Sunday Supper - Week 6
"When Chekhov saw the long fall, he saw a football season bleak and dark and bereft of hope. Yet we know that winning ugly is just another step towards winning a National Championship. But being here among the over reactionary members of Burnt Orange Nation and basking in the warmth of their hearths, hearts, and collective anxiety, I couldn't imagine a better fate than a long and insane football season."
My heartfelt condolences to all Longhorns fans for our loss. Dropping a whole spot in the latest poll, from #2 to #3, has cast a pall over my fragile psyche and made me feel not good...I'm so cold. Please, hold me, but don't judge me.
Come on, you know you want it. You know you need it. How 'bout a big BON family group hug before we sit down to break bread and each other's balls at the never stable Sunday Supper table...
Usually I spend most of this weekly post touching upon the national scene, but it was actually a pretty pedestrian weekend in the world of college football, and since we're having a crisis here in Longhorn land, we'll hang here for a while...
"Game over, man. GAME OVER. The #$*& are we gonna do now?" - Last week I wrote that Texas' toughest regular season opponent may very well be apathy. And I don't think anyone would disagree - including the players - that UT came out flat Saturday night. You can blame them all you want, but it's understandable considering the entire week leading up to the game all everyone was talking about was how bad the Buffaloes stunk and how coach Dan Hawkins should tell his QB son to go play intramurals because this is DIVISION I FOOTBALL!!! Hell, the main article on the front page of the Statesman's sports page Saturday was, "What's Wrong With Colorado?" (I know because I was using it to pick up my dog's morning steamer.)
Now the only thing anyone wants to talk about is, "What's Wrong with the Texas offense?" Well let me be the last one to say that there probably isn't anything wrong with "it." At this point, I'm just not willing to claim that this is a personnel issue or that Texas is lacking in talent in any key area (though I don't think we've come close to replacing Quan Cosby yet). In my hubristic opinion, it's simply a lack of focus. Running the ball, finding the open receiver, not playing tip drills with Colt's passes, etc...that's all execution at this point for an experienced offense like the Longhorns role out. That was evident at the end of the 2nd quarter when Colt & Co. finally sniffed what Greg was shovelin', and marched down the field in 8 plays, scoring with ease.
My hunch is that when push comes to shove, UT will answer the bell. If the silver lining to Saturday's frustrating offensive output, it's probably that the Horns will be all the more focused going into the Red River Shootout where you know apathy is never an issue and claiming ignorance (about what to expect from the other team) is never an excuse. I think the bigger concern isn't the Sooners, how the Horns maintain their focus over the following weeks in Columbia and Stillwater.
"He's on a boat (he's on a boat). He's on a boat (he's on a boat). Everybody look at Colt throw a ball to Shipley on a boat (Shipley on a boat)." - If you're still demanding an explanation for the Longhorns lethargic offense in the first halves of games and inconvenient truths like influenza, the news that Pedialyte quit making Colt's favorite flavor - Diarrhea Grape, and unnamed sources confirming the crusts weren't cut off McCoy's pre-game PB&J, won't appease you, then I offer this explanation up instead: "they're BORED."
Seriously, I think if we put the entire UT receiving corps on roller skates and Colt on a Vespa, his completion percentage would be like 80% again. The Texas offense is like the smart kid in elementary school that all the teachers wrongly diagnosed with A.D.D. The Texas O is not fidgety or unable to do their work without being sent to the isolated desk facing the wall, they're bored. If you want to get their attention, scare them.
"You Longhorns...you lollygag the ball down the field. You lollygag your way around the Red Zone. You lollygag on and off the field. You know what that makes you? Lollygaggers!"
As for the rest of college football, which we have no time to give two sh*ts about so screw them...
"You know - TCB - Taking Care Of Business." - The main storyline of week 6 was there was no storyline. For the first time all season, we didn't witness any major upset. Only four teams in the Top 25 lost and three of them were losses to higher ranked opponents.
Unranked Arkansas did spank #17 Auburn and I'm sure a few people were surprised that Tiger OC (and former Razorback OC) Gus Malzahn didn't have a few more tricks up his sleeve for his return to the house that Nutt cut, but I don't think it can be construed as a big upset considering Petrino's had the Hog offense rolling and Auburn's undefeated start had a lot a do with playing weaker competition.
No doubt some national pundits are starting to circulate similar sentiments about the Longhorns and will undoubtedly predict that Texas will be the next Top 10 team to get exposed as overrated once they play some decent competition. Well the only response to say to that is, "opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one." Including me. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to track down some black market Diarrhea Grape Pedialyte.
By the way, this just in, OU Sucks. No really, they do.
54b
2 recs |
17 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Thanks, 54
I’m with you. I’m probably in the minority, but I’m not too concerned about the offense. I don’t think a lot of motors were fully revved on Saturday night. I imagine Mack or Major went through the playbook and removed the pages labeled “Save for games that matter and opponents that can play.”
OU fields exactly the kind of team that would constitute a trap game, if it weren’t for the rivalry. The Sooners have a stud QB and a terrific front seven on defense. They can keep the game close by limiting the running game (not terribly difficult considering the state of UT’s running game) and harassing the QB. The stud QB can come up with a few big plays. But traps are sprung when your attention is diverted. Presumably, that won’t be the case.
Just one thing, offense — please. Either pop a big play or go 75 yards in 10 plays sometime before the bands take the field at halftime.
by edsp on Oct 11, 2009 8:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, and thanks for painting a better picture
People seem to forget that the only poll that matters right now is the USA Today Poll and the Harris. Both of which have Texas at 2. (Harris has us tied with Bama for 2nd place)
Bama and UF will knock each other out in the SEC-CG. There is no need for everyone to start collectively rubbing their hoo-ha’s in anguish because we dropped a spot in the AP. Fuck the media. Just win, baby.
Get off your knees Greg, you're blowin' the game.
by kriess on Oct 11, 2009 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
No poll matters right now, especially when it concerns two teams that at least one of them is guaranteed a loss.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Oct 12, 2009 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would think the O-Line would be bored
with getting beaten senseless by allegedly inferior talent. Their ineptitude is the catalyst for nearly all of the offense’s struggles. CU had them bewildered and bumbling all night.
Disciplina Praesidium Civitatis.
by zamm on Oct 11, 2009 9:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nothing has changed.
Win and we’re in. Either Bama or FL will go in, not both. We win out, we’re in. We ain’t gonna get jumped by no one-loss team from any conference, and no way we’ll get jumped by Boise “Our hardest game is Hawaii after Oregon!” State. Besides OU, we got Kansas and Okie St coming up, and both are ranked. And who knows, Mizzou may get ranked again by the time we see them. That’s, at the least, three ranked teams to help our SOS. We’re good. Win and we’re in. I ain’t worried at’tall.
In-VINCE-able.
by iamjackburton on Oct 11, 2009 10:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mizz is ranked 24th in USA today
We would most likely play Nebraska in Big 12 championship.
OU, Mizz, Okie Lite, Kansas, Big 12 Championship Game. Thats 5 ranked teams left in 8 games.
As good as Tech looked last night, they could play well down the stretch and be ranked at the end as well. Wyoming is playing well so far in the MWC. Not sure how well ULM has done, but UTEP crapped the bed against Memphis.
No need to worry at all.
Get off your knees Greg, you're blowin' the game.
by kriess on Oct 11, 2009 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm hoping that, now that we've gotten Tech out of the way
they start tearing it up. Obviously if they beat the other ranked teams that we play then it doesn’t matter that much, but yesterday they looked good enough to beat any unranked team on their schedule.
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
by circa1015 on Oct 11, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oklahoma State barely...
….. (5 points) escaped Aggieland. Both Missouri and @Baylor are real threats and a loss drops them from the ranks. Kansas has losses to OU, @TT and to Nebraska before we play them.
OU, at #18, might well be the only ranked team we play this regular season. Hopefully, Nebraska is good enough to run the table and provide us with a Top-8 opponent in the Big-XII CCG.
--- All roads to the Big-XII Championship lead through OU/RRS. It's not just another game! We're all about championships here. ---
by HornChamps on Oct 11, 2009 10:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I get what you're saying, but...
Florida’s remaining schedule, potential ranked games:
- vs. Arkansas (10/17). Not ranked.
- @ MSU (10/24). Will not be ranked.
- vs. Georgia (10/31). Not likely given that Richt let Jonathan Crompton have the best game of his college career.
- vs. Vandy (11/7). Will not be ranked.
- @ South Carolina (11/14). SC is currently ranked #22, so there’s a chance. Of course, before that, SC plays @ Alabama, @ Tenn, and @ Ark.
- vs. FIU (11/28). Uhh, no.
- vs. FSU (11/28). Sitting at 2-3, but wouldn’t count them out of running the table, going 8-3 and slipping into the top 25 by the end of the year in a parity-filled ACC.
So there’s a strong chance that Florida will also only play one ranked team all year, until the clash of the titans SEC Championship against Alabama.
by jc25 on Oct 12, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The difference being.....
…. Florida has already beaten a #4 LSU team. Meanwhile we have an undetermined game with #18 OU. Not hardly comparable. Then there is that nagging problem of Florida being the defending Nat’l Champion.
Florida will face a #2 Bama team in their CC game and we have to hope above all that Nebraska can run the table, so they can enter the Big-XII CC game with a Top-8 ranking. If not, then oh well.
--- All roads to the Big-XII Championship lead through OU/RRS. It's not just another game! We're all about championships here. ---
by HornChamps on Oct 14, 2009 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Respectfully 54b
I disagree. Although I could never write about it as well. There is something wrong with this offense. In fact there are many things wrong with this offense. I don’t doubt that they are bored, or lathargic, or apathetic like you said – but that is not all they are. They were also predictable, bland, short-pass-heavy, not executing well, with absolutely no running attack in this game.
If ALL of that was caused by a lack of focus, then I guess we can hope that they get focussed for OU next weekend.
But we have seen it in every game so far that we have played in other than UTEP.
And if it weren’t for a defense that is just playing lights out (even with our offense giving the ball back as often as they did, CU only had 127 yds total offense) we would not be dismissing this as easily.
Having said all that, I still think that if we do in fact get it together, we are capable of running the table convincingly. But they had better find that groove quickly, and stay in it for 4 quarters every weekend from here on out.
"A lot of people look for the easy way to do anything, in swimming there is no easy way." - Eddie Reese
by SwimTexas on Oct 11, 2009 10:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There is no doubt...
I have the minority opinion here and most feel as you do. So by all means, please disagree, that’s what the forum’s for. And I’m sure you figured out that my “bored” explanation was fraught with sarcasm and meant mostly just to be funny.
Regardless, I think there’s some further explanation needed when you throw out some Hot Sports Opinions as I did, but I really need a stats guy to do this because my argument can really only be made with numbers and I hate stats.
If I did have the time and the inclination, I would try to prove that the Texas offense is basically the same as it was last year with one big difference, Colt is no longer running the ball and that has lead to fewer total yards, fewer TD’s, and fewer 3rd down conversions. (Yeah, I know, way to state the obvious).
At this time last year, he was our leading rusher and let’s face it, the yards he got on the ground weren’t because of some superior o-line blocking scheme. Most of the time, he was flushed from the pocket because the blocking had broken down.
All that to say I don’t think the O-Line is any better or any worse. So for people to feign shock when we’re not able to run the ball like the days or yore, is a bit disingenuous in my opinion. And as for the offense as a whole, besides the Mizzou game last year, what “big” game (games like UTEP wouldn’t count) has our O gotten out of the gate fast in. It just seems to be our M.O. to feel things out and then go a on a run like a basketball team. Once we click, we steamroll. I don’t think that happened Saturday night because it never had to thanks to special teams.
What’s funny is we won by the same margin we did last year, 38-14.
Be nobody but yourself in a world that desperately wants you to be like everybody else.
by 54b on Oct 12, 2009 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You inspired me
I’ll put myself in the minority with you but I went ahead and ran some numbers to satisfy my own curiosity. I looked at this year to date against last year through 5 games. It’s certainly debatable but I’d say this year’s schedule has been a bit more difficult but comparable to last year’s (FAU, @ UTEP, Rice, Ark, @ CU).
Big picture
Total Yards:
2009 – 2398 (6.10 yards/play)
2008 – 2359 (6.59)
Rush Yards:
2009 – 875 (4.53/att)
2008 – 990 (4.56/att)
Pass Yards:
2009 – 1523 (7.6/att)
2008 – 1369 (9.7/att)
3rd Down Conversions:
2009 – 48.00% (36/75)
2008 – 51.67% (31/60)
Touchdowns:
2009 – Pass = 10, Rush = 14
2008 – Pass = 17, Rush = 13
So, what did we learn from that… Total offense is a wash but 2008 was a tad more efficient. There are roughly 10% more offensive snaps in ‘09 and I think I’d attribute that to the improved defense. Rushing stats appear effectively equal (surprised much? I am). Rush touchdowns are a wash. Passing TD’s are significantly different. More passing yards in ‘09 but quite a disparity in yards/att. Maybe it’s true that the pass playcalling has been “shorter” this year…
Further Analysis
Colt’s Rushing:
’09 – 34/58 = 1.71 yards/att (sack adj: 29/90 = 3.10)
’08 – 45/317 = 7.04 (40/346 = 8.65)
(Ouch.)
Team Rushing Stats w/o McCoy:
’09 – 817 (5.14 yards/att)
’08 – 673 (3.91)
So, believe it or not, the RB’s are actually more effective rushing the ball this year (in spite of the 1.84 yard/att last Sat). I won’t say that I wasn’t concerned with the running game after the last performance but I think (or hope) it will be the down game for this season. At least GD only called 25 runs, 17 fewer than season avg.
Oh, and about the downfield passing…
Completions over 15 yards:
’09: 27
’08: 29 (damn good number of them to Chris O)
by gwh65 on Oct 12, 2009 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Wow, much appreciated
It is uncanny how similar the numbers are, but how different our perceptions are of the offense from year to year.
I still say let the Colt run. It adds a threat to the game that stats don’t always track.
That being said, the only stat that matters is the W.
Thanks again for running the numbers.
Be nobody but yourself in a world that desperately wants you to be like everybody else.
by 54b on Oct 12, 2009 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
his completion percentage would be like 80% again
I would just like to point out that Colt was at 82% for the game.
Yes, a lot were short passes, but he did pass the ball for 15+ yards at least 5 times that I counted to Ship (4 were caught, the other would have been a TD if they had not grapped ship running by them). I want to say there was a 6th that was broken up. He also had a couple that were close (~14 yards) to Buck.
The main problem is with the offensive line. Some may argue that we just don’t have our best RB (Fozzy) in the game. That is BS. He may be our best RB, but that doesn’t matter. Yes, he turned a broken play into a TD. Against a team like OU, that doesn’t happen. Fozzy ran backwards to avoid a 3 yard loss and ended up getting in the endzone, but against OU he would have turned that 3 yard loss in to 5 or 8 yard loss. We’ve seen it a million times with Selvin or JC trying to turn nothing into something behind bad blocking.
To end our offensiv woes, we need to stop getting blown up in one on ones.
— Random other thing: The wild horn CAN work (it does at other schools with less talent). However, Chiles and the coaches have to do a better job with it. Chiles needs to hand it to Monroe. Davis needs to call a sweep to Monroe or a pass from Chiles (for more detail, just GoBR’s write up).
by UT_BKC on Oct 12, 2009 8:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I should make it clear that I’m not saying that we shouldn’t have tried more down field passes. Frankly, as bad as our offense was and as well as CU was keeping the short game in front of them, I think we should have tried boom/bust with the long passes for a couple series.
My point is that Colt’s throwing isn’t the problem. Yes, anything could improve to 100%. Or a few of the balls he threw could have been placed just a little better, possibly allowing for a few more YAC. But when you are throwing 82%, that is not the problem.
by UT_BKC on Oct 12, 2009 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boredom, Sacrebleu!
ESPN showed a marathon of past Texas vs OU games on Sunday and words that are never used to describe those games, malaise and ennui but I agree they could apply to the Horns effort on Saturday.
one note about running the ball,
the RRS ver 1996 had a OU team going into the game on a 5 game losing steak playing a Texas team with a back field of Priest Holmes and Ricky Williams. Even with the one of the best back fields in the history of college football Texas lost
by Xerxes on Oct 12, 2009 9:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















