Morning Coffee Wonders: To Offer Or Not To Offer?
2010 quarterback class complete. Before various sources started telling Texas recruiting services that Connor Wood gave his commitment to the Longhorn coaching staff on Tuesday evening, I had written a section for this Morning Coffee about other potential quarterback targets, notably Nick Montana, son of Joe and visitor to Austin this week. So much for that.
What does Connor Wood mean for Texas? Most obviously, it means that the quarterback position, assuming that Wood redshirts and then stays four more years, is set until the 2015 season. Think about that for a minute. It also means that Garrett Gilbert is unlikely to redshirt, as the coaching staff would want to separate Gilbert and Wood by the widest margin possible -- two years.
There is another storyline here as well. A few weeks ago, a rumor made the rounds that Thidodaux, LA's Trovon Reed was planning to transfer to Houston Second Baptist next season to play with Wood. Reed, of course, is close friends with Lache Seastrunk, with some talk that the two may attend the same college. While Wood's commitment doesn't guarantee anything from the other two players, it increases the possibility that Reed and Seastrunk could also find themselves in burnt orange.
The final interesting storyline concerns the turf war between Texas and Oklahoma for recruits. As the tide turned on the football field, it has also turned on the recruiting front, with the exception of Jamarkus McFarland. Even with OU offering earlier playing time and quite possibly a cushy Big Red Auto job, Wood still decided to stay in Texas -- a major loss for the Sooners, who are scrambling to find a replacement for Sam Bradford. Too bad, Stoopsie.
To offer. Or not to offer. Indeed, it is the question. While the first Junior Day seems like Christmas with offers going out to the best of the best in Texas and the intrigue surrounding if any big-time recruits will commit early, the second Junior Day looks mostly at the second-tier players and players who couldn't make the first Junior Day (like DeMarco Cobbs, certainly not second-tier, even nationally). Nearly every player at the first Junior Day received an offer, but a much smaller percentage will receive an offer at the second, with a higher percentage probably committing shortly in the days following. By the end of the first week in March, Texas should have around 15 commitments or more, leaving mostly the elite players waiting to make decisions.
One player invited to the second Junior Day on February 29 falls into the category of a player on the borderline of receiving an offer. With outstanding offers to wide receivers Darius White, Trovon Reed, and DeMarco Cobbs, the coaching staff has serious decisions to make about how many more receiver offers go out and to whom, especially since each of those players is a national recruit and Texas is unlikely to give any a deadline to make a decision, even a soft one.
Skyline's Mike Davis is one of the few who didn't receive an offer at the first Junior Day. A receiver coming in for the second Junior Day about whom offer speculation swirls is North Shore's DeAndrew White, a 6-0, 170-pound speedster (4.4 40) in the mold of a guy like Trovon Reed, with similar speed, lateral quickness, and outright elusiveness. Since the Percy Harvin-type is all the rage and I'm becoming infatuated with the triple option, Texas coaches would make a serious mistake by not bringing in a smaller, elusive receiver in the class to provide the versatility to carry the ball a few times per game and balance out larger, outside receivers like John Harris and Darius Terrell (who, of course, may switch to tight end). Already with an Alabama offer, White calls Texas his "dream team ($)," which might make a commitment imminent following an offer. The question is whether Texas decides to only offer one smaller receiver in Reed and miss out on White. Stay tuned.
To offer. Or not to offer. Part II. Like receiver, running back is a position that the Texas coaching staff may wait on. The problem is that the lone current offer is out to Lache Seastrunk, and he may not make a decision until late in the process. Do the Longhorns go after a bigger running back then, like Traylon Shead (who now reportedly has an offer) or Aldine's Dontae Williams, a big talent who has little film from his junior year because of Hurrican Ike and injuries.
Perhaps for those reasons Williams doesn't yet have an offer ($), but his grainy film does looks impressive. Even if the major programs haven't yet given him a lot of attention, Rivals sees something impressive, ranking him as the seventh-best prospect in Texas for 2010. Williams has the perfect size for a running back, at 6-0, 205 pounds, which allows him to play with good pad level and balance, while showing the burst of an elite back. Texas and LSU occupy the top two positions on his wish list for offers. It almost hurts the Longhorns that they have helped to accelerate the recruiting process to such an extent that waiting to evaluate the senior film of players who missed their junior season is too late except for guys who really fall through the cracks, like Tevin Mims and DJ Grant.
Wherefore art thou, tight end of 2009? Defensive end is a position of serious concern for the 2009 season because of attrition from graduation. Tight end is a little bit different -- it's a position of concern because of attrition, but that attrition took the form of devastating injuries to every pass-catching tight end on scholarship: Blaine Irby, Josh Marshall, and Ian Harris.
First, the bad news. Relatively. Mack Brown and company are holding out that Irby will make it back for the Tech game on September 19, which seems optimistic considering Irby isn't even running yet. And more bad news. Converted receiver Marshall won't be fully healed until later in spring practice, likely close to the game on April 5.
The good news is that Greg Smith won't see the field to run uselessly into the flat. Bill Frisbie, in what has to be a joke, noted that Smith duties last year were only "run-blocking in jumbo packages." Um, no. Unfortunately, that wasn't the case, particularly in the first half of the Tech game, when Greg Davis' sphincter tightened considerably, leading him to insert Smith into the game to drop passes in the flat and fail to block Tech defensive ends. Mack Brown says the tight ends need to block better, since they gave up five sacks last year. Yes, they do, particularly those tight ends who are basically offensive lineman. Thankfully, Smith should rarely see the field next year.
Hopefully, DJ Grant will have a lot to do with that. The coaches want Grant to get up to 230 if possible, then use him flexed out as a receiver and in tight to block occasionally. The receiving part shouldn't be a problem, but the question will be how well he run blocks. The Texas running game needs serious help, but a tight end who consistently missed blocks won't help that and shouldn't see the field an h-back option like Barrett Matthews.
What Grant can do is stretch the field up the seam. It's a statement that seems like a cliche coming from the Texas coaches -- they use it that often. What is the importance of stretching the field vertically with the tight end, anyway? Most importantly, it threatens to draw a safety, particularly since most linebackers can't cover converted receivers like Jermichael Finley or speedy tight ends like Blaine Irby. With a safety forced to help, that opens up single coverage either on the split end (Malcolm Williams next year) or on both of the receivers lined up on the strong side of the formation (Jordan Shipley and Collins/Kirkendoll).
The Texas offense needs a versatile tight end to make sure the offense remains multiple, making tight end one of the most interesting positions to watch going into the spring game.
On the question of a point guard. Much has been made of the insertion of Dogus Balbay into the starting lineup a little more than a week ago against Oklahoma State. The move paid immediate dividends, with Balbay pushing the ball in transition to score the first basket of the game. While Balbay's aggressiveness is heartening, the three-game stint as a starter has put into sharp relief his current faults.
The most commonly-known problem is Balbay's inability to shoot from the perimeter, evidenced by his (I believe) three made jump shots on the season. That's a problem. His problems at the free-throw line seem to be a general lack of touch rather than an issue with mechanics, but he does struggle from the field with his balance, often drifting on his shot, which he needs to work hard to correct in the off season. Fortunately, Balbay's quickness still allows him the ability to get into the lane, particularly in the open court, where few players can match his quickness.
A more significant impediment to his playing time is his inability to stay out of foul trouble. Besides the occasional foul in transition trying to contest a lay up, almost every other foul on the defensive occurs far away from the basket. It's enough of a problem that I've begun joking to my friends that Balbay must lead the country in the average distance from the basket that he commits his fouls. It's probably somewhere around 20 feet.
Balbay has the strength and the lateral speed to generally stay in front of players (besides a stretch in the second half against Oklahoma State when Byron Eaton abused him), but he struggles with his body control and often picks up cheap fouls. Those type of plays accounted for two of his four fouls against Texas A&M and limited his time on the court. Ball pressure between half court and the three-point line is a high-risk/low-reward game right now for Balbay. Instead of forcing turnovers, he generally either gives up dribble penetration or commits a foul far from the basket. If Balbay can't pressure the ball without fouling, Rick Barnes is going to have to ask him to back off.
The other issue concerns Balbay's struggles finishing around the rim, despite his extraordinary athleticism. It appears to be an issue of knowing how to use the backboard. He often lofts the ball up without any touch or spin, sometimes even failing to use the backboard at all. Several shots around the rim have gone in after hitting the side and heel of the rim and bouncing in. Since he often likes to attack the rim directly and use a finger roll, it could be that Balbay has little experience using the backboard. The finger roll is a relatively low percentage shot around the rim because it has only two results -- it goes in or hits the heel and bounces out. There isn't much room for it to bounce around and go in.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Balbay Finishing
Dogus is one of th best leapers on the team – I have no idea why he doesn’t dunk more. It looks like he can dunk 75% of the time he drives the lane but isn’t comfortable flushing it yet. Even James screamed at him during the 2nd of half of Aggie after he got fouled and missed a potential 3 pt play “Just f*cking dunk everything, man!”
A little less Euro, a little more American please!!
Good call on the James comment
I remember hearing that during the game, too. Nice bit of leadership from James and hopefully Balbay takes that to heart.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 19, 2009 7:41 AM CST up reply actions
I still wonder whether he might have a problem with his vision.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
All shots have two results, miss or make
The finger roll is a relatively low percentage shot around the rim because it has only two results — it goes in or hits the heel and bounces out.
Just messing with you GoBR, very good write up.
-rBr-
Balbay does struggle with finishing
we would all like him to dunk, BUT it’s key that he continues to push the break and drive to the basket. I don’t care what his % is, it’s important he keeps driving, even if it’s just finger rolls he shoots up there.
Multiple times we’ve been able to rebound his layups and get put-backs. James did it against A&M. If Pittman is near the rim there’s a good chance he gets the rebound off a missed finger roll because of how slowly the ball would bounce off the rim.
by goingforthecorner on Feb 19, 2009 9:21 AM CST reply actions
Love the recruiting updates
as always thanks for the work you put in ghost…
Personally I’m already pretty impressed with the players that we have committed for 2010. The prevailing thought among some posters here at BON seems to be that if Texas were not to land either jeffcoat or seastrunk the whole class comes down as a failure for the entire class. I don’t feel that way at all. Don’t get me wrong their being in the class could take it from a great one to possibly the top class in the nation but I think if we were able to keep all the players that we have currently committed and add say Cobbs, A. White, Hicks and Wilson as well as a couple other solid additions this goes down as a great class in my mind.
Already we’ve got the top 2 DT’s, the top QB, and the top DB in the state to go with money LB’s and potential playmakers outwide. I’m very impressed with what we’ve got so far.
Agree with your assessment
There are a lot of great players still out there, but the class already has some great players in it. In my opinion, getting both Whites, one of Wilson and Jeffcoat, and a receiver like Cobbs or Reed makes this an absolutely outstanding class. It’s probably wishful thinking to hope that Texas gets every big-time target this year, particularly national recruits like Seastrunk and Jeffcoat.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 19, 2009 4:53 PM CST up reply actions
I love it
This made my day:
The good news is that Greg Smith won’t see the field to run uselessly into the flat.
Garrett Gilbert: 2014 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year
Seastrunk and Wood have the same handler...
He’s technically a “trainer” and also was Trent Richardson’s “trainer” last year. A guy like Wood makes him look very legit, but apparently Major is in good with him and they talk a lot….just what I’ve heard from sources very close to the situation…
Just wondering
Which way do you think we’re leaning towards on the second junior day? With most, if not all, of our top targets likely waiting until (or close to) signing day to commit, will Texas pull the trigger and offer some of these “inferior” (using the term loosely) targets in order to secure a commitment, or will they hold out for the big fishes? It’s a nice problem to have, to be sure, but we could still potentially strike out in many ways.
Great question
and I don’t have an answer to it. It will be interesting to find out what the coaches decide to do because it’s definitely a conundrum for them.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 19, 2009 4:54 PM CST up reply actions
Recruiting 2010--The Whites
What is the word—if any—on Darius White (WR-Dunbar) or Adrian White (DB-Desoto)? It sounds like the third White (DeAndrew of Northshore) will commit if he gets an offer after second Jr. day? Do you think we might take both he and Reed?
The film I saw on Phillips from Garland was on offense. I assume he is projected at DB since he looks similar (size/speed) to Reed and DeAndrew White as a wideout.
Phillips will probably end up on defense
Darius White last fall sounded like he was going to commit as soon as he was offered, but has now become a national target, which means he could go just about anywhere he wants. That’s slowing down his process, but I think Texas still looks good. Adrian White’s situation is very similar as well, though he’s not as highly regarded nationally. I think DeAndrew White, from all accounts, commits if offered. If the third White, as you call him, commits I still think the coaches leave room for Reed, but probably tell the wide receivers there are only four or five spots (probably five since Darius Terrell could end up at tight end).
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 19, 2009 4:57 PM CST up reply actions
Nick Montana
The sons of good NFL Quarterbacks are always awsome…. right? I mean we’ve never had a tremendously overhyped son of a famous NFL quarterback come and play for Texas and get consistently owned by Oklahoma and than go on to bomb in the NFL…. Have we?
OU SUCKS!!!!!!
I'm not a Simms apologist
I just don’t understand the point of ragging on the guy, sure we was extremely hyped, but give the guy some credit, he eventually was the starting QB at Texas and is still playing in the NFL. There have been equally hyped players coming out of high school, who fail in college and NEVER make it to the NFL.
Btw, Nick Montana must be pretty good, and the attention he is getting has nothing to do with his Dad. He has an older brother who is a freshman in college, and as far as I know was never heavily recruited like Nick.
by Hookem4life84 on Feb 19, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions
Agree
I also don’t think that nearly enough fans give Simms credit for starting alot of the momentum, especially recruiting momentum, that ultimately lead to a MNC. In alot of ways him choosing UT put us back on the map and made us the “cool” school again.
He and Redding, as I recall. Weren’t Redding and Simms #1 and #3 in the Rivals 100?
by burntorangehorn on Feb 20, 2009 7:40 AM CST up reply actions
So what are your thoughts on Gilbert?
by BrooklynHorn on Feb 19, 2009 12:40 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
well, because...
he hasn’t thrown any interceptions yet…
Ghost!! Thanks so much for the
recruiting scuttlebutt . . . the time, skill and insight to take something often murky and hyped-up and make it intelligible is highly commendable. My thoughts/disagreements:
1. Don’t wait on Seastrunk. I don’t agree with Kirk Bohls all that often, but his sense or feel (or his sources) are excellent; he thinks UT’s odds on Lache are not good. Sadly, I agree. But GET a RB, and NOT another big one (Whaley, Johnson fill that) . . . Get somebody who might be a home run hitter.
2. I’m content to let the current crop of young TEs evolve.
3. We MUST have another stud LB in the 2010 class.
4. Am I the only one not worried about CB? By the time the 2010 signees get on campus, both Browns will be seniors and Beasley will be gone. No CBs redshirted last year, I’m not sure there’s a true CB among the 2009 signees (I see two safeties, and two of the three who signed are coming off major surgery). I think 4 DBs should be signed every year . . . . we’re playing five a majority of the time; DBs can’t play if their legs are not 100% healthy, so depth is critical; and more than half of the coverage and return teams are made up of DBs (or WRs).
When you are talking about a home run hitter
you sound like a fan of Westwood’s Princeton Collins, who is basically a Seastrunk-lite and is coming to the next Junior Day.
2. Agree, I don’t think Texas takes a true tight end in this class.
3. With so many good linebackers, the Longhorns will get another in this class, at least, and it could be a player like Shaun Lewis.
4. It sounds like you mean you are worried about cornerback. I think Marcus Davis is a cornerback, which makes one for 2009. The Longhorns are still after White and Lufkin’s Byndom. Dominique Sanders was supposed to come down, but overslept. He’s still an option, as is Toney Hurd, who is undersized. There are definitely more options and Texas probably takes two or three in the class.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 19, 2009 5:01 PM CST up reply actions
TE/CB
TE – it just amazes me the amount of true difference making stud TE’s in the Big 12 lately, but Texas only ever seems to be able to find/keep one on campus at a time. And right now you could argue we don’t have any – all are either coming back from a major injury or completely unproven. There is supposed to be a very good TE on the same Ohio team as LB Hicks. Maybe we take a look at him?
CB – it seems recently the view of Marcus Davis is more that of a safety, and Barnett and Vacarro are more likely CB’s. They are all getting the dreaded “can play either position” tag, which has not served us particularly well the last couple of years.
by Horncasting on Feb 20, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions
First thing. You need to lighten up on Greg Smith. He started the year at C and was moved to TE as a stop gap after Irby and the rest were injured. He has moved back to the interior of the OL already and will see the field from there. Yes he had a bad day at Tech, but so did some others.
After all it is a game played by mere mortal human beings. I’m not absolutly perfect either. There are times you need to cut some folks a little slack.
I am on the T. Shead bandwagon. If we can get him and Seastrunk goes elsewhere I will still be happy. Like Ghost, I like DeAndrew White. With Harris and Terrell already in(and those two are excellent) and offers to Darius White, Reed and Cobbs, we are running out of slots. You can’t take everybody.
It's true that it's not Smith's fault
that the coaches put him in a position to fail. And fail he did. I just don’t want to see him on the field any more at tight end. So that frustration is directed at the coaches.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 19, 2009 5:03 PM CST up reply actions
Connor Wood
I watched a highlight (if you can call it that) of Wood and after 15 throws he’s thrown ONE spiral and that’s in 7 on 7. We need a top tier running back….the pro style qb is not gonna cut it. I think we all know the reason for the NC…..a running qb who could improvise.Does anyone have any confidence that Greg Davis can scheme the Horns to a national title? I don’t.
It was bc of Greg Davis
That we beat OK this year. Movin shipley to a hybrid TE in a formation we havent used in 6-8 years to expose OU over the middle was genius. Sure he has his bad moments, but he doesnt get nearly enough credit
Greg Davis
He was one dropped interception from doing exactly that last year.
by Sweed4Heisman on Feb 19, 2009 4:50 PM CST up reply actions
Ooh ooh
And he tooled our offense away from a pro-style to the zone read to do it in 2005!
I dont know why you wouldnt trust Greg to form a good offense, or develop a QB, those are his strong suits. Going conservative in big games and not trusting young players, well thats something different altogether.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Feb 19, 2009 5:00 PM CST up reply actions

by 
































