Recruiting Spotlight: Chris Whaley
With Signing Day rapidly approaching and the great majority of the Longhorns' 2009 class already committed, it's time to look at each individual prospect.
Vitals
Name: Chris Whaley
Position: Running back
Height: 6-3
Weight: 232
Speed: 4.45 40-yard dash
High School: Madisonville
Rating (Rivals): Four out of five
Strengths
More than anything else, the pure physique of Chris Whaley is impressive. Standing at 6-3 and weighing more than 230 pounds, Whaley has the makeup of a defensive end or linebacker or tight end more than a running back, hence the rampant speculation about whether Whaley will stay at running back in college and leading Rivals to list him as an athlete. More on that later.
His size at the running back position draws comparisons ($) to former Arkansas star running back Darren McFadden, Adrian Peterson, and Eddie George (who not Eric Dickerson, too?), though Whaley may be even bigger than McFadden coming out of high school, while McFadden was and is significantly faster, as is Peterson.
Far from being a lanky 6-3, Whaley has the thickness in the lower body of a running back, though not as thick as, say, A&M commit Christine Michael. That bulk helps Whaley punish small opposing defenders, particularly defensive backs, showing little regard for life or limb in running through arm tackles by keeping his thick legs churning after contact. Deploying a stiff arm also aids in his physical play from the running back position and doesn't allow small defenders to wrap him up, but Whaley can only use that stiff arm going in one direction, as he nearly always carries the ball in his right arm.

Not just big and strong, however, Whaley has remarkable speed for his size, running in the mid 4.4s in the 40 and a 10.8 100m as a sophomore. Besides having the speed to take the corner, Whaley also possesses many of the attributes of a good running back, running with patience and vision, while displaying good feet for his size. His production is hard to argue with, as Whaley combined for more than 6,800 rushing yards and 90 touchdowns in his three years on varsity at Madisonville, no small feat, even against sub-par competition. It's not easy to run for nearly 2,000 yards ($) in nine games and score 24 touchdowns on 187 carries against defensive fronts featuring nine or 10 players in the box on every down, as Whaley did as a senior. That insane production twice earned him Player of the Year honors in his district and garnering him first-team All-State honors in 2007, as well as an invite to the 2009 US Army All-American game, where he broke a screen pass for a 46-yard touchdown and gained 24 yards on three carries.
Weaknesses
This is a familiar frame with running backs and defensive lineman -- most don't play with the proper pad level. Whaley is no exception, as he perpetuates comparisons to McFadden to running with a nearly straight back most of the time, similar to Adrian Peterson, as well. Those players get away with their lack of fundamentals by making up for failing to run behind their pads with pure speed and power.
Whaley doesn't have the suddenness cutting or accelerating that either McFadden or Peterson have -- basically, he isn't the freakish athlete that those two are, though Whaley is a fine athlete in his own right. Without the ability to generate the same forward momentum as McFadden or Peterson, running with proper pad level becomes even more crucial to collegiate success, as it is much easier to tackle a player running upright than one finishing the play with a lowered shoulder and behind the pads. The good news is that Whaley improved in that respect during his senior season and will help himself greatly at the college level by continuing to show improvement in that area, indicating that's he's aware of his shortcomings and tries to address them.
Upright running poses another problem -- that of leaving the legs vulnerable to hard hits and injuries. Whaley's generally good health at the high school level despite logging major carries speaks to his durability, but he also played against poor competition at tiny Madisonville and suffered a broken right hand ($) towards the end of his senior season that limited him to 68 yards on 19 carries in a bad loss to Navasota in the playoffs. There isn't any mention of Whaley's leaping ability anywhere, but he could try to add the hurdle move to his repertoire to dissuade tacklers from going low on him all the time.
BOB's Bobby Bragg saw some potential issues ($) with Whaley in reviewing game film from his senior season, believing that Whaley will "have to somewhat reinvent himself" to find success in college. Of particular concern is the style of running game Madisonville employed with Whaley -- often running toss sweeps to the outside:
Whaley bounces too many runs outside. There are many times when Whaley could grind out a three or four yard run using his power and falling forward to maximize an inside run, but opts to try and bounce it outside. He had several runs for negative or no gain against a good Rockdale defense that swarmed the football and had the speed to get to the sidelines.
The desire to bounce everything outside wasn't the only problem Bragg saw with Whaley:
On the toss plays when he gets his pads square and downhill, he can be effective as a guy 6-3, 233-pounds running downhill with a full head of steam isn't going to be stopped on the HS level. Where he gets into problems is when the pads aren't turned downhill, but east and west. On those runs, Whaley doesn't possess the quickness and burst to beat defenders to the edge and can look a little stiff at times on change of direction.
As a guy who projects as an inside, downhill runner in college, that propensity to try to break it outside won't work with the Longhorns, especially since the zone blocking scheme is conducive to running backs trying to get outside to make the big play instead of taking a 3-4 yard gain to stay ahead of the chains. The lack of consistency squaring his shoulders will also work against him at the college level.
Whaley also wasn't in great shape coming into fall practice of his junior year, carrying some extra weight. It's not clear why Whaley was out of shape, since he runs track and plays basketball, but he eventually turned that excess weight into muscle, ending the season faster than he was as a sophomore. It may be that Whaley puts on weight easily, which would bode well for a movement to the defensive side of the ball, but not so much for staying at running back.
Verdict
The Longhorn coaching staff infamously declared recruiting ($) at the running back position for 2009 complete just four days after National Signing Day when Whaley committed. Promising to only take Whaley, Texas passed on Christine Michael and Florida's Trent Richardson, a long-time Longhorn fan who expressed serious interest in the program. Both of those players are more highly-regarded nationally and project as pure running backs at the next level. Given the closure of recruiting at the position after Whaley, the Longhorn coaches seem intent on giving him a shot at running back, otherwise it wouldn't made any sense to have only offered Whaley at the position. Whaley echoed those thoughts ($) after the Army game:
I talked to coach (Major) Applewhite and he said they're not moving me at all. I'm coming to play running back.
Richardson is one of the top handful of running backs in the country, so that speaks for itself. Personally, having watched film of Michael in high school and his performance in the Army All-American game, he seems like a better pure runner than Whaley, with better burst, better lateral quickness, better cutting ability, while still possessing a powerful lower body to break some tackles and pick up yardage after contact. His ability to accelerate quickly from a stand still seems to fit better in the zone blocking scheme the Longhorns employ. Not only that, but passing on Michael lets the Aggies feel like they can actually recruit a little bit -- no reason to let their heads grow -- and could really improve their program.
Lacking elite acceleration, it's hard to imagine that Whaley will work well without a running start in the horizontal running game at Texas. That means one of three things: 1) a chance in blocking scheme and the quarterback going under center more, 2) incorporating the Pistol formation to give all the running backs a head start, or 3) simply moving Whaley to another position, likely linebacker, defensive end, or halfback/tight end. With Cody Johnson entrenched as the short-yardage running back and possessing similar speed, a lower center of gravity, and better pad level, Whaley will have to unseat a handful of running backs in front of him in the rotation and needs to show some serious aptitude for the Texas running scheme to get carries next season.
Offensively, the most intriguing position change for Whaley would be the transition to halfback/tight end. Mitigating that intrigue is the presence of Barrett Matthews, an accomplished blocker and owner of experience at that position. Texas coaches demand execution at a high level and since Whaley will have undoubtedly have a shot at running back, there is little chance that Whaley would be ready to contribute as a halfback/tight end in 2009 even if he made the switch as soon as he gets on campus.
Back to the intrigue of moving Whaley -- playing at halfback would be perfect for installing the Florida shovel triple option, with Whaley as the inside pitch man in the scheme. While not a prolific pass catcher in high school, Whaley does have good hands and some receiving ability that he showed off ($) at the Texas mini-camp last June, which could possibly flourish with a move. The question about Whaley at the halfback/tight end position is his lack of experience blocking, though he was known on the high school level as willing and capable of picking up the blitz, which should almost go without saying at his size. An inability or lack of desire to pick up the blitz with his size would be a major red flag. All in all, with Matthews coming in at the same time and similar projections at the halfback positions, putting Whaley there would waste one of their talents and probably doesn't make much long-term sense.
On the other side of the ball, the Texas defensive coaches are no doubt drooling to get a chance at Whaley, as he has some room on his frame for growth in the weight room, one of the primary reasons there is so much talk about a position change -- working hard at the weights may push Whaley up past the 240-pound range. (It's important to note here that while Whaley played his senior season at around 230, he wanted to get down to 225 ($).) If he enters that territory, linebacker might be the perfect position for him, as he would have excellent speed for that position. Initially, I thought he had enough room on his frame to grow because of his long arms, but looking through the pictures here ($), I don't think he has wide enough shoulders to get into the 250-260 range and play defensive end, though it still might be possible. At that position, the Longhorns have a serious need for a power end, which is why Tevin Mims could seriously compete for playing time there as a true freshman if he can put on 10-15 pounds over the summer, with a move to defensive tackle possibly looming after that.
Of course, the coaches telling Whaley he will play running back makes it necessary and worthwhile to project his skills to the college level. Bobby Bragg highlights well the bad habits developed by Whaley in high school because of the level of talent he faced and the toss sweeps they always ran to him, forcing the need to "reinvent" Whaley as a tough, inside runner. Even with a reinvention to highlight his combination of size, speed, and strength inside, the only running play Texas currently runs that would work well with Whaley is the inside zone, as the outside zone could reinforce Whaley's habit of taking everything outside. The counter was probably the most effective running play Texas ran in 2008 and might work with Whaley since he has good vision and patience.
Getting Whaley the ball while having time to accelerate makes a ton of sense. Chris Ault's Pistol formation looks like the solution to maximize not only Whaley's skills, but also the skills of guys like Cody Johnson and Vondrell McGee. If Texas doesn't run some Pistol formation I will be intensely disappointed but not surprised in the least.
The most likely solution for Davis and company is to run more plays with Colt McCoy under center next season. Going under center has ramifications for the passing game that are best discussed in other forums, but it could help showcase what Whaley does well, while giving the offensive line serious incentive to be nasty. it's common knowledge by now that Mack Brown loves big, powerful backs and a good running game, so I think he's ready to do everything he can to feature Whaley going downhill. Whaley isn't as talented as Beanie Wells, but he does have the same imposing physical stature that makes coaches and fans wonder if smallish cornerbacks and safeties will be able to make first-down or touchdown-saving tackles. Having a physical and, therefore, physical edge on opponents shouldn't be underestimated.
All this speculation attests not only to the intriguing nature of Whaley as a prospect, but also his lack of ideal fit into the current Texas offense, made all the more strange by the promise Texas coaches made to him not to recruit any other running backs. Though there is great depth, if not transcendent talent, at the position currently, the coaches could have felt comfortable with the group as presently constructed, but passed on some serious talent to take Whaley.
That decision will end up being vindicated or universally panned, but everything is pure speculation until the spring game provides some small measure of insight. Most likely is that Longhorn fans will follow the situation closely throughout spring practice and the summer and bemoan the lack of information coming out about his progress, a process that will probably stretch into fall practice and perhaps well into the football season. In other words, hunker down for a long stretch of time without knowing any answers about how and where Chris Whaley will contribute in burnt orange.
Chris Whaley Highlights (via TexasPreps)
0 recs |
29 comments
|
Comments
Whaley 2nd Most Important Recruit
First of all, he has to play RB. It makes zero sense to limit your class to 1 RB and then have him switch to the defensive side. Secondly, IMHO – having an elite RB is a critical need for the Longhorns, probably 2nd biggest need behind DT. I know there is a lot of buzz around Fozzy, but I just don’t think he keeps Stoops up at night. While Cody adds pop – the elite teams often feature a “home run” hitter that just keeps defenses so honest against the pass. Bring a Percy Harvin type talent to the Horns would make them virtually unstoppable.
I initially was down on Whaley because of the lack of elite speed. But your video changed my mind. He doesn’t look all that fast, but then you just notice him effortlessly pulling away from (what I assume) the speedy DBs. Very smooth, reminiscent of Eric Dickerson – but without that WC speed.
Thanks again for the continued great posts Roy!
by realmccoy on Jan 28, 2009 8:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i agree on everything..
although he might not see such big holes to run through in college.
Roy, keep up the good work. Great work!
by thebrat on Jan 28, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
His film reminds me a bit of Edwin Simmons, though Simmons might have been a touch faster.
by SL Horn on Jan 28, 2009 10:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I mean, I know he’s “just” playing against 3A in that video, but cripes…why is he not a 5* prospect? Is it the tweener factor?
by burntorangehorn on Jan 28, 2009 10:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Pad Level
Wow, I haven’t seen anyone run that straight up and down. It makes him look extremely awkward running and trying to get through defenders. He did however seem to improve on that as the video got farther along.
TEXAS FIGHT
by Darklust on Jan 28, 2009 10:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't agree more about his pad level.
Hopefully some of it is that because he is so much taller than most kids playing 3A football, he stands out. Nonetheless, it is an issue.
Garrett Gilbert: 2014 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year
by jordansb on Jan 28, 2009 11:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is a fun page to look at
http://www.maxpreps.com/texas/football/madisonville/chris-whaley/stats.aspx?athleteid=479ecfd2-8f38-4e6e-9c6d-e65e1f043847&ssid=2f36027d-d6f6-4509-aba9-adad5cc85b5e&urpath=,local,player
Some things that stand out to me:
Against a winless Rudder Team – 410 yards, 25 ypc, 7 TDs on 16 carries. That means only 9 carries werent for TDs. Thats hilarious, no matter how bad Rudder is.
How the hell do they lose to Coldspring and Westwood with production like that from Whaley? The D of Madisonville must have really stunk, or the coaches have no idea how to win a game with a completely dominant back.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jan 28, 2009 11:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Haha. That happens in high school.
There’s the story from Lampasas when they made the playoffs with Lam Jones his senior year. In that game they only ran him eight times and they lost.
Barry Switzer was at the game and said to the effect, “What in the hell was that coach thinking. You run him 25 times and you win by 50.”
by whills on Jan 28, 2009 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fixed link
Was too long I guess try this.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Jan 28, 2009 11:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for link
Honestly, I can’t tell a thing from the highlights except HS kids couldn’t arm tackle this behemoth . . .
His straight-up running was when he was in the clear, either in the backfield pre-contact or when unchallenged up the field . . . I didn’t see anything but massive holes set up by terrific blocking or great fakes. I kinda think OU will have more people at the point of attack.
by edsp on Jan 28, 2009 11:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
4.45 40
isn’t good speed for a 6’3" RB? He reminds me of Brandon Jacobs.
by Longhorns84 on Jan 28, 2009 11:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Fine report, GoBR, great depth.
Minor edit:
“1) a chance [change] in blocking scheme…”
Speaking of said change, that is building up some anticipation. With spring football right around the corner, we should have some idea about that fairly quickly.
One of the facets if the Horns should go to a downhill scheme with the QB under center, both big and small backs, is that it would put a lot of pressure on smaller, pass oriented defenses. GD (or whoever) could literally have two very different attacks on the field at once.
Our school had a big back like Whaley, even bigger really, good speed but he was like a locomotive getting started. Not so effective from scrimmage. Needed that 5-10 yard span of acceleration to get going. Strangely enough he turned out to be a killer KO returner. He usually had the room to get to speed and then it was like a bowling ball blasting through a bunch of pins. He never fumbled and he did punish people to the max. Couldn’t do it on punt returns, not enough room, but he was hell of kick offs with a lot of long TD returns.
by whills on Jan 28, 2009 11:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
QB under center
Giving Colt more snaps under center would also improve his draft stock, as long as he runs it effectively. It would also hopefully open up some deep routes for Malcolm Williams, as the defense adjusts to the power running attack.
by BigTexBD on Jan 28, 2009 12:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that might be a serious part of future attacks
as smaller, speedier defenses develop to stop the onslaught of passing. If one of those backs can catch passes, then the offense can morph in and out of spread and running attacks on any given play, victimizing the smaller defense. We’re not just talking individual mismatches but “whole defense” mismatching, particularly out of the two-minute no huddle offense. I think this was the direction OU offense is heading and few defenses are that capable in terms of manpower to play both forms and it puts a premium on recognition. Texas is not going to stop passing, but how we run can become much more complimentary to the overall attack.
Then the big outside receivers would find less coverage over the middle as the safeties pull up to stop the possible run.
by whills on Jan 28, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
interesting
but at the risk of sounding like an ass…easier said than done. This isn’t tweaking a system, this is wholesale changes we’re talking about. This could take years to get running smoothly.
by owenh on Jan 28, 2009 2:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right about easier said that done.
A consistent design would be wiser in the long run and probably easier to teach, especially to a younger OL.
None of this is going to stand still.
We’re seeing a time of dynamic offenses, and defenses are scrambling to catch up. Those teams with elite athletes will adapt more quickly, but that is not who the Horns play in most games.
by whills on Jan 29, 2009 11:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So I hope I don't get killed for this...
but does his running style in the video remind anyone else of VY? He’s got that really long stride that causes people to take terrible angles coupled with the quick shifting of the hips that fakes out numerous people in that video.
by nahmorlah on Jan 28, 2009 12:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think the comparison is apt
in the sense that tall players with long strides blow up pursuit angles because the defenders don’t realize how fast the runner is really moving.
by GhostofBigRoy on Jan 28, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Colt under center in the tOSU game
We ran 2 straight running plays with Colt under center in the 3rd quarter of the Ohio State game, and both plays were very successful (Chris O. for 8 yards and Fozzy for 6 yards). Other than the goal-line formations I don’t recall seeing that at any other time this season.
Maybe a preview of next year? After those 2 plays we never ran it again against tOSU so who knows.
by Horncasting on Jan 28, 2009 1:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
With the "protection" the O-line offers Colt
I don’t think going under center consistently is wise. I like this situational hurry up offense though. The buckeyes were totally overwhelmed.
by owenh on Jan 28, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, “protection” is exactly right.
I loved watching the buckeyes gasping for breath, unable or unwilling to get into posistion before the next snap. It was amazing and entertaining. Although stressful, it was a great game to watch.
by UT_BKC on Jan 28, 2009 3:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Somewhat circular
If the running game were that much better from under center (a huge assumption I know), then the DL and blitzers wouldn’t be able to focus as much on teeing off on Colt the entire game, which should make our OL function better.
It would also (I assume) keep a RB in the backfield a little more often that would help to pickup the delayed blitzes that ended up being alot of the big hits Colt took this year.
by Horncasting on Jan 28, 2009 5:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"downhill" running
Given our recruiting at every position besides Chris Whaley at RB I don’t see anything to suggest we are going to abandon our zone-running scheme. I don’t know why we should, anyways. Our problem with it is a matter of talent and execution. Lack of talent on the O-line and poor execution by them and the RB’s.
Switching to a whole new scheme that has catchy phrases like “downhill” isn’t going to solve anything. If we run it like we do know it’ll just be our backs running into a solid wall and going downhill into the grass after a no-gain.
I’m not sure how Whaley fits with our scheme but we won’t have a good idea unless we improve our run-blocking and fine-tune the scheme. If we can punch holes like we did in 04-05 Whaley or any of the other guys will be fine.
by RolloTamasi on Jan 28, 2009 3:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Still Not Sold ...
but I have to go w/ the program. Trent Richardson looks a lot better to me than Whaley, and his commit to Alabama is wavering momentarily.
No matter, like Rollo & others point out, we need to block like men & not like Grandma’s flag-football team. That and eliminating the command for our backs to run sideways for a minimum of 10 yards before they turn it upfield.
by HalfmileHorn on Jan 28, 2009 3:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Trent Richardson wanted $50K
That has been well documented and that is the reason TX doesn’t want him….also, there’s a guy who we are goin’ after next year by the name of Lache Seastrunk and he puts all these guys to shame…
by SneezyBeltran on Jan 28, 2009 11:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, it was all over last night's sports news.
In this morning’s paper, too.
by HalfmileHorn on Jan 29, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
bird in hand and all that stuff
Seastrunk is no lock.
by andy_wooster on Jan 30, 2009 12:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmmmm
If Whaley is as big as a LB, faster than a LB and can catch the ball out of the backfield, I’ve got a Chris Ogbonnaya wheel route I’d love to see him try out.
-rBr-
by run Bevo run on Jan 28, 2009 9:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















