Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Texas Rolls Texas Tech in Second Half

Game Recap: Behind a strong second half offensive performance and an entire game of lock-down defense, Texas (13-4, 2-1) ran away from Texas Tech, 71-49, for their first conference road win of the season.

For the first time in weeks, the Texas Longhorns looked like they knew what to do on offense, at least in the second half. In the first half, Texas still struggled and led just 30-24. Some might look at a six point lead at half against a conference opponent and be pleased. Don’t be fooled into giving Pat Knight’s club too much credit. The Red Raiders are not good. They are no better than the ninth or tenth best team in the conference and only better than Colorado for sure. Texas Tech does not have great athletes, only has one player opponents have to game plan for, in Alan Voskuil, and doesn’t play pressure defense or force the tempo, which often helps inferior teams stay competitive. No, this was a road game that the Longhorns had to win and should win convincingly.

In the second twenty minutes, Texas did just that. Damion James (game high 18 pts) came alive on offense with timely three pointers, on-balance pull-up jumpers, and cuts to the basket which left the Tech defenders trailing. Longhorn fans also witnessed the "true" Justin Mason (15 pts) in the second half. Mason was a difference maker on both ends. He played solid defense, slashed to the basket in the half-court, and even knocked down a three pointer.

Star-divide

As solid as the offense was in the second half, the defense was just as impressive. Texas held Tech to 24 points in the first half and just 25 in the second, making Tech the third Texas opponent who failed to reach 50 points for the game.

This may overstate things slightly, but in the half-court, Tech couldn’t score. Texas did a fantastic job of pressuring the basketball and caused 14 Tech turnovers. They also hedged nicely on Tech screens and played solid man-to-man defense against the Tech motion offense. Texas forced Tech into countless tough shots and put the icing on the defensive cake by controlling the defensive glass. More often than not, Tech took a tough shot, missed it, and was quickly retreating on defense.

The outcome was: Satisfying. After the let downs in Fayetteville and Norman, I didn’t know what to expect from this afternoon’s trip to Lubbock. On one hand, Tech was really bad and shouldn’t be able to hang with the Longhorns for 40 minutes. On the other hand, Texas entered the game with a severe lack of confidence on offense and full of players who could be easily defended with a sagging zone defense.

The first half was more of the same: the Texas defense showed up, and will always be able to keep the ‘Horns in games, but the offense was still not clicking and preventing Texas from dominating an inferior opponent. Things quickly changed after the break as Texas scored the first five points of the half and never looked back.

Stat of the Game: Rebounds 37-25. Texas had the athletic advantage at every position, and it showed prominently through the battles on the glass. Justin Mason (10 rebounds), Damion James (8 rebounds), and Gary Johnson (7 rebounds) owned the glass on both ends. As already mentioned, Texas didn’t allow Tech second looks at the basket while grabbing 12 offensive rebounds of their own. That number would have probably been higher had the ‘Horns not shot 44% from the floor.

The Offensive MVP was: Damion James. In order for basketball teams to be great, they need three legitimate scorers. Texas knew coming into the season that AJ Abrams would provide the scoring from the perimeter, and after the non-conference season, it became clear that the combination of Gary Johnson and Dexter Pittman could provide a scoring threat in the post. The scoring threat from the wing was missing though. Despite coming into the season as a potential NBA lottery pick by season’s end and a likely All Big XII selection, James has struggled to adjust to the small forward position. His shot has been off and his handle more than a little shaky. DaMo has even started to let his offensive frustrations affect his entire game.

This afternoon in Lubbock, Damion looked like the Damion we all hoped we’d see all season. His shot selection was great, his passing and dribbling were under control, and he began to call for the basketball, as you could literally see his confidence rising. It goes without saying that Texas is an entirely different offensive club when more than Abrams is threat to score facing the basket.

The Defensive MVP was: Justin Mason. This is as much about a complete performance as it is about anything Mase did specifically on the defensive end. Mason scored 15 points on a variety of scoring drives in the lane while also adding 10 boards to complete his double-double performance. On defense, Mase did a good job keeping the Tech guards out of the lane and contesting three-pointers by Voskuil and John Roberson.

This was a complete team defensive performance, though, and reminiscent of the lock-down defense we saw from the ‘Horns to start the year. They played great team defense and rotated to the ball on drives and overplays by their teammates. Tech shot a horrendous 34% from the floor, turned the ball over 14 times, and never got the backdoor lay ups the motion offense is suppose to create.

Bench: Gary Johnson, in his first start of the season, replaced Dexter Pittman to start the game. For this one, the bench consisted of Dogus Balbay, Varez Ward, Pittman, Clint Chapman, Matt Hill, and Harrison Smith. Pittman, Chapman and Smith all played just the final two minutes of the first half and were not factors in the game. Ward played just eight minutes and may be in the same dog house as Pittman is. Varez is averaging 15 minutes per game on the season but played less than ten in Norman and again this afternoon.

So, the bench play was not extensive at all. Balbay played decently in the first half as he looked to finish himself instead of pass after penetrating into the lane. Dogus finished with six points, a couple of rebounds, and a couple of assists in 19 minutes. Balbay was the only Longhorn who failed to play solid defense without fouling. His four personal fouls was probably the reason he didn’t see more action in the second half.

Hill was a nice surprise for the ‘Horns. After playing more than ten minutes in just one game this season, Matt was on the floor for 27 minutes and responded with six points and five rebounds. Before we get too excited, though, let me point out that Texas Tech is one of the few conference teams with athletes that Hill can match up with. Against most other conference foes, Matt’s lack of lateral quickness on defense and fear of shooting the basketball will severely hurt the Longhorns. But today, nice job.

Three Things: (1) Team offense is more effective than AJ-centric offense. As Johnson scored in the paint and James and Mason attacked from the wings, the Texas offense was less reliant on AJ’s three-pointer and consequently, much more difficult to defend. In the last couple of games, opponents have been able to overplay Abrams and camp the other four defenders in the lane daring Texas to shoot perimeter jumpers. Today, Texas didn’t settle for jumpers and attacked the basket relentlessly. The Longhorns were rewarded not just in terms of higher percentage shots but also in trips to the free throw line. As a team, Texas was 15-of-20 from the stripe. I am going to begin to sound like a broken record: the more consistent James can be from the wing, the more open looks Abrams will get and the less congested the lane will be for Gary and Dex.

(2) Still waiting for Connor. The Longhorns improved a lot this afternoon in Lubbock. However, the one ‘Horn who is still searching is Connor Atchley. Connor played just 17 minutes as Barnes went small and with Hill in spots. Atchley took just two shots, missing both, and grabbed a couple of rebounds. He was whistled for two quick fouls in the first half, sat the bench, and never appeared to be mentally in the game. I, for one, am rooting hard for Connor. When AJ is getting overplayed and Mason and James are not able to knock down perimeter jumpers, it can be Atchley who forces the defense to play honestly and not just clog the lane. When Connor is on the court opposite Gary or Dex, as he usually is, the Longhorns are really playing a four out, one in offense. If those four face-the-basket players aren’t threats to hit three-pointers, there is nothing to prevent double or triple teaming of the post. I have this gut feeling that Connor is ready to break out with three or four treys and save Texas sometime soon. Keep your head up, Connor. We’re going to need you.

(3) The Big XII is a winnable league. Oklahoma also grabbed a conference road win and now sits at 3-0 with two wins already away from Norman. As bad as we looked on Monday, I still think this team has a chance to put it together on offense and grind our way toward another conference title. In order for that to happen, Texas will probably need to get to 12-4 in the Big XII. We get there by not losing a home game and adding road wins at Tech, at Colorado, and at Nebraska and then stealing a road win at Baylor, A&M, or Oklahoma State. If you’d asked me if this was possible at halftime, I would have said no. Now, after watching the ‘Horns play together on offense for 20 minutes, who knows.

Box Score

NEXT GAME: Home vs. Texas A&M – Saturday 1/24 7:00 p.m. ESPNU

0 recs  |  Comment 36 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Boy, talk about covering a spread!

It was only Texas -6.5. A few thoughts (can’t really give much since I couldn’t watch the game).

- I’m not going to make TOO much out of this impressive blowout, because Texas Tech sucks. Absolutely terrible. It’s not a coincidence that Texas State and Texas Southern gave us better games, because both teams would probably beat Tech.

- It’s good to have you back Justin Mason. Surprising boxscore with a FG% over 50%, with 15 points. But more than anything, it was just nice to see him active out there like I’ve been accustomed to. His 6 offensive rebounds meant more to me than his 15 points. Welcome back Damion James as well. I hope this continues.

- Rick Barnes’ message. ESPN box score says Pittman only got 1 minute. Obviously, Dexy was one of the guys that was pissing off Barnes because of his defense and effort. That’s kinda disappointing to see, because I’ve become a big fan of his inside presence, but hopefully he earns some playing time in the future. On the other hand, Matt Hill gets 27 minutes. Pretty clear that Barnes is a big fan of him. 17 minutes for Connor and 2 for Chaps.

- We played a crappy team, but one thing big thing that should come out of this game was the outstanding shot distribution. 14 shots for James, 12 for Johnson, and just 10 shots for Abrams. All I can say is I hope this continues. I’m ok with feeding Abrams if he’s hot, but it’s important to keep James and Johnson involved. Even though Dexy barely played, we need to feed him when he’s active as well.

by goingforthecorner on Jan 17, 2009 7:21 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Why This Thread, Now?

Okay, after the OU loss not one, not one single post was on this site that recapped the OU debacle, NOT ONE single post was here in the entire stretch since Monday to Saturday since that happened, yet, WOW!, within hours here’s the post on the win over Tech?

What gives?

I never thought of BON as a hack website for only abashed supporters of the Longhorns, good results only to be reported on. Instead, bad stuff, just turn the other head, offer no analysis, no critique, no reflection on what went wrong.

While I enjoy the information BON provides me and gives me insights on the state of the athletic programs, I suppose the omission of the OU game analysis entirely, for five full days, but the immediate inclusion of the Tech analysis tells me that this site might as well be as reliable and informative as the UT athletics site, which similarly ignores losses like they didn’t happen and extols the virtues of the program when wins happen.

I can do without fan websites that only focus on the good, not the areas of improvement necessary for the team I care about and follow, the University of Texas Longhorns.

This sequence of events has succeeded at changing my opinion of BON in ways I never thought I would. It leaves me with the impression that you guys are just mouthpieces for Deloss Dodds and the athletic department. Did they underwrite your website fees in exchange for your silence on bad outcomes?

Just wondering.

by RMHorn on Jan 17, 2009 9:39 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Hmm...

Actually it has much more to do with what each of us does for a living. Simply put, I didn’t have time to write a preview or a review Monday night’s game at OU. I work. A lot. And get paid to do so.

It has absolutely nothing to do with anything that you are implying. It has everything to do with the amount of free time that I have to write about Texas basketball.

I love the Texas Longhorns and write about them as much as I can. But I don’t get paid to do so and that is ok. However, I do have other responsibilities than BON. I would love to write about Texas basketball for a living but that is not the case right now.

Thanks for your comments. Glad to see that you’re not totally spoiled by all the great and free content that all of the authors provide.

--AW--

by awiggo on Jan 17, 2009 9:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

I’ll try not to fly on game day next time.

Thanks for the feedback.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Jan 17, 2009 10:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Over reaction of the year?

Pretty soon he will be talking about the black helicopters controlled by the UN that are ghost writing for BON

by Wells on Jan 17, 2009 10:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Do yourself a favor

Just go ahead and make a new BON account so you can start from scratch. You will never live this down.

by goingforthecorner on Jan 17, 2009 11:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeez

I posted a fanpost about the OU game on Jan 13th entitled Texas got rolled in OK, Dbag.

by jimmer on Jan 18, 2009 10:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Look

I’ve enjoyed reading your stuff in the past. And I understand that many of the contributors contribute out of love of the Horns, not financial remuneration.

But that doesn’t explain away the fact that this site had nada, zip, zilch, ZERO in terms of post game analysis of the OU loss. I’ve followed this site for a couple of years now. Never have I seen as glaring an omission of coverage as I’ve seen since Monday’s loss.

It surprised me quite a bit. And I initially suspected that the work and study schedules of the main contributors to BON lined up to prevent the analysis I’ve grown accustomed to. But then seeing this post so quickly after the win, while to this very moment no dedicated post was ever made that analyzed the OU loss has shown itself here begs the question, “Why”?

Spoiled? I suppose; BON has always been great before. But why NOTHING on the OU game? In a fantasy world I (and UT) don’t get to live in I suppose skipping over unfavorable chapters is a pretty convenient way to deal with bad stuff. My overreaching point was that I didn’t think BON was a fantasy world fan website, that’s why I added it to my bookmarks and to a blog I maintain.

Never bringing up OU loss in the course of the FIVE days since that game ended, but going straight to Tech win in fewer than five hours after it ended begs the question and concern. It leaves me quite perplexed and ready to change my viewing of BON to only include post-win games, but knowing that post-loss games will be ignored. If UT wins out, I’ll keep checking the site out; if UT loses any games I’ll know that BON will have nothing to critique and I might as well wait until UT wins again to check back to read only the accolades.

by RMHorn on Jan 17, 2009 10:03 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Was A Fan Post

Or Fan Shot, or whatever it was, but it wasn’t a main post. Sorry, but the posts on the right side of this page from fans, not the main guys, don’t really interest me much – they’re usually devoid of information I deem reliable, and don’t contain information I’m all that intrigued by, so, I can’t say as I read them regularly – the title has to catch my eye. Jimmer’s post was nice, but not information I give as much weight to as PB’s or AW’s, or what they deem worthy of moving from the Fan Post section to the main screen shot area.

by RMHorn on Jan 17, 2009 10:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude

it is Saturday, OU game was on Tuesday. There is the difference. Stop being such an ass.

by Wells on Jan 17, 2009 10:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

More to the point

This is the FIRST game in nearly four years that we haven’t covered. It’d be one thing if we only wrote after wins and ignored losses.

To pick the one game we didn’t cover — which happened to be a loss — and draw the conclusion that we’re cheerleaders for Deloss Dodds… well, that’s just a special brand of bullshit.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Jan 17, 2009 10:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I Concede

The point – Dodds stuff was overreaction

by RMHorn on Jan 17, 2009 11:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Monday

but whatever. That was the difference in the reviews. Not that I have to explain myself to RMHorn but here you go.

OU game was Monday night. After it, I went to sleep. Today’s game was mid day and I purposefully made sure that I had to time to write after its conclusion.

Sorry to have spent an hour or so putting together the review. Next time, I guess I’ll just wait a few days so that you have somthing else to complain about.

--AW--

by awiggo on Jan 17, 2009 10:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Was On Monday

I conceded I overreacted, as you wrote earlier. But you’re “ass” comment…pretty much makes you an asshole.

by RMHorn on Jan 17, 2009 11:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Since I am an asshole

I will go ahead and point this out:
you’re = you are
your is the possessive pronoun you are looking for.

by Wells on Jan 19, 2009 10:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This is completely asinine.

You think because they have website privledges, they know more about a perticular subject than the rest of us? Wells is right, you are being an ass.

-rBr-

by run Bevo run on Jan 18, 2009 1:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

f

way to encourage people never to contribute to the site. i was really looking forward to an OU post also. of course, AW and PB give better analysis than me, but at least i tried to help those that were looking for some discussion on the game. toolbag. yeah, i’m the asshole.

by jimmer on Jan 18, 2009 10:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Still waiting for your Fan Post on the game

We write for free. And we even provide you the tools to write about it yourself, so instead of singling out the one game in the past four years that we didn’t cover, why don’t you spend your own free time writing about the OU game.

We do the best we can covering UT sports while working jobs, going to law school, trying to maintain relationships, and all the rest.

If life gets in the way of covering one game and this is the conclusion you draw, I’d suggest the thin air is getting to you. Talk about fantasyland.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Jan 17, 2009 10:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Take it as a Compliment & Slam

I mean that in all sincerity. I know you do what you do for free, and I’ve read here about your schedules and study commitments. And I thank you for it.

But…there were many posts on the open game day thread that anticipated you or AW’s write up after the game, nope. And I checked back here throughout the week hoping one of you would break it down, or you’d take a post from the Fan Post section that you thought captured the essence of what fans needed to understand coming out of the shellacking we suffered and move it into the main area, nope.

It was like Monday in Norman didn’t happen. As much as I wanted UT Men’s BB put an exclamation point on what the FB team did after the BCS BS I wanted UT to win, and was hugely disappointed that they couldn’t dig deep and find a way. And I dearly desired to read other fans who know BB much better than I break down why that didn’t happen. I’m STILL waiting.

If I had insights about BB, contacts on the team, and could actually watch all the games from Denver I’d enjoy being a contributor, rather than a consumer. But I don’t know BB intimately well enough to analyze a game, I don’t have contacts on the team, and I don’t get all of the games here in the Rocky Mountains.

Take it as a compliment that BON has become such a well-regarded source of information on UT athletics that people visit the site to thoroughly enjoy the info you share. But with you providing such complete information for as long as you have comes an expectation that it will always be available. Kinda like..my newspaper delivery. I don’t remember the days it shows up, but you’d better believe I remember both times it hasn’t in the past few years.

The fact that this omission came after a loss, something that UT fans fortunately haven’t had many of in recent years, is what magnifies it. Okay, I ought not have impugned your character with my reference to Deloss Dodds and website fees, as Wells wrote it was an overreaction on my part. I suppose I deeply craved a solid, competent break down of the OU game that I could trust (compliment) and between UT’s website, AAS, etc. such a break down was lacking. Being out of state makes getting real, good information a premium to access.

Maybe you guys can write about the Tech game and include comparisons to the OU game, what could be explained by improved UT play, and what could be attributed to UT playing solid Top 10 Big 12 competition like OU vs. mediocre Big 12 competition like TTU.

by RMHorn on Jan 17, 2009 11:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't the mods recap the 39-33 Tech loss?

Did you miss that one too? That destroys your whole premise that they’re a bunch of bandwagoners. If you’re really that desperate for analysis of the games, you should check out more sites like Barking Carnival, and UT sports forums like hornfans.com, and shaggybevo.com.

Now with all that said, demand has a lot to do with it too. If there was as much demand for basketball as there was for football, you’d probably get a more immediate recap. But considering how crappy we played in the OU game with all our turnovers… why would you want a recap of that shit? I know I don’t. I wanted to erase that abomination from memory ASAP.

by goingforthecorner on Jan 17, 2009 11:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know what to tell you

I was circling a blizzard in Minneapolis at 30,000 feet for the entirety of the OU game. I didn’t see it. Andrew’s work week is insane right now. Txtwster, like me, is in law school.

One game not covered in four years is just that — one game not covered in four years. I’ll stand by that record and hope we do as well over the next four.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Jan 18, 2009 12:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you took a valid point...

…and went off the cliff with it.

I got sick after my trip home from Norman, and I had a ton of friends who called to ask WTF happened to our team. While the other losses this season were all close affairs where one could argue that we beat ourselves, this was the first game in which UT was beaten soundly by an opponent. OU whipped us on Monday night, and I know a lot of people were looking for answers to questions that were raised by the beating. Changes would be coming after the loss, and, after yesterday, we saw that changes have been made.

Wiggo does such a wonderful job with the reviews that I think we all were looking forward to his analysis over the beating in Norman. I know I wanted to hear what he had to say about it. There definitely was a gap in coverage over the game, but it wasn’t planned or intentional. PB missed the game, BigRoy was writing the Recruiting Spotlights, Bevo’s Round-Up continued interrupted, and everyone else was incapacitated or unavailable for a variety of reasons. The gap in coverage definitely wasn’t part of a campaign over cheerleading for the Athletic Department and was quickly corrected by a reader creating a diary.

I agree with you about the gap in coverage for the biggest game of the season, which wont happen again for the rest of the basketball season. As someone else said in another thread, there should always be a pre-game thread, game thread, post-game thread (for big games), and then a recap/summary/analysis post for every game. And, moving forward, that isn’t going to be an issue. Just like it wasnt an issue after we lost to Arkansas, Notre Dame, and Michigan State earlier in the season.

by txtwstr7 on Jan 18, 2009 12:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The best solution...

…would have been promoting the diary to the front page or creating a timely post-game thread saying a traditional analysis would have to wait or be scrapped.

I agree that it could have been handled better, but I think any tin-foil hat theory should be—and has been—quickly laid to rest…

by txtwstr7 on Jan 18, 2009 1:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm still waiting on my ruby-encrusted rocket pony that runs on liquid gold.

________________________________
I will give my shirt for Tennessee today.

by Holly Anderson on Jan 17, 2009 10:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

My rocket pony

will run on water and pee liquid gold!
PB and AW, it seems you have created a monster. I check out BON most mornings, and then often look again later in the day. Sometimes there is no new content. What the hell are you boys doing? Falling down on the job, I say.
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGRN39oifsE
So, get with the program, and no more excuses about jobs or lives outside of BON!

(Please don’t take this seriously.)

by Longhorn in Canada on Jan 18, 2009 12:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't get to watch or listen today.

I got to listen to part of the OU game.

However, we’re all getting a betting understanding of fartknockers every day.

by whills on Jan 18, 2009 1:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm dissapointed, HB

For what I pay for this site, I expect better analysis. Oh, wait, never mind.

by Longhorn in Canada on Jan 18, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're right

My new coverage of the game:

Hook ’em!

by Horn Brain on Jan 18, 2009 12:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Much better

Thanks. I feel like I got my money’s worth.

by Longhorn in Canada on Jan 18, 2009 3:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Mission accomplished for the women

In a performance that eerily mirrored the mens’ game, the Texas women absolutely shut down Colorado at home last night. Final score was 62-32… the fewest points ever scored by the Buffaloes. A very satisfying performance by the Horns, but what does it tell us? Not much. Texas beat two teams they should have beaten at home (they handled the Huskers 74-60 on Wednesday) after losing to three teams they should have beaten on the road (Tech, Purdue and San Diego State). Good start. Now comes the stretch that will define the season and likely determine our seed for the post-season (yes, already). As mentioned before, Texas faces road games to Norman, Waco and Stillwater bracketed around the home game to probable conference champion aTm. It’s likely the Horns will lose all four of these contests and drop out of the polls for the first time this season – and find themselves squarely on the bubble. But if they can keep up this kind of stifling defense Texas might just be able to pull off one or two wins before the rematch with Tech.

With apologies to AW:

The outcome was: Impressive. Texas held Colorado to its lowest point total ever while limiting the Buffs to 27.7% shooting. The Horns kept the Buffs from scoring for nearly 8 minutes in the first half. And once again nearly everyone on the team contributed valuable minutes and points, while the Buffs’ bench scored zero points. Zero.

Stat of the Game: 15. Texas had nearly as many offensive boards as Colorado had on defense.

Offensive MVP: No surprise, it’s Kat Nash. While Brittainey Raven was supposed to be the star of this year’s team it’s the rangey blonde girl with the sweet shooting touch that is emerging as a potential Big XII First Team selection. 16 points, 7 boards, a block and a steal in just 28 minutes.

Deffensive MVP: This has to be a team award.

Bench: Outstanding. Erika has adapted to coming off the bench (as a result of Kat’s hot hand) and found her shooting touch last night with 3 straight treys in the waning minutes. Ashely Gayle also was solid, with 7 points, 5 boards and a block. She’s going to challenge Tiffany Jackson’s freshmen record for blocks at this rate.

Three Things:
1. This team can’t challenge for the conference title, or make a deep post-season run, unless Brittainey rediscovers her shooting touch and assertiveness on the offensive side of the court. We used to count on her for 20+ a game. Now she can’t even deliver double digits.
2. National championships are going to have to wait until Coach G has all of her own players on the court. With the exception of Kat Nash, the most impressive players on this team are the 3 players recruited by the current Texas head coach. Several of Conradts recruits have transferred over the past two seasons and those that remain are really struggling to adapt to Coach G’s game (particularly Aubry Cook and Earnesia Williams).
3. Woes at the charity stripe are now a bigger problem for the women than they are for the men. And that’s saying a lot. Used to be you could count on Carla, Erika and Brittainey to hit something close to 90% of their free throws. Of late they haven’t even been getting to the line very often, but when they do they’re closer to 50% than 90%. Poor FT shooting probably cost Texas the game in Lubbock (Texas went 12-for-21, Tech was 15-for-21 in a 3-point loss).

Game Recap

Still a Blaine Irby fan

by patienthornsfan on Jan 18, 2009 3:16 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Good Lord

I believe I was the first to complain about the light coverage of the OU game, but it never crossed my mind that there might be some sinister conspiracy of silence to cover up the loss. More like some busy guys whose heads are still in football season where games are on a nice weekly schedule. But no worries, once the football recruiting stories subside, they’ll have nothing else to do and we’ll get all the hoops we can handle.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Jan 18, 2009 5:40 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Over OUed

IMHO most of us were sick of OU.They screwed us out of our chance to play for the national championship.

Then we get the McFarland thing with accusations of UT cheating.

We get a bunch of negative crap posted by Okies on numerous Longhorn boards leading up to thier implosion in the MNC game.

After the game in Norman where OU seems to get all the breaks etc., most of us just took some time away befor we responded to all the Okie ugliness.

Thank you Bon for all the Horn news you can use.

by TCB Orange Dino on Jan 18, 2009 7:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Tech Game

The second half was great to watch. Our team passing was better than I have seen it all season. I am still really behind Dogus getting more minutes at the point. He has no problem getting to the bucket which really breaks down opponents defense. I thought it was a solid 19 minutes.

Nice that Mason had a solid game. AJ seemed to be looking to create (or at least run) offense instead of just looking for his shot.

It was Tech. I am really looking forward to see if we have improved our offense against a real opponent. The aggie game should shed some light.

Hook ’em

by jimmer on Jan 18, 2009 11:05 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs UC Irvine Gameflow (+/- stats included)
Horns_small
Thanks to our Men & Women in the Armed Forces
Small
The Aggies are doing just enough this year to give us a good upset.

Recent FanPosts

Bevo_small
Aggie Week: Let's hear your favorite Aggie joke.
Ut_vs_fau_8-30-2008_049_small
Poor, Disillusioned aggies
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
#2 in USA Today Coaches' Poll
Small
Ohio State and Oklahoma Uni's
Small
BCS Formula Question
2401104_1__small
The Perfect Storm of College Football
T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs Western Carolina Gameflow
Lemon_small
Pat Murphy resigns
Small
Orakpo says TCU can't hang
Clock_tower_small
The Weekly BON Hit Award Baylor

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports