shows promise. Meanwhile, the defending champs, fresh off of stomping OU, return their Heisman winning QB for his senior year, and are being suckled regularly by the national media. Meanwhile the Sooners are looking at a down year, hemmoraging talent.

What did I miss?

by ctex80 on Jan 12, 2009 1:16 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What you're missing and what PB

either missed or omitted in his typically cogent post is the very significant difference between the 2005 USC and the 2009 Florida. Whereas most USC lost their best defenders from 2004, Florida will have either most or THE ENTIRE 2 DEEP coming back. Moreover, the USC offense from that year is much more analagous to this years’s OU O, if not in scheme than in production, glitz and, ultimately, softness. The Florida O, while sufficiently high scoring is much more notable for just such toughness, exemplified and embodied by Tebow. (Incidentally, however sickening the Tebow love may be it is much more warranted and less offensive than that given to Leinert whom I found much more distatasteful).

All this, of course, highlights the importance of PB’s principal point: that Mack and GD must push the envelope on offense from now right through the BCSCG.

Also, we can talk about all the pressure on Florida but in truth there is a great deal of pressure on the Horns as well. We are likely to be something approaching a consensus number 2 and speaking for myself and I’m sure a huge majority of Horn fans, anything short of a trip to Pasadena will be a real disappointment. Once we achieve that the burden will be exclusively on Florida but in the meantime we will have to play as favorites and as PB points out, Mack and GD have not uniformly done their best work in these cirucmstances. Let’s hope they heed his admonitions.

marshalld

by duras on Jan 12, 2009 2:16 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

All this, of course, highlights the importance of PB’s principal point: that Mack and GD must push the envelope on offense from now right through the BCSCG.

This need for a novel way of approaching offense is what scares me the most. Mack & co recognized the need for something right before last year’s Holiday Bowl and carried that same attitude clear through this Fiesta Bowl win. I like the idea of treating your bowl game as the start of your next season, with regards to attitude and scheme, so for the play-calling in the Fiesta Bowl to be wishy-washy does not get me excited.

Time will tell, however.

by TXinDC on Jan 12, 2009 2:55 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I appreciate that their defense will, in all

likelihood be better next year, however, Harvin (if he goes) would be a HUGE loss. And for all the sucking off of Tebow that has gone on, he threw 2 picks in the title game. He has one career 4th Quarter comeback win. I just don’t buy him as anything more than a product of Urban Meyer’s system + a solid power runner.

by ctex80 on Jan 12, 2009 4:11 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Excellent points.

I dont’t thnk I made it as clear as I should have in my comment, but it is the defense which is the principal distinction with USC and the reason I agree with PB that we have to develop flexibility, variety and toughness on offesne to counter it.

marshalld

by duras on Jan 12, 2009 7:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think saying Tebow is a system QB simplifies things too much

Meyer adjusts his system for the talents of the QB he starts. Tebow does things that Meyer did not (and really could not) ask Chris Leak to do.He also does things that Alex Smith couldn’t and wasn’t asked to do. Saying he is a “system QB” ignores the fact that he is needed to make this particular system work. This isn’t Tech’s Air Raid, where every QB who starts passes for 4,000+ and 30-something TDs.

Tebow has had a 3000 yds passing/30 TD season, which no one else has done in Meyer’s system (As a comparison, Vince Young only had 26 TD passes in 2005). He has completely changed the way Meyer runs his offense. To say he is a “system” QB is disingenuous, b/c in Tebow’s case, he IS the system.

I think people could make the same argument for QBs at texas under Greg Davis (and I think one commentator even tried to in McCoy’s case, saying his stats were inflated b/c he threw a lot of short passes? Anyone else remember this?). If you go back to Simms, Young, and now McCoy, Davis keeps producing record-breaking QBs for texas, and his offense stays the same. Davis tailors certain parts of his scheme to match the talents of certain players, just like Meyer does.

Just because a scheme fits a QB perfectly doesn’t mean the QB is a product of the system; it means they recruited and developed the right person to make their scheme work.

by Beergut on Jan 13, 2009 2:03 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Top 10 Games of the Mack Brown Era

Recent FanPosts

Me_small
Favorite Wash-outs
Small
Most Underrated Plays in the Mack Brown Era
Small
The Kindle Conundrum
Small
Fiercest Rivalry and Texas preview
Small
NCAA 2010 Player Ratings
Jack_small
Saving Grace
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Free event with Brown and coaching staff
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Texas Gridiron Kick-Off
Bevo_small
Let us debate.

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small PB @ BON

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Official Partner of CBS Sports