Morning Coffee Loves Malcolm Williams
Running game suffers biggest struggles since Colorado. Not only was it clear that Central Florida was the best team at stopping the run the Longhorns will face until a potential appearance in the national championship game, but the Knights also loaded up to the stop the run, daring the Longhorns to throw the football. So throw the football they did, to the tune of 470 yards by Colt McCoy. The concern, however, is that Texas didn't run the ball successfully after three straight games coming close to or exceeding the 60% success rate the coaches want to achieve. Against Central Florida, Texas rushed for 67 yards on 25 carries, with a success rate of only 50%.
There are certainly a lot of reasons for the lack of success. Much like the Colorado game, the coaches were relatively stubborn about using the basic running plays -- the counter and zone plays with some zone read sprinkled in, while eschewing the Monroe Series after the first play from scrimmage and choosing not to run the actual misdirection counter play and the draw play debuted on the first play against Oklahoma. Though Cody Johnson scored his first touchdown on an inside zone play, all of his other attempts on the play were stopped by the Knights -- it just doesn't make that much sense to have such a big back running laterally down the line of scrimmage. The easy adjustment here is to run the same plays from under center, where Johnson would have the ability to come downhill more on the plays and square his shoulders to the line of scrimmage, though that is, of course, unlikely. In the two times the coaches used the jet tempo package, however, the Longhorns did use play action both times, so they did break tendency there. Congratulations, GD!
The coaches also have to be careful with their substitution patterns when they bring Johnson into the game. As Greg Davis effectively moved between 11 personnel and 10 personnel while alternating Johnson and Whittaker at the running back position, Johnson coming into the game often meant a running play and he's just not good enough in the passing game to establish much of a threat, despite his 14-yard gain late in the game in which he broke several tackles and then moved the pile at the end. Improvement in the passing game and picking up the blitz should be major points of emphasis for Johnson in bowl practices.
It looks like Johnson will get the start against Baylor after Fozzy Whittaker came out with the ones against UCF, with Brown speculating that he may get 20 carries. The question is how those 20 carries come about. The I formation look hasn't been particularly successful this season and it just doesn't make a ton of sense to only have two receivers on the field if Antwan Cobb isn't going to split out at all as a receiver -- recall that there was some speculation in fall camp that he would earn the role of third-down back.
The fact of the matter is that the current scheme doesn't suit Johnson particularly well and if the coaching staff is really intent on giving him more carries, they have to figure out what plays consistently work. With the success of the jumbo package, which debuted some actual runs behind the left side of the line for the first time this year, and the possibility of bootlegs and some play-action passing, that might have to be more of an option on any short-yardage situations like 3rd and 3 or even 4 in the middle of the field.
Another adjustment in the receiving corps. Aren't there ways to get Marquise Goodwin the ball on the move? The freshman speedster had three catches on Saturday, all three of which got him the ball standing still, where he had no chance to use his speed or even avoid tacklers. The first came on an obvious screen pass out of a bunch formation with Shipley and Buckner that quickly got blown up because there were too many players in a small area. No idea what Davis was thinking on that play -- it had virtually zero chance of success.
The Longhorns have not run any slip screens for him that give him more momentum on the catch and also did not appear to run any slants, crossing routes, or deep routes other than clear-out go routes out of the empty set for Goodwin. The crossing route in particular may be intriguing given his ability to run away from virtually any defender -- neither Jordan Shipley nor James Kirkendoll have that kind of speed. It will be extremely disappointing if the coaches aren't more creative and/or assertive in getting Goodwin the ball so he can be effective -- after debuting Goodwin on the jet sweep against Oklahoma State, he did not receive a carry against UCF.
Perhaps the coaches essentially sabotaged Goodwin's ability to produce in order to have an excuse to re-insert Kirkendoll as the starter. The blocking effort from the local product has been much more better since his demotion, so that's great. He's also done a better job of making opponents miss in space to turn short passes into nice gains.
Mack Brown offered a pretty lame excuse for Kirkendoll's struggles after the Wyoming game:
I thought we probably worked James too much in preseason. Receivers run all the time in this heat. Jordan (Shipley) came out and didn't spend as much time out there. I'm not sure that James didn't hit a wall after Wyoming. He just got tired a little bit. We just need to get him some rest and shake it up a little bit. He played great on Saturday. He was one of the great performers during the ball game with his blocking. Our downfield blocking with our receivers was as good Saturday as we've had. We feel like now when Marquise (Goodwin) and John (Chiles) hit a little wall we can give them a little break. I think James is ready now with Malcolm (Williams) to make the stretch run here.
It's a lame excuse because Kirkendoll hasn't even gotten that much rest, as he and Chiles have both played heavily in the three games of their demotion, enough to pretty much call them de-facto starters with Williams and Goodwin. The demotion resulted in better effort from both players, but the questions about their ability to create separation still linger. After all, that was the main reason they lost their jobs in the first place.
The good news is that Malcolm Williams continues to play well. Though he did fail to attack the ball on the post route that should have gone for a touchdown, McCoy did underthrow the ball slightly and the defender did make a nice play to knock the ball loose. In the last two games, though, Williams has not had the type of out-and-out drop that he did against Missouri, catching the ball away from his body well on every play but the one mentioned above. After that play, McCoy went right back to him on a stop route and Williams used a ridiculous big brother-like stiff arm to make it past the first defender before nearly breaking another tackle on his way to 16 yards. It's that type of physical dominance and speed that gives Williams so much potential.
Jordan Shipley. It's difficult to put words to the type of performance that Shipley had against the completely overmatched UCF secondary. About the only thing that is easy to say is that the 53-yard catch he had late in the second quarter would have gone for a 93-yard touchdown had McCoy hit him in the stride after Shipley left a defender trailing and flailing on a double move.
It's probably the proper time, now that Shipley is the all-time single game receiving yards leader in the history of the program, to reflect once again on just how far he's come. After leg injuries kept him out of his first two seasons, Brown advised him that maybe his football career just wasn't going to happen. Though he may not have the pure speed he did in high school, Shipley never stopped working and, in fact, admittedly may have worked too hard coming back from his first injury, leading to some of the hamstring issues he experienced. Tell the guy to take a day off and he would probably look at you like you're crazy.
The bottom line is that Shipley will go down as one of the best receivers, perhaps the best, in the history of Texas football. A tireless worker and true student of his craft, "The Roommate" never seems to run a sloppy route or drop a football and is not only an incredible representative of his university and football program, but tops it all off with a heaping dose of genuine humility.
It's hard to imagine that Shipley will finally end his college career in January, but the good news is that if his younger brother really can run routes as well as his older brother and really does have the hands to match, as all reports indicate, he will have an extremely successful career as well. Let's just hope he doesn't have to endure so many injuries first.
Tracking: special teams play. Headng into the game, it seemed unlikely that the Longhorns would find much success in the return game, given their top-10 national rankings in both covering kicks and punts. Add in the fact that Texas wasn't likely to get many opportunities to return kicks and it seemed that the normal advantage Texas holds in special teams would mostly be negated. It turns out that was mostly the case. On the opening kickoff of the second half, the Texas wedge got blown up, limiting DJ Monroe to a 17-yard return. In the punting game, Texas had a little more success, as Shipley had an 11-yard return and picked up three on another -- his 14 yards nearly matched the 17 Central Florida had given up all season.
However, Shipley was only able to return two of eight kicks and the Central Florida punter, normally one of the worst in the country, managed to average 42.5 yards per kick, including a 70 yarder, and pinned Texas inside the twenty on four different occasions -- on the day, he was probably the best offensive weapon for the Knights, consistently flipping field position.
In the Texas kicking game, Justin Tucker, perhaps finally unleashed to put the ball in the end zone, had touchbacks on each of his last two kicks, while the coverage units played well with the exception of a 27-yard return. Antwan Cobb was the star, making tackles on consecutive kicks, while Aaron Smith also had a nice day in coverage.
On the negative side, Hunter Lawrence had his first bad miss of the season, missing well left on a 44-yard attempt. Certainly one miss isn't enough to cause concern, but it does ruin his otherwise perfect season (his other two misses came on a block and the 52 yarder that hit the cross bar against UTEP) in a week that saw him named a semi-finalist for the Lou Groza Award, given to the best place kicker in the country.
The other major negative was a shanked punt off the foot of Justin Tuckern, raising further concerns about the rugby-style of punting Mack Brown has adopted at the exclusion of John Gold. No doubt it will be something the coaching staff revisits this week. The Longhorns also did not come close to blocking any punts either, though it did not appear that the coaches really sent them after the quarterback, for unexplained reasons.
Overall, Brown sounded disappointed in the special teams as a whole after bragging about them so much over the last several weeks. Of the three phases, the special teams have the most room for improvement going up to Waco.
Behind the numbers. Some notes on the Central Florida game and the season to date. Also here.
-
EBS not only caught his fifth pass of the season, but also had six knockdown blocks in the game to earn the Boss Hawg Award.
- The defense had nine quarterback pressures, 13 hits on the quarterback, and seven sacks, the latter number representing the highest total this season.
- The defense gave up only 151 yards on 57 plays (2.6 yards per play), despite giving up 75 yards on the final drive, which came against mostly second-string players. UCF gained only 76 yards on 38 rushes -- 2.0 yards per carry. On the other nine drives by the Knights, it took them 43 plays to gain 76 yards, only 1.8 yards per play.
- Over the last six games, the Texas defense has given up 1.092 yards on 360 plays -- 3.0 yards per play. During that time, opponents have scored 58 points (9.7 per game) on nine scoring drives (six touchdowns, three field goals). That means that Texas has allowed scores on only 12% of 75 opponent possessions during that span.
- Texas leads the country in total defense (230 yards per game) and rushing defense (55 yards per game), while ranking in the top 10 in pass efficiency defense (94.61 rating/5th), tackles for loss (8.2 pg/6th), turnover margin (+1.0/7th) and scoring defense (12.4 ppg/8th).
- Opponents have scored more than 14 points only twice this season. In the last six games, no opponent has scored more than 14.
- The Central Florida game marked the fourth time this season the Longhorns have held their opponent to under 200 yards of total offense and the seventh time Texas has held their opponent to less than 100 yards rushing.
- The Longhorns also lead the country in scoring differential, having scored 369 points and given up 112. On average, then, Texas outscores their opponents by 28.6 points per game.
- After struggling against Oklahoma, McCoy has returned to his 2008 form: Over the last three games, McCoy has completed 75-of-94 passes (79.8%) for 910 yards (303.3 ypg) and six TDs (2 INT) -- a 177.9 pass efficiency rating. Excluding sacks, he's also rushed for 93 yards on 23 carries (4.0 ypc). He's led the Longhorns to scores on 15 (12 TDs/3 FGs) of 25 drives (60%) in those game.
- In the 117 years of Texas football, 43 of the 66 500-yard peformances by a Longhorn offense have come under Mack Brown.
0 recs |
61 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
I think it is unfair...
To assess Goodwin out of the line-up. There’s a concern for me regarding the constant shifting of personnel. I think you hit it dead on GoBR with the Goodwin analysis. I kept thinking we would see a deep route and watch someone try to keep up with him, but to see him catching ball after ball with both feet on the ground and his shoulders perpendicular to the los is weird. It takes away his strength for sure. I would also like to see the crossing route. How about a delayed drag underneath Jerry Rice style?
Your headline drew me to the post however. I am a Malcolm Williams fan. Whatever narcotic GD is on in practices needs to be changed. I played with a guy in highschool who would always be on the coaches list during practice, but during game time the guy won all the helmet stickers. I honestly think the practices were too boring for him. I understand the importance and maybe GD is the best thing to happen to Williams regarding a better work ethic? I only know Malcolm Williams is a playmaker pure and simple. It doesn’t matter what he’s doing either. ST, blocking, or yac attacking the guy is a stud. He get’s going so fast for a big man and just brings it.
Who is our next MW prototype? We need to keep this model on our system.
by orangetower on Nov 10, 2009 10:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Williams clone
Not sure if there is anyone in the pipeline with the same combination of size and speed as Williams, but John Harris might be the closest and Greg Timmons is a big dude, though probably not as fast. In the 2011 class, Trey Metoyer may be comparable in that he’s extremely fast for his size.
As far as practice habits, there are some mixed messages about Williams. Brown usually says that he is a hard worker and he has put in a lot of extra work on the JUGGS machine to work on his hands, but I think the issue is his lack of focus at times, which leads to him dropping passes. That’s been the problem, as near as I can tell. Great to see him out on the field making plays finally, though.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 10, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Metoyer
How is he on Texas? I’ve seen him regularly on different boards, but haven’t really heard about a top choice of his.
by orangetower on Nov 10, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OU and A&M
look like his top two, with Texas probably a distant third. There is a lot of ground to make up with him.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 10, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I looked him up
His body type looks just like MW. If he truly is a 4.42 40 then the guy is freakish. I would definitely want him on our team.
We need more MW highlights to show Metoyer how we would use him and reel this one in.
by orangetower on Nov 10, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just proud that my school
finally has a player to talk about when it comes to Texas recruiting.
Whitehouse High class of ’00
by aaronlybrand on Nov 10, 2009 8:23 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Do you have influence?
I mean is there a way to get some Burnt Orange Koolaid in the lunch room or something?
by orangetower on Nov 11, 2009 1:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent analysis, and I love the Behind the Numbers
I do take issue with one point you made: “The first (pass to Goodwin) came on an obvious screen pass out of a bunch formation with Shipley and Buckner that quickly got blown up because there were too many players in a small area. No idea what Davis was thinking on that play — it had virtually zero chance of success.”
Actually, if Ship and Buckner had maybe gotten close enough to block somebody, the play had a chance. Three defenders were there, sure; in theory, you block two of them and let Marquise try to beat the third one.
by edsp on Nov 10, 2009 11:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hands on the ground
Beginning in the seventh grade our coaches preached leverage. Playing with your pads lower than the guy in front of you. How does an offensive line in a two point stance gain leverage against guys who are usually more athletic and come out of a three point stance? I really do believe it has more to do with the scheme than the players.
by b&g80 on Nov 10, 2009 11:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Great point
It seems that the horns emphasize pass blocking more than run blocking. A two point stance works great for pass blocking. Even when the horns are run blocking, they typically are more focused on maintaining contact with the blockee rather than driving the blockee. A two point stance works well for this type of blocking, also. Obviously they don’t want to give away whether it is a pass play or run play by their initial stance (and GD always optimizes for the passing game) so two point stance it is.
by Kafka on Nov 10, 2009 11:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Players
It is really hard to blame a lot of the blocking breakdowns on the players. As others have pointed out, Cody is at a disadvantage when he receives the ball at a standstill and the line is not drive blocking. My guess is that this really peeves McWhorter.
by b&g80 on Nov 10, 2009 12:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, it is the scheme
As Kafka points out the current scheme is designed to facilitate pass blocking first then zone blocking to support the run. It is after all a spread offense. And I agree with you that It is impossible for most offensive linemen to gain the leverage to drive block one on one out of a two point stance. When this group does drive block (jumbo package) they do it quite well most of the time.
Given the current scheme the idea on running plays is to push guys sideways to create holes because you’re not going to knock them off the ball one on one. The laws of physics are on the side of the DT. So you try to create movement in the defensive line with the use of double teams where possible. The problem occurs when you can’t double team at the point of attack and you’re left with a not-so-athletic offensive lineman already at a disadvantage with respect to leverage one on one with an athletic DT. This is what I don’t like about the current scheme. It requires quick feet and good technique by the OL to work and I just think this group is more suited to a downhill, drive blocking attack based on strength (again I’ll use the jumbo success to corroborate my point.)
Most (if not all) guys coming out of high school are taught drive blocking out a three point stance so it’s hard to guess whether they’ll succeed in a zone blocking scheme. Player development becomes key and this is where I think the deficiency occurs, at least this year.
Now I am admittedly old school (love the I-formation, works in the NFL and I think Cody is a prototype fullback) but I’d be willing to compromise, keep the spread given the current personnel set but give up the perceived advantage of a two point stance for pass protection for a more conventional drive blocking running game. Lateral movement constitutes no movement in football and without a VY or Jamaal Charles the scheme dooms you before you begin against quality opposition. I guarantee you that Cody running from the zone read out of the end zone (or any yard line) against UF will result in a safety.
by SpiritOfTheFedora on Nov 10, 2009 9:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Typo
Sorry, no safety from midfield, but you get the point.
by SpiritOfTheFedora on Nov 10, 2009 9:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Post + Huge GD Indictment
With all the complaints about GD’s play calling – by far the biggest indictment against his capabilities is the current state of the offensive identity, and Roy does his usual great job of pointing this out. It is absolutely ridiculous for a team marching to the BCS MNC to have these “criminal situations”:
1. John Chiles, Kirk, Buckner costing Malcolm Williams significant developmental reps in the OOC part of the schedule.
2. Still not understanding the roles, and how those roles fit into the overall offensive and defensive schemes of Goodwin, Monroe, Cody Johnson, Fozzy, and Tre Newton. What is scary is how different the talents are of some of these fine young players/people.
3. And as Roy pointed out so well – the most mystifiying thing of using the wrong talent in the wrong play.
4. I want to be fair to GD – but we need to understand this offense has an unbelievalbe amount of weapons. Much deeper and physically freakish than what Will has to work with. If you don’t believe me, contrast the DT, and LB situatin vs. the WR, and RB situations.
I am still praying that this “work in progress” will click. As I firmly believe that if we were able to reach our tremendous potential on offense, that we would beat the SEC lore and take home MNC #5. Fortunately, we still have that capability due to defensive excellence + the mercurial talents of Ship, Malc, and Colt.
by realmccoy on Nov 10, 2009 11:47 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
What an indictment
Best part:
In the 117 years of Texas football, 43 of the 66 500-yard peformances by a Longhorn offense have come under Mack Brown.
by Wells on Nov 11, 2009 5:43 AM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Kirk and Chiles demotion
Kirk’s demotion was because he was dropping passes, blocking poorly and drew the totally stupid chest bumping foul vs OU. He has been good running after the catch all season.
Chiles had to be demoted because Malcolm needed to play and Chiles is the obvious candidate to sit. Chiles did a great job for a total rookie WR and was able to turn those WR screens into yards with his power. Having said that, Malcolm should have been starting since the Tech game last season (if not earlier).
by Kafka on Nov 10, 2009 12:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Chiles
had to sit because he wasn’t getting any separation and the WR screens were the only play in which he was effective. Read this again.
As for Kirkendoll, after the Wyoming game he was not making plays after the catch, part of the reason he was demoted, along with his issues catching passes and blocking.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 10, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha ha
That is your argument, you are going to point to a Peter Bean post as the bible rather than make a rational argument? Ha ha. You just pointed out that Goodwin is having trouble making yards with the same plays that Chiles was running. Maybe the problem is the plays and not the WR.
Of course Chiles is limited, he is a rookie WR. Despite being a rookie, he did a good job. He caught the ball fine, he blocked well, and he ran well. Why he ever started over Malcolm is what is perplexing. Chiles had to sit because Malcolm is so much better. Regarding separation, run Chiles on a crossing pattern and he will get separation.
Also, you really think the coaches are intentionally sabotaging Goodwin? Ha ha, that is really paranoid.
Kirk got sat down after the OU game, not the Wyoming game. You are wrong about Kirk running with the ball.
by Kafka on Nov 10, 2009 12:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I Agree With Roy & PB On This One
Chiles had to sit because he wasn’t getting any separation and the WR screens were the only play in which he was effective.
You can go back and watch the replays and see Chiles almost run to the defenders and give away the cushion vs snapping the route. He also had very limited setup moves coming off the snap and running routes. Look at Jordan as an expample.
by orangetower on Nov 10, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Do you have reading comprehension problems? You’re approaching Beergut territory here. I made my argument, then supported it with PB’s post, which makes the same point. I’ll even rephrase — neither Chiles nor Kirkendoll were getting separation, particularly against Oklahoma, one of the major reasons the offense struggled at times.
No, I said that Goodwin is having trouble making yards because he has to catch the ball standing still. He has not had problems separating on slant routes when he is moving. I was wondering why Davis didn’t call any for him this week.
No, Chiles did not block well, part of the reason why he got benched. Your argument for Chiles is terrible. It’s not even really an argument, because it’s completely vague and incorrect. What makes you think Chiles will get separation on a crossing pattern when Kirkendoll and Shipley haven’t been able to all season?
My comment about the coaches sabotaging Goodwin was facetious. Check your sarcasm meter while you work on your reading comprehension.
Really, Kirkendoll didn’t get benched after the Wyoming game? What a surprise — it was his best game of the season. He might have made yards after the catch on a play against Oklahoma State, but didn’t do that much between Wyoming and UCF, hence the problems.
Speaking of rational arguments, sarcastically laughing all the time doesn’t help your point, it just makes you sound pompous. Why don’t you just stick with your EBS lovefest? By the way, what’s your problem today?
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 10, 2009 3:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Kirk
If I remember correctly, Kirkendoll made one of the best runs after a catch in the Wyoming game for a TD. Or am I disremembering?
by b&g80 on Nov 10, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, Wyoming.
And it was a great run after catch. Slipping a tackle, then beating would be tacklers on the way to the end zone.
by Kool Hand on Nov 10, 2009 1:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll say one thing for sure, and brook no argument...
when Malcolm catches one of those WR screens, I feel a sense of possibility that I just don’t get when Chiles does…
by Pflash on Nov 10, 2009 12:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
+1
I would even take it to the “probability” level.
by orangetower on Nov 10, 2009 12:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well stated Pflash
Guy is a freak. He should have been on the field from day 1!
by realmccoy on Nov 10, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well put
I realize a great many people “hate” that play but had to laugh as Da Boys ran it to Roy against the Iggles. RW looked like MW, stiff armed a DB and racked up a 1st down.
you want to see MW go over the top? You have to do something to force a DB out of soft coverage.
by echeese on Nov 11, 2009 6:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Greg Smith is the Boss Hog award winner
Greg has been blocking great for awhile now and it is nice to see him getting recognition for his blocking.
I predict that Greg Smith will earn an NFL paycheck someday.
by Kafka on Nov 10, 2009 12:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Greg Smith
I really think it’s a disservice to call him EBS at this point… he’s no David Thomas, but who is? The guy has stepped up after 4 players ahead of him went down with injuries for the season, and he seems to catch passes and make plays when his number is called (or Colt checks down to him). Let’s give the kid some credit and use his actual name. My 2 cents.
by SelimSivad on Nov 10, 2009 12:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1 here
EBS was cute for a while, a kind of dig at Greg Davis after he made the comment/description.
by edsp on Nov 10, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
EBS retirement
I’ll consider retiring the name when he either catches more than two passes a game, has a catch of 15 yards or more, or catches another touchdown pass.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 10, 2009 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The challenge is on!!
I predict 3 receptions and a 16-yd TD against Baylor for Mr. Smith.
by SelimSivad on Nov 10, 2009 12:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No class
The class act would have been to pat Greg on the back and use this opportunity to retire the EBS title.
by Kafka on Nov 10, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
GoBR is about 8 notches above you on the BON totem pole
by acho81 on Nov 10, 2009 2:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the nickname
Is more of a sarcastic jab towards Greg Davis than Smith. Davis was the one who called him that, which amused a lot of people who thought tight ends should be more than just “surfaces.”
As for Smith, I’m happy he looks better and I appreciate his hard work. But heck, like circa said below, maybe “EBS” isn’t a sarcastic nickname anymore if he keeps blocking well.
by TheElusiveShadow on Nov 10, 2009 2:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't even think of it as a dig at Smith
I do think it was a hilariously poor choice of words by Davis, and gives some insight into he regards certain players. In the eyes of Davis, Smith is not a “weapon in the short passing game”, he’s not a “quality cog in the running game blocker”, he’s an “extra surface”.
If you were a starting player and called an “extra surface” how would you perceive your role in the offense?
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Nov 10, 2009 6:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
You’re really on a roll today. I would suggest sleeping it off. Or at least walking away from the computer for a while.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 10, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sir, put the mouse down
Slowly lift your hands from the keyboard. Now, get up and back away from the computer. Hands behind your back, please, while I get my cuffs . . .
Just kidding.
by edsp on Nov 10, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I am going to keep calling him EBS
But I use it now in a positive sense. I’ve become a big Greg Smith fan since he was inserted into the 11 and view the “EBS” monicker as something that he’s successfully overcome, and so now it represents his accomplishments more than his shortcomings. Kind of like “Weasley is our King”.
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
by circa1015 on Nov 10, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Man, we really need more passes with guys on the move.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
by Sunkist on Nov 10, 2009 12:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Where is Buckner
The coaches have been terrible at getting talent on the field this year
by thestos on Nov 10, 2009 1:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good question
The easy answer is that with the improvement that playing Greg Smith brings to the running game, and thus our overall offensive balance, the “flex” position that was held by Buckner has been replaced with the normal TE position (which was supposed to be the case anyways). It was always my impression, especially after the first few weeks, that Buckner was the easy #2 guy after Shipley, but apparently GD doesn’t want to split him out wide, and the slot role is now Ship’s after the failed “Shipley out wide” experiment. I don’t know why you wouldn’t want to try playing Buckner on the perimeter though, he is a big, tall receiver who can go up and bring down passes against most corners in this conference, much like Williams. I think we could be very dangerous with Ship in the slot and Williams and Buckner split wide.
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
by circa1015 on Nov 10, 2009 1:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Seems obvious
Buckner has great size and hands. Maybe it will happen by bowl time.
by Kafka on Nov 10, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Buckner was visibly limping several games back
I wonder if he’s being protected, and Mack is keeping the knee issue quiet. Can’t argue with that.
Through about four games it was clear the pecking order for Colt was (1) Shipley (2) Buckner (3) All others
by edsp on Nov 10, 2009 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Point
I agree we have to cut down on flex for Mr. Smith. The empty set was on pace to get Colt retired. But to your point, why can’t Buck go wide with Malcolm and Ship? Would that be indefensible or what?
by realmccoy on Nov 10, 2009 5:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
anyone else worried about colt "lofting" passes?
most of his picks this year have been from him not putting any zip on the ball
anyone else seeing this?
"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"
by greenspointexas on Nov 10, 2009 1:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
No.
most of his picks this year have been from him not putting any zip on the ball
I believe most of the interceptions have been from DBs jumping the routes, either by reading Colt or reading the playcall.
Second leading cause would probably be due to WR’s either by failing to seal out the DBs on slants, tipping passes that hit their hands, or not fighting enough for the ball.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Nov 10, 2009 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I've seen every one of Colt's picks this year
and I would place the blame on Colt on less than half of them. Most have been due to our young receivers not catching balls or making bad reads on the defense. I wouldn’t consider it an issue big enough to worry about (I’ll always trust Colt to make a throw).
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
by circa1015 on Nov 10, 2009 1:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe wind was a factor
I think Mack said something about the wind holding up some of Colt’s passes into the wind. I do believe that Colt takes something off the pass on short passes so that his guy can catch the ball.
by Kafka on Nov 10, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Colt's problem
The problem on his pass to Kirkendoll that was intercepted has to do with his release. He doesn’t have the picture-perfect mechanics of Peyton Manning or Tom Brady — in fact, it’s much closer to Vince Young’s arm slot than either of those two and that causes most of his intermediate throws to come out on a line. That makes it difficult to get the ball over the head of linebackers or defensive backs undercutting the ball — I imagine it’s something that will hurt him a bit when the draft comes around. He doesn’t have the best arm strength, but it’s not really an arm strength problem.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 10, 2009 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe his shoulder tendons are too short
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Nov 11, 2009 9:02 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Shipley and records
Looks like Shipley’s zeroing in on some nice school records to add to the single-game ones he already has (single-game yards and single-game receptions).
Receptions:
Most receptions, game: Shipley already owns this with 15.
Most receptions, season: Kwame had 100, and Ship has 75 so far.
Most receptions, career: Big Roy had 241, and Ship has 207 so far.
Yards:
Most yards, game: Shipley already owns this with 273.
Most yards, season: Kwame had 1188, and Ship has 1050 so far.
Most yards, career: Big Roy has 3866, and Ship (now 3rd place all-time) has 2756. This is almost certainly not going to fall to JS this year; however, he has a very good shot at getting second-place, which is currently 3032 by Mike Adams.
Touchdowns:
Most TDs, game: McGarity has it at 4; hard to say whether Shipley will ever have a shot at this.
Most TDs, season: Big Roy had 12 in one season; Shipley almost tied it with 11 last year, and has just six this season so far.
Most TDs, career: Big Roy had 36; Shipley has 26 so far. Looks like he would tie RW for both the season and career marks with six more touchdowns over the remaining five games this season.
Misc.:
100-yd. games in a season: Ship has five so far, and the record is seven.
If he were to get on a roll, Shipley could own almost every game, season, and career record for catches, yards, and touchdowns. The least likely are the career yardage mark (he’d need more than a thousand yards in five games) and the single-game touchdown mark. And this doesn’t even take into account any all-purpose records he might have.
by burntorangehorn on Nov 10, 2009 4:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sweed also had 12 TD in 2006
Give the man credit. Minus that injury in 2007 and he would have shown up a number of times in your comment, there.
by Horn Brain on Nov 10, 2009 10:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Absolutely true. He and Shipley both had enough injury time that their numbers could’ve been a lot more impressive.
by burntorangehorn on Nov 11, 2009 8:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Job BOH
That could be a post in and of itself.
by orangetower on Nov 10, 2009 4:25 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
M Williams has a mean streak
That I can’t wait to see more of. That stiff arm is just the start. He is going to be ripping it up in future games
by Wrangler86 on Nov 10, 2009 10:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Malcolm Williams
is what gets me excited about Texas football present and future. Him and the defense of course.
4th and 5.
by BMC237 on Nov 10, 2009 11:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























