Snap Shots: Abject Stupidity, aka I-Formation From the One, Redux
Context
The only poor kickoff coverage of the day by Texas resulted in a 27-yard return out to the UCF 46 yardline, giving the Knights excellent field position. Though they were able to pick up a rare first down on an offsides penalty by Ben Alexander following a nine-yard run by Johnathan Davis, Texas forced a punt after a Lamarr Houston sack on third down. On the first play of the fourth quarter, UCF punter Blake Clingan kicked a 50-yard punt downed by the punt coverage unit at the Texas one yardline. Texas starts their possesion after marching 87 yards on 15 plays their previous possesion, culminating in the touchdown pass to James Kirkendoll after holding the ball for over six minutes.
Snap Shots
The play is either 24 or 26 Lead, meaning that the fullback will either go fill the four hole inside the left tackle or the six hole outside of the left tackle, with Johnson following his lead blocker into the hole. The main difference in the two plays is whether or not the playside tackle, Adam Ulatoski, decides to kick out the defender to create a running lane through the four hole, or if he tries to seal the defender inside. Given that the playside defensive end is lined up over the outside shoulder of Ulatoski, the left tackle should kick the defender out, opening up the four hole for Cobb to come through and pick up the playside linebacker, with Johnson following on his hip.
There are several important things to point out on this play. One, there are eight UCF defenders in the box, as they correctly expect Texas to run out of the rarely-used I formation. Second, the tight end is on the right side of the Texas line of scrimmage, the stronger side of the Longhorn line behind which they prefer to run. Predictably, the Knights shade their defense to that side of the field, with the middle and outside linebackers taking the A and C gaps on that side of the field, respectively, with the cornerback providing outside leverage and a safety also providing run support on that side of the formation. Third, notice that UCF defensive tackle Torrell Troup, an excellent player in his own right and one of the better defensive tackles Texas will face all season, is lined up over the left shoulder of Chris Hall, while the left guard, Charlie Tanner, is uncovered, giving him no one to block at the line of scrimmage. Lastly, there is also the fact that Johnson is closer to the back of the end zone than the front, as I-formation plays leave the tailback seven yards from the line of scrimmage.
Let's play a fun game -- it's called "Watch How Far Torrell Troup Can Push Chris Hall Into the Backfield!" Okay, maybe this game isn't so fun for Texas fans, but we're going to play it anyway, dammit. The compact Troup fires off the ball with excellent leverage, getting under the pads of the Texas center, who receives no help from Tanner, headed for the Mike backer. Chris Hall is currently more than a yard behind the line of scrimmage. Notice also that if the Longhorns had run a bootleg, the safety, a converted quarterback, is giving Jordan Shipley 12 yards of cushion.
Chris Hall is now two yards behind the line of scrimmage and comes fairly close to stepping on the foot of Colt McCoy leaving center -- not an entirely uncommon occurrence when a center gets so completely blown up at the snap of the football. Notice also that Ulatoski has just engaged the defensive end and is getting no push.
Returning to our fun little game, Chris Hall is now at least three yards behind the line of scrimmage -- that's nine feet. He's not exactly on the line of scrimmage when he hikes the ball, so it's really only fair to point out that Troup has only moved him six to seven feet backwards. See, it's really not so bad is it? Well, except for the fact that Hall has been pushed almost into Johnson shortly after his receives the football, slowing the big backs momentum and disrupting what little timing still exists with the play.
Notice also that Ulatoski has his shoulders turned, which would be fine if there was still a running lane through the four hole, but since Hall got pushed so far back, there isn't. Notice as well that Cobb doesn't really have an idea of what he's trying to do to the playside linebacker -- he's sort of cutting the guy, but doesn't leave his feet, but also doesn't really block the guy, as his left arm is just kind of dangling by his side, unused for, you know, actually blocking the guy. In fairness to Cobb, his day was otherwise, most notably including his two special teams tackles and a crunching block on Johnson's touchdown run over the left side of the line from the Jumbo package.
Chaos time! The chaos has officially begun on this play, as happens on so many plays when the timing gets off because one player is beat badly at the line of scrimmage. Even though Hall fights back against Troup enough to arrest his backwards movement, it's too late. Cobb, who decided not to use his hands to block the playside linebacker, loses his block, getting shed by the linebacker -- no surprise, since the linebacker didn't even really have to disengage to do so. Ulatoski, who failed to get any push on the playside defensive end, loses his block. Tanner, being Charlie Tanner, loses his block on the middle linebacker.
At this point, it's one on three -- Johnson must fight through the three UCF defenders to pick up a litle more than a yard to get the ball out of the end zone.
Johnson fights forward, nearing the goalline, but appearing just short on his second effort.
Fortunately for Texas, Johnson keeps on fighting, barely getting the ball out of the end zone with his third, and possibly fourth, effort.
Final Verdict
Um, haven't we all seen this movie before? The Longhorns get pinned near the goalline, go I formation, obviously a running package...Chris Hall gets blown up after snapping the ball...The Texas running back receives first contact deep in the goalline...Sounds like the Tech game last year doesn't it? Same situation, almost the same result, except this time the coaches manage to brilliantly avoid putting an injured running back in the backfield, instead using the biggest back they have. Credit them for that, at least.
Greg Davis indicated after the game that the Longhorns did receive the look they wanted as well, with UCF overloading the left side of the line, leaving the Longhorns evenly matched up on the other side. The only problem is that UCF overloaded the other side of the line because the left side does a poor job of getting push on running plays, particularly Ulatoski, who remains much stronger in pass protection than actually moving defenders backwards.
The real problem here is that the coaches didn't learn from their mistakes last season and failed to understand that another I-formation running play was vritually doomed to failure. Mack Brown indicated that the coaches have, after one safety and another near safety, finally learned their lesson:
The one that was ugly coming off the goal line that Cody saved us otherwise it would have been a safety was missed assignments up front.
So we didn't block it right and Greg and I have talked about it, we're foolish from the 6-inch line to take the ball and hand it to a tailback seven yards deep. That's just foolish.
It happened to us at Tech, and we're going to change that. So that's more on us as coaches than on the kids. I thought it was just not smart and we've got some different things we can do.
Obviously, that ends up being a 99-yard touchdown drive. It ended up being effective. But if they are going to wad em all up and we're going to line up a tailback seven yards deep in the backfield, let's learn from it and move forward. That's on us as coaches, even though there was a missed assignment.
Yes, Mack -- foolish, stupid, dumb, and idiotic are all apt descriptions of the play call. Davis, however, has a slightly different perspective on whether or not there was a missed assignment on the play:
We had a missed call on the first play that Cody did such a great job. We got the look we thought we'd get.
The guard (Charlie Tanner) had an option to bang what we call Lock It, and we didn't make that call, which left Chris Hall in a one-on-one situation, and Chris did a pretty good job of maintaining.
And if we weren't on the minus-1 yard line, Cody probably would have taken it back door. But because of where we were at, he just went front side.
The missed call probably falls on Hall himself, as the center is normally responsible for making the line calls. So the responsibility falls both on the coaches were putting the players in a bad position, and on the players for not making the proper call at the line and for failing to execute, as three players essentially missed their blocks, leading to Johnson having to fight through three defenders
The play illustrates the individual breakdown(s) that have occurred all too frequently this season along the offensive line. When it's not Hall, it's Tanner. When it's not Tanner, it's Michael Huey or David Snow. When it's not Huey or Tanner, it's Ulatoski. No player has been immune from significant individual failures at different times. The play also illustrates the major problem with man blocking -- it allows one-on-one that can lead to penetration and highlight individual failures in a manner that zone blocking covers up to some extent. Of course, had the right call been made and Tanner had double teamed Troup with Hall, the play would have had a much better chance for success.
The final point worth making here is that Texas is better served by play-action passing in those situations than running out of the I. Lining up four wide isn't a good idea either, so the compromise here is probably 11 personnel, running play action, and moving the pocket, as the Longhorns did on the following two plays, resulting in a big third-down conversion on a pass to Malcolm Williams.
0 recs |
39 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Ah, great stuff!
When we lined up, I immediately told my gf, “This is going to be a safety”. I hate almost being right, and I hate the fact that I’m so confident in predicting our plays.
Get off your knees Greg, you're blowin' the game.
by kriess on Nov 12, 2009 10:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
So true
I’m actually amazed in the few instances that defenses have difficulty reading our offense. I’m no football genius. Many on here would claim my knowledge is technically inept. But I can look at the offense on the field prior to the snap and instinctively “call” the play with about 75 to 80 percent accuracy.
That’s frightening, coming from a non-technical football folk like me.
Watch out, I bite.
by EddieTheAlbinoSquirrel on Nov 12, 2009 11:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
offense
Execution beats out deception every time.
by Jason Mayer on Nov 12, 2009 11:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That may be true
But I’m not talking about being deceptive. I’m talking about the other team absolutely knowing exactly which play will be run almost every time.
If telegraphing plays to the other team didn’t matter, then why even bother with hand signals? Why not hand over the playbook before game time?
Watch out, I bite.
by EddieTheAlbinoSquirrel on Nov 13, 2009 8:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's really tough...
to think that aside from the QB position, the OL was supposed to be the most experienced unit and one of the strengths on this team. Watching games this season, it is painful to watch different members make the same mistakes over and over again.
It’s even worse to think what might happen next year. Who replaces Ulatoski? Poehlman? Is he really any better at run blocking?
What about Hall and Tanner?
Lets hope the OL doesn’t doom us down the road against a better team
by prince8846 on Nov 12, 2009 10:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The OL is the most significant internal threat
to destroy this team’s aspirations. They are a huge disappointment.
Disciplina Praesidium Civitatis.
by zamm on Nov 12, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cobb
As you pointed out this was the low light in another wise bright day for Antwann. He makes things happen. His block of two UCF players to spring Cody was a thing of beauty. Before the season started, in two a days, there was every indication that Davis was going to use Antwan’s skill set. He is a devastating blocker, he has speed, catches the ball well etc. He can be used in a two back set as a blocker, motion man or split him wide from that set.
I am as critical of the O-line as anyone but they are what they have been trained to be, pass first and (despite lip service) run as an after thought. How much time do they spend in practice on run blocking vs. pass. Then puff the OC decides that we are an I-team inside of the one with a play that was instrumental in the only loss from last year.
by b&g80 on Nov 12, 2009 11:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Chris really gets blown out
That’s amazing. If he had held Troup up a yard or two earlier, Cody goes for at least 2-3 since he’s not dodging the center on the hand off, 3-4 yards behind the LOS.
Maybe Chris overestimated his chances 1 v. 1 when he was making the call on the double team.
by notsofst on Nov 12, 2009 11:27 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Safety rules
Is the rule the same as a touchdown? i.e. if any part of the ball is touching the goal line when forward progress is stopped, does that make it a safety? Or does the ball carrier simply have to get any part of the ball out of the end zone to get it marked at the one?
I just now looked at the replay, and it sure doesn’t look like at any point did the entire ball get out of the end zone.
by Sweed4Heisman on Nov 12, 2009 11:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Opposite rule for a safety
Ball has to be completely out of the end zone when the tackle is made.
by Horncasting on Nov 12, 2009 11:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know what the rule is for touchdowns,
but on a safety, how much of the ball has to make it out of the endzone? Is it the whole ball, or if any part is out of the endzone? It seemed pretty clear on replay that only part of the ball peeked out of the endzone. Just curious.
by ctex80 on Nov 12, 2009 11:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Holes
I’ve always seen it as even numbered holes were right of center and odd numbered holes were left of center.
by Horncasting on Nov 12, 2009 11:31 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Directly over the center is zero.
Center – guard gap is 1
Guard is 2
guard – tackle gap is 3
tackle is 4
just outside of tackle is 5
by UT_BKC on Nov 12, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you just did a good job
naming all the defensive line techniques
He is talking about offensive hole numbering, though, and he is correct; traditionally it is odd numbers left, even numbers right. Tailback is 3, fullback is 4, playcall is back number, hole number, then type of block.
In texas’ playcalling lexicon, the TB is 3. 34/35 Zone Read is a staple.
by Beergut on Nov 13, 2009 4:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you're right in a sense
numbering has changed over the years. 48 vs 49 sweep was a staple in Middle School football. Or in College Station.
Get off your knees Greg, you're blowin' the game.
by kriess on Nov 12, 2009 1:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
play call
The call doesn’t look that bad to me. If we block it right, there is a nice hole there and it achieves the desired effect of giving some breathing room with the chance for a big play given the fact that the defense has 8 in the box and is overloaded to the back side.
I also wonder how much freedom Colt is given in a situation like that. With the safety that far off of him and the CB playing 6 yards off, it seems that flipping it out to Shipley would easily gain a lot of yards.
by Jason Mayer on Nov 12, 2009 11:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Colt's freedom
In my understanding, Colt has the ability to check out of running plays and into the short passing game if he doesn’t like the numbers in the box or the defense just gives him a look he doesn’t like. In this case, the defense gives the look they expected, so there wasn’t any particular reason for him to get out of the play.
The problem with the playcall, as Brown mentioned, is that Johnson gets the ball so deep. And, as I mentioned, the exact same thing happened last year against Tech. Sure, the play would have worked with proper execution, but the problem is that this team now clearly does not execute well in these situations. Going back to the missed line call, though, if Hall had made the proper decision given the fact he got blown up last year by Colby Whitlock, then the play probably would have worked.
So there is the first level of setting up the players for failure by the coaches because they gave them a play that had not worked before. Then the level of failure by Hall for not calling for some help. Then the level of failure by Hall, Ulatoski, and Cobb for not effectively making their blocks. Plenty of blame to go around.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 12, 2009 11:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If tanner helps out, does the MLB blow the play up? Maybe he’s far enough off the ball that Cody can get a little head of steam since he doesn’t run into the backside of Hall.
by UT_BKC on Nov 12, 2009 12:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That could be another element
I wouldnt think the MLB would be a threat to stop the play for a loss, but Tanner blocking the MLB opens up the chance of a big run.
Given the situation though, I would think you would want to make sure that the play gets to the LOS, as opposed to optimizing it for yardage, if that makes sense.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Nov 12, 2009 1:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The idea is that
Tanner would help on the double team long enough to neutralize Troup, then get to the second level and the Mike backer.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 12, 2009 1:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
With the safety playing so far off Ship
And the linebacker obviously selling out on run, why not audible into a 1-step dump to Shipley in this situation? If he catches it, which we should have high confidence of, hes got at least 3 yards. Miss a tackle or two, and he could be gone.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Nov 12, 2009 1:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Manhandled
Great writeup as usual. For some reason I had remembered us running a zone read on this play.
It is disconcerting that the line is overwhelmed in these situations. It’s almost as bad as having someone run up the middle of your defense. I couldn’t agree more- everybody contributed and only Cody Johnson stands a chance in avoiding a safety on this play. I don’t know if you could even trust a quarterback sneak now given the amazing severity with which Hall was manhandled.
With eight in the box you have to at least go against tendency. Play action with Williams on a fly pattern leaves the entire left side of the field for Shipley one on one. I’d take that wager any day.
by SpiritOfTheFedora on Nov 12, 2009 7:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We don't block it right.....
….. because it is so horribly predictable! Then there is the obvious lack of proper pad level and leverage.
--- All roads to the Big-XII Championship lead through OU/RRS. It's not just another game! We're all about championships here. ---
by HornChamps on Nov 12, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Generally, this is not a bad formation in these situations
And actually can be a very good one. However, it’s not one for our team; we rarely use the I-formation, and it makes little sense to whip it out when we absolutely cannot afford to lose yardage. I’d rather use the jumbo package.
I’m glad Mack took responsibility for that (see that, Stoops?). You can always say hypothetically, “Well, the players should have executed better,” but that’s just ignoring the reality that plays don’t always progress like they do on the chalkboard and players don’t execute everything the same like they do in video games. The coaches need to put the players in the best position to succeed, and there, our coaches didn’t do that.
by TheElusiveShadow on Nov 12, 2009 12:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Snap Count?
The rythym of the count gave the D-line an edge as well. How about going on touch from that position? I agree handing tha ball 7 yards deep is a recipe for disaster though and might have been better off just QB sneak for about 2 yards.
by orangetower on Nov 12, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Stuff Per Usual Ghost - But
Even if we go away from that play, it doesn’t solve the problem that Chris Hall got pushed around by an UCF tackle, and Uli couldn’t get any push on an UCF DE. These guys just aren’t mean and stout enough and it is my biggest fear about a matchup with an SEC defense, or even Suh vs. Nebraska. When you get beat in the middle, it just is very difficult to do anything. If Colt were to pass to Shipley – Hall would have prolly been forced to hold for a safety.
by realmccoy on Nov 12, 2009 1:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hall was being pushed straight back, dont know that there’d be time in Colt’s 3 step drop for Hall to get passed and have to hold.
by Displaced Longhorn on Nov 12, 2009 1:03 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
WOW. That was interesting to see that frame by frame
For shame on our o-line. It really doesn’t matter that much who is at RB if the line is getting pushed back 3 yards we aren’t going to have a good run game. Thank God Johnson gave it a 3rd effort. He saved the day on that one.
by Wrangler86 on Nov 12, 2009 2:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If this were the Tech game last year, he would've saved the day.
As it was, he just saved the team from an embarrassment. Maybe it would’ve been better for UCF to get the safety; then Mack would’ve had a reason to chew out the o-line.
by TXinDC on Nov 12, 2009 2:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure he did and is
I bet he chewed them out good. And, their spots are probably being reviewed daily. But, unlike Stoops, I don’t think he would blame them in public for a loss without acknowledging his role and ultimate responsibility as Head Coach.
by Wrangler86 on Nov 12, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting stuff, Big Roy
Well illustrated and extremely well explained. I’m a technical idiot when it comes to analyzing film and determining whether a certain player did/did not execute his assignment correctly. You have a knack for it.
This much I will say about THAT play call in that situation — it ain’t the safe way to play it.
Yeah, maybe it has five- to 10-yard potential if all goes well. I think when the ball is that close to the goal line, handing off deep in the end zone is foolish. Lotta bad things can happen, and with our style of offense, the probability goes way up.
Put the damn fullback in there and slam it straight forward. Oh, wait, our offense has fullbacks, occasionally, but they’re not permitted to touch the football. So, run the QB sneak. Pick the spot where the defense doesn’t have somebody on the line and run there. That’s a yard or two, and now you can execute most of the playbook on second-and-eight, second-and-nine.
Also, somebody pointed out that 35-3 is a lot better than 35-5. Except, it’s 28-5 and we’re punting the ball from the 20 and McCoy and Shipley never get to hook up for 88 yards.
by edsp on Nov 12, 2009 5:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Forgot to mention how important getting out was
Would have been sad not to have seen that big play.
by GhostofBigRoy on Nov 12, 2009 9:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let the debate end
Mack came as close as he ever will to calling out GD on this one. I lifted this most-excellent quote from dimecoverage’s daily roundup:
“That’s the last time we’ll be running from the I-formation from inside our 1-yard line,” coach Mack Brown said. “It doesn’t make any sense to hand the ball off to a guy who’s seven yards back from that spot on the field.”
Thanks for stating the obvious, Mack. Gives some of us comfort, knowing there is some actual review of the past week’s play calling, at least occasionally.
Watch out, I bite.
by EddieTheAlbinoSquirrel on Nov 13, 2009 8:18 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks GBR
Another great visual aids article! On that particular play, I agree with you that our OL didn’t do their job. But actually, they didn’t do well all year long when compares to last year. I just don’t know what the deal is. Its that may be why GD sometimes, needs Lamar Houston comes to help the line? The jumbo package?
by Horns98 on Nov 13, 2009 3:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
another way to look at it
is that Chris Hall receives a scholarship for a reason.
Make the block, don’t get blown up on the play, and you have a better chance for success.
Whoever was hyping Ulatoski for All-American in the preseason was on crack.
by Beergut on Nov 13, 2009 4:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 































