Texas 24 Ohio State 21: Fiesta Bowl Wrap
12-1, with wins over bowl participants FAU, Rice, Oklahoma, Missouri, Oklahoma State, Kansas, and Ohio State. (And little brother.) Perhaps short-thrifted of a conference championship, yes, but 2008 goes down as one of the best in the history of Texas football. And when you factor in the enormous amount this team exceeded expectations, it's certainly one of the most satisfying.
Let's talk about it.
TEXAS 24 OHIO STATE 21
The downside of sweatervests. Wearing a sweatervest to a Christmas party might pay dividends if just the right girl is in attendance -- probably Kelly Ann Marylou, whose life goal is to get hitched to a fellow who golfs where her girlfriends' husbands golf. But even if that works out, in the long run it doesn't; you wake up one day, realize you're 40, and find that you're giving your wife a gigantic spending account so she'll leave you alone. Of course, by that point you've got two kids, and somehow you agreed to let her name them Tucker and Persephone. The boy wants to go to Exeter and the girl has a Coach purse at age eight. "Where did it all go wrong?" you ask yourself.
And you shake your in shame... the sweatervest.
So it is with Jim Tressel and Ohio State. After a first half in which they played "Tressel-ball" to absolute perfection, their grand reward was a 6-3 lead. And so it was that on a night in which Texas struggled at different times with Chris Wells, Terrelle Pryor, and their own Greg Davis demons, the Longhorns still managed to come out on top 24-21. Such is the downside of the sweatervest: There's no margin for error when you play to win the game by a field goal; sometimes the other team has the ball last.
The definition of insanity... How did Texas manage just three points in the first half against Ohio State? In part because the Buckeyes held on to the ball for so long, but mostly it was one failed screen pass after another by the Longhorns. Texas' inability to screen is not a new problem; it's warted the offense all season. Most of all, Greg Davis seems to have a conceptual misunderstanding concerning its proper usage -- as complementary plays, they require component parts. (That would be downfield passing, Greg.)
It's simply baffling that Texas attempted exactly one downfield pass the entire game -- a 40 yard strike to Malcolm Williams that was an inch away from setting up a first and goal that would have put the game away. Beyond that, Texas dinked and dunked throughout the game -- to disastrous results in the first half, and just well enough in the second half to win the game. Not Greg Davis' finest evening as a playcaller.
Senior MVPs. If you had Quan Cosby and Roy Miller as MVPs on your scorecard, come on down and take a bow. Cosby finished with an astounding 171 yards on 14 catches, including 2 touchdowns, one of those the game winner. Roy Miller did all game long what he did all season - destroy the middle of the LOS. We'll sorely miss both players in 2009.
Other game ball honorees: Colt McCoy, Chris Ogbonnaya, Earl Thomas, and Henry Melton Brian Orakpo (Brain fart: wrong DE. As Big Roy rightly points out, Melton was consistently too far up the field, allowing Pryor escape angles out of the pocket. --ed, PB)
On Terrelle Pryor. After looking so closely at Terrelle Pryor to write this preview piece, I may have been more concerned than most, but he surprised even me with his play. He definitely surprised Texas' defenders, who did a piss poor job in the first half of taking the right angles to make plays on him in the open field. Of course, that was part of Vince Young's magic -- the long strides combined with unfair agility create for defenders a world of pursuit problems. As is always the case, Will Muschamp did a great job getting his kids to adjust, but at least for a half, he routinely made Texas defenders look silly.
Even though Jim Tressel did a nice job using Pryor as a receiver, overall the system he plays in does a comically poor job highlighting his talents. One more downside of being happy to score 3 points instead of 6.
Who is Malcolm Williams? Does Greg Davis know who Malcolm Williams is? Is he aware of his abilities? Does he have any grasp at all what he can do to a defense? What lessons were learned in Lubbock?
My goodness. As happy as I am overall with this win and this season... it almost ended on an especially sour note because our offensive game plan was so piss poor. I'm nowhere near the world's biggest Greg Davis critic, but he was inarguably the goat in Lubbock and the goat last night.
The Fiesta Bowl squeaker was reminiscent of Texas' too-close victory in Austin over Oklahoma State, a game Texas also won because Colt McCoy was freaky enough on most of his 93 six-yard pass attempts to secure the win. But it's utterly mad dening that Greg Davis was so unwilling to get the ball down the field a handful of times. Not doing so robs the team of the chance to make big plays, gifts the opposing safeties freedom to help underneath, destroys our running game, and requires of Colt McCoy near-perfection. I do not understand.
Final Fiesta thoughts. Criticisms out of the way, I do want to emphasize how pleased I am with the win. The nitpicking is mostly to note where things need to improve for a title run in 2009.
And let's be clear about that: this win may do for next year's team what the 2004 Rose Bowl win did for VY's squad. The parallels are eery, from the lone loss, to the final season record, to the dramatic last-second BCS win, to the site of next year's final game in Pasadena. The 2008 season was in almost every regard a stunning success, and especially so if it ends in confetti next January at the Rose Bowl.
THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP
AttaMack. It sounded a little bit silly considering Texas didn't play its best game, but I and the rest of the Burnt Orange Nation were happy to see Mack Brown holler that Texas was the best team in the country last night. The Longhorns took OSU's best shot and just barely escaped with a victory, but they got it done one more time and have as plausible a claim to #1 as any of the other one-loss teams.
There won't be any split title for Texas, but that's beside the point, as far as I'm concerned. It's also beside the point that Texas wasn't dominant on this particular evening. I still think their superior defense to Oklahoma's was the reason they won the RRS and the reason voters got it wrong in sending the Sooners to Miami to play Florida. That's the system we live in, though, and it's over with. Texas was one bad half in Lubbock away from the big enchilada. It was a great season.
Go Gators! With Utah, USC, and Texas all winning, there's not going to be any split national title, so if you were on the fence about who to root for on Thursday night, may I just remind you that it's 10:31 and OU still sucks. Go Gators.
2009. Much more on this in the coming days/weeks/months ahead, but the Longhorns should start the season ranked in the top three and the schedule sets up beautifully for a title run. Win in Dallas, win in Stillwater, and don't get upset by any double-digit underdogs and Texas will be playing for it all.
Hook 'em Horns
0 recs |
36 comments
|
Comments
The Landry Hat
Wear it and everyone (your wife, kids, the president) will quickly know that you are the absolute man, always will be, and are not to be messed with or disrespected.
And I have money on the gators.
by Ricky'sDreadlocks on Jan 6, 2009 11:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Kansas..
You missed Kansas as a bowl participant! :)
by nyclonghorngal on Jan 6, 2009 11:51 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ahem
“The boy wants to go to Exeter”
And what exactly is wrong with that?? Now, if he wanted to go to Andover….
-John, Phillips Exeter and Texas alumnus
by SelimSivad on Jan 6, 2009 11:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
There ya go
You got the spirit of the point ;)
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Jan 6, 2009 11:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have 2 questions, anyone can answers:
1. Where was vondrell mcgee
2. What did John Chiles do to earn the excessive celebration following Quans TD reception
by MJY6087 on Jan 6, 2009 11:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Got the number wrong
It was Quan’s penalty for diving into the endzone.
by Texas Wahoo on Jan 6, 2009 11:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was just wondering the same thing.
I didn’t see McGee.
I've been fuelin' my dreams eatin' greens and beans.
by 16thLonghorn on Jan 6, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
totally agree with the malcom williams comment
Its not just that we don’t throw deep to williams, its that we don’t work to get the ball in the hands of our most explosive receiver. It seems that his position in the greg davis offense is only used for vertical routes. Why not let williams run some short routes across the middle where he can catch the ball in stride with his speed? I love cosby and shipley but williams is much more explosive and we don’t work to get the ball in his hands to make it easier on colt and our offense to make big plays.
by dudoo on Jan 6, 2009 11:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Malcolm Williams
I thought OSU’s blitzing game plan in the first half effectively dictated that the ball was going to go to Quan, Shipley, and Collins in the hot route. In order to hit longer passes down field to a guy like Malcolm Williams we needed a TE who could either pass catch, or block the extra defenders at the LOS. You aren’t going to get many downfield looks with a single back or empty backfield against a relentless zone blitz – particularly if you’ve only got 5 guys blocking up front.
Colt did the smart thing by getting rid of the football early, he managed to avoid crushing hits, and brought Texas back both in time of possession and on the scoreboard. And let’s not forget that the best thing Greg Davis did between the A&M game and last night was install the hyper-hurry up offense. It worked like a charm in the second half by keeping tOSU’s defense unbalanced.
Sure it wasn’t pretty, and yes I’d love to see Colt toss the ball 20 to 30 yards every once in a while, but I’m confident its due to not having a TE to speak of.
by BMG on Jan 6, 2009 12:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point about the TE
It’s insane that we’ve done all this without Irby. I forget that.
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Jan 6, 2009 12:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
May be way off-base on this one
but could it be that Williams was often lined up against Jenkins? i think that’s who had him on the deep route that almost was. the commentators mentioned at one point in the 2nd half that UT hadn’t gone Jenkins’ way yet in the game, and it was probably only a couple times by the time the game was over. just saying, could be that he was often just covered or Colt routinely looked away from Jenkins.
by littlevisigoth on Jan 6, 2009 2:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Williams wasn't being covered by Jenkins...
because he wasn’t even on the field. He came in for a couple of plays when Kirkendoll (sp?) got hurt. That is when he made the play down field. As soon as Kirk got better, he came back in. Even when we were in 5-WR sets, we used the RB as a wideout most of the time. I kept looking for #9 all night and never found him. It was truly amazing.
by Hot Hands on Jan 6, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Will someone please take the bubble screen out of GD's playbook?
Peter, like you, I was frustrated by the Horns’ failure to throw the ball down the field. I had a bad feeling about the game as early as the second play from scrimmage for UT when they lost yardage on a bubble screen on 2nd and 2 and wound up having to punt. Several times during the game I found myself screaming at the TV, “Throw the f***ing ball down the f***ing field.” In defense of GD, however, is it possible the lack of long passes were due to the receivers being well covered deep, or even possibly that Colt could have been playing with a minor, unannounced injury? That would also explain that pathetic “pass” he threw just before the half.
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
by OBdoc on Jan 6, 2009 12:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Malcolm Williams
I think Williams could be a great receiver. The problem is I don’t think Colt has good enough protection to let it develop and his arm just isnt big enough to rocket it out there. We’ve seen the deep ball maybe 5-10 times this season and it aint pretty. It floats forever and the receivers can’t get YAC because of the lack of accuracy (diving catches, underthrown, to much air etc)
That being said we have seen some beautiful bombs out of McCoy but too few and I think Mack/Davis/Colt just dont trust the play enough to give it much thought.
by owenh on Jan 6, 2009 1:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
on another note
it seems everybody who’s scouted Garrett Gilbert says his arm strength is good not great. So does he have a better arm than Colt or is the “McCoy Offense” short passing game here to stay?
by owenh on Jan 6, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Watch the video
I’d say Gilbert’s arm strength is “good not great” in the same way Peyton Manning’s arm strength is “good not great.” In other words, it won’t be a factor.
the man, the myth, the legend.
by JYarbs on Jan 6, 2009 2:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The more I think back on the game, I start getting angry again at Davis
But we won, so I’ll give him credit for… well, coaching Colt McCoy. That first half was very frustrating. When we scored our field goal, Colt got sacked on first and goal for a big loss and Davis proceeded to run the ball the next down for a no gain. WTF? You run the bowl then on second and goal that was like at the 18? I always felt like he got too much criticism for our failures in the past, but moments like that really just boggle my mind.
by TheElusiveShadow on Jan 6, 2009 1:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Such a dumb call should have worked
TES, that run on 2nd and goal from the 18 had me saying “WTF” too. In retrospect, it was such a stupid call, no one should have been expecting it, and it thus should have worked. On the other hand, I wished he had called a run just before the half when Colt threw up that dying quail.
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
by OBdoc on Jan 6, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
Davis seems to overthink things sometimes. Imaginary train of thought:
Davis:
“We need to score from 18 yards out, we probably need to throw because theres no way we could run this in”
“However, maybe if we run a draw they wouldnt expect it!”
Yeah they wouldnt expect the play, that doesnt mean it’ll work Greg.
by owenh on Jan 6, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
While we can definitely say there was new blood on defense
I don’t think that was true whatsoever on offense. And it needs to happen. Just too many dumb calls.
Spreading the field deep is a key element of most any spread attack and their variations, even those who run much more. You must keep the safeties in their place.
The catching ability of Quan and Jordan helped elevate Colt’s numbers to the stratosphere. I don’t know what their catch to passes thrown ratio was, but it had to be incredible. What a standard to set for this team.
by whills on Jan 6, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is why OU was able to stomp Texas Tech
When we played Tech, those two safeties kept cheating up to stop the run/short pass running downhill. OU just saw these loser safeties and just said we’re gonna burn em with the deep ball every single time. And they were able to exploit the secondary easily. When we went deep on Tech, the safeties were helpless (Malcom Williams bomb).
by owenh on Jan 6, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
same thing happened
we had that gas pedal on in the third quarter.
in the 3rd quarter, on our second drive we had 3 passes for big gains.
Quan Cosby for 10 yards
Jordan Shipley for 17 yards
Quan Cosby for 12 yards
incomplete pass to Kirk
next play slip screen Colt sacked for 18 yards. stupid.
by karmaHorns on Jan 6, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks.
Our Gators will do what they can on Thursday and I appreciate your support.
Here we go again: http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/
by ejruiz on Jan 6, 2009 1:42 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Btw
I don’t know how much you can blame the Sweater Vest for his gameplan. He had few other options. They couldn’t afford to chunk the ball around with us, nor could they try to beat us in a shootout. They pretty much had to play for a close, ugly win, and they almost got it. It makes me feel good that we can still win when the other team executes their gameplan successfully, but it also disappoints me that we let them do so.
by TheElusiveShadow on Jan 6, 2009 2:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agree. Like a middle weight fight where only one has a knock-out punch.
So, you stick close all the time, body punch, clinch, make it painful and ugly and never give the guy with the KO capability the room to use it. And hope that a split decision goes your way, especially if your in your home ring.
by whills on Jan 6, 2009 7:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Greg Davis
I always have viewed Greg Davis as the 3/5 OC. That’s because 3 out of every 5 plays or 3 of 5 series are good and solid. Those plays move the ball down the field effectively, get you first downs and with some coachable talent, make your QB a Heisman contender.
Then you get the 2/5 that is just fatally flawed. The plays that make you wonder if the guy put down his headset to order some nachos. The plays that not only stop momentum, it takes the momentum, ties it’s hands behind it’s back and shoves a giant red ball in it’s mouth and tells it to squeal like a pig.
Look at the first series. Run for 9 yards, Screen pass for -2, incomplete pass on the wheel route. Nothing says, “Trying to feel you out” like a screen pass on 2nd and 1. You have 2nd and 1 and you can open your playbook to any play written and you choose a wr screen. Really? You’ve got a QB that’s proven to complete 77% of his passes and a wr screen is the best option? Really?
One down field pass is inexcuseable. Although, I think it was actually two because Oby caught one when the CB was thinking to himself there is no way Colt would throw to the RB split out wide just as Oby was running by him for a great catch.
Ease up on the screen pass next season. We wont get mad if you throw in some I formation that doesn’t involve a goal line situation. For goodness sake, Colt should never throw a lob to the middle of the field. Quit running that play.
-rBr-
by run Bevo run on Jan 6, 2009 2:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Rooting for Florida
Not sure. To the extent that we want this enormously satifsying season to end on a satisfying note, a Florida blowout is to be preferred. Any claim we have on being the best team in the country, however, rests on an OU vicotory. More tangibly, going forward, the reputation of the Big 12 is to a large extent dependant on an OU victory, and could impact the BCS process next year, especially vis-a-vis the SEC which is almost certain to be in the mix.
So, undecided at the moment. Suspect that as the game get closer and certainly as it gets underway, the OU hate will kick in, but not sure thats the best for us going forward.
marshalld
by duras on Jan 6, 2009 5:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Rule #1
Do.not.ever.root.for.OUsux.
No matter what.
by TXStampede on Jan 6, 2009 8:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"Rooting" is hardly the word...
…and as I say, to the extent that I seem to view an OU victory as beneficial to us, it is unlikely that this consideration will actually induce me to prefer such a victory rather than to wish for a humiliating defeat and take enormous pleasure in such. Still, the benefits of the victory would not be entirely nonexistant.
marshalld
by duras on Jan 6, 2009 10:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Year - Bout One More Downer to come
Don’t be surprised if both USC and Utah pass up the Horns in the final BS poll
by realmccoy on Jan 6, 2009 5:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
A bit of a different take
Hasn’t the way the Longhorns have played their last three BCS Bowl Games been the essence of what the BCS system and college football are all about? Great football games being played by great athletes who leave everything they have out on the field. Sure I would have loved to see Texas completely dominate and thrash tOSU but I’m equally happy to have been privileged to watch a great, great football game that held my attention for the full four quarters. Don’t fall prey to the naysayers who will try to rain on this parade by saying that Texas underachieved – tOSU is a very good football team that came prepared to play and left it all on the field. Texas’ three BCS Bowl victories are the epitomy of college football and should serve as an example as to why all college football fans love the game so much. What a great, great season this was….anxiously awaiting Augut ’09!
by OU Always Sucks on Jan 6, 2009 6:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
As has been suggested here before
Ideal outcome is Florida by 9. Much as I would like to see OU completely demolished, I can see negative results for the Big 12’s reputation. For our recruiting purposes and the general good of mankind, we don’t want to see an OU win. (It has been proven that OU football contributes to global warming and worldwide economic collapse.)
Go Gators, just not too much.
by Longhorn in Canada on Jan 6, 2009 10:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs



























