Morning Coffee Loves Beating OU
Flavor of the Week at running back: Cody Johnson. Yes, one might be inclined to suggest that Fozzy Whittaker deserves this honor after what was undoubtedly his best performance in a Longhorn uniform and to further suggest that the only reason Cody Johnson is receiving this coveted honor is because the Flavor of the Week must change, avoid repeats as long as possible. Both valid arguments.
However, there are several reasons for Johnson winning the award this week -- the first reason is the hard work that he put in this fall to lose nearly 20 pounds and maximize his quickness. Yes, he should have been in better shape coming into fall practice, but the point is that right now he is where he needs to be physically. The second reason is that the coaching staff seems to finally have settled on the proper role for Johnson -- a fourth-quarter battering ram to bludgeon tired defenses. Mack Brown spent a lot of time during the spring and beginning of fall practice talking about wanting to run a better four-minute drill at the end of games to kill the clock and maintain possession of the football. For that role, Johnson is the perfect weapon.
Johnson also wins this award because against Oklahoma he looked as quick as he ever have, but more importantly, he ran angry, with a purpose, instead of the tentative Johnson from earlier in the season. The end result -- five carries for 31 yards, helping him finish with the highest per-carry average on the team for the game, while also catching a pass out of the backfield for a six-yard gain. He won't ever be a big-play threat in the passing game, but if he can make himself available for McCoy to pick up positive yardage on otherwise well-defended plays it can provide a big lift to an offense struggling to find an identity.
The bottom line is that Johnson provides the Longhorns with a serious weapon in games that are close into the fourth quarter and in situations where Texas needs to kill the clock. Nice to see him finally deployed in a way that strategically makes sense other than his specialty, short-yardage situations.
Musical chairs at the receiver position. John Chiles took a beating in PB's Postgame React due to his inability to separate from defenders. Well deserved after catching two passes for one yard on the day, one of them on a slip screen that Oklahoma clealry saw coming, as they did not even bother to line up a defensvie back over him. Had he just run straight down the field he probably would have been open. James Kirkendoll picked up a personal foul penalty for head-butting Quinton Carter, who apparently took acting lessons this off season from former punter Mike Knall and would have made Vlade Divac or your average Argentinian basketball player proud with his subsequent flop. Kirkendoll caught three passes for 11 yards and may be the biggest disappointment in the receiving corps after so much off season talk about how consistently he runs routes. Besides the Wyoming game, Kirkendoll has provided little in the way of help this season on offense and has been giving questionable effort.
So, exit Kirkendoll and Chiles, enter Malcolm Williams and Marquise Goodwin. During his Monday press conference, Brown spoke about wanting to run the ball better to open up more play-action possibilities downfield, which is where Williams enters the equation. The bottom line is that the other receivers haven't produced, so it's time to finally, belatedly, see what Williams can do with his first shot at extended playing time. As for Goodwin, the touchdown catch and the diving play near the sideline illustrate just how good he can be with more opportunities. It's cliche now given that he's proven all season that he's a football player willing to put as much of a hit on defenders as he can, but it's true. He's a football player who also happens to be an all-world track star and the future at Texas is incredibly bright for that young man. It's also worth noting that Jordan Shipley will return to the flanker position that he occupied most of the last season after failing to create separation against Oklahoma's Brian Jackson, who surely raised his NFL stock with his strong performance on Saturday.
Tracking: playmaking defense. What a change a year can make. After forcing five turnovers against Oklahoma, with two coming on special teams, the Longhorns now have three more turnovers than they forced all of last season. Individually, Earl Thomas now has five interceptions, only one fewer than the team had as a whole in 2008 and good enough to tie for the national lead in that category. Apparently not content to allow his brother to recover all the fumbles, Emmanuel Acho joined the party with two fumble recoveries and would have had a chance at the fumble Thomas forced near the goalline had he broken down a little better instead of overrunning the football. Hey, at this point, if an Acho is around a loose football and doesn't recover it, it's a remarkable occurrence.
Curtis Brown and Deon Beasley, once regarded as the two least physical members of the entire defense, put hard hits on Oklahoma players to knock the ball out, with Beasley's play probably ranking as his best at Texas, though there really isn't much competition. Like Michael Huff and Aaron Ross before them, it's now time to say that Duane Akina has finally molded them into football players. At points last season, I wasn't sure that I would ever be able to say that about them.
Consider for a second the stats put up by Earl Thomas -- seven tackles, two for loss, three pass break ups, one forced fumble, and one interception. Thomas had huge expectations for growth entering the season and it's safe to say that he has fulfilled those expectations and perhaps even gone beyond them. His play on the interception was just beautiful -- he faked the blitz towards the line of scrimmage, then dropped back into coverage and showed off his excellent speed doing so. Kid is fun to watch and it will be a travesty if he doesn't win a Thorpe Award at Texas.
Speaking of which, he might end up with some serious competition from Aaron Williams, who recovered from the biggest mistake of his career, the missed tackle on the long touchdown by Ryan Broyles, by using his sick vertical leap to catch a pass that Landry Jones was trying to throw out of bounds. You can watch football for a long time and never see a more athletic pick than that. Oh yeah, and he also knocked the reigning Heisman winner out of the game. If Will Muschamp could engineer a nickel back, he would have a hard time making a more perfect player than Aaron Williams. Simply incredible.
It's easy to forget now how much the Longhorns had to replace on the defensive line losing four players who were essentially starters or major members of the rotation in Roy Miller, Brian Orakpo, Aaron Lewis, and Henry Melton. This group inside is playing about as well as you could ask -- even though Sergio Kindle doesn't have the gaudy sack numbers, every team slides their protection to his side of the field and he still makes plays, pressuring the quarterback and playing the running game so quickly and aggressively that he's able to consistently make plays up and down the line of scrimmage. The player that he has become in the last season and a half makes his usage through his first two seasons at Texas all the more criminal. Shame on you, Gene Chizik, Larry Mac Duff, and Duane Akina.
Sam Acho's play on the other side deserves plaudits as well -- he has made the jump predicted in his first season lagging heavy snaps. Then there's the interior of the line, supposedly a major weakness. Remember that? Seems so long ago, doesn't it, since we were all wringing our hands about the defensive tackle position? Lamarr Houston has been unbelievable and Ben Alexander continues to play extremely well in his last season on the 40 Acres. Kheeston Randall has held his own, but now has at least three roughing the passer penalties on the season and that needs to stop. Like, yesterday. Oscar Giles and Mike Tolleson both deserve a raise after the job they have done with this group. Phenomenal.
Tracking: special teams. The special teams may not have scored a touchdown on Saturday, but they sure worked hard at it. Deon Beasley's forced fumble along the sideline nearly led to a scoop and score by Malcolm Williams, but I still have no idea how the officials ended up determining that it was Texas ball at the OU 18. As mentioned below, the field goal kicking was perfect from Hunter Lawrence and the rubgy punt was much more effective this week from Justin Tucker, who did not kick the ball left-footed during the game.
Of his eight punts on the day, Tucker put three inside the Oklahoma 20 yardline and averaged 45 yards per attempt, including one 60-yarder. The concern is that he's having trouble consistently getting the ball to fall in front of opponents to get that good roll he consistently got last season, which creates another problem -- with the low, line-drive nature of the punts, it's easy to out-kick the coverage, especially if the punt travels 40 or more yards in the air. That precise scenario allowed Dominique Franks to return a punt 30 yards to midfield. After a week of evaluating whether to stick with the rugby punting or return to using John Gold, Brown clearly made the philosophical decision to stick with Tucker and that simply may be the way that Texas continues to punt in the future.
The return game was not as effective as it has been, with Shipley picking up negative yardage on his two punt returns and DJ Monroe failing to break off any long plays on his three returns. On the positive side, Antwan Cobb returned a sky kick 18 yards and Monroe was effective, averaging 25 yards a return, certainly enough to give the Longhorns the good field position they enjoyed for most of the day.
The Sooners made the smart decision to block Marquise Goodwin when punting, but Aaron Williams came free on the edge and nearly blocked the first attempt of the day. Good to see him return to action in that capacity. On the other side, the Longhorns covered kicks as well as they have this season, holding Mossis Madu to only 21 yards per return on the day.
Overall, it's clear that the Sooners have worked hard in the last year to shore up their kick coverage and did a passable job by not allowing any long returns by Jordan Shipley or DJ Monroe. However, it's equally clear that Texas will continue to win the special teams phase of the game if the Longhorns can continue to cover kicks and get good production of Justin Tucker rugby punting. And it should be a major relief to Texas fans that Hunter Lawrence proved himself so capable on such a pick stage. Way to go, kicker.
Randomness. Let's do this bullet-style.
- The game plan running the football was excellent against Oklahoma with some actual misdirection and using DJ Monroe in motion on the jet sweep. Kudos to the coaching staff. The plan in the passing game? Not so much.
- Recently, PB asked me about where I would rank this Texas defense and after that performance against Oklahoma, it has to rank right up there with 2005, but this team even seems to have a few more playmakers on it. Another performance like that against Missouri and I might be inclined to put them in front of that excellent 2005 unit.
- Fozzy Whittaker won the Hard Hat award this week after crashing into Thomas following a personal foul committed by Oklahoma. Mack Brown said that the team had a good laugh about that at the meeting.
- How clutch was Hunter Lawrence? Anyone who has watched teams like South Florida over the years knows that field goals of over 40 yards are far from gimmes in the college game and Lawrence nailed identical 42-yarders. You can bet that Bobby Petrino would have sacrificed one of his children to have someone that consistent against Florida this weekend.
- Blake Gideon missed six tackles by himself against Oklahoma. Christian Scott let his team down terribly by failing to remain eligible and I wonder how his teammates will accept him back next season, assuming that he makes progress academically -- will it be hard for them to trust someone who left them hanging with his own selfishness?
- Why has the offensive line been such a disaster in the first half of so many games, only to respond with sometimes-dominant performances in the second half? I love the ability to finish, but why the consistently poor play early?
- You may have heard rumors about OU still sucking. Absolutely true.
87 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Post
-----@ Live the Dream---- 2009 @------
by LadyLonghorninOK on Oct 20, 2009 8:38 AM CDT reply actions
Deon Beasley’s forced fumble along the sideline nearly led to a scoop and score by Malcolm Williams, but I still have no idea how the officials ended up determining that it was Texas ball at the OU 18.
it was ruled a muffed punt, muffed punts are apparently not able to be advanced, therefore, Texas had possession of the ball and never should have gotten to the point of trying to score (we’d have had the TD removed and still had it on the 18 even if he didn’t fumble it for the touchback).
by Displaced Longhorn on Oct 20, 2009 8:49 AM CDT reply actions
Thanks, that squares with what happened.
First of all, why can’t the defense advance a muffed punt? That doesn’t make sense. The offensive player is supposed to hold onto the football. Why protect him? Second of all, I disagree with the officials that it was a muffed punt. Franks had possession of the football, therefore it should have been a fumble and the Longhorns should have been able to advance it. The Longhorns might have dodged a bullet there though because I think Williams may have fumbled that ball out of the end zone, which would have given the ball back to OU.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Oct 20, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions
Muffed punt rationale
I was asking the same question, and the only thing I could come up with was back in the day they were trying to encourage more returns so they made that rule to lower the risk of attempting a return.
I don't know, I think the refs called it right in the end
If you look at the highlights – http://videos.utexasclan.com/view.php?id=7207 at the 4:00 minute mark you can see that it was really a boom-boom play. Beasley made the hit just as Franks got his hands on it and before he could make a move.
It really could have gone either way, but as biased as I am, I contend that in the end the right call was made. Muff.
Agreed. I think that was a fumble, not a muff.
Had it been a receiver catching a pass, they’d have ruled fumble.
(Parenthetically, I could not believe the announcers, with 3-4 minutes lag time, couldn’t at least bring up the possibility that the eventual ruling would be muff and that all that-goal line hubbub was moot.) Moment the ball was picked up, I thought, “It’s coming back.” When Williams fumbled, I thought, “I SURE HOPE it’s coming back.”
Bang Bang play.
I believe it was a muff which cannot be advanced. The reciever must demonstrate control. He was basically standing still then beasley hit the ball. In the NFL he needs to “make a football move” in order to consider it a fumble. I don’t know for sure if the same applies here.
Stoops suffers from homo un-erectus. That's where his wang is hugeified not by a woman, but by a man.
Thas what I was tellin' you befo'!
The player that he has become in the last season and a half makes his usage through his first two seasons at Texas all the more criminal.
The swine flu takes a Will Muschamp shot every September.
by pleaseplaykindle on Oct 20, 2009 9:30 AM CDT reply actions
didn’t he spend most of the first two seasons nursing ankle injuries?
by Displaced Longhorn on Oct 20, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't remember, its possible.
I do remember sitting at DKR for the 2006/2007 seasons wondering why the hell that kid Kindle who, when put in the game once or twice would play with a ridiculous motor and effort, was being blocked on the depth chart by the likes of Robert Killebrew.
The swine flu takes a Will Muschamp shot every September.
by pleaseplaykindle on Oct 20, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions
Some of the blame has to fall on Kindle
He missed the beginning of what should have been his breakout soph year because of his DWI arrest.
And yes, he did seem to always be nursing injuries his first 2 seasons.
by Horncasting on Oct 20, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions
For some reason I thought it was hamstring injuries, but the ankle may have been the concern.
Either way, they might as well have redshirted the kid his first year, because they really didn’t use him very well (too much time in coverage, which he hadn’t learned yet) even in the rare occasions they did use him. Can you imagine having him back in 2010?
by burntorangehorn on Oct 20, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions
GoBR
I would love to see a pictorial breakdown of defensive series just like you do on offense for the OU game.
The swine flu takes a Will Muschamp shot every September.
by pleaseplaykindle on Oct 20, 2009 9:31 AM CDT reply actions
Goodwin is slated for his first collegiate start Saturday when Texas travels to Missouri, replacing John Chiles as the primary Sub B receiver.
how much does it suck to come to Texas to be a starting QB, never make it, switch to WR, play so well, and then get replaced by a true freshman who came in on a track scholarship? Chiles has to be mad as hell, hope he plays Saturday like he wants his job back.
by Displaced Longhorn on Oct 20, 2009 9:36 AM CDT reply actions
Doesn't seem like he's played that well
against anyone of consequence. Seems to me like Chiles is what he is at this point.
strong safety perhaps?
At least until Christian Scott comes back in. I kid, of course. But seriously…
I hope he gets good and mad
and starts hitting somebody. Like, when we’re running the ball. Like, when a teammate catches a pass. Like, maybe run to the press box and hit GD when the OC calls a bad play. I could live with Chiles’ inexperience if he’d just PLAY LIKE IT MATTERS. Like No. 9 on kick coverage.
Are we even sure John Chiles is athletic?
I’ve never seen a slower “fast guy” in my life. He is not a football player in any sense of the word, and thank God we have Marquise Goodwin on the team. John Chiles makes Blake Gideon look like Sean Taylor. How you can say he “played so well” is beyond me.
More Randomness...
Can someone please tell me why G. Davis will not consistently attack the middle of the field? Hitting Buckner in the middle of the field seems like it should be an easy pitch and catch between Colt and Buckner – and might have helped slow down OU’s relentless pass rush. Look – a win is a win and we’re 6-0. Hell, if we win the rest of our games in defensive struggles like this – I could care less. I’m just tired of WR screens in the flat, five yard outs to the flat, and throwing the ball to our WRs when they are standing still. These are athletic WRs – get them the ball as they are moving up the field. Slants, crossing patterns, etc. Thoughts? Agree? Disagree?
Attempting to answer your question...
Something about OU’s scheme on Saturday took the middle of the field away from us. I heard Colt say that twice, so that seems to be why we did not do it. It was not available or too much of a risk for some reason to go there. Best I can come up with since I am no expert on defensive scheming.
Play like you mean it...
Colt made a comment
that he didn’t have enough time for anything to develop downfield or across the middle
Follow Up
Yeah, I heard Colt mention that as well – but I think defenders are starting to key in on our offensive tendency to focus on the flats. I can remember at least two quick outs that Colt threw on Saturday that could have/should have been picked and might have been scores. Don’t want to beat a dead horse but I would love to attack up the field more. Anyway, unbelievable game on Saturday – great effort in all three phases. This team seems to have picked up where last year’s team left off – no egos, full effort, play hard, win games. Could be a nice recipe for a championship!
Yeah but when OU was blitzing like they do, there has to be SOMEONE open.
The flats were covered AND the middle was covered? If that is the case, we are running the wrong plays. In football, there is always someone open..especially when the defense is blitzing. We just didn’t make any adjustments in the first half to counter their blitzing and that’s why we sucked it up on offense. Yes, we did better in the 2nd half with the running game helping out a lot, but the lack of adjustments in the first half is scary.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
There probably was
someone open, but with the line blocking like a sieve in the first half, there wasn’t any time for McCoy to locate that person.
by aaronlybrand on Oct 20, 2009 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Colorado did the same thing
and so will every defense remaining on the schedule. Time to adjust.
Disciplina Praesidium Civitatis.
That’s what I heard too. I think they took away the middle almost by blocking out with the outside linebackers and bringing as much pressure up the middle. The pressure was getting there before the targets could reach the middle of the field. Colt had so little time before he would’ve been sacked that he was extremely limited in where he could put the ball.
by burntorangehorn on Oct 20, 2009 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions
One, there was little time.
But the second part is that OU was successfully collapsing the front of the pocket and Colt couldn’t step up to make that throw up the middle.
You must have running plays to counter such an attack: traps, dive plays, quick counters and the like. Then those LBs have to stay home.
Oh sure
You can bet that Bobby Petrino would have sacrificed one of his children to have someone that consistent against Florida this weekend.
Things Bobby Petrino would sacrifice one of his children to have:
Hunter Lawrence
A QB that never learned under Lloyd Carr’s staff
A glass of good Scotch instead of “this toilet-water” they keep in his office
Jumping to the head of the line at checkout
An extra roll with dinner
Someone to replace the batteries in the damn remote
Someone to find the damn remote
“Another kid that doesn’t require so much damn ‘love’ and ‘attention’ and can remember where he left the remote after he’s done lounging around all day in the house that Bobby P paid for with the money I got from spending all those long hours bustin’ my butt in contract negotiations!”
by Horn Brain on Oct 20, 2009 10:13 AM CDT reply actions 2 recs
In all fairness, good scotch is probably hard to come by in Fayetteville
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Oct 20, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
so my younger sister actually used to date his son...
Fam. lives in Louisville now and they met before Petrino left Louisville. By all accounts your list seems about right. His son pretty much describes him as a grade-A asshole.
Kicking game and Hunter Lawrence
Seems like the FG miss by OU in the first half has been forgetten in this game, but ultimately that was the deciding margin. Hunter’s clutch kicking stands out even more when you consider that he was 100%, while his counter part was 2 for 3.
R running game impressive
It was great to see Mack/GD finally involve a WR in the running game. Colt looked good runnig the ball except for the fumble. One subtle change that I have also been wanting for a long tiime is that Colt would sometimes run to the TB for the handoff. This draws the D in the direction that Colt is running, thus setting up O line blocks when the TB gets the hand off. Using a TE who can block makes a huge difference in the run game.
Greg Smith did not attempt to pick up a blitizing OU defender which led to Colt’s blindside hit fumble. Greg made no attempt to block the guy and normally would go out on a route rather than pass block (in a designed attempt to pull a defender with him). Greg looked good run blocking and caught two passes. He took a lot of crap from people who said he can’t catch the ball or block, I wonder if they will give him his props now. UT ran well when Greg was in the game.
Chiles, Buckner, and Greg Smith don’t know how to run routes well. Buckner and Greg don’t know how to run a buttonhook. You have to run right at the LB, get right next to him and post him up(i.e. block him out from the incoming pass). Colt has to deliver the ball on time.
The out patterns to Buckner and Greg Smith are a disaster because they give the opportunity to the defender for easy picks. When a receiver is defended by a faster guy onan out route, you have to hit the receiver right after the cut. There was little precision in timing on most passes Colt threw to people other than Ship.
OU seemed to be playing a matchup zone some of the time. It would be great to run some very quick crossing patterns against this.
The UT receiver patterns too often had WRs just standing in one spot.
Minor point
Wasn’t a blitz that Smith missed but rather English the DE but it doesn’t change your point.
One MAJOR point you missed entirely GoBR (and is pretty surprising)...
WE’RE BOWL ELIGIBLE FOLKS!!! Put your party hats on!
Just like we dont dogpile in baseball
we dont celebrate being bowl eligible. thats for lesser programs, like the aggies.
And the Sooners
At this rate, they just may have reason to dogpile at the end of the season.
"Stats are for losers, I like winning games."
by SuperBentley on Oct 20, 2009 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Anybody notice
OU (still sucks; I’m starting 362 days early) must travel to Lubbock, Lawrence and Lincoln, and closes with Ok. State? That loss column could grow. (Other games are Aggies and Aggie-destroyer K-State in Norman).
Goodwin is the real deal
I am so impressed by him. But, I also was very impressed with Fozzy. I will be in MO this weekend and can’t wait. After re-watching the game last night I wasn’t as upset as I thought. I feel that we have so much upside that if we can tap half of it we will be in the NC. To win the NC we better tap all of it.
Heard Herbie on radio about spread.
Thinks we may be seeing the endgame for spread offenses as the defenses have caught up with it. He said this happens with every great offensive scheme – wishbone, etc. and the defenses create packages to stop it by forcing the team to be one dimensional. Interesting thought?
Yip, the mousetrap is starting to catch up to the mouse, so it’s time to build a better mouse.
by burntorangehorn on Oct 20, 2009 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions
I think you are right
Scoring is way down from the last three years and the relative strength of defense is what’s led to so many upsets.
by burnt in ny on Oct 20, 2009 6:24 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
No way the spead dies
Next you’ll try to convince me I have to give up my Beta VHS
Stoops suffers from homo un-erectus. That's where his wang is hugeified not by a woman, but by a man.
Endgame? Kirk's right, of course it's the endgame.
That obsolete wing T will never work in an NFL football game, just like no decent coach would choose a spread offense at this juncture. Any top level coordinator could sniff out the spread in seconds.
The sooner everyone gives up and admits that Ohio State has the only right minded offensive approach, the better off we will all be.
/End Herbstreit induced reflexive sarcasm
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Oct 20, 2009 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Heh, yeah, it’s definitely not the end for the spread, but I think the momentum’s slowing, and eventually the pendulum will swing in another direction. Hard to say what the next save will be. Some folks tell me it’s some newfangled thing called the “wildcat,” and judging by the context in which the casual fans and geniuses like Len Pasquerelli use the term, I can only conclude that it means any offensive set in which the guy taking the snap can run faster than a 4.8 40.
by burntorangehorn on Oct 20, 2009 8:53 PM CDT up reply actions
A Texas/Alabama Championship game
could be a referendum on the spread offense.
by BrooklynHorn on Oct 20, 2009 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Scott selfish?
I wouldn’t say Scott’s academic problems stem from selfishness. After all what did he have to gain? He’s just a dumbass.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
How do we know it is even his fault
He is not out for grades, which means he could have taken the classes his advisers told him to, passed, and still not be able to play.
That’s true. I want to blame the students themselves, in a way, yes. But even thought the student, not the compliance office, is ultimately responsible for ensuring that he takes the right classes in order to meet requirements, the compliance office is still a standard reliance. They are supposed to instruct the students on what credit and course requirements there are, and then work through with them to ensure they have a plan in place to meet those requirements.
by burntorangehorn on Oct 21, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions
What did he have to gain?
A starting job, the chance to play for a national championship, the chance to raise his pro stock.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Oct 21, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Props for calling out players for their negligence
When news of Scott/Beasly/Collins’ screw up first surfaced, it was wildly popular to blame the staff.
while the staff certainly shares in some culpability, you don’t skirt the bare minumum margins and not shoulder more than your share of the blame. Not knowing the playbook will mitigate any level of talent.
Overall another good BON read.
The staff deserves way more blame than that
They dedicate an entire staff to helping players get their shit together. People are paid to watch out for this. I could put it all on the player if it was up to him alone, but there is a huge support staff that screwed the pooch on this. It’s 50% on Scott and 50% on coaches/staff.
really?
“James Kirkendoll picked up a personal foul penalty for head-butting Quinton Carter, who apparently took acting lessons this off season from former punter Mike Knall”
Look I’m not going to argue the Mike Knall point because it can’t be argued. But if you think Quinton Carter took a dive, you must have missed the award winning performance your resident golden boy performed in the final minute. He drew the personal foul penalty after barely getting touched by Beal, waiting a full second, and then flopping around like a fish he’d just pulled into the boat. A punter flopping around on the ground is one thing, but your Heisman Trophy “candidate” quarterback pulling that stunt is another thing entirely.
What does Colt's behavior have to do with Carter's?
Colt acted a little bit on that, yeah. So did Carter when he fell to the ground after a little head knock. The two events are mutually exclusive. What’s your point?
my point
was I’ve read countless times what a sissy Knall was for pulling that act last year only to witness Colt do exactly the same thing and that in my opinion a punter doing it is pathetic enough, but to watch Colt do it was truly weak. The two can be exclusive which I suppose is why there was no mention of Colt’s performance in the article above only Carter’s and yet another outdated reference to Knall last year. I very much respect the fact that you at least admitted Colt’s embellishment as I certainly did not expect that. On a personal note, I’ve been reading the site for several years and just started posting but I’ve always enjoyed your writing billy.
It's one of those things
When the opposition does it, it’s annoying; when your guy does it, it’s gamesmanship. This phenomenon is as vital to sports as beer.
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Oct 20, 2009 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Personally...
I disagreed with that final roughing the passer call. It was a horrible way for the game to have ended. In general, we got the better side of the officiating Saturday.
by BrooklynHorn on Oct 20, 2009 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions
let me fly around a non mobile tight end and swing my arm around your throat
that shit is gonna hurt
i would never
expect that call to be passed on when the qb is a) sliding b) on the ground already, and c)in the backfield not even attempting to gain yards. Beal dives in and tries to bring colt’s head with him. No matter how lightly you do that, It will get called every time.
McCoy hardly waited
for a full second. When you’re already on the ground that doesn’t seem like much of a flop. If he did flop, as you say, perhaps it was because Beal took a cheap shot by grabbing his head on the previous play, which is the one that should have drawn a penalty. To me, Beal was trying to hurt McCoy at the end of the game, which is a real POS thing to do.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Oct 21, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks for reading, though.
This is all a matter of opinion in the end.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Oct 21, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Running clock
Did anyone else notice that when the first half was winding down and OU had the ball, OU ran the clock down then there was an official review, but when the review ended the clock started again and OU was able to run off another 35 seconds?
Then on UT’s last drive of the game, a UT OL was called for holding and when the ball was spotted, the clock started running again.
Both instances allowed the offense to kill more than a full minute between plays.
I assume this is not supposed to happen in either case.
OU declined the Hold on our last drive.
wouldve given us an extra down to run more clock.
by the other Andrew on Oct 20, 2009 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Brandon Caleb
Let’s hope your wide receivers watched how that kid blocks when the ball isn’t in his hands.

by 




























