Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

Morning Coffee Goes Macro, Returns To Micro

Horns_bullet_mediumState of the nation. Or, state or the nation? SI's Andy Staples takes a look at the state of national recruiting in his excellent article, sparking a series of posts by Scipio Tex over at BC about the ramifications for Texas. Basically, Staples' idea is that the key to recruiting is luring players who are geographically close, usually within 200 miles, and being close to the recruiting hotbeds of California, Texas, Florida, and the Dirty South. So what does that mean for nationally recruiting? As Scipio Tex points out, even in Texas talent isn't evenly distributed across the positions every year, which causes unbalanced classes and serious talent drop-offs. As examples, think of the linebacker situation during the Derry/Bobino/Killebrew years and the lack of quality secondary play when Huff/the Griffins/Brown/Ross matriculated and left the defensive backfield bereft of playmakers.

As a result, national recruiting is necessary to fill Texas talent gaps, but how to go about it? Scipio Tex has five recommendations:

1. Stick to the in-state knitting. When the state lacks in an area, look outside.
2. The obvious place to look to explore a need is California.
3. Obviously check out OOS legacies (Kasey Studdard) and any special coaching staff "in."
4. If there's a game changer somewhere (yes, even SEC country) who expresses a consistent interest in Texas and makes the requisite effort to demonstrate this (camp attendance, unofficials), pursue them.
5. Don't throw random darts at the national Top 100 or do Dennis Franchione-style scholarship cropduster drops. California is interesting to me because it's easy. Luring a kid from Miami isn't.

With the lack of top programs in California, it makes sense to start there when nationally recruiting, that's pretty basic logic. Add in the obvious similarities between the weather in Austin and in Southern California and the incentive is clearly there.

What Scipio Tex doesn't mention about forays into SEC country is the Will Muschamp wild card. While it doesn't make sense to actively pursue players from Florida because of the intense competition, it does make sense for Muschamp to continue to use his contacts to pick several national recruits every year to go after.

Dre Kirkpatrick and Jarvis Jones are the test cases for that theory, as Muschamp had long relationships with both from his Auburn days. Neither one is expected to choose Texas, with Kirkpatrick likely staying at home in Alabama and Jones going to Florida, lending further credence to Staples' conclusions.

It may be that Muschamp should continue to go after guys he already has relationships with for the 2010 class or so, but it may not be worthwhile to start forging new relationships with recruits if his initial efforts don't net any results. In other words, there may be something there, but if there isn't, use the time and resources to pursue Texas athletes who are much more likely to commit.

The key for out-of-state recruits, as Scipio Tex says, is to pursue the kids who have long had an interest in Texas and express that interest, like Ohio linebacker Jordan Hicks, who wears burnt orange paraphernalia around his school and paid his own way to a Texas camp last summer.

Star-divide

Horns_bullet_mediumJeffcoat, analyzed. Plano West defensive end Jackson Jeffcoat has the combination of production, pedigree, and raw talent that makes him one of the top several players in the 2010 class and a top national recruit. Analyzing most high school film comes with the caveat of the talented player you're watching going against much less talented players who will never play a down of competitive football after their high school career. What makes this bit of film so valuable is that it pits Jeffcoat against serious talent -- 2009 Texas commit Thomas Ashcraft and 2010 prospect Adam Shead of Cedar Hill.

What Jeffcoat shows ($) is his elite explosiveness off the ball, more reminiscent of a skill position player than a defensive end. Using that explosiveness, Jeffcoat can run by offensive lineman and also pursue plays from the backside, much like Alex Okafor, though Jeffcoat might even be more advanced technically. He also uses his quick feet to stutter inside and leave attempted blocker Adam Shead absolutely in the dust when the guard fails to get his hands into Jeffcoat's body. In fact, he's so fast that most offensive lineman don't even have a chance to get their hands into him. For some evidence that Ashcraft doesn't have the feet to play left tackle, Jeffcoat simply runs by him after using his hands to keep Ashcraft out of his body. He also shows an impressive slipperiness when offensive lineman try to block him, as Jeffcoat almost effortlessly avoids them when the opposing player loses their balance trying to get into his body.

Despite his long and lanky frame, he shows no problems using leverage and his lower body to stand up opposing lineman and shed them while moving laterally down the ine of scrimmage on running plays. On another play, Jeffcoat stands up two blockers, keeping his outside shoulder free to tackle the running back when entering his area.

In most of the recruiting spotlights I've written about defensive lineman recently, I've talked a lot about how few high schools players at that position have anything even approaching sound technique. Jeffcoat does, undoubtedly the result of having a father who not only played in the NFL, but currently coaches those same techniques at Houston. When combined with his natural ability, Jeffcoat's incredibly developed technique makes him almost unblockable at the high school level.

Note: Jeffcoat wears #42. The film below is not the film I analyzed, but it is worthwhile to watch because it highlights his prodigious skills, in particular his ability to get up in the air and knock down passes, with one particularly athletic play where he tips the ball in the air, then finds it and makes a diving catch.

Horns_bullet_mediumAnother 2011 basketball target. Unlike football at Texas, which operates on a year-to-year basis in offering recruits, basketball works in a much different manner, evidenced by the Longhorns already possessing two commitments for 2010 and one commitment for 2011. There is another early Texas target in that 2011 class, Wayne Blackshear of Chicago, another national recruit and recipient of an early scholarship offer.

The 6-5, 210-pound shooting guard/small forward is averaging 16 points, eight rebounds, and five blocks a game this season and possesses slashing ability, rebounding acumen, and a decent stroke out to 20 feet, as well as significant blocking prowess. He has the length to be a good defender in the future, but doesn't yet give maximum defensive effort, while also needing to improve his strength ($) and work on his ball handling.

As an example of how the success on the football field can influence basketball recruiting and the cross pollination that occurs at schools successful in basketball as well, Blackshear took an unofficial visit to Austin in the fall to take in the Missouri football game. He does say that "it would be nice" to stay in the state of Illinois, making the University of Illinois a serious contender, a school he has already visited and from which he's received an offer.

Horns_bullet_medium2010 targets: Quarterbacks. While the number of quarterbacks taken in the 2010 class may depend on whether John Chiles decides to transfer, the Longhorns will certainly take one signal-caller and perhaps one more for pure number's sake. Foremost on the list is Houston Baptist quarterback Connor Wood, who may be more of a prototypical player for what the Longhorns ask of their quarterback than even a young Colt McCoy or Garrett Gilbert. And no, that's not hyperbole. At 6-4, 210-pounds, Wood runs a 4.6 40 and, if he commits, would possibly be the most athletically gifted Texas quarterback out of high school since Vince Young, posting a 32-inch vertical at the Scout Combine. Not to say he's Vince Young, of course, because that comparison got tired a long time ago and Wood isn't even in the same stratosphere, but Wood is a better and more athletic runner in high school than either McCoy or Gilbert.

The obvious issue, of course, is that Gilbert will be in the class in front of Wood. Working that out logically, with Gilbert expected to play next season and Wood more than likely to take a redshirt year, that means Wood would have to wait until his junior season to start if Gilbert stays all four years. Three years is a long time to wait and even though Wood seems to like Texas and will seriously consider becoming a Longhorn, he will have other big-time offers to schools where he can play much more quickly. Could be the deal breaker.

After Wood, the mostly likely candidate is the other quarterback holding a February 8 junior day invite, none other than Colt's little brother, Case, who would benefit greatly from a redshirt year to put some more muscle on his 6-2, 175-pound frame, which looks about as lanky as Colt's did when he came out of high school, while Case seems to have longer arms. Even if Chiles stays, the Longhorns could offer little McCoy and Connor Wood, with McCoy much more likely to commit. Two other quarterbacks as back-up plans include a Colordao kid named Austin Hinder who likes the Longhorns but hasn't heard much from them, and Cuero's Tyler Arndt.

The 2010 class isn't nearly as deep at quarterback as the 2009 class, with Connor Wood the only quarterback from the class likely to project as a starter at Texas, with McCoy probably a back-up (yes, I know the same was said about Colt) and the other quarterbacks mostly roster filler and emergency options in case of a series of catastrophic quarterback injuries.

Horns_bullet_mediumOnly Arkansas and Texas remain for Hamilton. The news out of Texarkana ($) is that freshly-offered 2009 wide receiver Cobi Hamilton narrowed his list down to Texas and Arkansas after taking visits from both the Auburn coaching staff and Texas coaching staff on Wednesday at his school. Hamilton will visit Austin on Friday to take his final official visit and tour the campus and facilities, expecting to make a decision next week.

With his parents Arkansas alums and his former high school quarterback Ryan Mallett at Arkansas, Arkansas looks to have the edge, particularly in need, as they will graduate the starter at Hamilton's position next year. Despite the depth at wide receiver for Texas, it's not hard to see Hamilton in a Longhorn uniform, particularly since he attends Texas High School, which sports orange jerseys not quite as burnt as the ones in which the Longhorns take the field on home Saturdays.

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There is an epidemic among college sports writers of misusing the verb "matriculate."

It’s like “trickeration” except I think that most people know that’s not actually a word, but use it for fun. However, what I don’t think most sports writers realize is that “matriculate” doesn’t mean graduate/leave school. It means the opposite, to enter school.

You have fallen prey to common mis-usage, GOBR! Pretty soon you’re going to be convinced that “irregardless” is a legitimate word…..

by billyzane on Jan 22, 2009 4:29 PM CST reply actions  

Irregardless of what you say, BZ...

I’ll still matriculate from UT.

/sarcasm

Nice read, GoBR!

by HornPossessed on Jan 22, 2009 4:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmm, I stand corrected.

Thanks for relieving my ignorance. I do know about irregardless though and don’t use the word, but I guess I opened myself up to that kind of stuff.

by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Jan 22, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions  

why are

those people always saying “look at him matriculate the ball down the field”. Totally makes no sense. Maybe they mean perambulate?

by owenh on Jan 22, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I think they say it, because of Hank Stram the old KC Chiefs coach.

He wore a mic in Superbowl IV and said that as well as a bunch of other quotable lines.

by ajax77777 on Jan 22, 2009 9:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I love those clips of Stram. The guy was a character. I’m too young to have watched him in those days, but let’s put it this way: there are only two coaches in KC history who could be considered to have been successful, and one of them is Marty Schottenheimer.

by burntorangehorn on Jan 23, 2009 7:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Legitimate?

Who defines legitimate?

The purpose of a word is to communicate an idea. Irregardless does this since we all know what it means. Get out of the Dark Ages, BZ, we’re in the internet era now. We don’t need some dictatorial board telling us what is and isn’t correct. The people shall decide. Viva la revolucion!

On another note, how many words are a part of your vocabulary that originated as a bastardization of other words? I’m guessing quite a few. Why hate on this one?

by Meekrob on Jan 23, 2009 9:24 AM CST up reply actions  

agree to disagree

Besides, as everyone knows, the proper English use is to masturbate the ball down the feel.

by jc25 on Jan 23, 2009 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Agree to disagree?

That’s what people say when they’re backed into a corner but refuse to admit defeat. And I’m guessing no lawyer would utter those words.

by Meekrob on Jan 23, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Well

Luckily, I’m not a lawyer, but I am a big fan of Anchorman.

by jc25 on Jan 23, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions  

At the risk of going over the same "irregardless" debate as we've done numerous times before...

You’re right that the purpose of language is to communicate, which is the entire reason that we need standardization: so everyone can understand everyone else. All the romance languages evolved from Latin (influenced of course by respective parochial languages), but a monolingual speaker of Spanish can’t understand French because eventually they all evolved into different languages. To ease communication, a standardization of what is a word and what is not and how those words should be used is necessary, lest the English language devolve any further into dialects where no one can really understand each other.

If you’re saying that the only consideration in language should be whether the person you’re talking to be able to understand what you are saying, then may I direct you to this thread (and note the company you keep in such line of thought): http://www.burntorangenation.com/2008/7/1/562509/probable-2008-cfb-storylin#7130691

Now, I’m not someone who hates new words that evolved as “bastardizations” of old words. I hate bastardizations of words that purport to mean the EXACT SAME THING as the actual word they were bastardized from. When you say “irregardless,” you mean “regardless” (i.e. without regard to). You can’t put the negative “ir-” prefix on a word and then claim that it means the same thing as the word without the prefix. Last I checked, “relevant” and “irrelevant” don’t mean the same thing. I know that it probably developed as a combination of regardless and irrespective, but those two words mean the same thing! You’re not combining ideas into 1 word! You’re taking two words that have more or less the same meaning and usage and combining them into 1 word that means the exact same thing as those two words but nevertheless has a counterintuitive prefix that renders the word completely antithetical to the rules of grammar! How does that facilitate good communication?

by billyzane on Jan 23, 2009 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm no linguist

Though I’d be willing to bet that there’s a good number of words that sprouted from other words, meant the exact same thing (and therefore were functionally unnecessary), and yet became accepted in their own right. I don’t see why irregardless should be any different.

Since irregardless most probably came from regardless and irrespective, then you could argue that the ir- at the beginning is not actually the prefix ir- but rather the first part of a compound word. In that sense, it’s not as ridiculous. However, one of the reasons that it’s an awesome word is because it’s so ridiculous. If we can’t have fun with our words, why even bother communicating at all?

As for the comparison to the other person who is liberal with his adherence to strictly defined rules, there’s a clear difference. Poor spelling can cause either miscommunication or additional effort just in determining what’s being said. Communication is meant to spread ideas, but if the listener has a tough time figuring out what those ideas are, then the speaker has failed. In the case of irregardless, I have not heard of cases where people didn’t understand the meaning at all nor have I heard of people having to go over it several times before they figured out what it meant. The issue you have with the word is not so much its clarity but rather its origin, and I don’t think that’s an important consideration.

You’re right in that we need standards for communication outside of groups that share a common dialect. However that doesn’t necessarily call for the end of all dialects. These are often what make language so interesting in general. Proper usage of words should therefore be related to the context within which they are used. On an internet blog for a major American university’s athletics, I feel like irregardless is perfectly appropriate, as the people who come here are familiar with the word and it is an informal setting.

by Meekrob on Jan 23, 2009 2:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Those "words" are horrible.

Another one that bothers me is gutty. Supposedly it originates from the late 1930s / early ‘40s, but what’s so wrong with plain old gutsy these days?

by horns129 on Jan 23, 2009 10:33 AM CST up reply actions  

Texas should start recruiting in my neck of the woods, I live in CA and im 5 min down the road from De La Salle. Coach ladouceur practices these guys as if they were a college team and every year since the 80’s they’ve almost always been a top 25 team in the nation

by kcmorse on Jan 22, 2009 5:22 PM CST reply actions  

4. If there’s a game changer somewhere (yes, even SEC country) who expresses a consistent interest in Texas and makes the requisite effort to demonstrate this (camp attendance, unofficials), pursue them.

   Agree and disagree. I agree that we should be pursuing game changers that express consistent interest in UT. I’d also say that this is blindingly obvious.

  But to make a kid travel all of the way to Austin from out of state without even an offer (as Texas typically does not offer except in person on campus) is not going to be a successful strategy. Texas typically gets between 75% and 90% of its class early, in the spring of their junior seasons. This leaves plenty of time for the staff to go balls-out for a few elite OOS players.

   Recruiting is a bit like dating. If you’re Tom Brady you may be able sit on your ass and have the ladies come to you, but it doesn’t work like that for the average guy. The average guy has to put himself out there and do some wooing. Texas isn’t doing enough wooing. When Texas starts to show more interest in OOS recruits, these recruits will start to show more interest in Texas.

   I don’t think the importance of having truly elite, “game changers” on the team can be overstated. It’s worth whatever it takes (with the law, of course) to get one of these players.

   I like everyone on this staff, but I hope Muschamp goes younger with his assistants when he takes over. Staff stability is very nice, but I think we need a few more guys on staff that are gunning for a promotion. These types of coaches will break their back for you in recruiting. I’m not sure how hungry some of our coaches are.

by andy_wooster on Jan 22, 2009 7:43 PM CST reply actions  

Jones and Kirkpatrick are taking their official visits

to Texas and they might have been in for a camp or something in the summer or junior days last year, but they might not have been on campus to receive offers. Really, I think if there’s a guy that you want out of state and you can’t get them in on a junior day or in the summer, they probably aren’t interested enough to warrant much pursuit.

by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Jan 22, 2009 9:30 PM CST up reply actions  

What Scipio Tex doesn’t mention about forays into SEC country is the Will Muschamp wild card. While it doesn’t make sense to actively pursue players from Florida because of the intense competition, it does make sense for Muschamp to continue to use his contacts to pick several national recruits every year to go after.

Dre Kirkpatrick and Jarvis Jones are the test cases for that theory, as Muschamp had long relationships with both from his Auburn days. Neither one is expected to choose Texas, with Kirkpatrick likely staying at home in Alabama and Jones going to Florida, lending further credence to Staples’ conclusions.

  That’s not a good example. Elite Florida players leave the state far more often than do elite players from Alabama.

The key for out-of-state recruits, as Scipio Tex says, is to pursue the kids who have long had an interest in Texas and express that interest, like Ohio linebacker Jordan Hicks, who wears burnt orange paraphernalia around his school and paid his own way to a Texas camp last summer.

  It seems to me that you’re basically calling for the player to recruit Texas before Texas will start recruiting him, which is similar to Mack Brown’s philosophy. Again, if Texas takes an active interest in a recruit, that will encourage a recruit to check out Texas, even if he didn’t have a strong interest before.

by andy_wooster on Jan 22, 2009 7:49 PM CST reply actions  

How do you figure that elite Florida players leave more?

Maybe some examples would help your point. That’s usually what I try to provide.

I’m not calling for the player to recruit Texas, I’m saying there needs to be prior interest if they are out-of-state, otherwise it’s an uphill battle and probably not worth it.

by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Jan 22, 2009 9:32 PM CST up reply actions  

is case mccoy actually any good?

What I am curious to know is if this kid would seriously be looked at by the horns if he had a different last name.

He fails my eye ball test – which is simply to say he looks (i mean this simply by appearance – i’ve never seen him play) nothing like a college football player.

by andmyster on Jan 22, 2009 7:59 PM CST reply actions  

He's probably right around where Colt was as a junior.

That sounds like the easy way out in terms of an answer, but I think it’s correct from watching film on him. Graham rolls him out a lot in either direction and he throws well on the run, going both right and left. In terms of his arm strength and delivery, he looks much like Colt, delivering the ball from the same slot, with a wind up that’s longer than Colt because it starts lower. He doesn’t have a cannon, but he can make most throws. You probably aren’t going to ask him to throw a lot of outs to the opposite hash, but Texas doesn’t ask that of Colt either and he should have won the Heisman. Athletically, he looks pretty similar and can probably add a little speed like Colt did. His decision-making seems like it could use some work, having thrown 10 and 11 interceptions the last two years, with only 17 touchdown passes. It looks like he tries to fit the ball into some pretty tight windows, which is probably the cause of that.

by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Jan 22, 2009 9:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Jeffcoat looks fantastic but It seems to me like Okafor and (potentially) Kennard will be a big obstacle in signing him. The thing that really sucks about that is that, of all the big name national recruiters, OU will be the thinnest at DE in 2010.

That said, I’ll be ecstatic if Kennard signs even if it costs us Jeffcoat. Two five star DEs in the same class, that’s playstation shit right there yo.

by hodad on Jan 23, 2009 11:27 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_57_small
Y'all Can Still Call Me GoBR
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Happy NSD Aggies!!!!
Jersey_front_small
A Recruiting Reminder

Recent FanPosts

Ff_519532_xl_small
No love for Shakeem Jefferson
Small
Texas Women's Basketball
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Nike helmet redesign
Horns_small
Rivals 100 released
Small
Don't mess with Texas.
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Defense)
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Offense)
Small
Big 12 Expansion is Back!
Small
Miles Onyegbule...why not TE?
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
Early Predictions for Fall Depth Chart (Defense)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8