Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Texas Drops Second Straight At Home

GAME SUMMARY

Texas dropped its second straight home game in a 69-65 loss to Misssouri that dropped the team to 15-6 overall, 4-3 in Big 12 play. Though Texas rode a huge first half from Dexter Pittman to lead 34-29 at intermission, Missouri head coach Mike Anderson made significant halftime adjustments and the Tigers outpaced the Longhorns 40-31 over the game's final 20 minutes to pick up the win.

Texas had the ball with less than a minute remaining and the game tied 65-65, but AJ Abrams missed an off balance three point attempt with 15 seconds remaining on the shot clock, giving Missouri the basketball with a chance to take the game's final shot. Following a timeout, the Tigers' Zaire Taylor ran the clock down to 10 seconds, then used a ball screen to gain a half step advantage past Justin Mason, driving to the basket for a game winning layup and foul. Why Rick Barnes did not instruct his team to switch on all screens I have no idea. Texas turned the ball over on the subsequent inbound play and the ballgame was over.

WHAT THE LOSS MEANS

After looking to be in great shape following a gutty road win in Waco, Texas now finds itself on the precipice of collapse -- Rick Barnes' first back-to-back home losses since 2002 likely dropping the team out of the conference title race and out of the Top 25. Though losing to Missouri isn't devastating on its own, given the context the loss is particularly disappointing. Rick Barnes has over the years done a remarkable job getting his kids to turn in a big performance when they needed it most, particularly following losses. Not last night, though, and the most disappointing effort of the night might have been from Barnes himself, who coached about as inconsistently as his team played.

On the one hand, I sympathize a bit with the difficult position Rick Barnes is in with this team. He has a nice assembly of quality items, but it's not at all clear how best to make them go together -- a bit like having a bowl of miso soup, a glass of desert wine, and plate of brisket.

 


"What am I supposed to do with this?".

But if the challenges Rick Barrnes is facing are significant, his attempts to deal with them have been disappointments. Details are after the jump, but the consecutive home losses now make Saturday's visit to Lincoln a must-win basketball game. While the quotes in the postgame wraps talk about the team just needing to "step up" and "get it done," the problems are more fundamental than that. And the solutions have to come from the top. Game on, Rick.

Star-divide

STATISTICAL OVERVIEW
Missouri Texas
Points Per Minute
1.73 1.63
Points Per Possession (PPP)
1.02 0.96
Points Per Shot (PPS)
1.13 1.10
2-PT FG% 47.8% 44.9%
3-PT FG% 33.3% 30.0%
FT% 52.6% 60.0%
True Shooting % 49.7% 47.9%
Assists 12 15
Steals 8 5
Turnovers 7 15
Ball Control Index
(Assists + Steals) / TO
2.86 1.33

GAME NOTES

  • Texas' first half man-to-man pressure defense worked really well in forcing Missouri into settling for jump shots, but Mike Anderson clearly got after his kids at halftime and had the Tigers attacking the rim in the second half. The adjustment had a domino effect that turned the game: Dexter Pittman got tired and started to foul, Justin Mason and Damion James lost their legs, and Texas fell into a devastating offensive slump.
  • Rick Barnes' press break was maddening to watch, not because Texas couldn't handle the Tigers' pressure, but because the only player who had any interest in creating offense in transition was Varez Ward. Everyone else seemed content to get the ball past halfcourt, pull up, and run halfcourt sets. That's on Barnes, of course, and when I wrote on Tuesday about making some fundamental changes, this was one of the areas I had in mind. Texas got 25 points from Dexter Pittman, but for many reasons that's not a 40-minute strategy. It's a 20-25 minute strategy, depending on Dexter's fouling, and the fundamental problem Rick's not addressing is what to do to on offense for the other 15-20 minutes each game. Trying to score in transition would be a great place to start.
  • I may be understating the problem, too, because it tookl Mike Anderson a full half to make the relatively easy adjustment to what Texas wanted to do in the halfcourt. When in the second half Anderson just packed his defense in the paint, Texas fell apart. There's the blueprint, and every team should/will do that to Texas heading forward.
  • Gary Johnson played a horrible game overall, and if I see him shoot another 15+ foot jump shot I'm going to personally run down on the court and yell at him. My goodness.
  • Raise your hand if you can explain why Dogus Balbay played two minutes last night? Anyone? No? Me neither. Though Justin Mason did a fine job in the first half, he was very obviously gassed by the midpoint of the second half, as ineffective down the stretch as he was effective early on.
  • My enthusiasm for Clint Chapman is next to zero. He's soft and one of my least favorite Longhorns for the opposite reason that Brian Boddicker was one of my favorites. Though arguably less skilled than Chapman, the much-maligned Boddicker played with real fire and physical toughness. Chappy looks like a guy who showed up at the wrong pick up game and is just trying not to be embarrassed.
  • I thought AJ Abrams played a nice game overall, on both ends of the floor. He let the game come to him, didn't force many shots, was pesky on defense, and actively trying to involve his teammates. That's what we need from him; the loss last night wasn't an "Damnit AJ!" kind of game.
  • When Damion James scores 6 points on 3-8 shooting, it's obvious the system is broken. We can have this same conversation over and over again, all the way to the NIT, or Rick can start putting this group in a better position to succeed. Open things up. Run the damn floor. Let these kids try to score in transition. The halfcourt game sans Pittman is a mess.
  • It's a little baffling that Barnes hasn't been willing to open things up like this yet. On the one hand, he continues to up Varez Ward's minutes, presumably because he recognizes that Ward is playing with exactly the kind of aggressive attacking that this team needs. On the other hand, Barnes doesn't seem willing to instruct everyone to play this way. Time and again last night, the Longhorns just settled into halfcourt sets, whether or not Pittman was on the floor. 31 second half points later, Texas had lost.
  • The question for the group, which I posed to Wiggo last night: Is it possible for a team to have two identities, one with Pittman on the floor and one without? Is that asking too much? I'm asking seriously. Maybe I'm asking too much, in which case we are what we are and there's not much room for optimism about postseason success. Either way, I still submit that it's worth trying to find out. There's just not much to lose if the effort fails.

WHAT WORKED

I don't want to conclude on such a wholly negative note, however, so let's wrap up by looking at what Texas is doing well in the halfcourt. The first half success with Pittman in the game was executed really nicely at times, with Texas running a simple high screen game featuring Pittman on the backside block. Here's the basic set, with James setting the ball screen for Mason:

Diagram1_medium

As Mason moves to the top of the key, Johnson flashes to the middle near the free throw line, setting up the following looks for Mason:

OPTION A: Backdoor look to Damion

Diagram_2_medium

Option B: Pass to Johnson in the middle, who will have a shooting option or look to Pittman option. (I have Johnson a little too high and to the left in the diagram; imagine him more centered and just below the FT line.)

Diagram4_medium

Option C: Reverse the ball and dump it in to Pittman.

Diagram3_medium

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Burnt Orange Nation

UCLA 34 Texas 12: Fire Greg Davis

Sep 2010 by Peter Bean - 246 comments

Comments

Display:

Agreed

I thought AJ actually had a decent game, obviously I miss those 20+ point games AJ had earlier in the year but this was not a Bad AJ game.

I’d also like to know what happened to Balbay, who I personally call Turkish and its driving me nuts to type Balbay, was he sick or in Barnes’ dog house? Turkish needs more playtime. And what happened to Matt Hill? Last time I saw him play he was playing better than Conner and Chapman, but got no playtime against Mizzou. So was Hill sick or in Barnes’ dog house? Because if these players were healthy then there is no excuse I can conceive of for their absence. It’s inconceivable!

I’m also liking the progress of Varez Ward and I’m so glad we picked this kid up. I like seeing Ward and Turkish on the court, I dread seeing Chapman on the court.

by urbanzero on Feb 5, 2009 4:38 PM CST reply actions  

Balbay Was Freelancing

From the Statesman:

“Barnes benched point guard Dogus Balbay for getting trapped after he was warned not to dribble along the sideline. Balbay played only two minutes for a team crying out for point guard production.”

by RMHorn on Feb 5, 2009 10:22 PM CST up reply actions  

JMO, but I think you're being too harsh on Barnes

I get that it’s extremely frustrating to watch our offense and observing Barnes’ offensive gameplans, but that’s nothing new. Barnes is a defensive-minded coach and always has been. Every year we feel like Barnes doesn’t get everything he can out of the offense as far as potential goes, but every fanbase of every school feels the same way about their college’s basketball coach.

But specifically this year, we’re missing the bigger point when we blame Rick for some of our offensive woes. We’re just not that good on offense, and Barnes has nothing to do with that problem. It’s clear to me that it’s a talent problem. The ship is sinking, and we’re worrying about a few dents on the dock.

I think Barnes has done a great job this season overall, not only with the nonconference scheduling (which might end up saving us from being NIT bound this season), but also transforming a great offensive team (and poor defensively) to a slower half-court team that relies on its defense to win them games. That’s basically a total 180 in our identity.

We basically lost a college basketball version of Steve Nash last year, and we had no one to replace him. Our options were a true volume SG in Abrams, and a couple of defensive glue guys in Mason and Balbay. Then couple that with the fact that in losing a great playmaker and passer, we also lost a great shooter, which leaves Abrams as the only good perimeter shooter on the team (with Connor’s inexplicable disappearance). Then the defense can focus on him, which lowers his efficiency.

And as far as Barnes’ influence on the players, the players still have to win you the games. The coaches can only do so much. Barnes can motivate his players all he wants on defense and offense, but it’s still up to the players to execute, and without a competent PG on the team, it’s going to be difficult to execute pretty much anything.

Luckily, we’re in the beginning of February. There’s still time to salvage a 4-5 seed, which gives us a great chance to at least advance a round in the Big Dance.

by goingforthecorner on Feb 5, 2009 9:09 PM CST reply actions  

Disagree with letting Barnes off the hook
specifically this year, we’re missing the bigger point when we blame Rick for some of our offensive woes. We’re just not that good on offense, and Barnes has nothing to do with that problem. It’s clear to me that it’s a talent problem. The ship is sinking, and we’re worrying about a few dents on the dock.

At what point do you stop giving the coach a free pass? When your guards are afraid to shoot, you don’t just say “fuck it” and have them dribble aimlessly around the three-point line while your big guys struggle to establish position against a packed-down lane defense. You teach them how to shoot until they’re not too chickenshit to do it in a real game. At some point, you just have to tell Mason, Ward and Balbay point-blank to shoot the ball themselves, because it’s better than not getting a shot off at all. Otherwise, all you’re doing is giving opponents one less thing to defend.

And to be blunt, the fact that Barnes keeps giving Chapman a non-zero number of minutes ought to be indication enough for anyone that he’s doing a crappy job this year. I would rather see us play four-on-five the rest of the season than let Chapman see any more court time.

A stupid system that works exactly like it's supposed to is still a stupid system.

by Microtonal on Feb 7, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Not Barnes fault

that our guards can’t shoot. It’s not a matter of them being scared to shoot, they can’t shoot, and nothing Barnes says is going to change that. A few practices and shoot-arounds won’t improve their FG% to 40-50%.

Barnes has to play Chapman minutes. Would you rather play Connor more? I guess I would say we should play Hill more. If Pittman didn’t get into foul trouble with his lack of discipline, this wouldn’t be as big of a problem. Wangmene getting injured ended up being a big blow this year with Connor’s disappearance.

by goingforthecorner on Feb 7, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice wrapup PB

I agree with most of what you said. Recognize that part of the problem is that it’s hard to have a successful basketball team with players who don’t have or don’t pursue offense. Connor is terrified to shoot, Chapman should be terrified to shoot, Mason is reluctant to shoot and AJ is usually covered up and can’t shoot. It just doesn’t leave many options for scoring especially when you have the starters on the floor.

I remember a Bob Knight team years ago that had 1 guy who never took a shot. But he was a fantastic ball handler and passer. So it was worth it to have that guy on the floor because he was a playmaker. We can’t say that about this Longhorn team in general. I get worried every time Damion dribbles now because he turns the ball over often when he does dribble.

ESPN put a picture of AJ up in their top story yesterday on the College Basketball page. The story was called Bubble Watch. If you can’t win at home, you don’t make the tournament. That makes me really sad.

by bballgrl on Feb 6, 2009 9:48 AM CST reply actions  

Bracket position

As a top seed seems highly unlikely at this point (1-4), I would argue that I would rather have a 6 or 7 seed than either a 5, 8 or 9.

It seems to me that playing against 10/11, then a 2/3 combo, is comparatively easier than 8/9/12, then a 1/4 combo.

So what do we need to do the remainder of the year to get a 6/7 seed? We have 9 games left with a current record of 15-6. Where do we end up if we go 7-2 (highly unlikely), 6-3 (possible), or 5-4 (probable). If we go 4-5 or worse, I am not sure we make it into the tourney at all.

by ethan on Feb 6, 2009 11:56 PM CST reply actions  

5 is better

Better to start against #12 than #10 or #11. Then in the second round you get the #4 team — likely the easiest pairing available since the other matchups are likely against the #1, 2, and 3 seeds who had very easy first rounds.

Looking ahead to the sweet 16, you will likely have the #1 seed (unless the #8 or 9 seed pulls the big upset) on one side and the #2 or #3 on the other. Since the goal is the final 4, you don’t really care which you have to face first. And once you are there, seeding doesn’t matter since pairings are based on region.

So in actuality, the #5 team is likeliest to play #12, #4, #1, #2. While your #6 has #11, #3, #2, #1.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Feb 7, 2009 12:50 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Sbnheadshot_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Hookem_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8

Harold_small HaroldHill

Michael_pelech_photo_small The Audit Horn