Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

A Season Without Villains

Good for a joke, at least.

More photos » by J. Pat Carter - AP

Good for a joke, at least.

There's something wrong this football season. For a while, I think maybe it is just me: I'm turning 30 next week. I'll be married within a year. I've been writing this blog for a full five years now. Maybe, I wonder, it feels like I'm just going through the motions because I'm burning out, ready to turn a corner to something new.

Wednesday evening I sit down to write a preview about Baylor, stare thoughtlessly at the Bears' team stat page for a few minutes, and realize I have nothing to say. I shut my laptop, open a beer, and fall asleep re-watching Magnolia for the twentieth time.

Star-divide

Driving home from class earlier today, I think again about what I might write, and again my mind feels mostly empty. What is there to say about a game that Texas likely will win by 30, and even if it wins by just 3, will matter all the same? What is there to say about any of the remaining four games, in all of which Texas will be heavily favored and need only to win? At this point, Texas can only lose, and I really don't want to write about that.

An old friend calls and I bemoan my lethargic state to him, saying only half-jokingly, "Maybe I'll just post a sign on BON's front page: Closed Until January."

"Hey," he warns, "if you'd done that last time, we never would have had Scott Ware."

Like a ton of bricks it hits, before he finishes his sentence... "Not a damned one of 'em," I mutter.

"Not any what?" he asks.

"Villains," I exclaim. "That's the problem with this season! There are no villains. No Scott Ware, no USC, no nothing."

"There's always Oklahoma..." he starts to argue, but pauses. "My God, you're right."

A Season Without Villains

At last, something to write about, but the reason it's seemed such a struggle throughout this season is because Texas is, essentially, running unopposed to the Rose Bowl. The 2005 Longhorns were also heavily favored in most of their games, but not only did we at least have the early-season showdown with Ohio State, there was the year-long battle with ESPN's Team Of Destiny -- USC.

This year... nothing. Oklahoma lost their quarterback and the game in the opener to BYU, lost another in Miami before the Shootout, and have since lost the wheels to the cheat-wagon, amounting to a season that is spiraling quickly down the toilet. Oklahoma State took care of business against Georgia, but not only are the Bulldogs nothing special, the Cowboys couldn't make it to Texas week without a loss, dropping one at home to Houston in September.

The rest of the Big 12? Pitiful. The race to the BCS? Set in stone: win and we're in. With Florida and Alabama winning without dominating, there's not even a mystical dragon who we can obsessively plan to slay.

Apparently, I'm not the only one waiting for the ball to drop, as I just noticed that Doc Saturday penned a post this morning titled, "If 2009 has any tricks up its sleeve, now is the time to break them out."

And frankly, it's beginning to feel like that kind of season. As Pete Thamel pointed out in Sunday's New York Times, every game is most definitely not a playoff down the stretch, as BCS proponents are so fond of contending. There is one "playoff' game -- Alabama-Florida in Atlanta, the winner of which is certainly bound for the BCS title game in the Rose Bowl, probably even if one of them happens to slip up in a horrifying upset in one of its last three games of the regular season -- but there is mere survival for Texas, which can also punch its ticket to Pasadena by taking care of its business against apparent non-threats Baylor, Kansas, Texas A&M and Overmatched Big 12 North Champion in the conference title game. For everyone else, it looks like playing out the string for lesser stakes.

That's fine, except that we're hitting mid-November, when the drama, turmoil and debate should be beginning to hit a fever pitch, and already the season feels like a foregone conclusion. There's nothing on the horizon like the familiar imbroglios that have made the rest of the decade so consistently entertaining.

He's right, and if the malaise is widespread, nowhere is it more numbing than for us. Cincinnati fans can carp about the unfair BCS system and obsess what an upset to one of the Big Three would mean for their title chances. Boise State fans are reeling to keep up with the school's frenzied blitz of moves aiming to elevate the program's prominence, now and in the future. This season is a wet dream for TCU fans who live for a chance to scream in the megaphone that THEY ARE RELEVANT. Fans of the SEC outside Tuscaloosa and Gainesville have the conference's officials; Florida and Alabama have each other.

Texas fans have... what? A crappy running game?

With no one to turn our guns on, it's no wonder that as a firing squad we've trained our sights on Greg Davis. There's literally no one else.

Yeah, yeah: every school should be lucky, cry-me-a-river blah blah blah. I get it. I'm happy, believe me. And if we win our next four, December and January are going to be amazing for us while for every other team but one it'll just be the end.

But I wish I had something to write about right now. I wish I had someone to hate.

0 recs  |  Comment 111 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

PB

What you need sir, is a good round of blog pong.

Get off your knees Greg, you're blowin' the game.

by kriess on Nov 12, 2009 3:11 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

nice read pb, but just like the rest of the world

people try to find storylines or ways to group or explain phenomena

this season it just so happens that there are about 4 to 5 really good teams and everyone else is about equal.

trying to explain that this is a season without villans is somewhat true, but all the familiar faces are still there

bob stoops – got what he deserved.. finally
lane kiffin – let the “kiffin cup” era begin today
usc – look at those jokers struggling through their c-usa-like conference
a&m – cant even pay the bills for the athletic dept.
tech – haha lost to a&m
notre dame – no explanation needed
etc.

if there were a villan this year, i would say it would be the ncaa. here is why:
from the suspension of dez bryant to the refs in the sec, this organization looks like a trainwreck. with boise state and tcu trying to “get in” to the party and the madness of the bcs, the evil that is the ncaa has reared its ugly head more this year than ever. how to slay this beast remains to be seen, but as for now i just say enjoy it! we are coasting to a possible big 12 and natl title. hook em horns and screw everyone else

"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"

by greenspointexas on Nov 12, 2009 3:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

USC will be fine and be back...

You cannot lose your defense to the NFL and start a freshman at QB and think you are actually going to attend. I live out here in SoCal and the true Trojan faithful knew what was in store this season. The media did not know…or preferred to not admit it that Pete’s bunch were going to be reduced to BCS after fodder.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hate to break it to you buddy...

But the Big 12 is a whole hell of a lot close to C-USA this year than the Pac-10 is. That wasn’t the case last year, and might not be next year, but this year it most definitely is. In fact, I’d put the Pac-10’s top 7 teams up against the top 7 of any other conference in the country. Hell, UCLA beat Tennessee and the Bruins are currently on a 5-game conference losing streak.

The old “Pac-10 is a joke” meme is dead. This year, at least.

by billyzane on Nov 12, 2009 3:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Pac-10

Pac-10 this year looks to me like th Pac-10 the last few years minus a dominant national team.

by Horncasting on Nov 12, 2009 3:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If USC had had this supporting cast in the conference in 2007 and 2008 . . .

. . . they might have had a better chance to get to the championship games in each of those seasons, despite the massive pro-USC media conspiracy out there.

by Hopkins Horn on Nov 12, 2009 4:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But then...

they might also would have had more losses. The correlation works both ways.

by BrooklynHorn on Nov 12, 2009 11:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Totally Agree - Pac-10 Probably Best Conference Top to Bottom

Living at Ground Zero of the Trojan Nation, I hate to agree, but it’s true. In the past, this has been Snow White and the nine dwarves. Not this year.

Despite losing last weekend, I still think Oregon would beat Boise State if they played again next Saturday. Stanford is the real deal and I think they win this weekend in the Coliseum. Arizona is the best ranked team no one is talking about and my pick to win the conference. And Washington has only two conference wins – but against USC and Arizona – and they should’ve beat LSU.

(FYI BZ – Bruins ended losing streak with win over Huskies last Saturday.)

by JRPasadena on Nov 12, 2009 11:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

NCAA is just there
from the suspension of dez bryant to the refs in the sec, this organization looks like a trainwreck

Dez Bryant lied about having dinner with a known street agent Deion Sanders and got what he deserved. The NCAA can only suspend people for what they can prove, and they could prove that Dez lied about some very shady things.

Regarding the SEC officials, the NCAA has nothing to do with the officiating in the SEC except for setting up guidelines years ago.

The problem is that the NCAA is not powerful enough. It does not control the BCS or the SEC. Both of these pseudo-for profit entities are far more powerful than the NCAA,

by Eskimohorn on Nov 12, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The BCS is a contractual product of the NCAA.

And with a vote of the presidents of the member colleges they can cut it off. That is the real power. They just won’t use it.

You can blow through the BCS propaganda in seconds; it really isn’t much. It is the presidents that hold the key and why they don’t act is probably a deep and dark story unto itself…or just blissful ignorance of the more ironic sort. Pick ’em.

by whills on Nov 12, 2009 5:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Please

A full year of eligibility lost for having dinner? The NCAA couldn’t “prove” USC did anything wrong when there is sworn testimony by Michaels and others that he took money. Yahoo! has verified $291,000 in total gifts given to the Bush family. AWinston Justice got free limo rides around L.A. Bush’s family got 64,000 in free rent and flights to away games. Bush got $13000 to fix up a car. And USC got nothing.

Oklahoma: Bomar made $69 an hour to not wash cars and they had 8 wins taken away…. Then REINSTATED a year later. No punishment.

Dez Bryant ate dinner. He lost a year of eligibility. It’s BS.

by the1austin on Nov 12, 2009 6:26 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

thoughts on the season

I think it’s kind of refreshing… there are so many media outlets today that want to talk/write about sports all day, and often it seems like they are so desperate to latch on to some controversy, however mundane and irrelevant, and run with it. (i.e. Favre, T.O., OchoCinco).

We are spoiled here at BON with the great writing, commentary, analysis, and community interaction. The rest of the sports-reporting world could take a few lessons.

Also I believe the notion that 2009 is a “boring” season arises partially from the contrast to the last couple of seasons. In 2007 everybody was talking about the year of the upset, and every week there was some major drama or shake-up in the polls when the latest #2 team got defeated, or an FCS school pulled off a major upset. That also carried over somewhat to 2008, and people began to expect that was the new state of college football (“the era of parity”).

This coincided with a general increase in the sheer volume of sports media outlets (blogs, radio shows, tv shows, tv coverage, etc…). As a result, with all these people wanting to say something but lacking the compelling or dramatic content, there is a perception that nothing interesting is happening.

I disagree. There is plenty of drama out on the field(s) for me every Saturday (and sometimes Thursday/Friday). It’s about the thrill of victory, the competition, and the agony of defeat.

by SelimSivad on Nov 12, 2009 3:36 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

This is similar to my take.

I would also add that, while not as dominant, Florida and Time Tebow form a reasonable analogy to USC and Reggie Bush with regard to hype. Why not hate them?

I actually see this season as very similar to 2005. OU sucked that year as well, we coasted through the conference expecting to play #1 in Pasadena, and in the end, the preseason top-2 met in the Championship game.

Perhaps its just not as magical the second time through.

by BrooklynHorn on Nov 12, 2009 11:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with BH...

The Tebow love fest continues. And ‘USC: Best Team Eva’ is replaced with ‘SEC, SEC, SEC’. Whoever wins the SEC, probably even with one-loss, will still be held up as the team to beat by the media even if we go into January at #1. to me the SEC hype is even more annoying that the USC hype in ‘05 since at least that USC team was mostly living up to is expectations. Fla and Bama haven’t looked like world beaters and yet the same song of SEC dominance is still playing.

I guess the newness has worn off, so while in 2005 it probably was easy to get up and analyze a Baylor team we knew we were going to whip, this year, especially with Griffin out, the game just doesn’t even get the blood pumping. I just hope the team isn’t having this sort of issue.

by Rickyspub on Nov 13, 2009 8:12 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the summarizing sentiment

is being more excited for this sunday afternoon than saturday morning.

by UTrumbo on Nov 12, 2009 3:37 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Funny, was thinking the same thing this morning

I honestly think the best thing for Texas would be for Florida to go on a dominant 4 game run that has the media putting them back on the hype pedestal. Something similar to USC 2005 would be nice.

by Horncasting on Nov 12, 2009 3:39 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Just to be "that guy"

…if we had the top 8 BCS teams in a playoff, how exciting would the race be for the final few seeds? Iowa-tOUS, Cinci-Pitt, TCU-Utah, all of these games would be much more important (I’m also aware of the detriment to the Fla-Bama game it would cause, let’s not start anything).

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Nov 12, 2009 3:40 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

good points

i have mixed feelings about an eight team playoff, but you are right that it would be fun to watch those teams square off, and to think about the matches for the next few weeks. hmmm.

by Orangetower87 on Nov 13, 2009 8:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We would need:

Florida to DESTROY Alabama in the SEC-CG something to the tune of 63-10, and Texas to pull a 70-3(ish) victory over Kansas State. Colt throws for 7 TDs and gets the Heisman, then we can have.

Florida vs Texas. The Ultimate Showdown

Colt McCoy vs Tim Tebow: Battle for the Greatest QB of all Time
Colt McCoy vs Tim Tebow, part II: Battle for the Greatest Christian QB of all Time
(They both have to go on missions over the Christmas Break)

Then we could have some hating to do. USC-style

Get off your knees Greg, you're blowin' the game.

by kriess on Nov 12, 2009 3:43 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

plenty to hate

i hate lou holtz
i hate mark may
i hate that stupid ass pretend court thing
i hate tv breaks
i hate gary danielson
i hate the sec and it’s sledge hammer destruction of all things decent
i hate all fans of all other teams
i hate all things aggie
i hate rick perry
i hate musburger
i hate greg davis
i hate the lack of misdirection plays
i hate the fact that i have no control over the play calling
i hate bob stoops and everything about ou
i hate the shamwow guy on bob stoops’ sideline
i hate the fact that when we get to a bowl game we’re gonna conservative it up when we could blow out any team we faced if we want to
did i mention i hate rick perry
i hate john chiles catching the ball standing still
i hate the fact i get anxiety everytime kirkendol is in the game
i hate the media slop fest of tebow
i hate bars that don’t start saturday happy hour until noon when the game starts at 11
i hate the o-lineman with the neck roll
i hate mike leach
sorry pb, i still have plenty to hate and always will
i hate usc
i hate terryl pryor because he’s scared to get hit
i hate jim classuwhatevers face because he looks like a bird
i hate sawyer park off washington ave for pretending to be a sports bar and succeeding at being duche central
i hate jager bombs
i hate bar food
etc
etc
i could keep going on here
i hate that i only have five games left of college football … walks away in tears

i LOVE that ou might not make a bowl

by abcdmetrius on Nov 12, 2009 3:43 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

+1

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 8:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Mack for guv

by dkrandmack on Nov 13, 2009 8:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I still think the SEC in general

is our “mythical dragon” figure. The overarching monolith of college football that only Texas has a chance of toppling, and dry the media drool once and for all.

by UTrumbo on Nov 12, 2009 3:57 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

well, until next season that is...

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 3:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We have to win every game left

How is that not a playoff? It’s just a really easy bracket.

by Meekrob on Nov 12, 2009 4:00 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

simple: TCU and Cincy can as well with no ticket to punch.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 4:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

if the unthinkable happens, TCU will be

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 6:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

John Saunders is Meekrob?

Thanks for visiting Burnt Orange Nation

by Eskimohorn on Nov 12, 2009 4:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

plus

the teams we play would not “advance” with a victory, as in a playoff

by Infield Elephant on Nov 12, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

When people say playoff

In regards to the BCS, they don’t mean an actual playoff. They mean that every game matters, and just one loss may knock you out. That’s why college football has the best, most exciting regular season of any major American sport.

The other teams we play already lost, and thus are already out of the “playoff.”

by Meekrob on Nov 12, 2009 5:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well they are two different things

And the people who want a playoff are annoyed that the term has been co-opted by BCS-ers to describe the regular season.

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Nov 12, 2009 5:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It is too subjective...

some years you can lose…others you cannot. Some years you can lose early, others you can lose late (Hi OU…talking to you and your KState beatdown). Most fans want objectivity…not an abrupt end to the season like we had last year and countless others.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This isn't an argument for or against playoffs

I’m merely stating that when people say the regular season are like playoffs, it’s because losing would be detrimental to your season. Which, this year, for Texas, it would be. I don’t get how that’s hard to understand.

by Meekrob on Nov 12, 2009 7:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I understand...

the fact that “this year” has to be pointed out is all I have a problem with…but I see what you are saying.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 8:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait a second...

Maybe WE are the villans!

Dum, dum, dummmmmm

by Iron on Nov 12, 2009 4:05 PM CST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Same thought I had

See TCU and Cincy. We should laugh maniacally and point to our unbeatable preseason #2 ranking.

by notsofst on Nov 12, 2009 4:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I had this same thought though

Our great war, is ourselves… and our running game.

If Nebraska goes on a streak, maybe we can get psyched up for them? Everything’s pretty much gone pretty easy for us this season… almost too easy.

by notsofst on Nov 12, 2009 4:23 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

It's easy to get lethargic

but we had better keep our Eyes on the Prize. You guys better all wake up and get your edge on. It’s no time to stop the buzz, the chatter, the undeniable euphoria that OUR team is in control of it’s own destiny.

This is no time to be wishing for something that is not NATURAL. The ebb and flow is what it is. This is our time, our year, and none of this non-villainous talk should stand in the way of our positive, daily diatribes.

Hell, where is The Daily Roundup? This week it looks like BON has turned into “bump the latest Fanshot”.

I come here for laughs, insight, and commeraderie. Yea, yea, yea. Call me lame but you all come here for the same thing.

We need to keep positive, stay sharp, and ride on the wings of OUR team to Pasadena! You never know when one of the next 4 teams we play wake up earlier than we do. Nothing like a pretender spoiling the procession.

"We don't freestyle Texas Fight, big boy." - Coach Brown

by TXStampede on Nov 12, 2009 4:30 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Well, if the BCS was handing out trophies to active volunteer blogs, we would be the 6 time defending champion.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 4:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good Points PB

Are we in the doldrums of the season right now? I mean we made it through the gauntlet this year virtually unscathed with the ou game being much more defensive than it needed to be. I have faith though, that ugly will rear it’s head before long. I still look for another ou recruiting or eligibiilty scandal to break by the end of the year.

This week I can get riled over the Briles voting incident from last year though. There’s a villain who needs to be put in stocks and flogged ( in a winning way of course).

The aggies are getting kind of brazen lately so there’s a likely candidate for a villain.

I agree with TXStampede. This is not the time to get lethargic. I think a Baylor shutout would do just fine about now.

59-0 With Colt going 85%, Malcolm Williams going deep for 2, and Gilbert throwing 2 TD’s. No early let downs on either side of the ball.

by orangetower on Nov 12, 2009 4:42 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I think that Greg Davis should call up a deep pass to Shipley on the very first play

A la Iowa State in 2007 (also to Shipley). A one play drive to start things could take the air out of Baylor before they even get any.

by acho81 on Nov 12, 2009 4:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You'd be suprised how many of our passing plays have a guy going deep

Most people here forget that the QB is supposed to do something called reading the coverage. Considering that the base defense we’ve seen almost all year is “keep it all in front”, it is no wonder that fans are all clammering for more fade routes.

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Nov 12, 2009 5:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

the deep pass

I agree, Colt will throw it deep if he knows there is a good chance of completion or no chance of an interception. the defenses Texas has faced have guarded against the deep ball and like last Saturday, against he run with 7-8 men in the box. Colt does a great job with the offense and tries to limit turnovers. I like the deep ball, but you have to go with it when it’s there (88 yarder Shipley from Colt against UCF), but if it’s not available it can lead to an int

by Ryan2907 on Nov 12, 2009 10:14 PM CST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

The reason this is a season without a villain is because we're sitting in the catbird seat.

Every other year (except 2005), we’d lost a game, or more, and that was plenty of reason to keep the angst and frustration and criticism turned up to a rolling boil. (Last year, it was a loss AND the Big 12 tiebreaker.) This proves it’s easier to get stirred up by something negative than by something positive, words that radio call-in shows and TV all-news stations include in their mission statements.

As to the doldrums — that’s the fear. That’s Iowa taking out Penn State at this time last year. It’s Oregon State biting USC in September of 2008. It’s the f-ing Aggies getting us in 2006. It’s Pittsburgh denying West Virginia a spot in the 2007 MNC (and Ohio State, not LSU, would have been the opponent).

I think there’s lots of villains out there. I’ll start with Baylor, Kansas, Aggie, Nebraska/K-State. If we leave those villains muttering, “Curses, foiled again,” I’ll come up with a new villain.

by edsp on Nov 12, 2009 5:15 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Baylor's offense looked good vs Mizzou; Malcolm's impact on the O

Baylor’s replacement QB looked great in win at Mizzou but Baylor had zero running game. I predict that UT forces at least 3 picks and/or fumbles by the Baylor QB.

One reason that UT’s running game looked bad vs CFU was that CFU was selling out to stop the run and CFU is quite good at stopping the run anyway. They stopped the run but got shredded by passes. The CFU game does not say that much about the UT run game.

Realistically, you have to provide safety support for both Malcolm and Ship, which means 5 DBs covering 3 UT WRs. UT should be able to run OK against anyone who is defending UT with a nickel or dime while UT plays a TB, TE, and 3 WRs (because 8 UT guys are defended by only 6 defenders).

Making Malcolm a starter has had a huge impact on the O.

If Malcolm is not doubled, then the CB defending Malcolm has to give him a big buffer. This makes throwing the short pass to Malcolm easy but makes tackling Malcolm difficult. Until the D plays press coverage on Malcolm, you might as well throw every pass his way. These short passes to Malcolm are like a one down vacation for the OL and QB.

Running off the fake of the throw to Malcolm (basically a quick draw play) gets much easier because the fake pass sets up the blocks for the OL. Anytime the ball is thrown short to Malcolm, the D will be scrambling to get out there and contain Malcolm because he is so likely to get past the CB defending him.

Malcolm is a triple threat at WR. He can take take the short pass and get YAC with his explosiveness and strength. He can win the 50-50 deep ball with his size and jumping ability. He can separate from a defender with his his speed on an intermediate route. Because of his physique, he can go across the middle and take the heavy contact. He is an excellent blocker who can block an LB so he makes running outside on his side effective.

OK, he is a quintuple treat. The point is, you can construct a huge chunk of your offense around Malcolm.

With Malcolm at WR, it makes it easy to isolate Cody on a CB. This is terrible news for the CB and easy yards for the horns. The mechanism is that Cody goes out for a short pass in the flat on the same side as Malcolm. Malcolm blocks the LB covering Cody which leaves the CB who initially covered Malcolm left with the daunting task of tackling Cody. Since Cody does not waste time faking but istead accelerates and hits the CB straight on, this is a quick developing play (i.e. less time for help from other defenders). This is a very quick and easy pass so it is another 1 play vacation for the OL and QB. You should be able to run this play quite a few times a game.

by Kafka on Nov 12, 2009 5:25 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I don't get it.

I just don’t get it. Texas hasn’t played THAT well this year. There is only one currently ranked team that you have beat: Oklahome State. And all of your out of conference teams were weak: Louisiana-Monroe, Wyoming, UTEP, UCF? You won’t schedule hard teams anymore.

Texas isn’t even the best team in the state, much less the nation.

by CHANEYJM on Nov 12, 2009 5:31 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Somewhere, a bridge is missing a troll.

and a village, quite possibly, is missing it’s idiot.

Texas '06.

by afrokinger on Nov 12, 2009 5:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think College Station was built under a bridge. nt

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Nov 12, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Reading comprehension: low

Aggie or Sooner? He misses the point, but he does read, so he’s not a Sooner.

You ain't hurt.

by Peter Bean on Nov 12, 2009 6:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm

From repetitive personal experience, I would have to swap that one around.

by BrooklynHorn on Nov 12, 2009 11:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Epic Fail

@ ChaneyJM.. haha seriously? Remember you said all this when UT wins the National Title…

by jtdiddy on Nov 12, 2009 6:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just who have you played since you are knocking Texas' schedule...I am waiting on your top 10 list.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 6:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Right

Next year UT will probably schedule Stephen F Austin and Tyler Junior College. We wouldn’t want some hungry up and coming program to ruin their chances.

by CHANEYJM on Nov 12, 2009 6:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Texas scheduled TCU a few years back

It was one of our worst teams in the last few years. And we won. Also, we scheduled mighty Utah last year. They bailed. We scheduled Arkansas this year. They bailed. We have to play Oklahoma and Oklahoma State. You have to play San Diego State and UNLV. Yes, the Big 12 is down. But, it’s not like the MWC is the SEC. I wish beating Virginia would give us credibility.

by the1austin on Nov 12, 2009 6:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Every thing you say is true.

But seriously, this year you have NOT been challenged.

By the way, regarding TCU’s schedule, you might mention Clemson, BYU and Utah. At least we didn’t schedule seller dwellers, UVA excluded.

Texas has a great team, and, being a 7th generation Texan, I will always support them them unless they are playing the Frogs. But UT’s #3 ranking is not supported by the facts.

by CHANEYJM on Nov 12, 2009 6:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Utah...or Oklahoma State...about the same this year. BYU? Frauds. Clemson? OU would be favored by 3.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 6:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

seller- one who sells
cellar- where a “cellar dweller” would dwell

by acho81 on Nov 12, 2009 10:07 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

We let Florida schedule those cupcakes...

The facts of the matter are Texas is the beneficiary of a high pre-season ranking that they have yet to relinquish along with Florida and Alabama. The ranking was deserving due to the amount of returning starters from last year’s 12-1 squad.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 6:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

34-10

Not two years ago pal, Texas already dispatched the up and coming TCU

"Stats are for losers, I like winning games."

by bendj on Nov 12, 2009 7:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW, I am for an 8 Teamer...which you would be in this year.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 6:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

There we go

I figured a Horn Frog fan would come out of the woodwork, just didn’t know when. I for one hope that Alabama and Florida find a way to lose themselves out of the National Championship so Texas can drop the boom on TCU.

"Stats are for losers, I like winning games."

by bendj on Nov 12, 2009 7:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ironically enough, the net troll actually comes from the fishing action

but the fairy tale troll came to represent the emotional element and the behavior side.

Certainly not relevant but in this thread, what is?

by whills on Nov 12, 2009 5:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Boise Hate

I hate Boise State and the freaking blue turf……

by Dawnpatrol on Nov 12, 2009 5:42 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

The blue turf is moronic...

But I do not hate Boise anymore than I hate Gonzaga in Hoops…and I do not hate them. Boise has been good enough, long enough to warrant their at large berths.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Leave it to the Sooners

To get me fired up. My God that’s idiotic.

You ain't hurt.

by Peter Bean on Nov 12, 2009 6:23 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

When you said this season lacked something . . .

well, it’s not lacking on the OU blogs. Those folks don’t have enuf hours in the day to spew their venom. Stoops loses another game, he’s gonna need to hire a food-taster.

by edsp on Nov 12, 2009 7:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

maybe this will help

you get fired up as well.
http://www.iamthe12thman.com/2009/11/13/1155401/sb-nation-big-12-roundtable-2009#storyjump

Read the very end of the post. Oh, Beergut.

Get off your knees Greg, you're blowin' the game.

by kriess on Nov 13, 2009 6:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Can Kinda Quantify the Apathy

I’ve joined with other Texas alumni and fans here in Denver to watch Longhorn football with the official alumni group for as long as I’ve lived in the Rocky Mountains. We’ve done headcounts of all attendees for all the games for quite awhile now.

In the 2005 season the smallest turnout we had was over 100, with a few games (tOSU, OU, TTU, Big 12 Championship v. CU) over 300, and the NC game with almost 600 in attendance. The other games were pretty consistently around 150.

This season we’ve had also had three games with over 300 (ULM because PPV, TTU, OU). But we’ve already had two games with only 60-70 show up. And this Saturday we’ll probably make that three. I have no doubt that we’ll be back up over 300 for the Big 12 Championship game and in that same 500-600 range for the NC if we don’t trip ourselves up.

Now, granted, it could be the economy taking its toll here as a factor that is impacting us unrelated to fan apathy. But if there’s a way to quantify the vibe in the Longhorn nation you write about this is about as good a measure as any.

by RMHorn on Nov 12, 2009 6:28 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

great post

But this is why to me personally, college football is so boring and so flawed. Great for the 12 saturdays there are games, but that’s about it.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Blitzburgh on Nov 12, 2009 6:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Don't get the connection

The malaise of which I’m complaining would be tenfold in the NFL, where once you get to 10 wins you’re in the playoffs. There’s nothing to get worked up about over a win or a loss. The problem this year for Texas is simply an accident of circumstance — not a flaw in the game’s structure.

You ain't hurt.

by Peter Bean on Nov 12, 2009 7:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And last year as well...

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 12, 2009 8:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What?

Last year was one of the most exciting. Full of villians, stories, wins and even a heart breaking defeat. If anything, a storybook NCAAF year, even if it didnt go our way. EVERYONE was very much worked up about something.

Perhaps you misunderstand what PB is talking about?

by BoddickerIsClutch on Nov 13, 2009 8:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Last year we were a victim of circumstance as well...that was what I was referencing.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 13, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Caused by laying an egg in Lubbock.

We’ve got to take ownership of our faults.

by DaGoose on Nov 13, 2009 11:16 AM CST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

oh the triangle of losses...victim of circumstance...57 yarder by Nebraska...blah blah blah.

The facts are last season was a travesty to the BCS system. Whether they care to admit it or not is another issue all together. The Horns took care of business last year as well as anyone less Utah with their cupcake schedule.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 13, 2009 2:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I do sort of get it

In that the month-long wait between the conference CG’s and the meaningful bowl games is ridiculous. Not bc fans lose interest, but bc I’m sure its a herculean feat for coaches to juggle the whims of their distracted roster for the whole month.

by Loomby on Nov 12, 2009 9:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I have always hated the long layoff

No way you’d get the same result a week after the CCG that you get 4-5 weeks after the last game.

I love college football. I just find it’s postseason baffling.

Disciplina Praesidium Civitatis.

by zamm on Nov 12, 2009 11:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"baffling"

is the very nicest term you can possibly use for it…

by Pflash on Nov 13, 2009 7:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You know...

We were basically cheated out of a shots at the Big XII title, the Heisman, and the NC last year.

So the fact that we’re rolling along unhindered this year does not bother me deeply.

In fact, it seems basically fair.

by tblog123 on Nov 13, 2009 1:22 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Malaise

I was putting together the Daily Roundup for today and there was very little, if anything, on the Baylor game. And I hadn’t posted anything for two days so for three days straight, there haven’t been any articles. Amazing. Number 3 team in the country and no one is writing anything about the game, even the Waco paper.

No planes flying overhead, no drama. That must be it.

by dimecoverage on Nov 13, 2009 8:45 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Meh

you want drama, try breaking Colt McCoy’s arm, or taking a significant deficit into the 4th quarter against a lame team. Heck, lose a game.

Be careful what you wish for, you might get it.

and the Mustache of Truculence (formerly Canada4Mizzou)

by Wan Ihite on Nov 13, 2009 2:06 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I just want to say

Congrat, PB. Who is that lucky gal? Anyway, I sincerely to send you a best wishes to your upcoming wedding :)

Also, I thank you for open up this blog for all the Horns fans! I can’t believe it’s been 5 years. Time just flies too fast…

by Horns98 on Nov 13, 2009 3:31 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

Time flies, indeed. And all I want for my birthday is a trip to Pasadena…

You ain't hurt.

by Peter Bean on Nov 13, 2009 9:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

May your

Birthday wish comes true!

Regarding the Pasadena trip, we may end up to see each other there.

Always Hook’em!

by Horns98 on Nov 13, 2009 10:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The real villain, PB, is...

age. If only we could all stay in our 20s forever. Oh well. I welcome you to the 30+ club next week so enjoy 29 for as long as humanly possible.

by seth78 on Nov 13, 2009 6:47 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

+1

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." - Will Muschamp
"Somebody will always break your records. It is how you live that counts." - Earl Campbell

by Mulliganville on Nov 13, 2009 7:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs UC Irvine Gameflow (+/- stats included)
Horns_small
Thanks to our Men & Women in the Armed Forces
Small
The Aggies are doing just enough this year to give us a good upset.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ohio State and Oklahoma Uni's
Small
BCS Formula Question
2401104_1__small
The Perfect Storm of College Football
T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs Western Carolina Gameflow
Lemon_small
Pat Murphy resigns
Small
Orakpo says TCU can't hang
Clock_tower_small
The Weekly BON Hit Award Baylor
11-09_small
2009 Horns VS 2005 Horns....are we better? Equal? Worse?
Small
Vote for McCoy Saturday at Gate 25!
1994_brown_james_small
I am glad to say I've seen the greatest team of my lifetime...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports