Leach and Tech Agree on New Contract
Looks like Leach got that contract he wanted. Story here
This is bad news bears for the Big 12, but I like Leach anyway. He's a funny man, and I'll enjoy him around for years to come. I want to see what Tech is like next year.
Your FanPost must be at least 75 words long. Right now it's only 29 words long. If you just have a quote, link, video or photo you'd like to share with the community, try creating a FanShot instead.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
This is not bad news for the Big 12
The Big 12 needs as many good teams as possible, having Tech at their peak is a good thing. If anything, it helps boost our schedule strength which we badly need if we are going to continue with the UTEP, UCF, Rice route. With the recent Nebraska implosion (which Pelini could fix) the Big 12 can use all the elite teams it can field.
If anything, this is bad news for Texas A&M. Leach saw his contract and it became 6 more years of 4th place in Aggieland.
by the1austin on Feb 19, 2009 7:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Teams over the next 5 years or so (estimated guess):
Elite Teams (contend for chance at NC):
OU
Texas
Above Average (will contend year in/year out for conference champ):
Nebraska
Tech
OSU
Possibly Kansas (they got lucky as hell two years ago with a joke schedule that would make Leach blush and a BCS bowl berth vs. a crappy VT team with no, absolutely no offense)
Inbetweens (between sucking and possibly upsetting a good team every year or so/ getting lucky):
Mizzou
Kansas again
Maybe Baylor… we’ll see if Briles’ Bears are Bowl Bound in ’09
Will be at the bottom of the conference until they restructure it again in 2015 to include U of H or TCU instead of Iowa State/ Baylor/ A&M:
Iowa State
A&M
Colorado
KSU
Baylor again
I just dont see why the conference goes to a east – west division with it looking like this:
East: UT, Tech, A&M, Baylor, Mizzou, Iowa State
West: OU, OSU, KSU, Kansas, Colorado, Nebraska
by greenspointexas on Feb 19, 2009 7:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
?
Tech in the East? OU in the West?
by Horn Brain on Feb 19, 2009 8:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I just threw the teams under the division names regardless of geographic location
by greenspointexas on Feb 19, 2009 8:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
?
are you at it again?
But, Go Coogs, baby.
by divinebovine on Feb 20, 2009 2:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
for the record everyone
divinebovine is a douche… that is all
by greenspointexas on Feb 20, 2009 5:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would chastise you for name calling
But I think the weakness of that reply is humiliation enough
by Wells on Feb 21, 2009 10:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
After fighting so hard to have no buyout in his contract
Who really thinks he is going to stay for the full 5 years if he can avoid it.
by Texas Wahoo on Feb 19, 2009 8:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Tech caved completely there...
But, they did what they had to do. The guy is the best coach they have ever had, I credit their administration (Not AD) for getting the deal done and saving face (at least until next January). I think its clear he wants out of Lubbock, and this contract is doing nothing to keep him there any longer than he wants to be.
by the1austin on Feb 19, 2009 9:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree. But now he can shop with impunity.
While loving Lubbock every moment.
by whills on Feb 19, 2009 11:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He’s been actively politicking for jobs at Miami, U-Dub, etc., many of which chose much lesser candidates who accepted much less money than Leach makes now or will make in his new contract. He doesn’t meet with boosters, participate in many fundraising events, or do many of the other non-coaching aspects of being head coach at a large football program in a football-oriented region. While Leach is always a great interview with plenty of media savvy, it appears to me that lots of programs just plain don’t want him. He saw TT as a stepping-stone job, and still does, but he’s been stuck there nine years. That’s why TT wanted a fairly severe buyout.
I like Leach, although I definitely lost a lot of respect for him in light of his coach poll vote, but I don’t think many big-time schools are interested in him right now, because he doesn’t do the off-the-field things a coach has to do at big-time programs.
by burntorangehorn on Feb 20, 2009 7:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I do not think he fought “so hard to have no buyout in his contract.” His last counter-offer before he and Hance sat down and hammered out a deal had a 500K buyout, which was the same as his old contract.
The school came down on the buyout (from 1.5M to 0) to get Leach to come down on the termination, which was at 40% of his total income on his old contract, and it was at 40% on his counter-offer. Ultimately he settled at 16%, which makes him much more affordable to fire. In many ways it’s a consequence free contract, if Leach wants to go he won’t owe the school money (anyways… is 1.5M going to deter a program that really wants him, if such should come along? Not really) and if the school terminates, they’ll owe him a tiny fraction of his contract.
For a guy who has head coached at exactly one school, and done so for nearly a decade, and is 7 wins away from breaking the all-time franchise win record, it’s basically assumed that he’s gone. As a poster below noted, even if Leach does want to go… is it at all clear that anyone wants him? This gets thrown around a lot and I think it is mostly overstated, but maybe Leach is simply too strange for some programs to want him?
And anyways, as the DMN recently reported, maybe Leach’s “loyalty” (I’d prefer something less value-ridden, like reluctance to leave a high paying job in a city he’s lived in for years) isn’t as bad as everyone thinks. He initially turned down a job interview from Washington in November, he turned down a job interview from Tennessee, and he turned down a job interview with UCLA, which is the kind of job many people assume he wants to flee towards (west coast and all that). Miami never even offered an interview. A lot of the speculation about how much Leach is interested in other schools is his own fault, because he doesn’t say the right things in interviews (like Nick Saban: I will not leave the school, etc.) but when push has come to shove, in nine years Leach has accepted one interview with the University of Washington and turned down two with 1) UCLA — everyone thinks he’s a west coast guy, and 2) Tennessee, which is no stepping stone.
by Skin Patrol on Feb 20, 2009 1:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Every Longhorn fan should be happy
Not just that Leach is staying. I agree with the points made by others that if Tech implodes, it hurts the Big 12 and our strength of schedule.
No, we actually share the main reason we have to be happy with every other college or university in the land, except one. No matter how bad things might get, even if you are a fan of Washington or Washington State, you can always take comfort by telling yourself: “Things could be worse. We could have Gerald Myers as our AD.”
by Longhorn in Canada on Feb 19, 2009 10:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Vince Gill is good for the Big XII!
![]()
I've been fuelin' my dreams eatin' greens and beans.
by 16thLonghorn on Feb 20, 2009 6:24 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















